Search (151 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005) 0.04
    0.03964754 = sum of:
      0.010768119 = product of:
        0.043072477 = sum of:
          0.043072477 = weight(_text_:authors in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043072477 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.17807868 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.028879419 = sum of:
        0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003464655 = score(doc=2392,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053056188 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
        0.025414765 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025414765 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053056188 = queryNorm
            0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
    
    Classification
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    DDC
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.2, S.302 (L.A. Ennis):"This is an important and timely anthology of articles "on the normative issues surrounding information control" (p. 11). Using an interdisciplinary approach, Moore's work takes a broad look at the relatively new field of information ethics. Covering a variety of disciplines including applied ethics, intellectual property, privacy, free speech, and more, the book provides information professionals of all kinds with a valuable and thought-provoking resource. Information Ethics is divided into five parts and twenty chapters or articles. At the end of each of the five parts, the editor has included a few "discussion cases," which allows the users to apply what they just read to potential real life examples. Part I, "An Ethical Framework for Analysis," provides readers with an introduction to reasoning and ethics. This complex and philosophical section of the book contains five articles and four discussion cases. All five of the articles are really thought provoking and challenging writings on morality. For instance, in the first article, "Introduction to Moral Reasoning," Tom Regan examines how not to answer a moral question. For example, he thinks using what the majority believes as a means of determining what is and is not moral is flawed. "The Metaphysics of Morals" by Immanuel Kant looks at the reasons behind actions. According to Kant, to be moral one has to do the right thing for the right reasons. By including materials that force the reader to think more broadly and deeply about what is right and wrong, Moore has provided an important foundation and backdrop for the rest of the book. Part II, "Intellectual Property: Moral and Legal Concerns," contains five articles and three discussion cases for tackling issues like ownership, patents, copyright, and biopiracy. This section takes a probing look at intellectual and intangible property from a variety of viewpoints. For instance, in "Intellectual Property is Still Property," Judge Frank Easterbrook argues that intellectual property is no different than physical property and should not be treated any differently by law. Tom Palmer's article, "Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified," however, uses historical examples to show how intellectual and physical properties differ.
    Part III, "Privacy and Information Control," has four articles and three discussion cases beginning with an 1890 article from the Harvard Law Review, "The Right to Privacy," written by Samuel A Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. Moore then includes an article debating whether people own their genes, an article on caller I.D., and an article on computer surveillance. While all four articles pose some very interesting questions, Margaret Everett's article "The Social Life of Genes: Privacy, Property, and the New Genetics" is incredible. She does a great job of demonstrating how advances in genetics have led to increased concerns over ownership and privacy of genetic codes. For instance, if someone's genetic code predisposes them to a deadly disease, should insurance companies have access to that information? Part IV, "Freedom of Speech and Information Control," has three articles and two discussion cases that examine speech and photography issues. Moore begins this section with Kent Greenawalt's "Rationales for Freedom of Speech," which looks at a number of arguments favoring free speech. Then the notion of free speech is carried over into the digital world in "Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society" by Jack M. Balkin. At 59 pages, this is the work's longest article and demonstrates how complex the digital environment has made freedom of speech issues. Finally, Part V, "Governmental and Societal Control of Information," contains three articles and three discussion cases which provide an excellent view into the conflict between security and privacy. For instance, the first article, "Carnivore, the FBI's E-mail Surveillance System: Devouring Criminals, Not Privacy" by Griffin S. Durham, examines the FBI's e-mail surveillance program called Carnivore. Durham does an excellent job of demonstrating that Carnivore is a necessary and legitimate system used in limited circumstances and with a court order. Librarians will find the final article in the book, National Security at What Price? A Look into Civil Liberty Concerns in the Information Age under the USA Patriot Act by Jacob R. Lilly, of particular interest. In this article, Lilly uses historical examples of events that sacrificed civil liberties for national security such as the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II and the McCarthyism of the Cold War era to examine the PATRIOT Act.
    The book also includes an index, a selected bibliography, and endnotes for each article. More information on the authors of the articles would have been useful, however. One of the best features of Information Ethics is the discussion cases at the end of each chapter. For instance, in the discussion cases, Moore asks questions like: Would you allow one person to die to save nine? Should a scientist be allowed to experiment on people without their knowledge if there is no harm? Should marriages between people carrying a certain gene be outlawed? These discussion cases really add to the value of the readings. The only suggestion would be to have put them at the beginning of each section so the reader could have the questions floating in their heads as they read the material. Information Ethics is a well thought out and organized collection of articles. Moore has done an excellent job of finding articles to provide a fair and balanced look at a variety of complicated and far-reaching topics. Further, the work has breadth and depth. Moore is careful to include enough historical articles, like the 1890 Warren article, to give balance and perspective to new and modern topics like E-mail surveillance, biopiracy, and genetics. This provides a reader with just enough philosophy and history theory to work with the material. The articles are written by a variety of authors from differing fields so they range in length, tone, and style, creating a rich tapestry of ideas and arguments. However, this is not a quick or easy read. The subject matter is complex and one should plan to spend time with the book. The book is well worth the effort though. Overall, this is a highly recommended work for all libraries especially academic ones."
    Pages
    455 S
    Type
    s
  2. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.03
    0.032673333 = product of:
      0.065346666 = sum of:
        0.065346666 = sum of:
          0.007839619 = weight(_text_:s in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007839619 = score(doc=3027,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
          0.057507046 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057507046 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
    Source
    Journal of information ethics. 7(1998) no.1, S.42-48
  3. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.03
    0.031525247 = product of:
      0.06305049 = sum of:
        0.06305049 = sum of:
          0.005543448 = weight(_text_:s in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005543448 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
          0.057507046 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057507046 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
  4. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.03
    0.031525247 = product of:
      0.06305049 = sum of:
        0.06305049 = sum of:
          0.005543448 = weight(_text_:s in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005543448 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
          0.057507046 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057507046 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
    Pages
    S.17-27
  5. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.03
    0.031525247 = product of:
      0.06305049 = sum of:
        0.06305049 = sum of:
          0.005543448 = weight(_text_:s in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005543448 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.057507046 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057507046 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
    Source
    Journal of information ethics. 7(1998) no.1, S.15-23
  6. Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019) 0.03
    0.031525247 = product of:
      0.06305049 = sum of:
        0.06305049 = sum of:
          0.005543448 = weight(_text_:s in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005543448 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
          0.057507046 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057507046 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch den Beitrag von D. Helbing et al.: 'Digitale Demokratie statt Datendiktatur: Digital-Manifest' in: Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2016, H.1, S.50-60.
    Date
    25.12.2019 14:19:22
  7. Van der Walt, M.S.: Ethics in indexing and clssification (2006) 0.03
    0.028627288 = sum of:
      0.027241426 = product of:
        0.1089657 = sum of:
          0.1089657 = weight(_text_:authors in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1089657 = score(doc=5876,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.45050737 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.001385862 = product of:
        0.002771724 = sum of:
          0.002771724 = weight(_text_:s in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.002771724 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To start off I would like to briefly address the relationship between indexing and classification, which are very technical activities performed by information professionals, and the concept of social responsibility (the focus of this conference), which refer to the human side of the profession. Although indexing and classification involve many technicalities, the basic objective of these activities is to provide access to informationbearing objects, thereby contributing to the social process of information transfer. Information transfer takes place between authors (creators of information- bearing objects) and information users. The authors have something to communicate, and the users have information needs that must be satisfied by the information professional acting as intermediary. In the process of facilitating this information transfer the indexer and classifier therefore has a responsibility towards both authors and information users. Authors can expect the information professional to represent their creations as accurately and exhaustively as possible in retrieval systems, within the constraints of time and cost. Users can expect the information professional to index and classify in such a way as to ensure that information that can satisfy their information needs will be retrievable within the shortest time and with the least effort possible. One can also see the social responsibility of indexers and classifiers in a broader context. They do not only have a responsibility towards specific authors and users, but also towards communities as a whole, e.g. the scientific community, the business community, or society at large. In the case of the scientific community effective transfer of information about advances in research can be seen as essential for the progress of science. Providing effective and suitable information retrieval systems to make this transfer possible can therefore be seen as a responsibility of information professionals. In a business enterprise the effective organization of business records and other business information sources can make a significant contribution to the smooth operation of the enterprise, may be essential for legal purposes, and can enable management to use the information for decision-making at all levels. The information manager therefore has a responsibility towards the enterprise to properly organize and index all these resources.
    Pages
    S.115-121
  8. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.03
    0.028589167 = product of:
      0.057178333 = sum of:
        0.057178333 = sum of:
          0.006859667 = weight(_text_:s in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.006859667 = score(doc=1697,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
          0.050318666 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050318666 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
    Pages
    S.251-258
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  9. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.03
    0.027584592 = product of:
      0.055169184 = sum of:
        0.055169184 = sum of:
          0.004850517 = weight(_text_:s in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004850517 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
          0.050318666 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050318666 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
    Source
    Biblioteche oggi. 11(1993) no.1, S.30-33
  10. Benedetto, C. di; Leone, L.; Seta, M. Della: Semantic approach to bioethics in the Ethicsweb project : building a semantic architecture for a European documentation system 0.02
    0.020352896 = sum of:
      0.018274104 = product of:
        0.07309642 = sum of:
          0.07309642 = weight(_text_:authors in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07309642 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0020787928 = product of:
        0.0041575856 = sum of:
          0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0041575856 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is to present the activities of the European project Ethicsweb, funded under the 7th Framework Program of the European Commission, placing special emphasis on the semantic approach provided by this project. The objectives of Ethicsweb are basically those of: (a) facilitating access to information on ethics in science through an integrated infrastructure; (b) developing sophisticated tools, both technical and semantic to establish the above mentioned infrastructure; (c) creating a European Reference Center for Bioethics, in order to collect the information provided by various local centers and international organizations; (d) developing multilingual tools (thesauri and ontologies) for indexing and searching of documents in bioethics. In this paper the authors will present the steps undertaken until now, such as application profiles, XML schemes and examples.
    Pages
    S.327-333
  11. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.02
    0.01970328 = product of:
      0.03940656 = sum of:
        0.03940656 = sum of:
          0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003464655 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
          0.035941906 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035941906 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1134-1142
  12. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.02
    0.01970328 = product of:
      0.03940656 = sum of:
        0.03940656 = sum of:
          0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003464655 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.035941906 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035941906 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.5, S.347-355
  13. Rubel, A.; Castro, C.; Pham, A.: Algorithms and autonomy : the ethics of automated decision systems (2021) 0.02
    0.0176783 = sum of:
      0.01522842 = product of:
        0.06091368 = sum of:
          0.06091368 = weight(_text_:authors in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06091368 = score(doc=671,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.002449881 = product of:
        0.004899762 = sum of:
          0.004899762 = weight(_text_:s in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004899762 = score(doc=671,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Algorithms influence every facet of modern life: criminal justice, education, housing, entertainment, elections, social media, news feeds, work... the list goes on. Delegating important decisions to machines, however, gives rise to deep moral concerns about responsibility, transparency, freedom, fairness, and democracy. Algorithms and Autonomy connects these concerns to the core human value of autonomy in the contexts of algorithmic teacher evaluation, risk assessment in criminal sentencing, predictive policing, background checks, news feeds, ride-sharing platforms, social media, and election interference. Using these case studies, the authors provide a better understanding of machine fairness and algorithmic transparency. They explain why interventions in algorithmic systems are necessary to ensure that algorithms are not used to control citizens' participation in politics and undercut democracy. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 73(2022) no.10, S.1506-1509 (Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo).
    Pages
    x, 205 S
  14. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.01
    0.014294583 = product of:
      0.028589167 = sum of:
        0.028589167 = sum of:
          0.0034298336 = weight(_text_:s in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0034298336 = score(doc=459,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.059458308 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
          0.025159333 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025159333 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
    Footnote
    Vgl. die Wiedergabe der vollständigen Fassung in: Bibliotheksdienst 41(2007) H.7, S.705-707.
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 41(2007) H.4, S.417-418
  15. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.01
    0.011821967 = product of:
      0.023643933 = sum of:
        0.023643933 = sum of:
          0.0020787928 = weight(_text_:s in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0020787928 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.036037173 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
          0.021565141 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021565141 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 41(2007) H.7, S.705-707
  16. Ethik in Wissenschaft und Technik : Erfahrungen und Perspektiven im interdisziplinären Dialog (1994) 0.00
    0.0039198096 = product of:
      0.007839619 = sum of:
        0.007839619 = product of:
          0.015679238 = sum of:
            0.015679238 = weight(_text_:s in 5147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015679238 = score(doc=5147,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.2718094 = fieldWeight in 5147, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5147)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    170 S
    Type
    s
  17. Zipkowitz, F.: Professional ethics in librarianship : a real life casebook (1996) 0.00
    0.0036005753 = product of:
      0.0072011505 = sum of:
        0.0072011505 = product of:
          0.014402301 = sum of:
            0.014402301 = weight(_text_:s in 69) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014402301 = score(doc=69,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.24967289 = fieldWeight in 69, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=69)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library review 46(1997) nos.5/6, S.365-367 (S. Hannabuss)
    Pages
    161 S
  18. Ethics, information and technology : readings (1998) 0.00
    0.0036005753 = product of:
      0.0072011505 = sum of:
        0.0072011505 = product of:
          0.014402301 = sum of:
            0.014402301 = weight(_text_:s in 3776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014402301 = score(doc=3776,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.24967289 = fieldWeight in 3776, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3776)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 50(1999) no.8, S.726-728 (T.A. Peters)
    Pages
    323 S
    Type
    s
  19. Konstruktivismus und Ethik : Delfin 1995 (1996) 0.00
    0.0034298336 = product of:
      0.006859667 = sum of:
        0.006859667 = product of:
          0.013719334 = sum of:
            0.013719334 = weight(_text_:s in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013719334 = score(doc=3585,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    340 S
    Type
    s
  20. Ethical issues of new technology (1995) 0.00
    0.0034298336 = product of:
      0.006859667 = sum of:
        0.006859667 = product of:
          0.013719334 = sum of:
            0.013719334 = weight(_text_:s in 7280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013719334 = score(doc=7280,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 7280, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    AI and society. 9(1995) no.1, S.1-114
    Type
    s

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 106
  • d 42
  • m 2
  • es 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 126
  • m 18
  • s 12
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects