Search (110 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsmittel"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000) 0.05
    0.048643336 = product of:
      0.09728667 = sum of:
        0.06534809 = weight(_text_:technology in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06534809 = score(doc=4878,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.46537298 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
        0.03193858 = product of:
          0.06387716 = sum of:
            0.06387716 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06387716 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Subject gateways zu den Bereichen: Business economics - The virtual music library - clinical information - food science and food technology - energy technology
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:31
  2. Gentil-Beccot, A.; Mele, S.; Holtkamp, A.; O'Connell, H.B.; Brooks, T.C.: Information resources in High-Energy Physics : surveying the present landscape and charting the future course (2009) 0.02
    0.02436481 = product of:
      0.04872962 = sum of:
        0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 2704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023104034 = score(doc=2704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2704)
        0.025625587 = product of:
          0.051251173 = sum of:
            0.051251173 = weight(_text_:management in 2704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051251173 = score(doc=2704,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 2704, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2704)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Access to previous results is of paramount importance in the scientific process. Recent progress in information management focuses on building e-infrastructures for the optimization of the research workflow, through both policy-driven and user-pulled dynamics. For decades, High Energy Physics (HEP) has pioneered innovative solutions in the field of information management and dissemination. In light of a transforming information environment, it is important to assess the current usage of information resources by researchers and HEP provides a unique test bed for this assessment. A survey of about 10% of practitioners in the field reveals usage trends and information needs. Community-based services, such as the pioneering arXiv and SPIRES systems, largely answer the need of the scientists, with a limited but increasing fraction of younger users relying on Google. Commercial services offered by publishers or database vendors are essentially unused in the field. The survey offers an insight into the most important features that users require to optimize their research workflow. These results inform the future evolution of information management in HEP and, as these researchers are traditionally early adopters of innovation in scholarly communication, can inspire developments of disciplinary repositories serving other communities.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.1, S.150-160
  3. Koch, T.: Quality-controlled subject gateways : definitions, typologies, empirical overview (2000) 0.02
    0.02153496 = product of:
      0.08613984 = sum of:
        0.08613984 = sum of:
          0.041425828 = weight(_text_:management in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041425828 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04714662 = queryNorm
              0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
          0.04471401 = weight(_text_:22 in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04471401 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04714662 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    'Quality-controlled subject gateways' are Internet services which apply a rich set of quality measures to support systematic resource discovery. Considerable manual effort is used to secure a selection of resources which meet quality criteria and to display a rich description of these resources with standards-based metadata. Regular checking and updating ensure good collection management. A main goal is to provide a high quality of subject access through indexing resources using controlled vocabularies and by offering a deep classification structure for advanced searching and browsing. This article provides an initial empirical overview of existing services of this kind, their approaches and technologies, based on proposed working definitions and typologies of subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:37:55
  4. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.02
    0.019536663 = product of:
      0.039073326 = sum of:
        0.023104034 = weight(_text_:technology in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023104034 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
        0.01596929 = product of:
          0.03193858 = sum of:
            0.03193858 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03193858 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1711-1726
  5. Rieth, D.: Erstellung eines Diabetes Portals für einen mittelständischen Verlag auf XML-Basis (2001) 0.02
    0.018458538 = product of:
      0.07383415 = sum of:
        0.07383415 = sum of:
          0.035507854 = weight(_text_:management in 5878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035507854 = score(doc=5878,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04714662 = queryNorm
              0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 5878, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5878)
          0.038326293 = weight(_text_:22 in 5878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038326293 = score(doc=5878,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04714662 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5878, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5878)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    17. 5.2001 20:11:22
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  6. Pesch, K.: ¬Eine gigantische Informationsfülle : "Brockhaus multimedial 2004" kann jedoch nicht rundum überzeugen (2003) 0.02
    0.01580879 = product of:
      0.06323516 = sum of:
        0.06323516 = product of:
          0.12647033 = sum of:
            0.12647033 = weight(_text_:22 in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12647033 = score(doc=502,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    22. 9.2003 10:02:00
  7. Fallis, D.: Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia (2008) 0.02
    0.01562933 = product of:
      0.03125866 = sum of:
        0.018483229 = weight(_text_:technology in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018483229 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.13162735 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
        0.012775432 = product of:
          0.025550865 = sum of:
            0.025550865 = weight(_text_:22 in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025550865 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Wikipedia (the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit) is having a huge impact on how a great many people gather information about the world. So, it is important for epistemologists and information scientists to ask whether people are likely to acquire knowledge as a result of having access to this information source. In other words, is Wikipedia having good epistemic consequences? After surveying the various concerns that have been raised about the reliability of Wikipedia, this article argues that the epistemic consequences of people using Wikipedia as a source of information are likely to be quite good. According to several empirical studies, the reliability of Wikipedia compares favorably to the reliability of traditional encyclopedias. Furthermore, the reliability of Wikipedia compares even more favorably to the reliability of those information sources that people would be likely to use if Wikipedia did not exist (viz., Web sites that are as freely and easily accessible as Wikipedia). In addition, Wikipedia has a number of other epistemic virtues (e.g., power, speed, and fecundity) that arguably outweigh any deficiency in terms of reliability. Even so, epistemologists and information scientists should certainly be trying to identify changes (or alternatives) to Wikipedia that will bring about even better epistemic consequences. This article suggests that to improve Wikipedia, we need to clarify what our epistemic values are and to better understand why Wikipedia works as well as it does. Somebody who reads Wikipedia is rather in the position of a visitor to a public restroom, says Mr. McHenry, Britannica's former editor. It may be obviously dirty, so that he knows to exercise great care, or it may seem fairly clean, so that he may be lulled into a false sense of security. What he certainly does not know is who has used the facilities before him. One wonders whether people like Mr. McHenry would prefer there to be no public lavatories at all. The Economist (Vol. 379, April 22, 2006, pp. 14-15)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.10, S.1662-1674
  8. Roberts, J.R.; Drost, C.A.: Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts (2006) 0.01
    0.011435915 = product of:
      0.04574366 = sum of:
        0.04574366 = weight(_text_:technology in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04574366 = score(doc=4862,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.32576108 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The article focuses on the EBSCO databases that provide services to libraries. The Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts (LISTA) include resources focusing on librarianship, classification, cataloging, bibliometrics, online information retrieval, and information science. LISTA has more than 21,000 articles from more than 600 periodicals and includes more than 5,000 conference papers and reports. In the database, there are also cited references and the number of times the source was used can also be found within the database. These are helpful tips in bibliography researching. The database has also several search options including "Basic Search," "Advanced Search," and Indexes." The EBSCOhost interface is simple to use and easy to grasp while LISTA is a free abstract database.
  9. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.01
    0.011291993 = product of:
      0.04516797 = sum of:
        0.04516797 = product of:
          0.09033594 = sum of:
            0.09033594 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09033594 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  10. Gersmann, G.; Dörr, M.: ¬Der Server Frühe Neuzeit als Baustein für eine Virtuelle Fachbibliothek Geschichte (2001) 0.01
    0.011178503 = product of:
      0.04471401 = sum of:
        0.04471401 = product of:
          0.08942802 = sum of:
            0.08942802 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08942802 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2001 11:57:52
  11. Schininà, A.: Literatur im Internet (2001) 0.01
    0.011178503 = product of:
      0.04471401 = sum of:
        0.04471401 = product of:
          0.08942802 = sum of:
            0.08942802 = weight(_text_:22 in 6879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08942802 = score(doc=6879,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6879, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6879)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2001, Nr.70, S.22-36 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 54(2001) H.2/3]
  12. Ahlers, T.: Betrieb eines WWW-Portals mit Unterstützung durch ein Content-Management-System (2002) 0.01
    0.010356457 = product of:
      0.041425828 = sum of:
        0.041425828 = product of:
          0.082851656 = sum of:
            0.082851656 = weight(_text_:management in 6260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082851656 = score(doc=6260,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6260, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6260)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  13. D'Ambra, J.; Wilson, C.S.: Use of the World Wide Web for international travel : integrating the construct of uncertainty in information seeking and the Task-Technology Fit (TTF) Model (2004) 0.01
    0.0100043425 = product of:
      0.04001737 = sum of:
        0.04001737 = weight(_text_:technology in 1135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04001737 = score(doc=1135,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.2849816 = fieldWeight in 1135, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1135)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this study, we attempt to evaluate the performance of the World Wide Web as an information resource in the domain of international travel. The theoretical framework underpinning our approach recognizes the contribution of models of information seeking behavior and of information systems in explaining World Wide Web usage as an information resource. Specifically, a model integrating the construct of uncertainty in information seeking and the task-technology fit model is presented. To test the integrated model, 217 travelers participated in a questionnaire-based empirical study. Our results confirm that richer (or enhanced) models are required to evaluate the broad context of World Wide Web (the Web) usage as an information resource. Use of the Web for travel tasks, for uncertainty reduction, as an information resource, and for mediation all have a significant impact an users' perception of performance, explaining 46% of the variance. Additionally, our study contributes to the testing and validation of metrics for use of the Web as an information resource in a specific domain.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.8, S.731-742
  14. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Intellectual property information : A comparative analysis of main information providers (2006) 0.01
    0.009802213 = product of:
      0.03920885 = sum of:
        0.03920885 = weight(_text_:technology in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03920885 = score(doc=210,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14042088 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04714662 = queryNorm
            0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    After modeling expert user needs with regard to intellectual property information, we analyze and compare the main providers in this specific information area (Thomson DIALOG, Esp@cenet by the European Patent Office, Questel-Orbit, and STN International) in terms of system content and system functionality. The key question is whether the main providers are able to satisfy these expert user needs. For patent information, some special retrieval features such as chemical structure search (including Markush search), patent family references and citations search, biosequence search, and basic informetric functionality such as ranking, mapping, and visualization of information flows are realized. Considering the results of information science research, the practice of patent information shows unexhausted improvement opportunities (e.g., the application of bibliographic patent coupling and co-patent-citation for mapping patents, patent assignees, and technology specialties). For trademark search, users need multiple truncated search (realized) as well as phonetic search and image retrieval (not realized yet).
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.13, S.1794-1803
  15. Graff, B.: Microsoft Encarta : Goethe höret die Signale (2000) 0.01
    0.009581573 = product of:
      0.038326293 = sum of:
        0.038326293 = product of:
          0.07665259 = sum of:
            0.07665259 = weight(_text_:22 in 4751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07665259 = score(doc=4751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4751)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2000, Nr.66, S.22-25 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 53(2000) H.1]
  16. Pipp, E.: E-Psyche - "die umfassendste, kostengünstigste und aktuellste Datenbank im Fachbereich Psychologie"??? (2001) 0.01
    0.009581573 = product of:
      0.038326293 = sum of:
        0.038326293 = product of:
          0.07665259 = sum of:
            0.07665259 = weight(_text_:22 in 5963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07665259 = score(doc=5963,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5963, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5963)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2002 18:22:30
  17. Flemming, A.: Kurzbericht des Vorstandes des Deutschen Bibliotheksverbandes 1998 bis 2001 (2001) 0.01
    0.009581573 = product of:
      0.038326293 = sum of:
        0.038326293 = product of:
          0.07665259 = sum of:
            0.07665259 = weight(_text_:22 in 6858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07665259 = score(doc=6858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    11. 6.2004 13:22:23
  18. Sixtus, M.: ¬Das Gemeinschaftsnetz : Im Wiki-Web können alle Surfer Seiten umschreiben und hinzufügen - so entstehen ganze Enzyklopädien (2003) 0.01
    0.009229269 = product of:
      0.036917076 = sum of:
        0.036917076 = sum of:
          0.017753927 = weight(_text_:management in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017753927 = score(doc=1739,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04714662 = queryNorm
              0.11172107 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
          0.019163147 = weight(_text_:22 in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019163147 = score(doc=1739,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04714662 = queryNorm
              0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    "Wissen ist in. Allerorten wird es zum Rohstoffdes 21. Jahrhunderts ausgerufen. Doch je mehr man weiß, desto wichtiger ist es, die Informationen professionell zu verwalten, zu organisieren und zu pflegen. Manche Unternehmen bauen dazu teure, komplexe Knowledge-Management-Systeme ins Firmennetz ein. Doch das Wissensmanagement geht einfacher - mit Wikis. Ein Wiki ist eine Sammlung dynamischer Webseiten, die über Verweise verbunden sind und alle über eine Besonderheit verfügen: Ganz unten fordert ein Button alle Surfer dazu auf, die aktuelle Seite zu verändern. Prinzipiell kann jeder jede Seite ändern, ergänzen, verbessern oder sogar löschen. Rechte-Hierarchien existieren schlicht nicht. Jeder User ist gleichzeitig Leser, Lektor, Redakteur und Autor. Seiten anlegen und verlinken geschieht in einem Arbeitsgang. Einige rudimentäre Möglichkeiten zur Textformatierung und zur Einbindung von Grafiken sowie eine Volltextsuche runden den bescheidenen Funktionsumfang eines Standard-Wikis ab - und machen es verblüffenderweise doch zu einem mächtigen Werkzeug. Geübte User erzeugen mit dem virtuellen Zettelkasten in Windeseile Strukturen, die Hunderte oder Tausende von Einzelseiten umfassen. Die Einsatzmöglichkeiten sind vielfältig: Wikis fungieren als Wissensspeicher, als Basis für gemeinsame Projektdokumentationen, als Materialanforderungsformular oder als Brainstorminghilfe in Kreativberufen. Und selbst bei der Planung von Betriebsfeiern oder als Datenbank für Kochrezepte sollen sie schon zum Einsatz kommen. Wenn jeder Nutzer jedes einzelne Dokument ändern oder löschen kann, herrscht dann nicht das Chaos? Was passiert, wenn Fehler sich einschleichen oder wichtige Passagen verschwinden? Dagegen sind die Wikis gewappnet: Mit der HistoryFunktion und über Differenzberechnungen lässt sich überblicken, wer wann was geändert hat. Bei Bedarf lassen sich alle Anderungen rückgängig machen. Jeder historische Zustand ist so mit wenigen Mausklicks wiederhergestellt. Seit 1999 setzen Teams des Mobilfunkherstellers Motorola auf Wikis als Werkzeuge für das kollaborative Arbeiten, die Lufthansa verwendet sie zur Verwaltung technischer Dokumentationen, und die Konzerne SAP und Disney experimentieren mit den wenigen hundert Kilobyte kleinen Systemen in ihren Firmennetzen. Das erste Wiki hat der Software-Entwickler Ward Cunningham im Jahr 1995 unter der Adresse c2.com/cgi/wiki ins Netz gestellt - und dort steht es heute noch. Der Begriff "Wiki" ist das hawaiianische Wort für "schnell", und genau darum ging es Cunningham: flottes, unkompliziertes Arbeiten, ohne von einem unübersichtlichen Funktionsumfang gebremst zu werden. Mittlerweile existieren etliche Klons und Weiterentwicklungen des UrWikis, in mehreren Programmiersprachen und für fast alle Computerplattformen. Die meisten stehen gratis und unter der Open-Source-Lizenz im Netz.
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  19. Besant, A.; Wiemer, M.; Boehnke, P.; Kind, J.: www.wikomp.de - Das Metaportal der Wirtschaftsinformationen (2002) 0.01
    0.0088769635 = product of:
      0.035507854 = sum of:
        0.035507854 = product of:
          0.07101571 = sum of:
            0.07101571 = weight(_text_:management in 6272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07101571 = score(doc=6272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15891297 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 6272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  20. Brahms, E.: Aufbau und Förderung Virtueller Fachbibliotheken durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft : Lichtbildvortrag (2001) 0.01
    0.007984645 = product of:
      0.03193858 = sum of:
        0.03193858 = product of:
          0.06387716 = sum of:
            0.06387716 = weight(_text_:22 in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06387716 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16509943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04714662 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2002 19:22:10

Languages

  • d 80
  • e 30