Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

0.017875303 = product of:
  0.08937651 = sum of:
    0.08937651 = weight(_text_:kurt in 796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08937651 = score(doc=796,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24926263 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030722462 = queryNorm
        0.3585636 = fieldWeight in 796, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=796)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

Inhalt: Holger Gast / Almut Mainka-Mehling: Gewinnung Quantitativer Ergebnisse zu Archäologischen Lebensbildern - Ingo Jonas: Datenbank als Arbeitsmittel zur personellen und theatralen Konstellationsforschung im Werk August Wilhelm Ifflands - Katrinette Bodarwé: FeMo-Data - Female Monasticism's Database. Von einem internen Hilfsmittel zum internationalen Internetprojekt - Klaus Gerlach: Die Datenbank zum Berliner Nationaltheater als Form des wissenschaftlichen Diskurses über die Entstehung einer modernen Großstadtkultur um 1800 - Stefanie Rüther: Rituale, Grabmäler und Schandgesten - Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer projektübergreifenden Datenbank in einem interdisziplinären Sonderforschungsbereich - Benno Wagner / Timo Reinhard: Das Virtuelle Kafka-Bureau - Dana Pflugmacher: Bibliographie der älteren niederländischsprachigen Literatur in deutscher Übersetzung - Karin Orchard: Die Datenbank des Kurt Schwitters Archivs im Sprengel Museum Hannover - Kerstin Albrecht: Das «Digitale Design Archiv» (dda) und die Entwicklung eines polyhierarchischen Thesaurus für Designgeschichte - Klaus Weber: Das Mainzer Model - eine uniweite Multimediadatenbank für Forschung und Lehre - Agnieszka SeidelGrzesiiiska: MIDAS auf Polnisch - Ein deutsches Regelwerk in Forschungs- und Lehrpraxis des Kunsthistorischen Instituts in Wroclaw/ Polen - Kay Heiligenhaus / Till Schicketanz: Digitalisierungsprojekte, Datenbankportale und Literaturmanagement in den Geisteswissenschaften. Anforderungsprofile - Softwarelösungen - Realisation - Daniel Burckhardt: Aggregieren und indizieren statt selbst produzieren. Der Aufbau einer Rezensionsdatenbank bei Clio-online - Kristina Lowis: Pfadfinder durch die Geschichte der Kunst. Eine Präsentation der Bibliographie d'Histoire de l'Art (BHA).

0.009582708 = product of:
  0.047913536 = sum of:
    0.047913536 = weight(_text_:biographie in 118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047913536 = score(doc=118,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25810096 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030722462 = queryNorm
        0.18563874 = fieldWeight in 118, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.401051 = idf(docFreq=26, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=118)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote

Rez. in: ZfBB 53(2006) H.6, S.319-321 (R. Strzolka): "Bespricht man ein Buch, welches der Wikipedia - vorsichtig ausgedrückt, nahe steht -, so ist es sinnvoll, dies im Bewusstsein einer Öffentlichkeit zu tun, die zwischen berechtigter Kritik und kritikloser Sektenhaftigkeit der Wikipedianer oszilliert. Wirklich gleichgültig ist die Wikipedia kaum jemandem, der sich mit Informationsvermittlung beschäftigt. Einer der Vorzüge ist zugleich die Achillesferse des Projektes: der offene Zugang ermöglicht zum einen für jedermann die Mitarbeit, öffnet andererseits aber auch Tür und Tor für Manipulationen. Dass die Offenheit des WikipediaKonzeptes als Gefahr empfunden wird, zeigt die Tatsache, dass Chinas größte Suchmaschine Baidu im Mai 2006 eine eigene Alternative zur Wikipedia ins Netz stellte und der Zugang zur allgemeinen Wikipedia gesperrt wurde. Die an sich reizvolle Grundidee, dass ein offenes Projekt sich von selbst justiert und Fehler auf diese Weise binnen kurzer Zeit korrigiert werden, scheint sich nicht so selbstverständlich zu verwirklichen wie die Initiatoren der Wikipedia 200s dachten, als das Projekt online ging. Während die Kritik in den populären Massenmedien wie dem SPIEGEL sich vor allem um spektakuläre Manipulationen von Biographien Prominenter dreht, kritisiert die wissenschaftliche Diskussion eher Fragen kultureller Gleichschaltung durch einen globalen Diskurs. Die Diskussion um Fälschungen zur Biographie eines führenden Siemens-Mitarbeiters schlug Mitte 2006 hohe Wogen, doch wurden auch Angaben zu Bill Gates oder Jane Fonda gefälscht oder der Journalist John Seigentler verdächtigt, in die Ermordung von John und Robert Kennedy verwickelt gewesen zu sein (Wikipedia in der Kritik www.heute.de/ZDFheute/inhalt/14/0,3672,3022414.htm). Der Journalist Nicholas Carr hatte ein Jahr zuvor schon in einem Blog die Qualität der Wikipedia drastisch kritisiert und der WikipediaMitbegründer Jimmy Wales hatte ihm in einem Kommentar dazu in weiten Teilen Recht gegeben (www.roughtype.com/ archives/2005/10/the_amorality_0.php). Allerdings verblüfft die Art Qualitätsstandard, die Wales anstrebt, weil er zugab, dass die Artikel über Fonda und Gates schlecht seien - dies wäre schlimmer als handelte es sich um Einträge zu einem Dichter des 13. Jahrhunderts. Gerade bei solchen Randthemen aber ist eine Enzyklopädie interessant, nicht bei Klatsch über Prominente, für die es genügend andere Quellen gibt.

0.0055440525 = product of:
  0.027720261 = sum of:
    0.027720261 = product of:
      0.08316078 = sum of:
        0.08316078 = weight(_text_:29 in 5981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08316078 = score(doc=5981,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10807201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030722462 = queryNorm
            0.7694941 = fieldWeight in 5981, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5981)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

25.11.1995 12:29:09
12. 2.2006 19:29:36

0.0028001692 = product of:
  0.014000846 = sum of:
    0.014000846 = product of:
      0.042002536 = sum of:
        0.042002536 = weight(_text_:29 in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042002536 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10807201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030722462 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

18. 7.2002 19:36:29

0.0013874898 = product of:
  0.0069374493 = sum of:
    0.0069374493 = product of:
      0.020812348 = sum of:
        0.020812348 = weight(_text_:22 in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020812348 = score(doc=455,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10758483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030722462 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 3.2008 16:17:01

8.4005075E-4 = product of:
  0.0042002536 = sum of:
    0.0042002536 = product of:
      0.01260076 = sum of:
        0.01260076 = weight(_text_:29 in 507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01260076 = score(doc=507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10807201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030722462 = queryNorm
            0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=507)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote

Weitere Rez: BuB 29(2007) H.1, S.71-72 (J. Plieninger)

7.000423E-4 = product of:
  0.0035002115 = sum of:
    0.0035002115 = product of:
      0.010500634 = sum of:
        0.010500634 = weight(_text_:29 in 2487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010500634 = score(doc=2487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10807201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030722462 = queryNorm
            0.097163305 = fieldWeight in 2487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2487)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

26.10.2008 18:29:48

6.937449E-4 = product of:
  0.0034687247 = sum of:
    0.0034687247 = product of:
      0.010406174 = sum of:
        0.010406174 = weight(_text_:22 in 3992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010406174 = score(doc=3992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10758483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030722462 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 3992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3992)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 3.2004 14:46:50

5.600338E-4 = product of:
  0.002800169 = sum of:
    0.002800169 = product of:
      0.008400506 = sum of:
        0.008400506 = weight(_text_:29 in 3993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008400506 = score(doc=3993,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10807201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030722462 = queryNorm
            0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 3993, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3993)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 56(2005) no.11, S.1237-1238 (E. Yakel): "This book provides the profession with a cogent, thorough, and thoughtful introduction to digital reference. Janes not only provides the breadth of coverage expected in an introduction, but also depth into this important topic. Janes' approach is managerial or administrative, providing guidelines for reference work that can be applied in different settings. Janes creates a decision-making framework to help reference librarians make decisions concerning how, to what extent, and in what cases digital reference services will be delivered. In this way, Janes avoids dictating a "one-size-fits-all" model. This approach is the major strength of the book. Library administrators and heads of reference services will find the administrative approach welcome by helping them think through which digital reference policies and methods will best target core constituencies and their institutional environments. However, the book deserves a broader audience as professors will find that the book fits nicely in a general reference course. For all readers, the book is readable and engaging and also challenging and questioning. The book begins with a history of reference work, nicely positioning digital reference in this tradition and noting the changes wrought by the digital age. By doing this, the author establishes both continuity and change in reference work as well as the values surrounding this activity. These values are largely those from the library community and Support people's access to information as well as activities that support the use of information. Janes closes this chapter by noting that the continuing changes in demographics, technology, and connectivity will impact reference work in ways that are not yet imaginable. This introduction sets the tone for the rest of the book. Janes defines digital reference service as "the use of digital technologies and resources to provide direct, professional assistance to people who are seeking information, wherever and whenever they need it" (p. 29). This definition covers a lot of ground. Examples include everything from a public library answering email queries to commercial ask-an-expert services. While the primary audience is librarians, Janes continually reminds readers that many others perform reference activities an the World Wide Web. Furthermore, he cautions readers that there are larger forces shaping this activity in the world that need to acknowledged. In building a framework for decision-making, Janes outlines the types of digital reference service. This discussion covers the communieations modes, such as e-mail, chat, Web forms, etc. It also analyzes the modalities by which reference service is delivered: synchronous/ asynchronous. Using these two dimensions (communication method and synchronous/asynchronous), Janes presents the variety of contexts in which digital reference can take place and then outlines the strengths and weaknesses of each of these. This translates into a decision-making framework by which readers analyze their particular setting and then select the modes and modalities that world be most effective. This is a powerful device and demonstrates the many options (and perhaps also the obstacles) for providing digital reference service.