Search (64 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsmittel"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Spree, U.: Wörterbücher und Enzyklopädien (2013) 0.03
    0.030581811 = product of:
      0.08409998 = sum of:
        0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039050733 = score(doc=734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=734)
        0.03218541 = weight(_text_:r in 734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03218541 = score(doc=734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=734)
        0.0034720355 = weight(_text_:s in 734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034720355 = score(doc=734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=734)
        0.044537462 = weight(_text_:u in 734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044537462 = score(doc=734,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.5116319 = fieldWeight in 734, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=734)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Pages
    S.550-561
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
    Type
    a
  2. Zielinski, K.; Nielek, R.; Wierzbicki, A.; Jatowt, A.: Computing controversy : formal model and algorithms for detecting controversy on Wikipedia and in search queries (2018) 0.02
    0.015296815 = product of:
      0.04206624 = sum of:
        0.0055226083 = weight(_text_:a in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055226083 = score(doc=5093,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
        0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016092705 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
        0.018714907 = weight(_text_:k in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018714907 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    Controversy is a complex concept that has been attracting attention of scholars from diverse fields. In the era of Internet and social media, detecting controversy and controversial concepts by the means of automatic methods is especially important. Web searchers could be alerted when the contents they consume are controversial or when they attempt to acquire information on disputed topics. Presenting users with the indications and explanations of the controversy should offer them chance to see the "wider picture" rather than letting them obtain one-sided views. In this work we first introduce a formal model of controversy as the basis of computational approaches to detecting controversial concepts. Then we propose a classification based method for automatic detection of controversial articles and categories in Wikipedia. Next, we demonstrate how to use the obtained results for the estimation of the controversy level of search queries. The proposed method can be incorporated into search engines as a component responsible for detection of queries related to controversial topics. The method is independent of the search engine's retrieval and search results recommendation algorithms, and is therefore unaffected by a possible filter bubble. Our approach can be also applied in Wikipedia or other knowledge bases for supporting the detection of controversy and content maintenance. Finally, we believe that our results could be useful for social science researchers for understanding the complex nature of controversy and in fostering their studies.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 54(2018) no.1, S.14-36
    Type
    a
  3. Geiger, J.; Seubert, K.: Qualitätsbewertung von Online-Informationsressourcen (2011) 0.01
    0.013712841 = product of:
      0.037710313 = sum of:
        0.006345466 = product of:
          0.012690932 = sum of:
            0.012690932 = weight(_text_:h in 4906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012690932 = score(doc=4906,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 4906, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4906)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 4906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027335514 = score(doc=4906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 4906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4906)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 4906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=4906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4906)
        0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 4906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02620087 = score(doc=4906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 4906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4906)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.6/7, S.315-320
    Type
    a
  4. Deardorff, A.; Masterton, K.; Roberts, K.; Kilicoglu, H.; Demner-Fushman, D.: ¬A protocol-driven approach to automatically finding authoritative answers to consumer health questions in online resources (2017) 0.01
    0.013323798 = product of:
      0.036640443 = sum of:
        0.004532476 = product of:
          0.009064952 = sum of:
            0.009064952 = weight(_text_:h in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009064952 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039050733 = score(doc=3688,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
        0.026466874 = weight(_text_:k in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026466874 = score(doc=3688,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this research was to establish an upper bound on finding answers to health-related questions in MedlinePlus and other online resources. Seven reference librarians tested a set of protocols to determine whether it was possible to use the types and foci of the questions extracted from customer requests submitted to the National Library of Medicine to find authoritative answers to these questions. Librarians tested the protocols manually to determine if the process was sufficiently robust and accurate to later automate. Results indicated that the extracted terms provide enough information to find authoritative answers for about 60% of questions and that certain question types are more likely to result in authoritative answers than others. The question corpus and analysis performed for this project will inform automatic question answering systems, and could lead to suggestions for new content to include in MedlinePlus. This approach can serve as an example to researchers interested in methods of evaluating question answering tools and the contents of online databases.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.7, S.1724-1736
    Type
    a
  5. Lauber-Reymann, M.: Informationsressourcen : ein Handbuch für Bibliothekare und Informationsspezialisten (2010) 0.01
    0.0111293085 = product of:
      0.040807463 = sum of:
        0.0054389704 = product of:
          0.010877941 = sum of:
            0.010877941 = weight(_text_:h in 4266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010877941 = score(doc=4266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0036082454 = weight(_text_:s in 4266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0036082454 = score(doc=4266,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.124836445 = fieldWeight in 4266, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4266)
        0.03176025 = weight(_text_:k in 4266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03176025 = score(doc=4266,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 4266, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4266)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Classification
    BCAQ (FH K)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ZfBB 58(2011) H.3/4, S.240-242 (S. Köppl)
    GHBS
    BCAQ (FH K)
    Pages
    491 S
  6. Cho, H.; Chen, M.-H.; Chung, S.: Testing an integrative theoretical model of knowledge-sharing behavior in the context of Wikipedia (2010) 0.01
    0.00988465 = product of:
      0.027182788 = sum of:
        0.0076918663 = product of:
          0.0153837325 = sum of:
            0.0153837325 = weight(_text_:h in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0153837325 = score(doc=3460,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0057392623 = weight(_text_:a in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057392623 = score(doc=3460,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
        0.00294612 = weight(_text_:s in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00294612 = score(doc=3460,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
        0.010805541 = product of:
          0.021611081 = sum of:
            0.021611081 = weight(_text_:22 in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021611081 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    This study explores how and why people participate in collaborative knowledge-building practices in the context of Wikipedia. Based on a survey of 223 Wikipedians, this study examines the relationship between motivations, internal cognitive beliefs, social-relational factors, and knowledge-sharing intentions. Results from structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis reveal that attitudes, knowledge self-efficacy, and a basic norm of generalized reciprocity have significant and direct relationships with knowledge-sharing intentions. Altruism (an intrinsic motivator) is positively related to attitudes toward knowledge sharing, whereas reputation (an extrinsic motivator) is not a significant predictor of attitude. The study also reveals that a social-relational factor, namely, a sense of belonging, is related to knowledge-sharing intentions indirectly through different motivational and social factors such as altruism, subjective norms, knowledge self-efficacy, and generalized reciprocity. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
    Date
    1. 6.2010 10:13:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.6, S.1198-1212
    Type
    a
  7. Allgeier, R.: Landeslizenz für Munzinger Archive und Brockhaus-Online in NRW : 111 Bibliotheken profitieren / Projekt ist auf drei Jahre befristet (2010) 0.01
    0.008841358 = product of:
      0.024313735 = sum of:
        0.004532476 = product of:
          0.009064952 = sum of:
            0.009064952 = weight(_text_:h in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009064952 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0019525366 = weight(_text_:a in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019525366 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
        0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016092705 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Source
    BuB. 62(2010) H.9, S.590
    Type
    a
  8. Schumann, L.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein umfassendes ganzheitliches Modell für Evaluation und Akzeptanzanalysen von Informationsdiensten : Das Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Modell (2014) 0.01
    0.00876942 = product of:
      0.024115905 = sum of:
        0.006345466 = product of:
          0.012690932 = sum of:
            0.012690932 = weight(_text_:h in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012690932 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027335514 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
        0.012606464 = product of:
          0.025212929 = sum of:
            0.025212929 = weight(_text_:22 in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025212929 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 18:56:46
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.4/5, S.239-246
    Type
    a
  9. Gantert, K.: Elektronische Informationsressourcen für Historiker (2011) 0.01
    0.008411721 = product of:
      0.030842979 = sum of:
        0.0054389704 = product of:
          0.010877941 = sum of:
            0.010877941 = weight(_text_:h in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010877941 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.00294612 = weight(_text_:s in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00294612 = score(doc=4085,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
        0.022457888 = weight(_text_:k in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022457888 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IWP 63(2012) H.2, S.130-131 (T. Meyer).
    Pages
    IX, 428 S
  10. McNamara, M.; Arnold, C.; Sarma, K.; Aberle, D.; Garon, E.; Bui, A.A.T.: Patient portal preferences : perspectives on imaging information (2015) 0.01
    0.008258283 = product of:
      0.030280372 = sum of:
        0.0057392623 = weight(_text_:a in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057392623 = score(doc=2134,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
        0.022457888 = weight(_text_:k in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022457888 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Patient portals have the potential to provide content that is specifically tailored to a patient's information needs based on diagnoses and other factors. In this work, we conducted a survey of 41 lung cancer patients at an outpatient lung cancer clinic at the medical center of the University of California, Los Angeles, to gain insight into these perceived information needs and opinions on the design of a portal to fulfill them. We found that patients requested access to information related to diagnosis and imaging, with more than half of the patients reporting that they did not anticipate an increase in anxiety due to access to medical record information via a portal. We also found that patient educational background did not lead to a significant difference in desires for explanations of reports and definitions of terms.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.8, S.1606-1615
    Type
    a
  11. Gantert, K.: Elektronische Informationsressourcen für Germanisten (2010) 0.01
    0.0077991355 = product of:
      0.02859683 = sum of:
        0.0064098886 = product of:
          0.012819777 = sum of:
            0.012819777 = weight(_text_:h in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012819777 = score(doc=178,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0034720355 = weight(_text_:s in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034720355 = score(doc=178,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
        0.018714907 = weight(_text_:k in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018714907 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: BuB 62(2910) H.10, S.724-725 (D. Graf); Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H. 3/4, S.151-154 (S. Alker)
    Pages
    323 S
  12. Arazy, O.; Lifshitz-Assaf, H.; Balila, A.: Neither a Bazaar nor a cathedral : the interplay between structure and agency in Wikipedia's role system (2019) 0.01
    0.007379484 = product of:
      0.02029358 = sum of:
        0.004532476 = product of:
          0.009064952 = sum of:
            0.009064952 = weight(_text_:h in 4670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009064952 = score(doc=4670,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4670, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4670)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.004782719 = weight(_text_:a in 4670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004782719 = score(doc=4670,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 4670, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4670)
        0.00924237 = product of:
          0.03696948 = sum of:
            0.03696948 = weight(_text_:o in 4670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03696948 = score(doc=4670,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.27716863 = fieldWeight in 4670, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4670)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 4670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=4670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4670)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    Roles provide a key coordination mechanism in peer-production. Whereas one stream in the literature has focused on the structural responsibilities associated with roles, another has stressed the emergent nature of work. To date, these streams have proceeded largely in parallel. In seeking to enhance our understanding of the tension between structure and agency in peer-production, we investigated the interplay between structural and emergent roles. Our study explored the breadth of structural roles in Wikipedia (English version) and their linkage to various forms of activities. Our analyses show that despite the latitude in selecting their mode of participation, participants' structural and emergent roles are tightly coupled. Our discussion highlights that: (a) participants often stay close to the "production ground floor" despite the assignment into structural roles; and (b) there are typical modifications in activity patterns associated with role-assignment, namely: functional specialization, multispecialization, defunctionalization, changes in communication patterns, management of identity, and role definition. We contribute to theory of coordination and roles, as well as provide some practical implications.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.1, S.3-15
    Type
    a
  13. Vanopstal, K.; Stichele, R.Vander; Laureys, G.; Buysschaert, J.: PubMed searches by Dutch-speaking nursing students : the impact of language and system experience (2012) 0.01
    0.006881903 = product of:
      0.025233643 = sum of:
        0.004782719 = weight(_text_:a in 369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004782719 = score(doc=369,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 369, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=369)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=369,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 369, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=369)
        0.018714907 = weight(_text_:k in 369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018714907 = score(doc=369,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 369, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=369)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    This study analyzes the search behavior of Dutch-speaking nursing students with a nonnative knowledge of English who searched for information in MEDLINE/PubMed about a specific theme in nursing. We examine whether and to what extent their search efficiency is affected by their language skills. Our task-oriented approach focuses on three stages of the information retrieval process: need articulation, query formulation, and relevance judgment. The test participants completed a pretest questionnaire, which gave us information about their overall experience with the search system and their self-reported computer and language skills. The students were briefly introduced to the use of PubMed and MeSH (medical subject headings) before they conducted their keyword-driven subject search. We assessed the search results in terms of recall and precision, and also analyzed the search process. After the search task, a satisfaction survey and a language test were completed. We conclude that language skills have an impact on the search results. We hypothesize that language support might improve the efficiency of searches conducted by Dutch-speaking users of PubMed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.8, S.1538-1552
    Type
    a
  14. Tomaszewski, R.: Citations to chemical databases in scholarly articles : to cite or not to cite? (2019) 0.01
    0.006271268 = product of:
      0.022994649 = sum of:
        0.0051659266 = weight(_text_:a in 5471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051659266 = score(doc=5471,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 5471, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5471)
        0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 5471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016092705 = score(doc=5471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 5471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5471)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 5471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=5471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5471)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Chemical databases have had a significant impact on the way scientists search for and use information. The purpose of this paper is to spark informed discussion and fuel debate on the issue of citations to chemical databases. Design/methodology/approach A citation analysis to four major chemical databases was undertaken to examine resource coverage and impact in the scientific literature. Two commercial databases (SciFinder and Reaxys) and two public databases (PubChem and ChemSpider) were analyzed using the "Cited Reference Search" in the Science Citation Index Expanded from the Web of Science (WoS) database. Citations to these databases between 2000 and 2016 (inclusive) were evaluated by document types and publication growth curves. A review of the distribution trends of chemical databases in peer-reviewed articles was conducted through a citation count analysis by country, organization, journal and WoS category. Findings In total, 862 scholarly articles containing a citation to one or more of the four databases were identified as only steadily increasing since 2000. The study determined that authors at academic institutions worldwide reference chemical databases in high-impact journals from notable publishers and mainly in the field of chemistry. Originality/value The research is a first attempt to evaluate the practice of citation to major chemical databases in the scientific literature. This paper proposes that citing chemical databases gives merit and recognition to the resources as well as credibility and validity to the scholarly communication process and also further discusses recommendations for citing and referencing databases.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 75(2019) no.6, S.1317-1332
    Type
    a
  15. Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014) 0.01
    0.00508037 = product of:
      0.018628024 = sum of:
        0.0057392623 = weight(_text_:a in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057392623 = score(doc=1540,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
        0.010805541 = product of:
          0.021611081 = sum of:
            0.021611081 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021611081 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Hundreds of scholarly studies have investigated various aspects of Wikipedia. Although a number of literature reviews have provided overviews of this vast body of research, none has specifically focused on the readers of Wikipedia and issues concerning its readership. In this systematic literature review, we review 99 studies to synthesize current knowledge regarding the readership of Wikipedia and provide an analysis of research methods employed. The scholarly research has found that Wikipedia is popular not only for lighter topics such as entertainment but also for more serious topics such as health and legal information. Scholars, librarians, and students are common users, and Wikipedia provides a unique opportunity for educating students in digital literacy. We conclude with a summary of key findings, implications for researchers, and implications for the Wikipedia community.
    Date
    18.11.2014 13:22:03
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.12, S.2381-2403
    Type
    a
  16. Martínez-Ávila, D.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Pinho, F.A.; Fox, M.J.: ¬The representation of ethics and knowledge organization in the WoS and LISTA databases (2015) 0.01
    0.00508037 = product of:
      0.018628024 = sum of:
        0.0057392623 = weight(_text_:a in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057392623 = score(doc=2358,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
        0.010805541 = product of:
          0.021611081 = sum of:
            0.021611081 = weight(_text_:22 in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021611081 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    A naïve user seeking introductory information on a topic may perceive a domain as it is shown by the search results in a database; however, inconsistencies in indexing can misrepresent the full picture of the domain by including irrelevant documents or omitting relevant ones, sometimes inexplicably. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on the domain of ethics in knowledge organization in the World of Science (WoS) and Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA) databases to discern how it is being presented by search results in those databases and to attempt to determine why inconsistencies occurred.
    Date
    17. 2.2018 16:50:22
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 42(2015) no.5, S.269-275
    Type
    a
  17. Knäusl, H.: Information Behavior : Informationssuche in der Wikipedia (2015) 0.00
    0.0044065937 = product of:
      0.01615751 = sum of:
        0.010255822 = product of:
          0.020511644 = sum of:
            0.020511644 = weight(_text_:h in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020511644 = score(doc=1737,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.31055614 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031240587 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.1, S.10-16
    Type
    a
  18. Hartmann, B.: Ab ins MoMA : zum virtuellen Museumsgang (2011) 0.00
    0.004154129 = product of:
      0.015231806 = sum of:
        0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 1821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0023430442 = score(doc=1821,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1821, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1821)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 1821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=1821,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1821, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1821)
        0.010805541 = product of:
          0.021611081 = sum of:
            0.021611081 = weight(_text_:22 in 1821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021611081 = score(doc=1821,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1821, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1821)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    Source
    Bergische Landeszeitung. Nr.28 vom 3.2.2011, S.9
    Type
    a
  19. Gierke, B.; Mangei, J.; Merz, D.; Simon, S.: Fachinformationsdienst Buch-, Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft : ein Werkstattbericht (2019) 0.00
    0.00390114 = product of:
      0.01430418 = sum of:
        0.007251961 = product of:
          0.014503922 = sum of:
            0.014503922 = weight(_text_:h in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014503922 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031240587 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
        0.00392816 = weight(_text_:s in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00392816 = score(doc=5108,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 53(2019) H.12, S.768-792
    Type
    a
  20. Nowag, B.: Query by Humming : ein Vergleich von Suchmaschinen zur Melodie-Erkennung (2010) 0.00
    0.0035873586 = product of:
      0.013153648 = sum of:
        0.007251961 = product of:
          0.014503922 = sum of:
            0.014503922 = weight(_text_:h in 3506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014503922 = score(doc=3506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 3506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 3506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031240587 = score(doc=3506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3506)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 3506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=3506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3506)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.2, S.111-115
    Type
    a

Languages

  • d 39
  • e 25

Types

  • a 54
  • m 7
  • el 6
  • i 1
  • More… Less…