Search (82 results, page 4 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001) 0.00 
    0.0013866236 = product of:
  0.008319741 = sum of:
    0.008319741 = product of:
      0.024959221 = sum of:
        0.024959221 = weight(_text_:29 in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024959221 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:01:01
  2. Stock, W.G.: Publikation und Zitat : Die problematische Basis empirischer Wissenschaftsforschung (2001) 0.00 
    0.0013866236 = product of:
  0.008319741 = sum of:
    0.008319741 = product of:
      0.024959221 = sum of:
        0.024959221 = weight(_text_:29 in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024959221 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Series
    Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd.29
  3. Doré, J.-C.; Ojasoo, T.: How to analyze publication time trends by correspondece factor analysis : analysis of publications by 48 countries in 18 disciplines over 12 years (2001) 0.00 
    0.0013866236 = product of:
  0.008319741 = sum of:
    0.008319741 = product of:
      0.024959221 = sum of:
        0.024959221 = weight(_text_:29 in 6030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024959221 = score(doc=6030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 6030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6030)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:02:58
  4. Swanson, D.R.; Smalheiser, N.R.; Bookstein, A.: Information discovery from complementary literatures : categorizing viruses as potential weapons (2001) 0.00 
    0.0013866236 = product of:
  0.008319741 = sum of:
    0.008319741 = product of:
      0.024959221 = sum of:
        0.024959221 = weight(_text_:29 in 6513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024959221 = score(doc=6513,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 6513, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6513)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:09:13
  5. Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: Scholarly use of the Web : what are the key inducers of links to journal Web sites? (2003) 0.00 
    0.0013866236 = product of:
  0.008319741 = sum of:
    0.008319741 = product of:
      0.024959221 = sum of:
        0.024959221 = weight(_text_:29 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024959221 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.1, S.29-38
  6. Brown, C.: ¬The role of electronic preprints in chemical communication : analysis of citation, usage, and acceptance in the journal literature (2003) 0.00 
    0.0013866236 = product of:
  0.008319741 = sum of:
    0.008319741 = product of:
      0.024959221 = sum of:
        0.024959221 = weight(_text_:29 in 1453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024959221 = score(doc=1453,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1453, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1453)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:23:05
  7. White, H.D.: Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis : a remapping of paradigmatic information scientists (2003) 0.00 
    0.0013866236 = product of:
  0.008319741 = sum of:
    0.008319741 = product of:
      0.024959221 = sum of:
        0.024959221 = weight(_text_:29 in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024959221 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:55:24
  8. Raan, A.F.J. van; Noyons, E.C.M.: Discovery of patterns of scientific and technological development and knowledge transfer (2002) 0.00 
    0.0013866236 = product of:
  0.008319741 = sum of:
    0.008319741 = product of:
      0.024959221 = sum of:
        0.024959221 = weight(_text_:29 in 3603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024959221 = score(doc=3603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3603)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  9. Egghe, L.: Untangling Herdan's law and Heaps' law : mathematical and informetric arguments (2007) 0.00 
    0.0013866236 = product of:
  0.008319741 = sum of:
    0.008319741 = product of:
      0.024959221 = sum of:
        0.024959221 = weight(_text_:29 in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024959221 = score(doc=271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 4.2007 19:51:08
  10. Coleman, A.S.; Bracke, P.: Controlled vocabularies as a sphere of influence (2006) 0.00 
    0.0013866236 = product of:
  0.008319741 = sum of:
    0.008319741 = product of:
      0.024959221 = sum of:
        0.024959221 = weight(_text_:29 in 1491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024959221 = score(doc=1491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1491)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 2.2008 16:21:04
  11. Archambault, E.; Campbell, D; Gingras, Y.; Larivière, V.: Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus (2009) 0.00 
    0.0013866236 = product of:
  0.008319741 = sum of:
    0.008319741 = product of:
      0.024959221 = sum of:
        0.024959221 = weight(_text_:29 in 2933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024959221 = score(doc=2933,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2933, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2933)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    19. 7.2009 12:20:29
  12. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006) 0.00 
    0.00137415 = product of:
  0.0082449 = sum of:
    0.0082449 = product of:
      0.024734698 = sum of:
        0.024734698 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024734698 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:11:05
  13. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007) 0.00 
    0.00137415 = product of:
  0.0082449 = sum of:
    0.0082449 = product of:
      0.024734698 = sum of:
        0.024734698 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024734698 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
  14. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.00 
    0.00137415 = product of:
  0.0082449 = sum of:
    0.0082449 = product of:
      0.024734698 = sum of:
        0.024734698 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024734698 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
  15. Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation (2009) 0.00 
    0.00137415 = product of:
  0.0082449 = sum of:
    0.0082449 = product of:
      0.024734698 = sum of:
        0.024734698 = weight(_text_:22 in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024734698 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:52:50
  16. Mukherjee, B.: Do open-access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? : a bibliometric study of selected open-access journals using Google Scholar (2009) 0.00 
    0.00137415 = product of:
  0.0082449 = sum of:
    0.0082449 = product of:
      0.024734698 = sum of:
        0.024734698 = weight(_text_:22 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024734698 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:54:59
  17. Costas, R.; Bordons, M.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers (2009) 0.00 
    0.00137415 = product of:
  0.0082449 = sum of:
    0.0082449 = product of:
      0.024734698 = sum of:
        0.024734698 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024734698 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:02:48
  18. White, H.D.: Authors as citers over time (2001) 0.00 
    0.0011092988 = product of:
  0.0066557927 = sum of:
    0.0066557927 = product of:
      0.019967377 = sum of:
        0.019967377 = weight(_text_:29 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019967377 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 13:58:38
  19. Frohlich, C.; Resler, L.: Analysis of publications and citations from a geophysics research institute (2001) 0.00 
    0.0011092988 = product of:
  0.0066557927 = sum of:
    0.0066557927 = product of:
      0.019967377 = sum of:
        0.019967377 = weight(_text_:29 in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019967377 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:01:26
  20. Bensman, S.J.: Urquhart's and Garfield's laws : the British controversy over their validity (2001) 0.00 
    0.0011092988 = product of:
  0.0066557927 = sum of:
    0.0066557927 = product of:
      0.019967377 = sum of:
        0.019967377 = weight(_text_:29 in 6026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019967377 = score(doc=6026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 6026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6026)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:02:27

Authors

Languages

  • e 66
  • d 16

Types

  • a 79
  • r 2
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications