Search (52 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Oberhauser, O.: ¬Die Dewey Decimal Classification im Österreichischen Verbundkatalog : Status und Perspektiven (2009) 0.00
    0.0012581941 = product of:
      0.018872911 = sum of:
        0.018872911 = weight(_text_:und in 2922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018872911 = score(doc=2922,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 2922, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2922)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag berichtet über quantitative und qualitative Aspekte der Präsenz von DDC-Notationen im Österreichischen Verbundkatalog. Obwohl die DDC in Österreich nur von sehr wenigen Bibliotheken aktiv verwendet wird, ist im Wege der Fremddatennutzung eine grössere Anzahl von DDC-Notationen in den Verbundkatalog gelangt - früher nur durch die Nutzung der British National Bibliography, jetzt aber zunehmend auch aus den Fremddaten der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek. Da letztere die Dewey-Notationen in einer anders strukturierten MAB-Kategorie ("DDC analytisch") liefert, war es erforderlich, durch die Implementierung eines Fix-Programmes für eine automatische Zusammenführung der DDC-Informationen zu sorgen. Zur Verbesserung der Datenqualität war überdies eine Reihe von Korrekturen notwendig, die überwiegend mit Hilfe automatischer Routinen erledigt konnten. Die DDC-Notationen sollen nun auch im OPAC des Verbundes angezeigt und für das Weiternavigieren verfügbar gemacht werden. Die dafür nötigen Parametrisierungsarbeiten beinhalten auch die Anzeige der (frei verfügbaren) deutschsprachigen Klassenbenennungen der ersten drei Hierarchieebenen jeder Notation, um den Benutzern den thematischen Umraum des jeweiligen Codes zu verdeutlichen.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 62(2009) H.1, S.37-50
  2. Meink, P.: ¬Das Gestern und das Morgen mit einer DK von Heute : eine Klassifikation hält Schritt (1988) 0.00
    0.0010484952 = product of:
      0.015727427 = sum of:
        0.015727427 = weight(_text_:und in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015727427 = score(doc=2576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
  3. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.00
    0.0010469672 = product of:
      0.015704507 = sum of:
        0.015704507 = product of:
          0.031409014 = sum of:
            0.031409014 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031409014 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  4. Comaroni, J.P.: Use of the Dewey Decimal Classification in the United States and Canada (1978) 0.00
    9.1609627E-4 = product of:
      0.013741443 = sum of:
        0.013741443 = product of:
          0.027482886 = sum of:
            0.027482886 = weight(_text_:22 in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027482886 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 22(1978), S.402-408
  5. McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future prospects (1995) 0.00
    9.1609627E-4 = product of:
      0.013741443 = sum of:
        0.013741443 = product of:
          0.027482886 = sum of:
            0.027482886 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027482886 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.64-69
  6. Lindpointner, R.: ¬Die Einführung der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) in der Oberösterreichischen Landesbibliothek (OÖLB) (2010) 0.00
    8.896776E-4 = product of:
      0.013345163 = sum of:
        0.013345163 = weight(_text_:und in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013345163 = score(doc=4378,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Der Grund für die Einführung der DDC war die Umstellung auf Freihand durch den damals bevorstehenden Umbau und Ausbau der Bibliothek. Durch die Errichtung von 3 Tiefgeschoßen war es möglich, das gesamte oberirdische Magazin für das Publikum zu öffnen, wodurch die Publikumsflächen von vorher weniger als 200 m**2 auf nun 2200 m**2 ausgeweitet werden konnten. Zur Ausgangssituation: Wir hatten damals eine Freihand-Bibliothek im Umfang von einigen tausend Nachschlagewerken im Lesesaal, die wir einige Jahre zuvor - nach einem Umbau des Lesesaals - grob nach der 3-stelligen DDC aufgestellt hatten. Aber im Grunde genommen war das Thema Freihand für uns vollkommenes Neuland.
    Series
    Schriften der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare (VÖB); Band 7
  7. Klassifikationen für wissenschaftliche Universalbibliotheken in Deutschland : Analysen und Empfehlungen (1998) 0.00
    8.387961E-4 = product of:
      0.012581941 = sum of:
        0.012581941 = weight(_text_:und in 2133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012581941 = score(doc=2133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2133)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
  8. Preuss, M.: Wissen in Ordnung : eine Bibliotheksfantastik (2004) 0.00
    8.387961E-4 = product of:
      0.012581941 = sum of:
        0.012581941 = weight(_text_:und in 3119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012581941 = score(doc=3119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 3119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3119)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliotheken sammeln Wissen und archivieren es abrufbereit. Wie soll aber eine große Menge an Informationen in Form unterschiedlichster Medien so geordnet werden, dass daraus zugreifbares Wissen entsteht? Bibliotheken (aber nicht nur die) in aller WeIt verwenden als Ordnungssystem für ihre Bestände die Dewey Decimal Classification oder kurz DDC. Zurzeit entsteht an der FH Köln im Rahmen eines Projektes der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) die erste deutsche Ausgabe dieser traditionsreichen Universalklassifikation.
  9. Heiner-Freiling, M.: DDC German - the project, the aims, the methods : new ideas for a well-established traditional classification system (2006) 0.00
    7.852253E-4 = product of:
      0.011778379 = sum of:
        0.011778379 = product of:
          0.023556758 = sum of:
            0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023556758 = score(doc=5779,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    The paper will give a short outline of the project DDC German. The project is not limited to a mere translation of DDC 22, but aims at the implementation of Dewey in the library networks of the German-language countries. Use of DDC mainly for retrieval purposes, not for shelving, leads to certain new aspects in classifying with Dewey which are described in detail and presented together with the German web service Melvil. Based an the German experience of cooperation and data exchange in the field of verbal indexing the paper develops some ideas an future Dewey cooperation between European and American libraries.
  10. Svanberg, M.: Mapping two classification schemes : DDC and SAB (2008) 0.00
    7.852253E-4 = product of:
      0.011778379 = sum of:
        0.011778379 = product of:
          0.023556758 = sum of:
            0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023556758 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2008 11:22:44
  11. Satija, M.P.: Abridged Dewey-15 (2012) in historical perspectives (2012) 0.00
    6.5435446E-4 = product of:
      0.009815317 = sum of:
        0.009815317 = product of:
          0.019630633 = sum of:
            0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019630633 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    3. 3.2016 18:59:22
  12. Immroth, J. P.: Library of Congress Classification (19??) 0.00
    5.2621565E-4 = product of:
      0.0078932345 = sum of:
        0.0078932345 = product of:
          0.015786469 = sum of:
            0.015786469 = weight(_text_:information in 5645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015786469 = score(doc=5645,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5645, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5645)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.15
  13. Hjoerland, B.: Arguments for 'the bibliographical paradigm' : some thoughts inspired by the new English edition of the UDC (2007) 0.00
    4.8335994E-4 = product of:
      0.007250399 = sum of:
        0.007250399 = product of:
          0.014500798 = sum of:
            0.014500798 = weight(_text_:information in 552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014500798 = score(doc=552,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 552, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=552)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    The term 'the bibliographic paradigm' is used in the literature of library and information science, but is a very seldom term and is almost always negatively described. This paper reconsiders this concept. Method. The method is mainly 'analytical'. Empirical data concerning the current state of the UDC-classification system are also presented in order to illuminate the connection between theory and practice. Analysis. The bibliographic paradigm is understood as a perspective in library and information science focusing on documents and information resources, their description, organization, mediation and use. This perspective is examined as one among other metatheories of library and information science and its philosophical assumptions and implications are outlined. Results. The neglect and misunderstanding of 'the bibliographic paradigm' as well as the quality of the new UDC-classification indicate that both the metatheoretical discourses on library and information science and its concrete practice seem to be in a state of crisis.
    Source
    Information research. 12(2007) no.4, paper colis06
  14. Slavic, A.: Use of the Universal Decimal Classification : a world-wide survey (2008) 0.00
    3.4805894E-4 = product of:
      0.005220884 = sum of:
        0.005220884 = product of:
          0.010441768 = sum of:
            0.010441768 = weight(_text_:information in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010441768 = score(doc=1736,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.20526241 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a general overview with up-to-date information on the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) use worldwide. Design/methodology/approach - The research combined e-mail interviews with LIS professionals in 208 countries, literature research and information obtained from UDC distributors/publishers (AENOR, BSI, UDC Consortium). The following categorisation of UDC use was offered: A - dominant system; B - used in some kind of libraries only; or C - rarely used. Findings - The paper finds that, of the 208 countries contacted and researched through the literature in 2004-2006, the UDC was found to be used in 124 (60 per cent) of these. In 34 (28 per cent) of the countries researched (in Europe, Asia and Africa), UDC is the main classification system used across national information networks. In 45 (36 per cent) of the countries it is used in certain kinds of libraries. In the remaining 45 (36 per cent) of the countries it is used rarely, in only a few libraries or information centres. Research limitations/implications - It was beyond the scope of this research to provide any information regarding the actual number of institutions using UDC in a given country or to give an estimate of the size and number of document collections organised by it. Although a decline in UDC use since the 1980s was reported from a number of countries, it was not possible to measure this accurately. Practical implications - The interest shown for using UDC in the organisation of digital collections, information exchange and cross domain and cross collection resource discovery depends on accurate knowledge of its actual usage worldwide. This gives a measure of its global importance and verifies its credentials as an indexing standard. This research, which attempted wider and more systematic coverage than previous surveys, should help clarify the status of UDC and its potential use in the networked environment. Originality/value - The paper provides up-to-date information on the presence of the UDC system across countries and languages.
  15. Chan, L.M.: Dewey Decimal Classification : Edition 21 and international perspectives. Opening remarks (1997) 0.00
    3.4178712E-4 = product of:
      0.0051268064 = sum of:
        0.0051268064 = product of:
          0.010253613 = sum of:
            0.010253613 = weight(_text_:information in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010253613 = score(doc=25,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    In respect to the nature and quantity of available information, 1876 was a very different world from the one we know in the 1990s. Yet in spite of over a century of changes, the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), the system that helped organize a small college library, has grown to one that is helping the whole world organize its vast store of information resources. In this closing session, I would like to summarize some of the major factors that have contributed so far to the Dewey system's success as an information organization tool. I will also discuss ongoing efforts to ensure its viability in the future
  16. Lloyd, G.A.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification as an international switching language (1972) 0.00
    3.2888478E-4 = product of:
      0.0049332716 = sum of:
        0.0049332716 = product of:
          0.009866543 = sum of:
            0.009866543 = weight(_text_:information in 1269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009866543 = score(doc=1269,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1269, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Series
    Contributions in librarianship and information science; no.3
  17. Rojas L.; Octavio, G.: Translating the DDC : the experience of the Spanish version (1997) 0.00
    2.848226E-4 = product of:
      0.004272339 = sum of:
        0.004272339 = product of:
          0.008544678 = sum of:
            0.008544678 = weight(_text_:information in 29) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008544678 = score(doc=29,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 29, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=29)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    When we first began discussing with Peter Paulson, executive director of OCLC Forest Press, the possibility of translating into Spanish the twentieth edition of the Dewey Decimal Classification, and even during the initial contact we had with the late John A. Humphry, we knew that the project would be a complex and hard task. The reality was that the project exceeded all expectations and was much more complex and difficult than we had anticipated. This not only made it more interesting for those who participated in its development, but also made it an extraordinary challenge, especially due to the time frame initially foreseen for its development: eight to ten months. Once we agreed with Peter Paulson on the basic terms of the project, Rojas Eberhard Editores was able to convince Information Handling Services (a company located in Denver, Colorado, known worldwide for its products and services in the field of technological information) to participate with us in this translation and publication project. Information Handling Services channeled its participation through its subsidiary in Mexico, to facilitate the integration of the project into the main zone of influence of the final product: Latin America.
  18. McIlwaine, I.: Knowledge classifications, bibliographic classifications and the Internet (1998) 0.00
    2.6310782E-4 = product of:
      0.0039466172 = sum of:
        0.0039466172 = product of:
          0.0078932345 = sum of:
            0.0078932345 = weight(_text_:information in 63) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0078932345 = score(doc=63,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 63, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=63)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    The advent of the Internet has intensified problems of classification and nomenclature in a range of disciplines that have been the concern of librarians and scientists for over a century. Biology and Medicine are selected as examples, and the work of specialists both in scientific systematics and taxonomy and in bibliographic classification is examined in order to suggest some solutions to current difficulties in information retrieval
  19. Mcllwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : a response to a challenge (2006) 0.00
    2.6310782E-4 = product of:
      0.0039466172 = sum of:
        0.0039466172 = product of:
          0.0078932345 = sum of:
            0.0078932345 = weight(_text_:information in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0078932345 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
  20. Mitchell, J.S.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) (2009) 0.00
    2.6310782E-4 = product of:
      0.0039466172 = sum of:
        0.0039466172 = product of:
          0.0078932345 = sum of:
            0.0078932345 = weight(_text_:information in 3873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0078932345 = score(doc=3873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3873)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates