Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Heiner-Freiling, M.: DDC Deutsch 22 : formale, terminologische und inhaltliche Aspekte einer deutschen DDC-Ausgabe (2001) 0.06 
    0.057250317 = product of:
  0.085875474 = sum of:
    0.06306415 = weight(_text_:im in 6993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06306415 = score(doc=6993,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.4372462 = fieldWeight in 6993, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6993)
    0.022811322 = product of:
      0.06843396 = sum of:
        0.06843396 = weight(_text_:22 in 6993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06843396 = score(doc=6993,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 6993, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6993)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Es werden die Überlegungen im Zusammenhang mit der Einführung der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation im deutschen Sprachraum dargestellt, wobei die künftige deutsche DDC-Ausgabe auf der Basis der 22. Auflage der Original-DDC im Mittelpunkt steht. Dringlich für eine deutsche Ausgabe sind neben Korrekturen und Expansionen für deutsche Sachverhalte, etwa im Bereich der geografischen Hilfstafel, die Schaffung eines deutschen Begriffsinventars für das Instrumentarium der DDC selbst und eine Integration der Terminologie der Schlagwortnormdatei, soweit das mit der Struktur einer Klassifikation vereinbar ist. Daneben kommt der über eine reine Übersetzung hinausgehenden Anpassung der Beispiele und Registereinträge der DDC an die Suchgewohnheiten deutschsprachiger Benutzer eine erhebliche Bedeutung zu.
  2. Kleiber, K.; Lindpointner, R.: DDC in Europa : Workshop "The use of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) in Europe: recent developments and future perspectives" und "Meeting of the European DDC users' group" (2007) 0.04 
    0.042025935 = product of:
  0.0630389 = sum of:
    0.033101782 = weight(_text_:im in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033101782 = score(doc=1286,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.22950643 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
    0.029937115 = product of:
      0.04490567 = sum of:
        0.015576826 = weight(_text_:online in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015576826 = score(doc=1286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.100593716 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
        0.029328842 = weight(_text_:22 in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029328842 = score(doc=1286,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    "Am 11. und 12. Juni 2007 fand in der Schweizer Nationalbibliothek in Bern unter dem Titel: "EDUG 2007 - Die Verwendung der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) in Europa: Aktuelle Entwicklungen und Perspektiven für die Zukunft" das erste europäische DDC-Anwendertreffen in Europa statt (wobei 'EDUG' für European Dewey Users Group steht). Organisatoren der Tagung waren Elena Balzardi und Patrice Landry von der Schweizer Nationalbibliothek. Unter den 55 Teilnehmern, davon gut die Hälfte aus der Schweiz, waren u.a. Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare aus Großbritannien, Frankreich, Italien, Griechenland, Schweden und Norwegen. Aus den USA war Joan Mitchell, die Herausgeberin der DDC zugegen, aus Deutschland u.a. Magda Heiner-Freiling (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) und aus Österreich Karin Kleiber (Nationalbibliothek) und Rudolf Lindpointner (00. Landesbibliothek). Am ersten Tag standen verschiedene Präsentationen zur Arbeit mit der DDC in Europa auf der Tagesordnung. Thema der ersten Vorträge von Federica Paradisi (Florenz), Anne-Celine Lambotte (Paris) und Heidrun Alex (Frankfurt) war die Verwendung von Dewey in Italien, Frankreich und Deutschland, Erfahrungen und Problematiken in einzelnen Bereichen. So wird z.B. in der Bibliothèque nationale de France DDC seit 1992 für die Freihand-Aufstellung verwendet und seit 2000 auch für die Neuzugänge im Magazin vergeben. In der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek werden seit Bibliografiejahrgang 2007 die Reihen A (Monografien und Periodika des Verlagsbuchhandels), B (Monografien und Periodika außerhalb des Verlagsbuchhandels) und H (Hochschulschriften) der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie mit vollständigen DDC-Notationen erschlossen. Probleme gibt es generell in den Bereichen des Rechts, des Erziehungssystems und bei der Archäologie (die BNP vergibt hier z.B. gegen die Regeln einen geographischen Zusatz).
    Der dann folgende Vortrag von Joan Mitchell mit dem programmatischen Titel "Locality and universality in the DDC" gab zuerst einen Überblick über die laufenden Übersetzungsprojekte, bezogen auf die Ed. 22, nämlich: Französisch, Italienisch, Spanisch, Griechisch, Arabisch und Chinesisch. Bezogen auf die Abridged Ed. 14 außerdem: Hebräisch und Vietnamesisch. Sie erwähnte auch den Einsatz von Dewey bei internationalen Projekten wie der "World Digital Library". Der zentrale Punkt des Vortrags betraf dann den Spagat zwischen ,Localization and Interoperability', d.h. zwischen Anpassung an regionale Gegebenheiten (wie z.B. Unterschiede in den Bereichen des Rechts- und Erziehungssystems) auf der einen Seite und Festhalten an der Durchgängigkeit der Bedeutung über alle Sprachen und Kulturen hinweg. Wie auch Magda Heiner-Freiling in ihrem Vortrag hinwies, hat sich die amerikanisch geprägte DDC im Zuge der Übersetzungsprojekte zwar schrittweise den Bedürfnissen der Benutzer in anderen Erdteilen geöffnet, dennoch bestehen noch zahlreiche Schwierigkeiten. Das von Heiner-Freiling erwähnte Beispiel der Pädagogik zeigte aber auch, dass Vorsicht bei Alleingängen auf nationaler Ebene geboten ist, da z.B. im Zuge des Bologna-Prozesses auch in Europa amerikanische institutionelle Strukturen und Terminologie im Bildungswesen Einzug halten. Weitere Vorträge befassten sich mit der Arbeit an elektronischen Verfahren zur automatischen Analyse von DDC-Notationen (Ulrike Reiner aus Göttingen), mit der DDC-Übersetzungs-Software, die für die Übersetzung ins Deutsche entwickelt wurde und nun auch in allen anderen Sprachen im Einsatz ist (Peter Werling, Fa. Pansoft) bzw. mit der DDC-Suche in verschiedenen Webportalen (Lars G. Svensson, DNB). Der abschließende Vortrag von Magda Heiner-Freiling (DNB) ging dann wieder ins Programmatische mit dem Vorschlag, eine gemeinsame European DDC Users Group (EDUG) zu gründen, um gemeinsame Anliegen der europäischen Dewey-User, was z.B. die anfangs erwähnten Probleme in einzelnen Bereichen betrifft, gemeinsam gegenüber den amerikanischen Herausgebern zu vertreten, um so mehr Einfluss auf die künftige Entwicklung der DDC zu haben.
    Wer sich näher für einzelne Themen interessiert, hat die Möglichkeit, auf der Homepage der Schweizer Nationalbibliothek die Präsentationsunterlagen der einzelnen Vorträge einzusehen (http://www.nb.admin.ch/slb/slb_professionnel/projektarbeit/00729/01615/01675/index.html?lang=de). Ziel des zweiten Tages war die Gründung einer europäischen DDC-Anwendergruppe zum Zweck der Vernetzung und Planung für die gemeinsame Entwicklungsarbeit. Anwesend waren Vertreterinnen der Nationalbibliotheken von Großbritannien, Deutschland, Frankreich, Schweden, Norwegen, Italien, Schweiz und Österreich sowie eine Vertreterin von OCLC. Eingeladen hatten die Nationalbibliotheken von Deutschland und der Schweiz. Vormittags wurde eine allgemeine Diskussion über die Ziele und Möglichkeiten einer solchen Anwendergruppe sowie allgemein über die Vorteile einer DDC-Anwendung in Europa diskutiert. Ziele von EDUG könnten sein: - Monitoring der europäischen DDC-Anwendungen - Kenntnis der unterschiedlichen Anwendungsregeln in den verschiedenen Ländern - Zugang auch zu den DDC-Übersetzungen in anderen Sprachen samt Expansionen - Zusammenarbeit beim Angebot von "built numbers" Zusammenarbeit mit OCLC als Vertreterin von europäischen Anliegen (die am Vortag ausführlich angesprochen worden waren) - Harmonisierung der Änderungen in den verschiedensprachigen Ausgaben (21./22. Ed., unterschiedliche Erweiterungen, anderer Sprachgebrauch) - Kooperation bei der Realisierung von technischen Plänen wie z.B. die automatische Klassifikation von Online-Dokumenten oder dem Mapping zu anderen Klassifikationssystemen - Weitergabe von Know-how und Erfahrungen an andere Interessierte Spontan wurden drei Arbeitsgruppen ins Leben gerufen, und zwar eine für technische Angelegenheiten und zwei inhaltliche für die kritischen Bereiche Recht und Erziehung. Nachmittags wurden die Satzungen von EDUG diskutiert und überarbeitet. Bei vielen Punkten wurde Übereinkunft erzielt. Einzelne Fragen blieben noch offen und sollen beim nächsten Treffen - wahrscheinlich im April 2008 in Frankfurt - endgültig fixiert werden."
  3. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.L.: Library of Congress Classification (LCC) (2009) 0.04 
    0.038828045 = product of:
  0.11648413 = sum of:
    0.11648413 = sum of:
      0.04405792 = weight(_text_:online in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04405792 = score(doc=3842,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051022716 = queryNorm
          0.284522 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
      0.03094897 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03094897 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051022716 = queryNorm
          0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
      0.04147724 = weight(_text_:22 in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04147724 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051022716 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Classification (LCC), originally designed for classifying the Library's own collection, is now used in a wide range of libraries, both in the United States and abroad. This entry recounts its history and development from its genesis to the present time, leading up to an explanation of LCC structure, tables, and notation. It then considers the system's potential for wider application in the online age, through speculation on using LCC as a tool for (a) partitioning large files; (b) generating domain-specific taxonomies; and (c) integrating classification and controlled subject terms for improved retrieval in the online public access catalog (OPAC) and the Internet. Finally, analyzing both its strong and relatively weak features, it addresses the question of whether in its current state LCC is in all respects ready for playing such roles
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:42
  4. Schmidt, A.F.: Vorschläge für eine partielle Modifikation der Dezimalklassifikation - dargestellt im Rahmen einer Kurzbeschreibung der DK (1987) 0.02 
    0.02402444 = product of:
  0.07207332 = sum of:
    0.07207332 = weight(_text_:im in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07207332 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.49970993 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  5. Mölgaard-Hansen, R.: UDC, DC und LC im Wettberwerb auf dem Gebiet der Universitäts-Bibliothek (1968) 0.02 
    0.02402444 = product of:
  0.07207332 = sum of:
    0.07207332 = weight(_text_:im in 1807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07207332 = score(doc=1807,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.49970993 = fieldWeight in 1807, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1807)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  6. Alex, H.: ¬Die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) (2018) 0.02 
    0.018205054 = product of:
  0.054615162 = sum of:
    0.054615162 = weight(_text_:im in 4338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054615162 = score(doc=4338,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.37866634 = fieldWeight in 4338, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4338)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) ist die international am weitesten verbreitete bibliothekarische Klassifikation. Ursprünglich vor allem im anglo-amerikanischen Raum eingesetzt, ist sie heute aufgrund vieler Übersetzungen unter anderem auch in Europa - seit Erscheinen der deutschen Ausgabe auch im deutschsprachigen Raum - weit verbreitet. Die Schwerpunkte dieses Beitrags liegen zum einen auf dem Klassifikationssystem selbst, indem z. B. sein Aufbau und die Notationsvergabe erklärt werden, und zum anderen auf der DDC-Anwendung im deutschsprachigen Raum (u. a. Projekt DDC Deutsch, WebDewey Deutsch, Anwendung der DDC in der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek).
  7. Oberhauser, O.: ¬Die Dewey Decimal Classification im Österreichischen Verbundkatalog : Status und Perspektiven (2009) 0.02 
    0.01801833 = product of:
  0.054054987 = sum of:
    0.054054987 = weight(_text_:im in 2922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054054987 = score(doc=2922,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.37478244 = fieldWeight in 2922, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2922)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag berichtet über quantitative und qualitative Aspekte der Präsenz von DDC-Notationen im Österreichischen Verbundkatalog. Obwohl die DDC in Österreich nur von sehr wenigen Bibliotheken aktiv verwendet wird, ist im Wege der Fremddatennutzung eine grössere Anzahl von DDC-Notationen in den Verbundkatalog gelangt - früher nur durch die Nutzung der British National Bibliography, jetzt aber zunehmend auch aus den Fremddaten der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek. Da letztere die Dewey-Notationen in einer anders strukturierten MAB-Kategorie ("DDC analytisch") liefert, war es erforderlich, durch die Implementierung eines Fix-Programmes für eine automatische Zusammenführung der DDC-Informationen zu sorgen. Zur Verbesserung der Datenqualität war überdies eine Reihe von Korrekturen notwendig, die überwiegend mit Hilfe automatischer Routinen erledigt konnten. Die DDC-Notationen sollen nun auch im OPAC des Verbundes angezeigt und für das Weiternavigieren verfügbar gemacht werden. Die dafür nötigen Parametrisierungsarbeiten beinhalten auch die Anzeige der (frei verfügbaren) deutschsprachigen Klassenbenennungen der ersten drei Hierarchieebenen jeder Notation, um den Benutzern den thematischen Umraum des jeweiligen Codes zu verdeutlichen.
  8. Heiner-Freiling, M.: DDC German - the project, the aims, the methods : new ideas for a well-established traditional classification system (2006) 0.02 
    0.016094714 = product of:
  0.048284143 = sum of:
    0.048284143 = product of:
      0.072426215 = sum of:
        0.03094897 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03094897 = score(doc=5779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
        0.04147724 = weight(_text_:22 in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04147724 = score(doc=5779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The paper will give a short outline of the project DDC German. The project is not limited to a mere translation of DDC 22, but aims at the implementation of Dewey in the library networks of the German-language countries. Use of DDC mainly for retrieval purposes, not for shelving, leads to certain new aspects in classifying with Dewey which are described in detail and presented together with the German web service Melvil. Based an the German experience of cooperation and data exchange in the field of verbal indexing the paper develops some ideas an future Dewey cooperation between European and American libraries.
  9. Lindpointner, R.: ¬Die Einführung der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) in der Oberösterreichischen Landesbibliothek (OÖLB) (2010) 0.02 
    0.015604331 = product of:
  0.046812993 = sum of:
    0.046812993 = weight(_text_:im in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046812993 = score(doc=4378,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.32457113 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Der Grund für die Einführung der DDC war die Umstellung auf Freihand durch den damals bevorstehenden Umbau und Ausbau der Bibliothek. Durch die Errichtung von 3 Tiefgeschoßen war es möglich, das gesamte oberirdische Magazin für das Publikum zu öffnen, wodurch die Publikumsflächen von vorher weniger als 200 m**2 auf nun 2200 m**2 ausgeweitet werden konnten. Zur Ausgangssituation: Wir hatten damals eine Freihand-Bibliothek im Umfang von einigen tausend Nachschlagewerken im Lesesaal, die wir einige Jahre zuvor - nach einem Umbau des Lesesaals - grob nach der 3-stelligen DDC aufgestellt hatten. Aber im Grunde genommen war das Thema Freihand für uns vollkommenes Neuland.
  10. Meink, P.: ¬Das Gestern und das Morgen mit einer DK von Heute : eine Klassifikation hält Schritt (1988) 0.02 
    0.015015274 = product of:
  0.045045823 = sum of:
    0.045045823 = weight(_text_:im in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045045823 = score(doc=2576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.3123187 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Wissensorganisation im Wandel: Dezimalklassifikation - Thesaurusfragen - Warenklassifikation. Proc. 11. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Aachen, 29.6.-1.7.1987. Hrsg.: H.-J. Hermes u. J. Hölzl
  11. Traiser, W.: Anwendung der Universellen Dezimalklassifikation in Nationalbibliographien (1988) 0.01 
    0.014864365 = product of:
  0.044593092 = sum of:
    0.044593092 = weight(_text_:im in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044593092 = score(doc=749,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.30917975 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Footnote
    Im Jahr 1977 hatte die Unesco in Paris eine Empfehlung für die Gliederung von Nationalbibliographien beschlossen [vgl. International Congress on National Bibliographies, Paris, 10.-15.9.1977, Final report. Paris: Unesco 1978. S.12, Recommendation 12 und International cataloguing 6(1977) S.43] und 2 Jahre später hinzugefügt, daß hierzu verwendet werden sollen entweder die DDC, die UDC/DK, die LCC und die Unesco-Classification. Die vorliegende Untersuchung beschränkt sich auf die europäischen Nationalbibliographien, von denen seit 1986 insgesamt 11 die DK verwenden ...
    Source
    Wissensorganisation im Wandel. Dezimalklassifikation - Thesaurusfragen - Warenklassifikation. Proc. 11. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Aachen, 29.6.-1.7.1987. Hrsg.: H.-J. Hermes u. J. Hölzl
  12. Beghtol, C.: Knowledge domains : multidisciplinarity and bibliographic classification systems (1998) 0.01 
    0.013800584 = product of:
  0.04140175 = sum of:
    0.04140175 = product of:
      0.062102623 = sum of:
        0.031153653 = weight(_text_:online in 2028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031153653 = score(doc=2028,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2028, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2028)
        0.03094897 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03094897 = score(doc=2028,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2028, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2028)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic classification systems purport to organize the world of knowledge for information storage and retrieval purposes in libraries and bibliographies, both manual and online. The major systems that have predominated during the 20th century were originally predicated on the academic disciplines. This structural principle is no longer adequate because multidisciplinray knowledge production has overtaken more traditional disciplinary perspectives and produced communities of cooperation whose documents cannot be accomodated in a disciplinary structure. This paper addresses the problems the major classifications face, reports some attempts to revise these systems to accomodate multidisciplinary works more appropriately, and describes some theoretical research perspectives that attempt to reorient classification research toward the pluralistic needs of multidisciplinary knowledge creation and the perspectives of different discourse communities. Traditionally, the primary desiderata of classification systems were mutual exclusivity and joint exhaustivity. The need to respond to multidisciplinary research may mean that hospitality will replace mutual exclusivity and joint exhaustivity as the most needed and useful characteristics of classification systems in both theory and practice
  13. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index : introduction (1985) 0.01 
    0.013011316 = product of:
  0.039033946 = sum of:
    0.039033946 = product of:
      0.058550917 = sum of:
        0.029371947 = weight(_text_:online in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029371947 = score(doc=3628,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.18968134 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
        0.029178968 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029178968 = score(doc=3628,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    To those outside the field of library science, the name Melvil Dewey (1851-1931) is virtually synonymous with library classification. To those in the field, Dewey has been recognized as the premier classification maker. His enormously successful system (i.e., successful in terms of the wide adoption of the system around the world for over one hundred years) has now undergone nineteen editions. The Dewey Decimal Classification has been translated into more than twenty languages and is the most widely adopted classification scheme in the world. Even in its earliest manifestations, the Dewey Decimal Classification contained features that anticipated modern classification theory. Among these are the use of mnemonics and the commonly applied standard subdivisions, later called "common isolates" by S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.), which are the mainstays of facet analysis and synthesis. The device of standard subdivisions is an indication of the recognition of common aspects that pervade all subjects. The use of mnemonics, whereby recurring concepts in the scheme are represented by the same notation, for example, geographic concepts and language concepts, eased the transition of the Dewey Decimal Classification from a largely enumerative system to an increasingly faceted one. Another significant feature of the Dewey Decimal Classification is the use of the hierarchical notation based an the arabic numeral system. To a large extent, this feature accounts for the wide use and success of the system in the world across language barriers. With the prospect of increasing online information retrieval, the hierarchical notation will have a significant impact an the effectiveness of the Dewey Decimal Classification as an online retrieval tool. Because the notation is hierarchical, for example, with increasing digits in a number representing narrower subjects and decreasing digits indicating broader subjects, the Dewey Decimal Classification is particularly useful in generic searches for broadening or narrowing search results. In the preface to the second edition of his Decimal Classification Dewey explained the features of his "new" system. The excerpt below presents his ideas and theory concerning the rational basis of his classification, the standard subdivisions, the hierarchical notation based an decimal numbers, the use of mnemonics, the relative index, and relative location. It also reflects Dewey's lifelong interest in simplified spelling.
  14. Preuss, M.: Wissen in Ordnung : eine Bibliotheksfantastik (2004) 0.01 
    0.01201222 = product of:
  0.03603666 = sum of:
    0.03603666 = weight(_text_:im in 3119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03603666 = score(doc=3119,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.24985497 = fieldWeight in 3119, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3119)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Bibliotheken sammeln Wissen und archivieren es abrufbereit. Wie soll aber eine große Menge an Informationen in Form unterschiedlichster Medien so geordnet werden, dass daraus zugreifbares Wissen entsteht? Bibliotheken (aber nicht nur die) in aller WeIt verwenden als Ordnungssystem für ihre Bestände die Dewey Decimal Classification oder kurz DDC. Zurzeit entsteht an der FH Köln im Rahmen eines Projektes der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) die erste deutsche Ausgabe dieser traditionsreichen Universalklassifikation.
  15. Hjoerland, B.; Albrechtsen, H.: ¬An analysis of some trends in classification research (1999) 0.01 
    0.011500487 = product of:
  0.03450146 = sum of:
    0.03450146 = product of:
      0.051752187 = sum of:
        0.025961377 = weight(_text_:online in 6391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025961377 = score(doc=6391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 6391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6391)
        0.025790809 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025790809 = score(doc=6391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 6391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6391)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper takes a second look at three prevailing main themes in knowledge organization: i) the academic disciplines as the main structural principle; ii) the fiction/non-fiction distinction; and iii) the appropriate unit of analysis in online retrieval systems. The history and origin of bibliographic classification [Dewey, Bliss, Mills, Beghtol] are discussed from the perspective of pragmatist philosophy and social studies of science [Kuhn, Merton, Reich]. Choices of structural principles in different schemes are found to rely on more or less implicit philosophical foundations, ranging from rationalism to pragmatism. It is further shown how the increasing application of faceted structures as basic structural principles in universal classification schemes [DDC, UDC] impose rationalistic principles and structures for knowledge organization which are not in alignment with the development of knowledge in the covered disciplines. Further evidence of rationalism in knowledge organization is the fiction/non-fiction distinction, excluding the important role of artistic resources for, in particular, humanistic research. Finally, for the analysis of appropriate bibliographic unit, it is argued that there is a need to shift towards a semiotic approach, founded on an understanding of intertextuality, rather than applying standard principles of hierarchical decomposition of documents. It is concluded that a change in classification research is needed, founded on a more historical and social understanding of knowledge
  16. Slavic, A.; Davies, S.: Facet analysis in UDC : questions of structure, functionality and data formality (2017) 0.01 
    0.011500487 = product of:
  0.03450146 = sum of:
    0.03450146 = product of:
      0.051752187 = sum of:
        0.025961377 = weight(_text_:online in 3848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025961377 = score(doc=3848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 3848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3848)
        0.025790809 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025790809 = score(doc=3848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 3848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3848)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The paper will look into different patterns of facet analysis used in the UDC schedules and how these affect the scheme presentation, the underlying data structure and the management of the classification scheme. From the very beginning, UDC was designed to represent the universe of knowledge as an integral whole allowing for subjects/concepts from all fields of knowledge to be combined, linked and the nature of their relationships made explicit. In Otlet's original design, the emphasis for his new type of classification was on the coordination of classmarks at the point of searching, i.e., post-coordination, which he firmly rooted in an expressive notational system. While some UDC classes exhibit various patterns of facet analytical theory proper, others, although used in an analytico-synthetic fashion, follow less canonical structural patterns. The authors highlight the lack of connection made throughout the various stages of UDC restructuring between: a) theoretical requirements of an overarching facet analytical theory as a founding principle guiding the construction of schedules; and, b) practical requirements for an analytico-synthetic classification in terms of notational presentation and data structure that enables its use in indexing and retrieval, as well as its management online.
  17. Hajdu Barat, A.: Knowledge organization of the Universal Decimal Classification : new solutions, user friendly methods from Hungary (2004) 0.01 
    0.011099571 = product of:
  0.033298712 = sum of:
    0.033298712 = product of:
      0.049948066 = sum of:
        0.0207691 = weight(_text_:online in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0207691 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
        0.029178968 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029178968 = score(doc=2649,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper aims at exploring the changes in the role and representation of information retrieval languages, particularly the UDC system in the digital, online environment and the Internet. The Totalzoom Technology takes a different approach, with the help of which even a lay user can easily navigate in the "informational space". This system follows the free associative nature of human thinking. Technically, it works with the wide degree of freedom afforded by a logical-associative network, coupled with a hierarchical search tree as an inner auxiliary structure.
    Content
    1. Introduction The use of classical classification methods are a strong tradition in Hungary. One of the most widespread systems is the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). We can find it in every type of library and at various levels. Perhaps it is not an overstatement to say that every library has used the UDC at least once in its history, and most of them still use it. Such standardization has been very wide and desirable, although the UDC has not become as popular a system among users everywhere as it has in Hungary. Naturally there are other information retrieval languages, too. They have been used by many libraries, but generally these institutions build their own subject system, own thesaurus, etc. There have also been attempts at creating a Hungarian General Subject s, like a Library of Congress Subject Headings or Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog. Another project was the KÖZTAURUSZ (Comprehensive Thesaurus for the Public Libraries) and the National Széchényi Library's thesaurus. To what do we owe such a variety of approaches? The typical answer of 15-20 years ago was that the UDC lacked flexibility, its codes could not readily be used in integrated library systems, its terms were out of date and not concrete enough, etc.
  18. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22: Dewey in the world, the world in Dewey (2004) 0.01 
    0.008587588 = product of:
  0.025762763 = sum of:
    0.025762763 = product of:
      0.077288285 = sum of:
        0.077288285 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077288285 = score(doc=2644,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.43256867 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In 2003, OCLC published Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22), in print and Web versions. The changes and updates in the new edition reflect a modern view of knowledge structures and address the general needs of Dewey users. The content of DDC 22 has been shaped by a number of social, geopolitical, and technical trends. The World Wide Web has provided a vehicle for more frequent distribution of updates to the DDC, and a medium for direct communication with Dewey users around the world. In addition to updating the system itself, other strategies are needed to accommodate the needs of the global Dewey user community. Translation of the system is one approach; another is mapping. Mapping terminology to the DDC is a strategy for supporting effective local implementation of the system while maintaining the internal cohesiveness of the DDC. This paper explores the usefulness of mapping terminology from English-language general subject headings lists produced outside the U.S.
    Object
    DDC-22
  19. Lorenz, B.: ¬Die DDC im Umfeld der Entwicklung dezimaler Klassifikationen (2008) 0.01 
    0.007507637 = product of:
  0.022522911 = sum of:
    0.022522911 = weight(_text_:im in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022522911 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051022716 = queryNorm
        0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  20. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01 
    0.006144777 = product of:
  0.01843433 = sum of:
    0.01843433 = product of:
      0.055302992 = sum of:
        0.055302992 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055302992 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 19
  • d 13
  • f 1

Themes