Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Drabenstott, K.M.: Web search strategies (2000) 0.07
    0.07009317 = product of:
      0.14018634 = sum of:
        0.14018634 = sum of:
          0.11216822 = weight(_text_:searching in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11216822 = score(doc=1188,freq=18.0), product of:
              0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051699217 = queryNorm
              0.53633493 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
                4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                  18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
          0.02801812 = weight(_text_:22 in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02801812 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051699217 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Surfing the World Wide Web used to be cool, dude, real cool. But things have gotten hot - so hot that finding something useful an the Web is no longer cool. It is suffocating Web searchers in the smoke and debris of mountain-sized lists of hits, decisions about which search engines they should use, whether they will get lost in the dizzying maze of a subject directory, use the right syntax for the search engine at hand, enter keywords that are likely to retrieve hits an the topics they have in mind, or enlist a browser that has sufficient functionality to display the most promising hits. When it comes to Web searching, in a few short years we have gone from the cool image of surfing the Web into the frying pan of searching the Web. We can turn down the heat by rethinking what Web searchers are doing and introduce some order into the chaos. Web search strategies that are tool-based-oriented to specific Web searching tools such as search en gines, subject directories, and meta search engines-have been widely promoted, and these strategies are just not working. It is time to dissect what Web searching tools expect from searchers and adjust our search strategies to these new tools. This discussion offers Web searchers help in the form of search strategies that are based an strategies that librarians have been using for a long time to search commercial information retrieval systems like Dialog, NEXIS, Wilsonline, FirstSearch, and Data-Star.
    Content
    "Web searching is different from searching commercial IR systems. We can learn from search strategies recommended for searching IR systems, but most won't be effective for Web searching. Web searchers need strate gies that let search engines do the job they were designed to do. This article presents six new Web searching strategies that do just that."
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  2. Lawrence, S.; Giles, C.L.: Searching the World Wide Web (1998) 0.04
    0.03738941 = product of:
      0.07477882 = sum of:
        0.07477882 = product of:
          0.14955764 = sum of:
            0.14955764 = weight(_text_:searching in 4102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14955764 = score(doc=4102,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 4102, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Lawrence, S.; Giles, C.L.: Searching the World Wide Web (1998) 0.04
    0.03738941 = product of:
      0.07477882 = sum of:
        0.07477882 = product of:
          0.14955764 = sum of:
            0.14955764 = weight(_text_:searching in 6428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14955764 = score(doc=6428,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 6428, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Spink, A.; Wolfram, D.; Jansen, B.J.; Saracevic, T.: Searching the Web : the public and their queries (2001) 0.03
    0.026438305 = product of:
      0.05287661 = sum of:
        0.05287661 = product of:
          0.10575322 = sum of:
            0.10575322 = weight(_text_:searching in 6980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10575322 = score(doc=6980,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.5056614 = fieldWeight in 6980, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6980)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In previous articles, we reported the state of Web searching in 1997 (Jansen, Spink, & Saracevic, 2000) and in 1999 (Spink, Wolfram, Jansen, & Saracevic, 2001). Such snapshot studies and statistics on Web use appear regularly (OCLC, 1999), but provide little information about Web searching trends. In this article, we compare and contrast results from our two previous studies of Excite queries' data sets, each containing over 1 million queries submitted by over 200,000 Excite users collected on 16 September 1997 and 20 December 1999. We examine how public Web searching changing during that 2-year time period. As Table 1 shows, the overall structure of Web queries in some areas did not change, while in others we see change from 1997 to 1999. Our comparison shows how Web searching changed incrementally and also dramatically. We see some moves toward greater simplicity, including shorter queries (i.e., fewer terms) and shorter sessions (i.e., fewer queries per user), with little modification (addition or deletion) of terms in subsequent queries. The trend toward shorter queries suggests that Web information content should target specific terms in order to reach Web users. Another trend was to view fewer pages of results per query. Most Excite users examined only one page of results per query, since an Excite results page contains ten ranked Web sites. Were users satisfied with the results and did not need to view more pages? It appears that the public continues to have a low tolerance of wading through retrieved sites. This decline in interactivity levels is a disturbing finding for the future of Web searching. Queries that included Boolean operators were in the minority, but the percentage increased between the two time periods. Most Boolean use involved the AND operator with many mistakes. The use of relevance feedback almost doubled from 1997 to 1999, but overall use was still small. An unusually large number of terms were used with low frequency, such as personal names, spelling errors, non-English words, and Web-specific terms, such as URLs. Web query vocabulary contains more words than found in large English texts in general. The public language of Web queries has its own and unique characteristics. How did Web searching topics change from 1997 to 1999? We classified a random sample of 2,414 queries from 1997 and 2,539 queries from 1999 into 11 categories (Table 2). From 1997 to 1999, Web searching shifted from entertainment, recreation and sex, and pornography, preferences to e-commerce-related topics under commerce, travel, employment, and economy. This shift coincided with changes in information distribution on the publicly indexed Web.
  5. Slone, D.J.: ¬The impact of time constraints on Internet and Web use (2007) 0.02
    0.024285134 = product of:
      0.048570268 = sum of:
        0.048570268 = product of:
          0.097140536 = sum of:
            0.097140536 = weight(_text_:searching in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097140536 = score(doc=431,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.46447968 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines the influence of time constraints on Internet and Web search goals and search behavior. Specifically, it looks at the searching behavior of public library Internet users who, previously limited to 30 minutes per Internet session, are given an unlimited amount of time for use. Interviews and observations were conducted with 34 participants searching on their own queries. Despite an increase in the time allowed for searching, most people spent less than 30 minutes on the Internet, carrying out tasks like paying bills, shopping, browsing, and making reservations. Those who took more than 30 minutes were looking for jobs or browsing. E-mail use was universal. In this context, influences like time-dependent and time-independent tasks, use of search hubs to perform more efficient searches, and search diversity were recorded. Though there are a number of large and small studies of Internet and Web use, few of them focus on temporal influences. This study extends knowledge in this area of inquiry.
  6. Hannemann, M.: Online ins Schlaraffenland der Wissenschaft : Literatur-Recherche im Internet ist ein teures Unterfangen ohne Erfolgsgarantie - Doch wer systematisch sucht, gelangt zügig ans Ziel (1999) 0.02
    0.02101359 = product of:
      0.04202718 = sum of:
        0.04202718 = product of:
          0.08405436 = sum of:
            0.08405436 = weight(_text_:22 in 3106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08405436 = score(doc=3106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3106)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  7. Notess, G.R.: Mega-searching from the desktop (1997) 0.02
    0.018694704 = product of:
      0.03738941 = sum of:
        0.03738941 = product of:
          0.07477882 = sum of:
            0.07477882 = weight(_text_:searching in 433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07477882 = score(doc=433,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 433, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=433)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Sieverts, E.: Liever browsen dan zoeken (1998) 0.02
    0.018694704 = product of:
      0.03738941 = sum of:
        0.03738941 = product of:
          0.07477882 = sum of:
            0.07477882 = weight(_text_:searching in 4722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07477882 = score(doc=4722,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 4722, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4722)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: A preference for browsing rather than searching
  9. Eggeling, T.; Kroschel, A.: Alles finden im Web (2000) 0.02
    0.017511327 = product of:
      0.035022654 = sum of:
        0.035022654 = product of:
          0.07004531 = sum of:
            0.07004531 = weight(_text_:22 in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07004531 = score(doc=4884,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2000 14:06:22
  10. Sauer, D.: Alles schneller finden (2001) 0.02
    0.017511327 = product of:
      0.035022654 = sum of:
        0.035022654 = product of:
          0.07004531 = sum of:
            0.07004531 = weight(_text_:22 in 6835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07004531 = score(doc=6835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11.11.2001 17:25:22
  11. Ross, N.C.M.; Wolfram, D.: End user searching on the Internet : an analysis of term pair topics submitted to the Excite search engine (2000) 0.01
    0.014021028 = product of:
      0.028042056 = sum of:
        0.028042056 = product of:
          0.05608411 = sum of:
            0.05608411 = weight(_text_:searching in 4998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05608411 = score(doc=4998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 4998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Garnsey, M.R.: What distance learners should know about information retrieval on the World Wide Web (2002) 0.01
    0.014021028 = product of:
      0.028042056 = sum of:
        0.028042056 = product of:
          0.05608411 = sum of:
            0.05608411 = weight(_text_:searching in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05608411 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Internet can be a valuable tool allowing distance learners to access information not available locally. Search engines are the most common means of locating relevant information an the Internet, but to use them efficiently students should be taught the basics of searching and how to evaluate the results. This article briefly reviews how Search engines work, studies comparing Search engines, and criteria useful in evaluating the quality of returned Web pages. Research indicates there are statistical differences in the precision of Search engines, with AltaVista ranking high in several studies. When evaluating the quality of Web pages, standard criteria used in evaluating print resources is appropriate, as well as additional criteria which relate to the Web site itself. Giving distance learners training in how to use Search engines and how to evaluate the results will allow them to access relevant information efficiently while ensuring that it is of adequate quality.
  13. Warnick, W.L.; Leberman, A.; Scott, R.L.; Spence, K.J.; Johnsom, L.A.; Allen, V.S.: Searching the deep Web : directed query engine applications at the Department of Energy (2001) 0.01
    0.014021028 = product of:
      0.028042056 = sum of:
        0.028042056 = product of:
          0.05608411 = sum of:
            0.05608411 = weight(_text_:searching in 1215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05608411 = score(doc=1215,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 1215, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1215)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Choo, C.W.; Detlor, B.; Turnbull, D.: Information seeking on the Web : an integrated model of browsing and searching (1999) 0.01
    0.013219153 = product of:
      0.026438305 = sum of:
        0.026438305 = product of:
          0.05287661 = sum of:
            0.05287661 = weight(_text_:searching in 6692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05287661 = score(doc=6692,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.2528307 = fieldWeight in 6692, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper presents findings from a study of how knowledge workers use the Web to seek external information as part of their daily work. Thirty four users from seven companies took part in the study. Participants were mainly IT specialists, managers, and research/marketing/consulting staff working in organizations that included a large utility company, a major bank, and a consulting firm. Participants answered a detailed questionnaire and were interviewed individually in order to understand their information needs and information seeking preferences. A custom-developed WebTracker Software application was installed an each of their workplace PCs, and participants' Web-use activities were then recorded continuously during two-week periods. The WebTracker recorded how participants used the browser to seek information an the Web: it logged menu choices, button bar selections, and keystroke actions, allowing browsing and searching sequences to be reconstructed. In a second round of personal Interviews, participants recalled critical incidents of using information from the Web.Data from the two Interviews and the WebTracker logs constituted the database for analysis. Sixty one significant episodes of Information seeking were identified. A model was developed to describe the common repertoires of Information seeking that were observed. On one axis of the model, episodes were plotted according to the four scanning modes identified by Aguilar (1967), Weick and Daft (1983): undirected viewing, conditioned viewing, informal search, and formal search. Each mode is characterized by its own Information needs and Information seeking strategies. On the other axis of the model, episodes were plotted according to the occurence of one or more of the six categories of information seeking behaviors identified by Ellis (1989, 1990): starting, chaining, browsing, differentiating, monitoring, and extracting. The study suggests that a behavioral framework that relates motivations (Aguilar) and moves (Ellis) may be helpful in analysing patterns of Web-based Information seeking
  15. Bertelmann, R.; Rusch-Feja, D.: Informationsretrieval im Internet : Surfen, Browsen, Suchen - mit einem Überblick über strukturierte Informationsangebote (1997) 0.01
    0.012257928 = product of:
      0.024515856 = sum of:
        0.024515856 = product of:
          0.049031712 = sum of:
            0.049031712 = weight(_text_:22 in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049031712 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2000 11:31:22
  16. Hsieh-Yee, I.: ¬The retrieval power of selected search engines : how well do they address general reference questions and subject questions? (1998) 0.01
    0.012257928 = product of:
      0.024515856 = sum of:
        0.024515856 = product of:
          0.049031712 = sum of:
            0.049031712 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049031712 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:22:51
  17. Wiley, D.L.: Beyond information retrieval : ways to provide content in context (1998) 0.01
    0.012257928 = product of:
      0.024515856 = sum of:
        0.024515856 = product of:
          0.049031712 = sum of:
            0.049031712 = weight(_text_:22 in 3647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049031712 = score(doc=3647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Database. 21(1998) no.4, S.18-22
  18. Mansourian, I.: Web search efficacy : definition and implementation (2008) 0.01
    0.01168419 = product of:
      0.02336838 = sum of:
        0.02336838 = product of:
          0.04673676 = sum of:
            0.04673676 = weight(_text_:searching in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04673676 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.22347288 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to report a number of factors that are perceived by web users as influential elements in their search procedure. The paper introduces a new conceptual measure called "web search efficacy" (hereafter WSE) to evaluate the performance of searches mainly based on users' perceptions. Design/methodology/approach - A rich dataset of a wider study was inductively re-explored to identify different categories that are perceived influential by web users on the final outcome of their searches. A selective review of the literature was carried out to discover to what extent previous research supports the findings of the current study. Findings - The analysis of the dataset led to the identification of five categories of influential factors. Within each group different factors have been recognized. Accordingly, the concept of WSE has been introduced. The five "Ss" which determine WSE are searcher's performance, search tool's performance, search strategy, search topic, and search situation. Research limitations/implications - The research body is scattered in different areas and it is difficult to carry out a comprehensive review. The WSE table, which is derived from the empirical data and was supported by previous research, can be employed for further research in various groups of web users. Originality/value - The paper contributes to the area of information seeking on the web by providing researchers with a new conceptual framework to evaluate the efficiency of each search session and identify the underlying factors on the final outcome of web searching.
  19. Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998) 0.01
    0.010506795 = product of:
      0.02101359 = sum of:
        0.02101359 = product of:
          0.04202718 = sum of:
            0.04202718 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04202718 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  20. Schultheiß, G.F.: Google, Goggle, Google, ... : Whose Mind is it Anywhere? Identifying and Meeting Divers User Needs in the Ongoing Sattle for Mindshare - NFAIS 47th Annual Conference, Philadelphia, USA vom 27. Februar bis 1. März 2005 (2005) 0.01
    0.010506795 = product of:
      0.02101359 = sum of:
        0.02101359 = product of:
          0.04202718 = sum of:
            0.04202718 = weight(_text_:22 in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04202718 = score(doc=3421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 13:38:26