Search (543 results, page 1 of 28)

  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  1. Wesch, M.: Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us (2006) 0.10
    0.104189366 = product of:
      0.20837873 = sum of:
        0.20837873 = sum of:
          0.15261425 = weight(_text_:v in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15261425 = score(doc=3478,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.6089284 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
          0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055764485 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Final version now available! http://youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g http://mediatedcultures.net A higher quality version is available for download here: http://www.mediafire.com/?6duzg3zioyd. Please note that this is the second draft and the final version will not be available until late February after I review all comments and revise the video. Please return for a new download link at that time.
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
    Source
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4nk0EOE
  2. Münch, V.: Internet bringt den Massenmarkt : Messebericht von der Online Information '94 in London (1995) 0.08
    0.081839524 = product of:
      0.16367905 = sum of:
        0.16367905 = sum of:
          0.10791456 = weight(_text_:v in 646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10791456 = score(doc=646,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 646, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=646)
          0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055764485 = score(doc=646,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 646, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cogito. 11(1995) H.1, S.19-22
  3. Suche 3.0 (2009) 0.08
    0.081839524 = product of:
      0.16367905 = sum of:
        0.16367905 = sum of:
          0.10791456 = weight(_text_:v in 3198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10791456 = score(doc=3198,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 3198, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3198)
          0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055764485 = score(doc=3198,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3198, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3198)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    Footnote
    Weitere Artikel auf S.2-3: Berberich, C.: Wie das Netz zwitschert - Beuth, P.: Kurz und fündig - Beuth, P. u. V. Funk: Ein Artikel, der nie fertig wird
  4. Andrade, T.C.; Dodebei, V.: Traces of digitized newspapers and bom-digital news sites : a trail to the memory on the internet (2016) 0.08
    0.081839524 = product of:
      0.16367905 = sum of:
        0.16367905 = sum of:
          0.10791456 = weight(_text_:v in 4901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10791456 = score(doc=4901,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 4901, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4901)
          0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 4901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055764485 = score(doc=4901,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4901, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4901)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 1.2019 17:42:22
  5. Znidersic, M.: DOI - Digital Object Identifier : Revolucijy v upravljanju in trgovanju z avtorsko pravno zascitenimi informacijami na Internetu v tretjem tisocletju (1997) 0.07
    0.0749507 = sum of:
      0.017720366 = product of:
        0.07088146 = sum of:
          0.07088146 = weight(_text_:authors in 1372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07088146 = score(doc=1372,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1372, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1372)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.05723034 = product of:
        0.11446068 = sum of:
          0.11446068 = weight(_text_:v in 1372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11446068 = score(doc=1372,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.45669627 = fieldWeight in 1372, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1372)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information technology has brought with it the problem of protecting authors' rights related to copyrighted works on electronic media. Describes a new system of labelling copyrighted works on the Internet, called DOI, developed in the USA. At the presentation at the bookfair in Frankfurt, 250.000 works were leabelled with DOI. The system is universal and enables the inclusion of current standard identifiers (ISBN, ISSN, SICI). The fact that a DOI identifier stays 'glued on' forever, makes the identification of the carrier of copyright possible at any moment. The DOI system presents the infrastructure system for trading in and use of copyrighted works over the Internet in the third millennium
  6. Quint, V.; Roisin, C.; Vatton, I.: ¬A structured authoring environment for the World-Wide Web (1995) 0.07
    0.06788638 = sum of:
      0.020673761 = product of:
        0.082695045 = sum of:
          0.082695045 = weight(_text_:authors in 2231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.082695045 = score(doc=2231,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2231, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2231)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.047212623 = product of:
        0.094425246 = sum of:
          0.094425246 = weight(_text_:v in 2231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.094425246 = score(doc=2231,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 2231, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2231)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Authoring documents for the WWW is not always an easy task. Most authors either directly type HTML syntax with an text editor or convert files that they produce with various document preparation systems, but both methods pose problems. Proposes another approach, based on a structured document editor, Grif. Analyzes the main characteristics of HTML documents and presents the extensions that the extensions that these documents have imposed to the Grif editor. With these extension, Grif becomes a comfortable environment for authoring WWW documents, and it allows better and more rogorously structured documents to be produced. It also allows a smooth evolution towards SGML
  7. Alfaro, L.de: How (much) to trust Wikipedia (2008) 0.06
    0.06325725 = sum of:
      0.029533945 = product of:
        0.11813578 = sum of:
          0.11813578 = weight(_text_:authors in 2138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11813578 = score(doc=2138,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 2138, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2138)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.033723302 = product of:
        0.067446604 = sum of:
          0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 2138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.067446604 = score(doc=2138,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 2138, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2138)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia: anyone can contribute to its articles simply by clicking on an "edit'' button. The open nature of the Wikipedia has been key to its success, but has a flip side: if anyone can edit, how can readers know whether to trust its content? To help answer this question, we have developed a reputation system for Wikipedia authors, and a trust system for Wikipedia text. Authors gain reputation when their contributions are long-lived, and they lose reputation when their contributions are undone in short order. Each word in the Wikipedia is assigned a value of trust that depends on the reputation of its author, as well as on the reputation of the authors that subsequently revised the text where the word appears. To validate our algorithms, we show that reputation and trust have good predictive value: higher-reputation authors are more likely to give lasting contributions, and higher-trust text is less likely to be edited. The trust can be visualized via an intuitive coloring of the text background. The coloring provides an effective way of spotting attempts to tamper with Wikipedia information. A trust-colored version of the entire English Wikipedia can be browsed at http://trust.cse.ucsc.edu/
    Source
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6mB4soRlR8&NR=1
  8. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994) 0.05
    0.051509395 = sum of:
      0.023627155 = product of:
        0.09450862 = sum of:
          0.09450862 = weight(_text_:authors in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09450862 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.027882243 = product of:
        0.055764485 = sum of:
          0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055764485 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
  9. Cetron, M.; Davies, O.: Mastering information in the new century (1994) 0.05
    0.051509395 = sum of:
      0.023627155 = product of:
        0.09450862 = sum of:
          0.09450862 = weight(_text_:authors in 5027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09450862 = score(doc=5027,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 5027, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5027)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.027882243 = product of:
        0.055764485 = sum of:
          0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 5027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055764485 = score(doc=5027,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5027, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5027)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Offers a thought-provoking forecast abouit the development of the information superhighway and the changes it will bring. Focusing on the legal, social and political implications of the enormous growth of information, the authors focus on anticipated changes in the professional and personal lives of people throughout the developed world
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.1, S.62 (R.F. Rose)
  10. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.05
    0.0502218 = sum of:
      0.025577148 = product of:
        0.10230859 = sum of:
          0.10230859 = weight(_text_:authors in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10230859 = score(doc=2808,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024644654 = product of:
        0.04928931 = sum of:
          0.04928931 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04928931 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  11. Broughton, V.; Lane, H.: Classification schemes revisited : applications to Web indexing and searching (2000) 0.05
    0.048490275 = sum of:
      0.0147669725 = product of:
        0.05906789 = sum of:
          0.05906789 = weight(_text_:authors in 2476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05906789 = score(doc=2476,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2476, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2476)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.033723302 = product of:
        0.067446604 = sum of:
          0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 2476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.067446604 = score(doc=2476,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 2476, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2476)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    A short discussion of using classification systems to organize the web, one of many such. The authors are both involved with BC2 and naturally think it is the best system for organizing information online. They list reasons why faceted classifications are best (e.g. no theoretical limits to specificity or exhaustivity; easier to handle complex subjects; flexible enough to accommodate different user needs) and take a brief look at how BC2 works. They conclude with a discussion of how and why it should be applied to online resources, and a plea for recognition of the importance of classification and subject analysis skills, even when full-text searching is available and databases respond instantly.
  12. Kuperman, V.: Productivity in the Internet mailing lists : a bibliometric analysis (2006) 0.05
    0.048490275 = sum of:
      0.0147669725 = product of:
        0.05906789 = sum of:
          0.05906789 = weight(_text_:authors in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05906789 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.033723302 = product of:
        0.067446604 = sum of:
          0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.067446604 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The author examines patterns of productivity in the Internet mailing lists, also known as discussion lists or discussion groups. Datasets have been collected from electronic archives of two Internet mailing lists, the LINGUIST and the History of the English Language. Theoretical models widely used in informetric research have been applied to fit the distribution of posted messages over the population of authors. The Generalized Inverse Poisson-Gaussian and Poisson-lognormal distributions show excellent results in both datasets, while Lotka and Yule-Simon distribution demonstrate poor-to-mediocre fits. In the mailing list where moderation and quality control are enforced to a higher degree, i.e., the LINGUIST, Lotka, and Yule-Simon distributions perform better. The findings can be plausibly explained by the lesser applicability of the success-breedssuccess model to the information production in the electronic communication media, such as Internet mailing lists, where selectivity of publications is marginal or nonexistent. The hypothesis is preliminary, and needs to be validated against the larger variety of datasets. Characteristics of the quality control, competitiveness, and the reward structure in Internet mailing lists as compared to professional scholarly journals are discussed.
  13. Internet : mailing lists (1993) 0.05
    0.047212623 = product of:
      0.094425246 = sum of:
        0.094425246 = product of:
          0.18885049 = sum of:
            0.18885049 = weight(_text_:v in 8001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18885049 = score(doc=8001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 8001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Editor
    Hardie, E.T.L. u. V. Neou
  14. Brochard, C.; Ruck, V.: Internet : das sechste Medium? (2000) 0.05
    0.047212623 = product of:
      0.094425246 = sum of:
        0.094425246 = product of:
          0.18885049 = sum of:
            0.18885049 = weight(_text_:v in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18885049 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Capps, M.; Ladd, B.; Stotts, D.: Enhanced graph models in the Web : multi-client, multi-head, multi-tail browsing (1996) 0.05
    0.045070723 = sum of:
      0.020673761 = product of:
        0.082695045 = sum of:
          0.082695045 = weight(_text_:authors in 5860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.082695045 = score(doc=5860,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5860, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5860)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024396962 = product of:
        0.048793923 = sum of:
          0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 5860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048793923 = score(doc=5860,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5860, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5860)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Richer graph models permit authors to 'program' the browsing behaviour they want WWW readers to see by turning the hypertext into a hyperprogram with specific semantics. Multiple browsing streams can be started under the author's control and then kept in step through the synchronization mechanisms provided by the graph model. Adds a Semantic Web Graph Layer (SWGL) which allows dynamic interpretation of link and node structures according to graph models. Details the SWGL and its architecture, some sample protocol implementations, and the latest extensions to MHTML
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  16. Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993) 0.05
    0.045070723 = sum of:
      0.020673761 = product of:
        0.082695045 = sum of:
          0.082695045 = weight(_text_:authors in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.082695045 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024396962 = product of:
        0.048793923 = sum of:
          0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048793923 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
    Source
    Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
  17. Kavcic-Colic, A.: Archiving the Web : some legal aspects (2003) 0.05
    0.045070723 = sum of:
      0.020673761 = product of:
        0.082695045 = sum of:
          0.082695045 = weight(_text_:authors in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.082695045 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024396962 = product of:
        0.048793923 = sum of:
          0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 4754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048793923 = score(doc=4754,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4754, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4754)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Technological developments have changed the concepts of publication, reproduction and distribution. However, legislation, and in particular the Legal Deposit Law has not adjusted to these changes - it is very restrictive in the sense of protecting the rights of authors of electronic publications. National libraries and national archival institutions, being aware of their important role in preserving the written and spoken cultural heritage, try to find different legal ways to live up to these responsibilities. This paper presents some legal aspects of archiving Web pages, examines the harvesting of Web pages, provision of public access to pages, and their long-term preservation.
    Date
    10.12.2005 11:22:13
  18. Münch, V.: ¬Eine vielbefahrene Datenautobahn ohne Verkehrsregeln : Führt das Internet die Wissenschaft ins Chaos? Deutsche Fachinformationszentren warnen, unklare Gebührenstruktur (1994) 0.04
    0.04046796 = product of:
      0.08093592 = sum of:
        0.08093592 = product of:
          0.16187184 = sum of:
            0.16187184 = weight(_text_:v in 8616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16187184 = score(doc=8616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.64586604 = fieldWeight in 8616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8616)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Münch, V.: Im Kampf gegen die 'alten grauen Herren' der Information : Internet-User fürchten um ihre Plattform für den hierarchiefreien Wissenschaftsdiskurs; Debatte zur Zukunft des Publizierens (1994) 0.04
    0.04046796 = product of:
      0.08093592 = sum of:
        0.08093592 = product of:
          0.16187184 = sum of:
            0.16187184 = weight(_text_:v in 8617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16187184 = score(doc=8617,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.64586604 = fieldWeight in 8617, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8617)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Herrero Solana, V.; Moya Anegon, F. de: Bibliographic displays of Web-based OPACs : multivariate analysis applied to Latin-American catalogues (2001) 0.04
    0.04046796 = product of:
      0.08093592 = sum of:
        0.08093592 = product of:
          0.16187184 = sum of:
            0.16187184 = weight(_text_:v in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16187184 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.64586604 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Years

Languages

  • e 283
  • d 246
  • f 8
  • ru 2
  • ? 1
  • el 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 463
  • m 50
  • s 22
  • el 16
  • r 2
  • x 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications