-
LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008)
0.08
0.08342713 = sum of:
0.018274104 = product of:
0.07309642 = sum of:
0.07309642 = weight(_text_:authors in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07309642 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.065153025 = sum of:
0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041575856 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.060995437 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060995437 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
- Abstract
- Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:28
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.1, S.54-59
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.05
0.050331432 = product of:
0.100662865 = sum of:
0.100662865 = sum of:
0.014402301 = weight(_text_:s in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014402301 = score(doc=2622,freq=6.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.24967289 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.086260565 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.086260565 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
- Pages
- 456 S
-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.04
0.03940656 = product of:
0.07881312 = sum of:
0.07881312 = sum of:
0.00692931 = weight(_text_:s in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00692931 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.07188381 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07188381 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.3, S.160-167
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.03
0.031525247 = product of:
0.06305049 = sum of:
0.06305049 = sum of:
0.005543448 = weight(_text_:s in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005543448 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.057507046 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057507046 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.3, S.148-163
-
Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007)
0.03
0.031525247 = product of:
0.06305049 = sum of:
0.06305049 = sum of:
0.005543448 = weight(_text_:s in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005543448 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.057507046 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057507046 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 51(2007) no.4, S.286-292
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.03
0.031525247 = product of:
0.06305049 = sum of:
0.06305049 = sum of:
0.005543448 = weight(_text_:s in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005543448 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.057507046 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057507046 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 51(2007) no.1, S.51-68
-
Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009)
0.03
0.031525247 = product of:
0.06305049 = sum of:
0.06305049 = sum of:
0.005543448 = weight(_text_:s in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005543448 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.057507046 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057507046 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 18:50:43
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 56(2009) H.1, S.9-19
-
Erdei, K.: Kein Umzug für Zettel : Die digitalisierten Kataloge im Neubau der UB Kiel (2001)
0.03
0.027584592 = product of:
0.055169184 = sum of:
0.055169184 = sum of:
0.004850517 = weight(_text_:s in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004850517 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
0.050318666 = weight(_text_:22 in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050318666 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 4.2001 16:49:22
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 35(2001) H.4, S.453-457
-
Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000)
0.03
0.027584592 = product of:
0.055169184 = sum of:
0.055169184 = sum of:
0.004850517 = weight(_text_:s in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004850517 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.050318666 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050318666 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.4, S.39-59
-
Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002)
0.02
0.023643933 = product of:
0.047287866 = sum of:
0.047287866 = sum of:
0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041575856 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.043130282 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043130282 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
- Pages
- S.137-150
-
Neubauer, W.: Von Bibliothekskatalogen zu Wissensportalen (2006)
0.02
0.023643933 = product of:
0.047287866 = sum of:
0.047287866 = sum of:
0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041575856 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.043130282 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043130282 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 12:40:17
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 30(2006) H.3, S.275-283
-
Arsenault, C.; Ménard, E.: Searching titles with initial articles in library catalogs : a case study and search behavior analysis (2007)
0.02
0.023643933 = product of:
0.047287866 = sum of:
0.047287866 = sum of:
0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041575856 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
0.043130282 = weight(_text_:22 in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043130282 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 51(2007) no.3, S.190-203
-
Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Have we made any progress? : catalogues of the future revisited (2009)
0.02
0.023268566 = sum of:
0.021536238 = product of:
0.086144954 = sum of:
0.086144954 = weight(_text_:authors in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.086144954 = score(doc=2843,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0017323275 = product of:
0.003464655 = sum of:
0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003464655 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Library online public access catalogues (OPACs) are considered to be unattractive in comparison with popular internet sites. In 2000, the authors presented some suggestions on how library catalogues should change. Have librarians actually made their OPACs more user-friendly by adopting techniques and technologies already present in other information resources? This paper aims to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The characteristics of four OPACs, one online bookstore and two internet search engines are analyzed. The paper reviews some of the changes and directions suggested by researchers and adds some of authors own. All this is in the hope that library catalogues will survive "Google attack." Findings - Changes are identified in the information services studied over a seven-year period. Least development is found in library catalogues. Suggestions are made for library catalogues of the future. Research limitations/implications - A library catalogue, a web search engine and an internet bookstore cannot be compared directly because of differences in scope. But features from each could be fruitfully used in others. Practical implications - OPACs must be both attractive and useful. They should be at least as easy to use as their competitors. With the results of research as well as the knowledge librarians have many years, the profession should be able to develop better OPACs than we have today and regain lost ground in the "competition" for those with information needs. Originality/value - A comparison of OPAC features in 2000 and 2007, even if subjective, can provide a panoramic view of the development of the field.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.3, S.500-514
-
Behrens-Neumann, R.: Aus der 55. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 5. und 6. November 2008 in Frankfurt am Main (2009)
0.02
0.020420834 = product of:
0.04084167 = sum of:
0.04084167 = sum of:
0.004899762 = weight(_text_:s in 2778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004899762 = score(doc=2778,freq=4.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 2778, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2778)
0.035941906 = weight(_text_:22 in 2778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035941906 = score(doc=2778,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2778, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2778)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Darin auch: "Crisscross Ziel des von der DFG geförderten Projekts ist die Schaffung eines multilingualen, thesaurusbasierten und benutzerorientierten Recherchevokabulars zu heterogen erschlossenen Dokumenten für die Nutzer des deutschen wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesens. Dazu werden die Sachschlagwörter der SWD mit den Notationen der Dewey Dezimalklassifikation verbunden sowie mit ihren Äquivalenten in LCSH und Rameau verknüpft. Im Berichtszeitraum wurde der Verlängerungsantrag bewilligt, der eine Laufzeit von 24 Monaten umfasst. Projektende ist jetzt ca. Januar 2010. In der Vergangenheit wurde der Schwerpunkt auf die Vergabe der DDC-Notationen für die Sachschlagwörter der SWD gelegt. Bisher nicht berücksichtigt wurden die Verknüpfungen der Sachschlagwörter mit den äquivalenten LCSH- und Rameau-Termen. Arbeitstechnische Mängel in der MACS-Datenbank (u.a. nicht aktuelle Datenbasis, Dubletten, fehlende Identifier) haben die Verlinkungsarbeit behindert und konnten im Berichtszeitraum in Zusammenarbeit mit den MACS-Partnern, insbesondere der Schweizerischen Nationalbibliothek, gelöst werden. Initiert wurde u.a. ein Update-Verfahren, das nun regelmäßig die Original-Thesauri und die vorhandenen Pärchen aktualisiert, so dass die konkrete Verlinkungsarbeit - unmittelbar in der LMI-Umgebung - demnächst beginnen kann." (S.161)
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 19:35:56
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 43(2009) H.2, S.139-181
-
McCathieNevile, C.; Méndez Rodríguez, E.M.: Library cards for the 21st century (2006)
0.02
0.020352896 = sum of:
0.018274104 = product of:
0.07309642 = sum of:
0.07309642 = weight(_text_:authors in 240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07309642 = score(doc=240,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 240, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=240)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0020787928 = product of:
0.0041575856 = sum of:
0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041575856 = score(doc=240,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 240, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=240)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper presents several reflections on the traditional card catalogues and RDF (Resource Description Framework), which is "the" standard for creating the Semantic Web. This work grew out of discussion between the authors after Working Group on Metadata Schemes meeting held at IFLA conference in Buenos Aires (2004). The paper provides an overview of RDF from the perspective of cataloguers, catalogues and library cards. The central theme is the discussion of resource description as a discipline that could be based on RDF. RDF is explained as a very simple grammar, using metadata and ontologies to semantic search and access. RDF Knitting the Semantic Web Cataloging & Classification Quarterly Volume 43, Numbers 3/4 has the ability to enhance 21st century libraries and metadata interoperability in digital libraries, while maintaining the expressive power that was available to librarians when catalogues were physical artefacts.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 43(2006) nos.3/4, S.21-45
-
Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000)
0.02
0.01970328 = product of:
0.03940656 = sum of:
0.03940656 = sum of:
0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003464655 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.035941906 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035941906 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.3, S.114-121
-
Lubetzky, S.: Principles of cataloging (2001)
0.02
0.0176783 = sum of:
0.01522842 = product of:
0.06091368 = sum of:
0.06091368 = weight(_text_:authors in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06091368 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.002449881 = product of:
0.004899762 = sum of:
0.004899762 = weight(_text_:s in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004899762 = score(doc=2627,freq=4.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This report constitutes Phase I of a two-part study; a Phase II report will discuss subject cataloging. Phase I is concerned with the materials of a library as individual records (or documents) and as representations of certain works by certain authors--that is, with descriptive, or bibliographic, cataloging. Discussed in the report are (1) the history, role, function, and oblectives .of the author-and-title catalog; (2) problems and principles of descriptive catalogng, including the use and function of "main entry, the principle of authorship, and the process and problems of cataloging print and nonprint materials; (3) organization of the catalog; and (4) potentialities of automation. The considerations inherent in bibliographic cataloging, such as the distinction between the "book" and the "work," are said to be so elemental that they are essential not only to the effective control of library's materials but also to that of the information contained in the materials. Because of the special concern with information, the author includes a discussion of the "Bibliographic Dimensions of Information Control," 'prepared in collaboration with Robert M. Hayes, which also appears in "American Documentation," VOl.201 July 1969, p. 247-252.
- Pages
- 113 S
-
Coyle, K.; Hillmann, D.: Resource Description and Access (RDA) : cataloging rules for the 20th century (2007)
0.02
0.016960748 = sum of:
0.01522842 = product of:
0.06091368 = sum of:
0.06091368 = weight(_text_:authors in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06091368 = score(doc=2525,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0017323275 = product of:
0.003464655 = sum of:
0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003464655 = score(doc=2525,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- There is evidence that many individuals and organizations in the library world do not support the work taking place to develop a next generation of the library cataloging rules. The authors describe the tensions existing between those advocating an incremental change to cataloging process and others who desire a bolder library entry into the digital era. Libraries have lost their place as primary information providers, surpassed by more agile (and in many cases wealthier) purveyors of digital information delivery services. Although libraries still manage materials that are not available elsewhere, the library's approach to user service and the user interface is not competing successfully against services like Amazon or Google. If libraries are to avoid further marginalization, they need to make a fundamental change in their approach to user services. The library's signature service, its catalog, uses rules for cataloging that are remnants of a long departed technology: the card catalog. Modifications to the rules, such as those proposed by the Resource Description and Access (RDA) development effort, can only keep us rooted firmly in the 20th, if not the 19th century. A more radical change is required that will contribute to the library of the future, re-imagined and integrated with the chosen workflow of its users.
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 13(2007) nos.1/2, x S
-
Pera, M.S.; Lund, W.; Ng, Y.-K.: ¬A sophisticated library search strategy using folksonomies and similarity matching (2009)
0.02
0.016960748 = sum of:
0.01522842 = product of:
0.06091368 = sum of:
0.06091368 = weight(_text_:authors in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06091368 = score(doc=2939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0017323275 = product of:
0.003464655 = sum of:
0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003464655 = score(doc=2939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Libraries, private and public, offer valuable resources to library patrons. As of today, the only way to locate information archived exclusively in libraries is through their catalogs. Library patrons, however, often find it difficult to formulate a proper query, which requires using specific keywords assigned to different fields of desired library catalog records, to obtain relevant results. These improperly formulated queries often yield irrelevant results or no results at all. This negative experience in dealing with existing library systems turns library patrons away from directly querying library catalogs; instead, they rely on Web search engines to perform their searches first, and upon obtaining the initial information (e.g., titles, subject headings, or authors) on the desired library materials, they query library catalogs. This searching strategy is an evidence of failure of today's library systems. In solving this problem, we propose an enhanced library system, which allows partial, similarity matching of (a) tags defined by ordinary users at a folksonomy site that describe the content of books and (b) unrestricted keywords specified by an ordinary library patron in a query to search for relevant library catalog records. The proposed library system allows patrons posting a query Q using commonly used words and ranks the retrieved results according to their degrees of resemblance with Q while maintaining the query processing time comparable with that achieved by current library search engines.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.7, S.1392-1406
-
Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004)
0.02
0.015762623 = product of:
0.031525247 = sum of:
0.031525247 = sum of:
0.002771724 = weight(_text_:s in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002771724 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.028753523 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028753523 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 6.2015 14:40:22
- Pages
- S.159-165
