Search (125 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Doering, W.: Managing the transition to a new catalog : tips for smotth sailing (2000) 0.04 
    0.042952724 = product of:
  0.107381806 = sum of:
    0.09507258 = weight(_text_:w in 3382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09507258 = score(doc=3382,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.58945394 = fieldWeight in 3382, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3382)
    0.012309224 = weight(_text_:a in 3382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012309224 = score(doc=3382,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3382, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3382)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Type
    a
  2. Neubauer, W.: Von Bibliothekskatalogen zu Wissensportalen (2006) 0.04 
    0.03700721 = product of:
  0.06167868 = sum of:
    0.040745392 = weight(_text_:w in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040745392 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
    0.003730258 = weight(_text_:a in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003730258 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
    0.01720303 = product of:
      0.03440606 = sum of:
        0.03440606 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03440606 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042324185 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:40:17
    Type
    a
  3. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.03 
    0.032847885 = product of:
  0.054746475 = sum of:
    0.030082928 = weight(_text_:u in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030082928 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
    0.007460516 = weight(_text_:a in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007460516 = score(doc=54,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
    0.01720303 = product of:
      0.03440606 = sum of:
        0.03440606 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03440606 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042324185 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Extensive literatures exist on information searching theory and techniques, as well as on the Bradford Distribution. This distribution, also known as "Bradford's Law of Scattering," tells us that information on a subject is dispersed in a characteristic and robust pattern that appears consistently across many different environments. This pattern may be expected to have important implications for information searching theory and techniques. Yet these two research literatures are rarely considered in relation to each other. It is the purpose of this article to distinguish three Bradford regions and speculate on the optimum searching techniques for each region. In the process, browsing, directed searching in databases, and the pursuit of various forms of links will all be considered. Implications of growth in size of a literature for optimal information organization and searching will also be addressed.
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    Source
    Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
    Type
    a
  4. Hahn, U.; Schulze, M.: Katalogerweiterungen, Mashups und Elemente der Bibliothek 2.0" in der Praxis : der Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek der Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (IHSU) Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg (2009) 0.02 
    0.020406486 = product of:
  0.03401081 = sum of:
    0.020055285 = weight(_text_:u in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020055285 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
    0.0024868385 = weight(_text_:a in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024868385 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
    0.011468686 = product of:
      0.022937372 = sum of:
        0.022937372 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022937372 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042324185 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Date
    22. 2.2009 19:40:38
    Type
    a
  5. Umstätter, W.; Wagner-Döbler, R.; Löffler, K.: Einführung in die Katalogkunde : Vom Zettelkatalog zur Suchmaschine (2005) 0.02 
    0.019638995 = product of:
  0.032731656 = sum of:
    0.024009453 = weight(_text_:w in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024009453 = score(doc=4880,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.1488596 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
    0.001554274 = weight(_text_:a in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.001554274 = score(doc=4880,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.03184872 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
    0.007167929 = product of:
      0.014335858 = sum of:
        0.014335858 = weight(_text_:22 in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014335858 = score(doc=4880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042324185 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Diese Einführung in die moderne Katalogkunde ist nicht nur für angehende Bibliothekare und Angehörige informationsbezogener Berufe gedacht, sie gilt auch allen interessierten Laien, die sich für eine professionelle Nutzung von Katalogen, insbesondere solchen in Form von Online-Datenbanken, im Bibliotheksbereich interessieren. Die Bibliothek ist eine Einrichtung zur Orientierung in einer Publikationsflut; aber nicht nur in Form einer «Positiv-Auswahl»: Sie stellt auch Information bereit, die man nach kurzer Prüfung verwirft oder die im Laufe des wissenschaftlichen Fortschritts falsifiziert wurde. Sie ist so auch Staumauer zur Eindämmung der Informationsüberflutung des Einzelnen, unabhängig vom aktuellen Nachfrage- oder Marktgeschehen. Insofern war sie auch immer eine Abwehr gegen Schund - und sei es nur durch dessen erbarmungsloser Dokumentation, und Bestandteil eines Controlling gegen schlechte und überflüssige Wissenschaft. Es ist daher auch die zentrale Aufgabe einer Katalogisierung, dazu beizutragen. Noch deutlicher gesagt, ist es weniger die Aufgabe der Bibliothekskataloge, uns zu zeigen, was wir alles lesen können, das sind allein etwa 100 Mio. verschiedene Buchtitel, es ist vielmehr ihre Aufgabe uns zu zeigen, was wir alles nicht lesen müssen, weil es bessere Quellen gibt. Diese Zeitersparnis ist insbesondere im Wettbewerb um das neu zu entdeckende Wissen in der Wissenschaft das höchste Gut, das wir haben, und Wissenschaft würde ohne diese Hilfe unbezahlbar. Es sei an eine mittlerweile rund 50 Jahre alte Maxime des großen indischen Bibliothekars und Bibliothekswissenschaftlers S.R. RANGANATHAN erinnert, die er (etwas irreführend) als ein «Gesetz der Bibliothekswissenschaft» bezeichnete: «Save the time of the reader. » Es ist aber auch für den Leser von Belletristik, für die Auswahl von Videofilmen oder Kinderbüchern nicht weniger wichtig, was man liest. So zitiert A. v. Harnack keinen geringeren als Leibniz mit den Worten «man weis, was bisweilen ein baar Bücher für Schaden gethan!'»
    Lesen hat mit Bildung zunächst nichts zu tun, es kommt darauf an, was man liest, und das wird nicht zuletzt von Katalogen beeinflusst. Wenn hier von Bibliotheken und Katalogen die Rede ist, mag der Leser und die Leserin bei Ersterem unwillkürlich an konkrete papierene Objekte denken, nämlich Bücher. Die Zahl derer hingegen, die mit «Katalog» Karteikarten verbinden, wird schon viel bescheidener ausfallen, denn wir benutzen heute selbstverständlich elektronische Datenbanken als Kataloge. Aber ebenso selbstverständlich gibt es nicht den geringsten systematischen Grund, im Folgenden digitale Bibliotheken auszuschließen. Im einfachsten Fall liegen zu den bibliographischen Informationen in einer Datenbank zugleich die zugehörigen Buchtexte vor, in welcher konkreten Form auch immer. Die Bibliothekare von heute haben es mit einer Vielzahl von Katalogen in Form von Bandkatalogen, Datenbanken, Karteien, Mikrofiches oder Multimedialen Katalogen zu tun, wobei sie immer mehr Datenbanken weltweit online erreichen. So wie wir in der Bibliotheksverwaltung (Ewert, G. und Umstätter, W. 1997) von einer Verwaltung im engeren und im erweiterten Sinne sprechen können, so müssen wir zwischen Katalogen unterscheiden, die den eigenen Besitz und solchen, die das verfügbare Wissen und die publizierte Information weiterer Einrichtungen oder sogar der ganzen Welt erschließen. Im ersten Fall sprechen wir von den Katalogen im engeren Sinne. Im zweiten Fall haben wir es einerseits mit der Zusammenführung von verschiedenen Bibliothekskatalogen zu tun, z.B. in Katalogisierungsverbünden oder sogenannten Internetportalen, und andererseits mit den meist thematisch ausgerichteten Datenbanken, die nicht selten aus den früheren Bibliographien hervorgegangen sind. Bei ihnen eine sogenannte Verlinkung mit den eigentlichen Quellen herzustellen ist oft leicht möglich. Die heutige Datenbanktechnik, die hinter modernen Katalogen steht, ergänzt stärker als je zuvor unser Gedächtnis, weil wir aus Volltext- und Multimediadatenbanken jederzeit gezielt all das abrufen können, was uns momentan nicht präsent ist. Wir können dies allerdings nur dann abrufen, wenn wir Wissen darüber besitzen, was abrufbar und wie es abrufbar ist. Zu dieser Grundlage will das vorliegende Buch beitragen. Schon die Griechen erkannten die fundamentale Bedeutung des geschriebenen Wortes als ein Langzeitgedächtnis, das unsere Erinnerung ins scheinbar Unendliche erweitert. Der Mythos von Theut beschäftigte sich mit der damit verbundenen Problematik. Aber erst die Daten- und Wissensbanken unserer Zeit schaffen die Möglichkeit, sich auch ganz gezielt zu erinnern. Sie bieten uns nicht nur die Möglichkeit bestimmte Bücher, sondern auch Aufsätze in Zeitschriften und inzwischen sogar einzelne Sätze bzw. Zitate zu finden.
    Date
    22. 1.2006 19:45:49
  6. Umstätter, W.: Bibliographie, Kataloge, Suchmaschinen : Das Ende der Dokumentation als modernes Bibliothekswesen (2005) 0.02 
    0.017790262 = product of:
  0.044475652 = sum of:
    0.040745392 = weight(_text_:w in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040745392 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
    0.003730258 = weight(_text_:a in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003730258 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Type
    a
  7. Cathro, W.: New frameworks for resource discovery and delivery : the changing role of the catalogue (2006) 0.02 
    0.016871577 = product of:
  0.04217894 = sum of:
    0.033954494 = weight(_text_:w in 6107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033954494 = score(doc=6107,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 6107, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6107)
    0.008224445 = weight(_text_:a in 6107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008224445 = score(doc=6107,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 6107, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6107)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    There is currently a lively debate about the role of the library catalogue and its relationship to other resource discovery tools. An example of this debate is the recent publication of a report commissioned by the Library of Congress on "the changing nature of the catalogue" As part of this debate, the role of union catalogues is also being re-examined. Some commentators have suggested that union catalogues, by virtue of their size, can aggregate both supply and demand, thus increasing the chance that a relatively little-used resource will be discovered by somebody for whom it is relevant. During the past year, the National Library of Australia (NLA) has been considering the future of its catalogue and its role in the resource discovery and delivery process. The review was prompted, in part, by the redevelopment of the Australian union catalogue and its exposure on the web as a free public service, badged as Libraries Australia. The NLA examined the enablers and inhibitors to proposition "that it replace its catalogue with Libraries Australia, as the primary database to be searched by users". Flowing from this review, the NLA is aiming to undertake a number of tasks to move in the medium to long term towards a scenario in which it could deprecate its local catalogue. Bezug zum Calhoun-Report
    Language
    a
  8. Pera, M.S.; Lund, W.; Ng, Y.-K.: ¬A sophisticated library search strategy using folksonomies and similarity matching (2009) 0.02 
    0.016871577 = product of:
  0.04217894 = sum of:
    0.033954494 = weight(_text_:w in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033954494 = score(doc=2939,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
    0.008224445 = weight(_text_:a in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008224445 = score(doc=2939,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Libraries, private and public, offer valuable resources to library patrons. As of today, the only way to locate information archived exclusively in libraries is through their catalogs. Library patrons, however, often find it difficult to formulate a proper query, which requires using specific keywords assigned to different fields of desired library catalog records, to obtain relevant results. These improperly formulated queries often yield irrelevant results or no results at all. This negative experience in dealing with existing library systems turns library patrons away from directly querying library catalogs; instead, they rely on Web search engines to perform their searches first, and upon obtaining the initial information (e.g., titles, subject headings, or authors) on the desired library materials, they query library catalogs. This searching strategy is an evidence of failure of today's library systems. In solving this problem, we propose an enhanced library system, which allows partial, similarity matching of (a) tags defined by ordinary users at a folksonomy site that describe the content of books and (b) unrestricted keywords specified by an ordinary library patron in a query to search for relevant library catalog records. The proposed library system allows patrons posting a query Q using commonly used words and ranks the retrieved results according to their degrees of resemblance with Q while maintaining the query processing time comparable with that achieved by current library search engines.
    Type
    a
  9. Libraries and Google (2005) 0.02 
    0.01664004 = product of:
  0.027733397 = sum of:
    0.0135817975 = weight(_text_:w in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0135817975 = score(doc=1973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.084207706 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
    0.010027642 = weight(_text_:u in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010027642 = score(doc=1973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.07235568 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
    0.0041239555 = weight(_text_:a in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0041239555 = score(doc=1973,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.08450422 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Google[trademark] has become a nearly omnipresent tool of the Internet, with its potential only now beginning to be realised. How can librarians effectively integrate this powerful search engine to provide service to their patrons? "Libraries and Google[trademark]" presents leading authorities discussing the many possibilities of using Google products as effective, user-friendly tools in libraries. Google Scholar and Print are extensively explored with an eye towards offering an expanded view of what is and may be possible for the future, with practical insights on how to make the most of the product's capabilities.
    Content
    Introduction: Libraries and Their Interrelationships with Google - William Miller Disruptive Beneficence: The Google Print Program and the Future of Libraries - Mark Sandler The Google Library Project at Oxford - Ronald Milne The (Uncertain) Future of Libraries in a Google World: Sounding an Alarm - Rick Anderson A Gaggle of Googles: Limitations and Defects of Electronic Access as Panacea - -Mark Y. Herring Using the Google Search Appliance for Federated Searching: A Case Study - Mary Taylor Google's Print and Scholar Initiatives: The Value of and Impact on Libraries and Information Services - Robert J. Lackie Google Scholar vs. Library Scholar: Testing the Performance of Schoogle - Burton Callicott; Debbie Vaughn Google, the Invisible Web, and Librarians: Slaying the Research Goliath - Francine Egger-Sider; Jane Devine Choices in the Paradigm Shift: Where Next for Libraries? - Shelley E. Phipps; Krisellen Maloney Calling the Scholars Home: Google Scholar as a Tool for Rediscovering the Academic Library - Maurice C. York Checking Under the Hood: Evaluating Google Scholar for Reference Use - Janice Adlington; Chris Benda Running with the Devil: Accessing Library-Licensed Full Text Holdings Through Google Scholar - Rebecca Donlan; Rachel Cooke Directing Students to New Information Types: A New Role for Google in Literature Searches? - Mike Thelwall Evaluating Google Scholar as a Tool for Information Literacy Rachael Cathcart - Amanda Roberts Optimising Publications for Google Users - Alan Dawson Google and Privacy - Paul S. Piper Image: Google's Most Important Product - Ron Force Keeping Up with Google: Resources and Strategies for Staying Ahead of the Pack - Michael J. Krasulski; Steven J. Bell
    Editor
    Miller, W. u. R.M. Pellen
    Footnote
    Weitere Rez. in JASIST 59(2008) H.9, S.1531-1533 (J. Satyanesan): "Libraries and Google is an interesting and enlightening compilation of 18 articles on Google and its impact on libraries. The topic is very current, debatable, and thought provoking. Google has profoundly empowered individuals and transformed access to information and librarians are very much concerned about its popularity and visibility. In this book, the leading authorities discuss the usefulness of Google, its influence and potential menace to libraries, and its implications for libraries and the scholarly communication. They offer practical suggestions to cope with the changing situation. The articles are written from different perspective and express all shades of opinion, both hopeful and fearful. One can discern varied moods-apprehension, resignation, encouragement, and motivation-on the part of the librarians. This is an important book providing a wealth of information for the 21st century librarian. There is a section called "Indexing, Abstracting & Website/Internet Coverage," which lists major indexing and abstracting services and other tools for bibliographic access. The format of the articles is uniform with an introduction, key words, and with the exception of two articles the rest have summaries and conclusions. References and notes of varying lengths are included in each article. This book has been copublished simultaneously as Internet Reference Quarterly, 10(3/4), 2005. Although there are single articles written on Google and libraries, this is the first book-length treatment of the topic.
    ... This book is written by library professionals and aimed at the librarians in particular, but it will be useful to others who may be interested in knowing what libraries are up to in the age of Google. It is intended for library science educators and students, library administrators, publishers and university presses. It is well organized, well researched, and easily readable. Article titles are descriptive, allowing the reader to find what he needs by scanning the table of contents or by consulting the index. The only flaw in this book is the lack of summary or conclusions in a few articles. The book is in paperback and has 240 pages. This book is a significant contribution and I highly recommend it."
  10. Fabian, C.; Holbach, W.: ¬Die Konversion des Quartkatalogs der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek : Schlussstein auf dem langen Weg zu einem vollständigen maschinenlesbaren Bestandskatalog!? (2007) 0.01 
    0.0148252165 = product of:
  0.03706304 = sum of:
    0.033954494 = weight(_text_:w in 396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033954494 = score(doc=396,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16128924 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 396, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=396)
    0.003108548 = weight(_text_:a in 396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003108548 = score(doc=396,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 396, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=396)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Type
    a
  11. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.01 
    0.013955525 = product of:
  0.03488881 = sum of:
    0.006217096 = weight(_text_:a in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006217096 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
    0.028671715 = product of:
      0.05734343 = sum of:
        0.05734343 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05734343 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042324185 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  12. Dierolf, U.; Mönnich, M.: Einsatz von Recommendersystemen am Beispiel des neuen OPACs der Universitätsbibliothek Karlsruhe (2006) 0.01 
    0.013525275 = product of:
  0.033813186 = sum of:
    0.030082928 = weight(_text_:u in 3230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030082928 = score(doc=3230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3230)
    0.003730258 = weight(_text_:a in 3230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003730258 = score(doc=3230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 3230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3230)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Type
    a
  13. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.01 
    0.012715709 = product of:
  0.031789273 = sum of:
    0.007460516 = weight(_text_:a in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007460516 = score(doc=101,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    0.024328759 = product of:
      0.048657518 = sum of:
        0.048657518 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048657518 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042324185 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
    Type
    a
  14. Hollender, U.: Heiliger Joseph! : Zu einem Kardinalschreibfehler in deutschen Bibliothekskatalogen (falscher *Guiseppe statt richtigem Giuseppe) (2002) 0.01 
    0.012339718 = product of:
  0.030849295 = sum of:
    0.028362457 = weight(_text_:u in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028362457 = score(doc=536,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.20465277 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
    0.0024868385 = weight(_text_:a in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024868385 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In schätzungsweise jedem vierten deutschen Zeitungsartikel und InternetDokument, in dem der italienische Vorname Giuseppe enthalten ist, taucht der Fehler auf, sei nun die Rede von Verdi, Arcimboldo oder Garibaldi: Giuseppe wird falsch geschrieben, nämlich als *Guiseppe, als handele sich um eine Variante von Guido, was dem deutschen Auge offensichtlich vertrauter ist. Bemerkenswert ist, dass die Buchstaben "i" und "u° auf der Tastatur direkt nebeneinander liegen, was der Tippfehleranfälligkeit Vorschub leistet. Lässt man die Internet-Suchmaschine Google "Seiten auf deutsch" absuchen, findet sie 61.500 Giuseppes und 15.200 *Guiseppes (über 25%). Google ist übrigens seit neuestem so "intelligent', bei der falschen Eingabe zu fragen: "Meinten Sie Giuseppe?'. Schränkt man die Suchmaschine auf italienisch-sprachige Seiten ein, sinkt der Anteil der falschen Schreibweise auf 0,54 % (426.000 richtige gegen 2.330 falsche). Bei genauerem Hinsehen tauchen die meisten der Falschschreibungen bei offenbar amerikanischen dot-com-Seiten auf, die italienische Genealogien aufschlüsseln. Die genuin aus Italien stammenden Seiten weisen nur in den allerwenigsten Fällen den Fehler auf. Dieses Phänomen fiel mir als Romanistin zunächst auf, dann störte es mich, später belustigte es mich beinahe und schließlich wurde die Suche danach fast zum Spiel. Unter bibliothekarischen Gesichtspunkten ist der Fehler ein Ärgernis, hat sich doch diese falsche Schreibweise massenhaft in bibliothekarische Datenbanken eingeschlichen. Als ich schon vor Jahren eine Düsseldorfer Diplombibliothekarin darauf ansprach, widersprach diese und behauptete, es gebe sehr wohl den Namen in der Schreibweise *Guiseppe neben der - vielleicht üblicheren - Form Giuseppe. Und tatsächlich findet sich die falsche Form in manchen Vornamenbüchern - so oft schon wurde der Fehler tradiert, dass er jetzt schon legitimiert erscheint. Schlägt man hingegen in italienischen Vornamenbüchern nach, zeigt sich, dass man hier vergeblich nach *Guiseppe suchen muss.
    Type
    a
  15. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.01 
    0.011988486 = product of:
  0.029971214 = sum of:
    0.007033842 = weight(_text_:a in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007033842 = score(doc=266,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
    0.022937372 = product of:
      0.045874745 = sum of:
        0.045874745 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045874745 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042324185 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  16. Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000) 0.01 
    0.011509654 = product of:
  0.028774135 = sum of:
    0.008703935 = weight(_text_:a in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008703935 = score(doc=5365,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
    0.0200702 = product of:
      0.0401404 = sum of:
        0.0401404 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0401404 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042324185 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
    Type
    a
  17. Klauß, H.: Möglichkeiten einer EDV-gestützten Ermittlung : Tippfehler in Bibliothekskatalogen (2001) 0.01 
    0.011271062 = product of:
  0.028177656 = sum of:
    0.025069108 = weight(_text_:u in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025069108 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
    0.003108548 = weight(_text_:a in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003108548 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Hollender, U.: Heiliger Joseph!: Zu einem Kardinalschreibfehler in deutschen Bibliothekskatalogen (falscher *Guiseppe statt richtigem Giuseppe). In: Bibliotheksdienst. 36(2002) H.4, S.465-468.
    Type
    a
  18. OIliges-Wieczorek, U.: Retrokonversion der Thomas-Mann-Sammlung : DFG finanziert Projekt an der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf (2008) 0.01 
    0.011271062 = product of:
  0.028177656 = sum of:
    0.025069108 = weight(_text_:u in 1669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025069108 = score(doc=1669,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13858819 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1669, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1669)
    0.003108548 = weight(_text_:a in 1669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003108548 = score(doc=1669,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 1669, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1669)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Type
    a
  19. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01 
    0.011164419 = product of:
  0.027911048 = sum of:
    0.004973677 = weight(_text_:a in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004973677 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
    0.022937372 = product of:
      0.045874745 = sum of:
        0.045874745 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045874745 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042324185 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  20. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.01 
    0.011164419 = product of:
  0.027911048 = sum of:
    0.004973677 = weight(_text_:a in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004973677 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.048801772 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042324185 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
    0.022937372 = product of:
      0.045874745 = sum of:
        0.045874745 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045874745 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14821209 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042324185 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

  • e 66
  • d 50
  • a 2
  • sp 2
  • f 1
  • slv 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 111
  • el 14
  • m 4
  • r 4
  • b 3
  • s 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications