Search (40 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Neubauer, W.: Von Bibliothekskatalogen zu Wissensportalen (2006) 0.05 
    0.050086886 = product of:
  0.1168694 = sum of:
    0.01702559 = product of:
      0.03405118 = sum of:
        0.03405118 = weight(_text_:w in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03405118 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.08546713 = weight(_text_:neubauer in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08546713 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21354654 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.037405 = idf(docFreq=286, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.4002272 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.037405 = idf(docFreq=286, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
    0.014376678 = product of:
      0.028753355 = sum of:
        0.028753355 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028753355 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:40:17
  2. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.02 
    0.015374731 = product of:
  0.053811558 = sum of:
    0.033479866 = weight(_text_:j in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033479866 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    0.020331694 = product of:
      0.040663388 = sum of:
        0.040663388 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040663388 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  3. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.01 
    0.014495435 = product of:
  0.05073402 = sum of:
    0.031565115 = weight(_text_:j in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031565115 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
    0.019168904 = product of:
      0.038337808 = sum of:
        0.038337808 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038337808 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Libraries and Google (2005) 0.01 
    0.012787679 = product of:
  0.029837918 = sum of:
    0.0056751966 = product of:
      0.011350393 = sum of:
        0.011350393 = weight(_text_:w in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011350393 = score(doc=1973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.084207706 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008380163 = weight(_text_:u in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008380163 = score(doc=1973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.07235568 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
    0.015782557 = weight(_text_:j in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015782557 = score(doc=1973,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Content
    Introduction: Libraries and Their Interrelationships with Google - William Miller Disruptive Beneficence: The Google Print Program and the Future of Libraries - Mark Sandler The Google Library Project at Oxford - Ronald Milne The (Uncertain) Future of Libraries in a Google World: Sounding an Alarm - Rick Anderson A Gaggle of Googles: Limitations and Defects of Electronic Access as Panacea - -Mark Y. Herring Using the Google Search Appliance for Federated Searching: A Case Study - Mary Taylor Google's Print and Scholar Initiatives: The Value of and Impact on Libraries and Information Services - Robert J. Lackie Google Scholar vs. Library Scholar: Testing the Performance of Schoogle - Burton Callicott; Debbie Vaughn Google, the Invisible Web, and Librarians: Slaying the Research Goliath - Francine Egger-Sider; Jane Devine Choices in the Paradigm Shift: Where Next for Libraries? - Shelley E. Phipps; Krisellen Maloney Calling the Scholars Home: Google Scholar as a Tool for Rediscovering the Academic Library - Maurice C. York Checking Under the Hood: Evaluating Google Scholar for Reference Use - Janice Adlington; Chris Benda Running with the Devil: Accessing Library-Licensed Full Text Holdings Through Google Scholar - Rebecca Donlan; Rachel Cooke Directing Students to New Information Types: A New Role for Google in Literature Searches? - Mike Thelwall Evaluating Google Scholar as a Tool for Information Literacy Rachael Cathcart - Amanda Roberts Optimising Publications for Google Users - Alan Dawson Google and Privacy - Paul S. Piper Image: Google's Most Important Product - Ron Force Keeping Up with Google: Resources and Strategies for Staying Ahead of the Pack - Michael J. Krasulski; Steven J. Bell
    Editor
    Miller, W. u. R.M. Pellen
    Footnote
    Weitere Rez. in JASIST 59(2008) H.9, S.1531-1533 (J. Satyanesan): "Libraries and Google is an interesting and enlightening compilation of 18 articles on Google and its impact on libraries. The topic is very current, debatable, and thought provoking. Google has profoundly empowered individuals and transformed access to information and librarians are very much concerned about its popularity and visibility. In this book, the leading authorities discuss the usefulness of Google, its influence and potential menace to libraries, and its implications for libraries and the scholarly communication. They offer practical suggestions to cope with the changing situation. The articles are written from different perspective and express all shades of opinion, both hopeful and fearful. One can discern varied moods-apprehension, resignation, encouragement, and motivation-on the part of the librarians. This is an important book providing a wealth of information for the 21st century librarian. There is a section called "Indexing, Abstracting & Website/Internet Coverage," which lists major indexing and abstracting services and other tools for bibliographic access. The format of the articles is uniform with an introduction, key words, and with the exception of two articles the rest have summaries and conclusions. References and notes of varying lengths are included in each article. This book has been copublished simultaneously as Internet Reference Quarterly, 10(3/4), 2005. Although there are single articles written on Google and libraries, this is the first book-length treatment of the topic.
  5. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.01 
    0.011290619 = product of:
  0.039517164 = sum of:
    0.025140489 = weight(_text_:u in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025140489 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
    0.014376678 = product of:
      0.028753355 = sum of:
        0.028753355 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028753355 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    Source
    Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
  6. Matthews, J.: ¬The value of information in library catalogs (2000) 0.01 
    0.00789128 = product of:
  0.055238955 = sum of:
    0.055238955 = weight(_text_:j in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055238955 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  7. Hahn, U.; Schulze, M.: Katalogerweiterungen, Mashups und Elemente der Bibliothek 2.0" in der Praxis : der Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek der Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (IHSU) Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg (2009) 0.01 
    0.0075270804 = product of:
  0.02634478 = sum of:
    0.016760327 = weight(_text_:u in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016760327 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
    0.009584452 = product of:
      0.019168904 = sum of:
        0.019168904 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019168904 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    22. 2.2009 19:40:38
  8. Doering, W.: Managing the transition to a new catalog : tips for smotth sailing (2000) 0.01 
    0.005675197 = product of:
  0.039726377 = sum of:
    0.039726377 = product of:
      0.07945275 = sum of:
        0.07945275 = weight(_text_:w in 3382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07945275 = score(doc=3382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.58945394 = fieldWeight in 3382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3382)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  9. Voß, J.; Hellmich, J.: »Am Kerngeschäft der Bibliothekare kann sich plötzlich jeder beteiligen« (2007) 0.01 
    0.0055799773 = product of:
  0.03905984 = sum of:
    0.03905984 = weight(_text_:j in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03905984 = score(doc=397,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  10. Umstätter, W.; Wagner-Döbler, R.; Löffler, K.: Einführung in die Katalogkunde : Vom Zettelkatalog zur Suchmaschine (2005) 0.00 
    0.004577917 = product of:
  0.016022708 = sum of:
    0.010032426 = product of:
      0.020064851 = sum of:
        0.020064851 = weight(_text_:w in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020064851 = score(doc=4880,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13479044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.1488596 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0059902826 = product of:
      0.011980565 = sum of:
        0.011980565 = weight(_text_:22 in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011980565 = score(doc=4880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Lesen hat mit Bildung zunächst nichts zu tun, es kommt darauf an, was man liest, und das wird nicht zuletzt von Katalogen beeinflusst. Wenn hier von Bibliotheken und Katalogen die Rede ist, mag der Leser und die Leserin bei Ersterem unwillkürlich an konkrete papierene Objekte denken, nämlich Bücher. Die Zahl derer hingegen, die mit «Katalog» Karteikarten verbinden, wird schon viel bescheidener ausfallen, denn wir benutzen heute selbstverständlich elektronische Datenbanken als Kataloge. Aber ebenso selbstverständlich gibt es nicht den geringsten systematischen Grund, im Folgenden digitale Bibliotheken auszuschließen. Im einfachsten Fall liegen zu den bibliographischen Informationen in einer Datenbank zugleich die zugehörigen Buchtexte vor, in welcher konkreten Form auch immer. Die Bibliothekare von heute haben es mit einer Vielzahl von Katalogen in Form von Bandkatalogen, Datenbanken, Karteien, Mikrofiches oder Multimedialen Katalogen zu tun, wobei sie immer mehr Datenbanken weltweit online erreichen. So wie wir in der Bibliotheksverwaltung (Ewert, G. und Umstätter, W. 1997) von einer Verwaltung im engeren und im erweiterten Sinne sprechen können, so müssen wir zwischen Katalogen unterscheiden, die den eigenen Besitz und solchen, die das verfügbare Wissen und die publizierte Information weiterer Einrichtungen oder sogar der ganzen Welt erschließen. Im ersten Fall sprechen wir von den Katalogen im engeren Sinne. Im zweiten Fall haben wir es einerseits mit der Zusammenführung von verschiedenen Bibliothekskatalogen zu tun, z.B. in Katalogisierungsverbünden oder sogenannten Internetportalen, und andererseits mit den meist thematisch ausgerichteten Datenbanken, die nicht selten aus den früheren Bibliographien hervorgegangen sind. Bei ihnen eine sogenannte Verlinkung mit den eigentlichen Quellen herzustellen ist oft leicht möglich. Die heutige Datenbanktechnik, die hinter modernen Katalogen steht, ergänzt stärker als je zuvor unser Gedächtnis, weil wir aus Volltext- und Multimediadatenbanken jederzeit gezielt all das abrufen können, was uns momentan nicht präsent ist. Wir können dies allerdings nur dann abrufen, wenn wir Wissen darüber besitzen, was abrufbar und wie es abrufbar ist. Zu dieser Grundlage will das vorliegende Buch beitragen. Schon die Griechen erkannten die fundamentale Bedeutung des geschriebenen Wortes als ein Langzeitgedächtnis, das unsere Erinnerung ins scheinbar Unendliche erweitert. Der Mythos von Theut beschäftigte sich mit der damit verbundenen Problematik. Aber erst die Daten- und Wissensbanken unserer Zeit schaffen die Möglichkeit, sich auch ganz gezielt zu erinnern. Sie bieten uns nicht nur die Möglichkeit bestimmte Bücher, sondern auch Aufsätze in Zeitschriften und inzwischen sogar einzelne Sätze bzw. Zitate zu finden.
    Date
    22. 1.2006 19:45:49
  11. Voss, J.: LibraryThing : Web 2.0 für Literaturfreunde und Bibliotheken (2007) 0.00 
    0.0045298235 = product of:
  0.015854381 = sum of:
    0.009864098 = weight(_text_:j in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009864098 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.08776677 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
    0.0059902826 = product of:
      0.011980565 = sum of:
        0.011980565 = weight(_text_:22 in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011980565 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 10:36:23
  12. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.00 
    0.0041076224 = product of:
  0.028753355 = sum of:
    0.028753355 = product of:
      0.05750671 = sum of:
        0.05750671 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05750671 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  13. Byrd, J.; Charbonneau, G.; Charbonneau, M.; Courtney, A.; Johnson, E.; Leonard, K.; Morrison, A.; Mudge, S.; O'Bryan, A.; Opasik, S.; Riley, J.; Turchyn, S.: ¬A white paper on the future of cataloging at Indiana University (2006) 0.00 
    0.003985698 = product of:
  0.027899884 = sum of:
    0.027899884 = weight(_text_:j in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027899884 = score(doc=3225,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  14. Carlyle, A.; Summerlin, J.: Transforming catalog displays : record clustering for works of fiction (2002) 0.00 
    0.00394564 = product of:
  0.027619477 = sum of:
    0.027619477 = weight(_text_:j in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027619477 = score(doc=5626,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  15. Krause, J.; Mayr, P.: Allgemeiner Bibliothekszugang und Varianten der Suchtypologie : Konsequenzen für die Modellbildung in vascoda (2007) 0.00 
    0.00394564 = product of:
  0.027619477 = sum of:
    0.027619477 = weight(_text_:j in 5998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027619477 = score(doc=5998,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 5998, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5998)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  16. Dierolf, U.; Mönnich, M.: Einsatz von Recommendersystemen am Beispiel des neuen OPACs der Universitätsbibliothek Karlsruhe (2006) 0.00 
    0.0035914986 = product of:
  0.025140489 = sum of:
    0.025140489 = weight(_text_:u in 3230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025140489 = score(doc=3230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3230)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  17. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.00 
    0.0034230188 = product of:
  0.02396113 = sum of:
    0.02396113 = product of:
      0.04792226 = sum of:
        0.04792226 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04792226 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12386176 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035370585 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Hollender, U.: Heiliger Joseph! : Zu einem Kardinalschreibfehler in deutschen Bibliothekskatalogen (falscher *Guiseppe statt richtigem Giuseppe) (2002) 0.00 
    0.0033860975 = product of:
  0.023702681 = sum of:
    0.023702681 = weight(_text_:u in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023702681 = score(doc=536,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.20465277 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    In schätzungsweise jedem vierten deutschen Zeitungsartikel und InternetDokument, in dem der italienische Vorname Giuseppe enthalten ist, taucht der Fehler auf, sei nun die Rede von Verdi, Arcimboldo oder Garibaldi: Giuseppe wird falsch geschrieben, nämlich als *Guiseppe, als handele sich um eine Variante von Guido, was dem deutschen Auge offensichtlich vertrauter ist. Bemerkenswert ist, dass die Buchstaben "i" und "u° auf der Tastatur direkt nebeneinander liegen, was der Tippfehleranfälligkeit Vorschub leistet. Lässt man die Internet-Suchmaschine Google "Seiten auf deutsch" absuchen, findet sie 61.500 Giuseppes und 15.200 *Guiseppes (über 25%). Google ist übrigens seit neuestem so "intelligent', bei der falschen Eingabe zu fragen: "Meinten Sie Giuseppe?'. Schränkt man die Suchmaschine auf italienisch-sprachige Seiten ein, sinkt der Anteil der falschen Schreibweise auf 0,54 % (426.000 richtige gegen 2.330 falsche). Bei genauerem Hinsehen tauchen die meisten der Falschschreibungen bei offenbar amerikanischen dot-com-Seiten auf, die italienische Genealogien aufschlüsseln. Die genuin aus Italien stammenden Seiten weisen nur in den allerwenigsten Fällen den Fehler auf. Dieses Phänomen fiel mir als Romanistin zunächst auf, dann störte es mich, später belustigte es mich beinahe und schließlich wurde die Suche danach fast zum Spiel. Unter bibliothekarischen Gesichtspunkten ist der Fehler ein Ärgernis, hat sich doch diese falsche Schreibweise massenhaft in bibliothekarische Datenbanken eingeschlichen. Als ich schon vor Jahren eine Düsseldorfer Diplombibliothekarin darauf ansprach, widersprach diese und behauptete, es gebe sehr wohl den Namen in der Schreibweise *Guiseppe neben der - vielleicht üblicheren - Form Giuseppe. Und tatsächlich findet sich die falsche Form in manchen Vornamenbüchern - so oft schon wurde der Fehler tradiert, dass er jetzt schon legitimiert erscheint. Schlägt man hingegen in italienischen Vornamenbüchern nach, zeigt sich, dass man hier vergeblich nach *Guiseppe suchen muss.
  19. Lee, H.-L.; Clyde, J.: Users' perspectives of the "Collection" and the online catalogue (2004) 0.00 
    0.003381977 = product of:
  0.023673838 = sum of:
    0.023673838 = weight(_text_:j in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023673838 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11238991 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  20. Klauß, H.: Möglichkeiten einer EDV-gestützten Ermittlung : Tippfehler in Bibliothekskatalogen (2001) 0.00 
    0.0029929157 = product of:
  0.020950409 = sum of:
    0.020950409 = weight(_text_:u in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020950409 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11581901 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035370585 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Hollender, U.: Heiliger Joseph!: Zu einem Kardinalschreibfehler in deutschen Bibliothekskatalogen (falscher *Guiseppe statt richtigem Giuseppe). In: Bibliotheksdienst. 36(2002) H.4, S.465-468.

Authors

Languages

  • e 22
  • d 17
  • a 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 33
  • m 4
  • b 3
  • el 2
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications