Search (45 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004) 0.04 
    0.04353961 = product of:
  0.108849026 = sum of:
    0.07590153 = weight(_text_:objects in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07590153 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3231294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
    0.032947496 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032947496 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    1. Introduction With the diversification of the material available in library collections such as: music, film, 3D objects, cartographic material and electronic resources like CD-ROMS and Web sites, the existing cataloguing principles and codes are no longer adequate to enable the user to find, identify, select and obtain a particular entity. The problem is not only that material fails to be appropriately represented in the catalogue records but also access to such material, or parts of it, is difficult if possible at all. Consequently, the need emerged to develop new rules and build up a new conceptual model able to cope with all the requirements demanded by the existing library material. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records developed by an IFLA Study Group from 1992 through 1997 present a generalised view of the bibliographic universe and are intended to be independent of any cataloguing code or implementation (Tillett, 2002). Outstanding scholars like Antonio Panizzi, Charles A. Cutter and Seymour Lubetzky formulated the basic cataloguing principles of which some can be retrieved, as Denton (2003) argues as updated versions, between the basic lines of the FRBR model: - the relation work-author groups all the works of an author - all the editions, translations, adaptations of a work are clearly separated (as expressions and manifestations) - all the expressions and manifestations of a work are collocated with their related works in bibliographic families - any document (manifestation and item) can be found if the author, title or subject of that document is known - the author is authorised by the authority control - the title is an intrinsic part of the work + authority control entity
    Date
    17. 6.2015 14:40:22
  2. Miksa, S.D.: Educators: what are the cataloging issues students get excited about? : professional and intellectual appeals of cataloging and students' misconceptions of cataloging (2008) 0.03 
    0.026565535 = product of:
  0.13282767 = sum of:
    0.13282767 = weight(_text_:objects in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13282767 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3231294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the professional and intellectual appeals demonstrated by cataloging students, as well as some common misconceptions. Given the current digital environment and the "Amazoogle" effect, students face many challenges when striving to complete a basic course in descriptive and subject cataloging. In the process, they face issues of varieties of information objects, how to tame tools such as AACR2 and LCSH, and how MARC encoding fits into the overall process of cataloging. They also must learn to re-conceptualize their ideas of copy cataloging and learn to appreciate the authoritative power that comes with using and applying cataloger's judgment.
  3. Buckland, M.: Document theory (2018) 0.03 
    0.026565535 = product of:
  0.13282767 = sum of:
    0.13282767 = weight(_text_:objects in 4536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13282767 = score(doc=4536,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3231294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4536, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4536)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Document theory examines the concept of a document and how it can serve with other concepts to understand communication, documentation, information, and knowledge. Knowledge organization itself is in practice based on the arrangement of documents representing concepts and knowledge. The word "document" commonly refers to a text or graphic record, but, in a semiotic perspective, non-graphic objects can also be regarded as signifying and, therefore, as documents. The steady increase in the variety and number of documents since prehistoric times enables the development of communities, the division of labor, and reduction of the constraints of space and time. Documents are related to data, facts, texts, works, information, knowledge, signs, and other documents. Documents have physical (material), cognitive, and social aspects.
  4. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.03 
    0.026357997 = product of:
  0.13178998 = sum of:
    0.13178998 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13178998 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  5. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.03 
    0.026357997 = product of:
  0.13178998 = sum of:
    0.13178998 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13178998 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  6. Miksa, F.: ¬The legacy of the library catalogue for the present (2012) 0.02 
    0.02277046 = product of:
  0.1138523 = sum of:
    0.1138523 = weight(_text_:objects in 5556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1138523 = score(doc=5556,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3231294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 5556, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5556)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The specter of impending change in library catalogues is strong but not very clear. In an attempt to help the clarification process, the first part of the present report discusses historical themes from the modern library catalogue legacy that has developed since the mid-nineteenth century-the origins and subsequent dominance of the dictionary catalogue for more than a century, considerations of library catalogue users and use over the same period, developments apart from the library catalogue during the twentieth century that have affected it, and aspects of the idea of the objects of a catalogue. In a second part, the general environment for the most recent period of library catalogue development is described, after which aspects of the historical legacy are used as a basis for raising questions relevant to impending library catalogue change.
  7. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.02 
    0.019768497 = product of:
  0.09884249 = sum of:
    0.09884249 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09884249 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
  8. Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982) 0.02 
    0.019768497 = product of:
  0.09884249 = sum of:
    0.09884249 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09884249 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    6. 1.2007 14:49:22
  9. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.02 
    0.019768497 = product of:
  0.09884249 = sum of:
    0.09884249 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09884249 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  10. Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998) 0.02 
    0.01647375 = product of:
  0.08236875 = sum of:
    0.08236875 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08236875 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
  11. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.02 
    0.01647375 = product of:
  0.08236875 = sum of:
    0.08236875 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08236875 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994) 0.02 
    0.01647375 = product of:
  0.08236875 = sum of:
    0.08236875 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08236875 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 4.2020 20:22:29
  13. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.01 
    0.013978439 = product of:
  0.0698922 = sum of:
    0.0698922 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0698922 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  14. Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007) 0.01 
    0.0132827675 = product of:
  0.066413835 = sum of:
    0.066413835 = weight(_text_:objects in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066413835 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3231294 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.20553327 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The impetus for this essay is the library community's uncertainty regarding the present and future direction of the library catalog in the era of Google and mass digitization projects. The uncertainty is evident at the highest levels. Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress (LC), is struck by undergraduate students who favor digital resources over the online library catalog because such resources are available at anytime and from anywhere (Marcum, 2006). She suggests that "the detailed attention that we have been paying to descriptive cataloging may no longer be justified ... retooled catalogers could give more time to authority control, subject analysis, [and] resource identification and evaluation" (Marcum, 2006, 8). In an abrupt about-face, LC terminated series added entries in cataloging records, one of the few subject-rich fields in such records (Cataloging Policy and Support Office, 2006). Mann (2006b) and Schniderman (2006) cite evidence of LC's prevailing viewpoint in favor of simplifying cataloging at the expense of subject cataloging. LC commissioned Karen Calhoun (2006) to prepare a report on "revitalizing" the online library catalog. Calhoun's directive is clear: divert resources from cataloging mass-produced formats (e.g., books) to cataloging the unique primary sources (e.g., archives, special collections, teaching objects, research by-products). She sums up her rationale for such a directive, "The existing local catalog's market position has eroded to the point where there is real concern for its ability to weather the competition for information seekers' attention" (p. 10). At the University of California Libraries (2005), a task force's recommendations parallel those in Calhoun report especially regarding the elimination of subject headings in favor of automatically generated metadata. Contemplating these events prompted me to revisit the glorious past of the online library catalog. For a decade and a half beginning in the early 1980s, the online library catalog was the jewel in the crown when people eagerly queued at its terminals to find information written by the world's experts. I despair how eagerly people now embrace Google because of the suspect provenance of the information Google retrieves. Long ago, we could have added more value to the online library catalog but the only thing we changed was the catalog's medium. Our failure to act back then cost the online catalog the crown. Now that the era of mass digitization has begun, we have a second chance at redesigning the online library catalog, getting it right, coaxing back old users, and attracting new ones. Let's revisit the past, reconsidering missed opportunities, reassessing their merits, combining them with new directions, making bold decisions and acting decisively on them.
  15. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.01 
    0.013178999 = product of:
  0.06589499 = sum of:
    0.06589499 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06589499 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  16. Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.01 
    0.013178999 = product of:
  0.06589499 = sum of:
    0.06589499 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06589499 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
  17. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01 
    0.013178999 = product of:
  0.06589499 = sum of:
    0.06589499 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06589499 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.01 
    0.013178999 = product of:
  0.06589499 = sum of:
    0.06589499 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06589499 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.01 
    0.013178999 = product of:
  0.06589499 = sum of:
    0.06589499 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06589499 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.01 
    0.013178999 = product of:
  0.06589499 = sum of:
    0.06589499 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06589499 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2128935 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.060794935 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 31
  • d 12
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 42
  • b 3
  • m 3
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes