Search (47 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004) 0.04
    0.04196448 = sum of:
      0.025415717 = product of:
        0.07624715 = sum of:
          0.07624715 = weight(_text_:objects in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07624715 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.32460076 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.06107176 = queryNorm
              0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.01654876 = product of:
        0.03309752 = sum of:
          0.03309752 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03309752 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.06107176 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1. Introduction With the diversification of the material available in library collections such as: music, film, 3D objects, cartographic material and electronic resources like CD-ROMS and Web sites, the existing cataloguing principles and codes are no longer adequate to enable the user to find, identify, select and obtain a particular entity. The problem is not only that material fails to be appropriately represented in the catalogue records but also access to such material, or parts of it, is difficult if possible at all. Consequently, the need emerged to develop new rules and build up a new conceptual model able to cope with all the requirements demanded by the existing library material. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records developed by an IFLA Study Group from 1992 through 1997 present a generalised view of the bibliographic universe and are intended to be independent of any cataloguing code or implementation (Tillett, 2002). Outstanding scholars like Antonio Panizzi, Charles A. Cutter and Seymour Lubetzky formulated the basic cataloguing principles of which some can be retrieved, as Denton (2003) argues as updated versions, between the basic lines of the FRBR model: - the relation work-author groups all the works of an author - all the editions, translations, adaptations of a work are clearly separated (as expressions and manifestations) - all the expressions and manifestations of a work are collocated with their related works in bibliographic families - any document (manifestation and item) can be found if the author, title or subject of that document is known - the author is authorised by the authority control - the title is an intrinsic part of the work + authority control entity
    Date
    17. 6.2015 14:40:22
  2. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.03
    0.03309752 = product of:
      0.06619504 = sum of:
        0.06619504 = product of:
          0.13239008 = sum of:
            0.13239008 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13239008 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  3. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.03
    0.03309752 = product of:
      0.06619504 = sum of:
        0.06619504 = product of:
          0.13239008 = sum of:
            0.13239008 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13239008 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  4. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.02
    0.02482314 = product of:
      0.04964628 = sum of:
        0.04964628 = product of:
          0.09929256 = sum of:
            0.09929256 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09929256 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
  5. Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982) 0.02
    0.02482314 = product of:
      0.04964628 = sum of:
        0.04964628 = product of:
          0.09929256 = sum of:
            0.09929256 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09929256 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2007 14:49:22
  6. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.02
    0.02482314 = product of:
      0.04964628 = sum of:
        0.04964628 = product of:
          0.09929256 = sum of:
            0.09929256 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09929256 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  7. Hollender, U.: Heiliger Joseph! : Zu einem Kardinalschreibfehler in deutschen Bibliothekskatalogen (falscher *Guiseppe statt richtigem Giuseppe) (2002) 0.02
    0.023374833 = product of:
      0.046749666 = sum of:
        0.046749666 = product of:
          0.09349933 = sum of:
            0.09349933 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09349933 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35945287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.26011568 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In schätzungsweise jedem vierten deutschen Zeitungsartikel und InternetDokument, in dem der italienische Vorname Giuseppe enthalten ist, taucht der Fehler auf, sei nun die Rede von Verdi, Arcimboldo oder Garibaldi: Giuseppe wird falsch geschrieben, nämlich als *Guiseppe, als handele sich um eine Variante von Guido, was dem deutschen Auge offensichtlich vertrauter ist. Bemerkenswert ist, dass die Buchstaben "i" und "u° auf der Tastatur direkt nebeneinander liegen, was der Tippfehleranfälligkeit Vorschub leistet. Lässt man die Internet-Suchmaschine Google "Seiten auf deutsch" absuchen, findet sie 61.500 Giuseppes und 15.200 *Guiseppes (über 25%). Google ist übrigens seit neuestem so "intelligent', bei der falschen Eingabe zu fragen: "Meinten Sie Giuseppe?'. Schränkt man die Suchmaschine auf italienisch-sprachige Seiten ein, sinkt der Anteil der falschen Schreibweise auf 0,54 % (426.000 richtige gegen 2.330 falsche). Bei genauerem Hinsehen tauchen die meisten der Falschschreibungen bei offenbar amerikanischen dot-com-Seiten auf, die italienische Genealogien aufschlüsseln. Die genuin aus Italien stammenden Seiten weisen nur in den allerwenigsten Fällen den Fehler auf. Dieses Phänomen fiel mir als Romanistin zunächst auf, dann störte es mich, später belustigte es mich beinahe und schließlich wurde die Suche danach fast zum Spiel. Unter bibliothekarischen Gesichtspunkten ist der Fehler ein Ärgernis, hat sich doch diese falsche Schreibweise massenhaft in bibliothekarische Datenbanken eingeschlichen. Als ich schon vor Jahren eine Düsseldorfer Diplombibliothekarin darauf ansprach, widersprach diese und behauptete, es gebe sehr wohl den Namen in der Schreibweise *Guiseppe neben der - vielleicht üblicheren - Form Giuseppe. Und tatsächlich findet sich die falsche Form in manchen Vornamenbüchern - so oft schon wurde der Fehler tradiert, dass er jetzt schon legitimiert erscheint. Schlägt man hingegen in italienischen Vornamenbüchern nach, zeigt sich, dass man hier vergeblich nach *Guiseppe suchen muss.
  8. Scholz, D.: Retrokonversion in der Zentralbibliothek der Universitätsbibliothek Dortmund : Abschlussbericht November 1995 bis April 2003 (2003) 0.02
    0.023374833 = product of:
      0.046749666 = sum of:
        0.046749666 = product of:
          0.09349933 = sum of:
            0.09349933 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 1941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09349933 = score(doc=1941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35945287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.26011568 = fieldWeight in 1941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1941)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die Abteilung Retrokonversion der Universitätsbibliothek - Die Abteilung Retrokonversion nahm im November 1995 ihre Arbeit zunächst mit einer Diplombibliothekarin auf. Aufgabenstellung war es, einen Geschäftsgang zu entwickeln, der eine rationelle Bearbeitung der Altbestände und einen kurzfristigen Nachweis im HBZ ermöglicht. Hier bot sich der Standortkatalog als Arbeitsinstrument für die Bestände der Zentralbibliothek an. Bedingt durch die Aufstellungssystematik der Zentralbibliothek in Großgruppen mit Numerus currens, wurden Signaturengruppen mit hoher Ausleihfrequenz für die Retrokonversion vorrangig ausgewählt. Ausgenommen von der Bearbeitung durch die Abteilung Retrokonversion wurden die Handbibliotheksbestände, die Lehrbuchsammlung und Mikrofiches, die von der Abteilung Monographienkatalogisierung im laufenden Geschäft bearbeitet wurden. Weiterhin ausgenommen waren die Altbestände der 17 Bereichsbibliotheken, hier erfolgte die Katalogisierung der nicht per EDV erfassten Bücher bereits seit 1993 anhand der vorhandenen Standortkataloge und vielfach in Autopsie. Von 1993 bis zum Abschluss in diesem Jahr wurden rund 190.000 Bände bearbeitet. Diese Tätigkeit wurde neben der normalen Arbeit durchgeführt. Nach der Erstellung eines Anweisungsprofils für die Arbeit mit dem HBZ konnten für eine Testphase, von Mai bis September 1996, 5 studentische Hilfskräfte für die Retrokonversion gewonnen werden. Nach erfolgreicher Testphase wurde das Personal aufgestockt. Im Oktober 1996 wurde dann die Produktion mit 10 studentischen Hilfskräften und 2, zeitweise 3, Diplombibliothekarinnen aufgenommen. Während der gesamten Laufzeit des Projektes wurden pro Jahr bis zu 12 verschiedene studentische Hilfskräfte mit insgesamt bis zu 125 Wochenstunden beschäftigt. Insgesamt wurden 28 studentische Hilfskräfte ausgewählt, angelernt und betreut. Die studentischen Hilfskräfte waren Angehörige sieben verschiedener Nationen, darunter auch Griechenland und Marokko. Der Anteil an studentischen Hilfskräften, deren Muttersprache nicht Deutsch ist, war gerade in der zweiten Hälfte des Projekts sehr hoch. Erschwerend kam im April 2000 die Umstellung auf das ALEPH-System im HBZ hinzu, was einen zusätzlichen Schulungsbedarf zur Folge hatte. - Die Arbeit in der Retrokonversion - Zeitgleich mit der Retrokonversion vor Ort wurde das Projekt Retrokonversion des Zentralkatalogs NRW 1800-1975 begonnen, bei dem die Firma DMP die Bestände der nordrhein-westfälischen Bibliotheken im Online-Katalog zugänglich machte. Das Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen stellte zusätzliche Geldmittel für die Einstellung von studentischen Hilfskräften in den beteiligten Bibliotheken des HBZ-Verbundes zur Verfügung. Da die Bestände der Zentralbibliothek in hohem Maße identisch sind mit Beständen anderer nordrhein-westfälischer Bibliotheken, und gerade in der Anfangsphase Signaturengruppen mit hoher Ausleihfrequenz vorrangig bearbeitet wurden, waren hohe Trefferquoten (bis zu 90%) bei der Recherche in der Datenbank des HBZ-Katalogs an der Tagesordnung. Schwierigkeiten bereitete die zunehmende Treffermenge je Suchanfrage durch die offline erfassten DMP-Aufnahmen, die in größeren Zeitabständen eingespielt wurden. Die Identifizierung einer Titelaufnahme als relevanten Nachweis für den Dortmunder Bestand wurde erschwert (Kriterien: Vollständigkeit und Richtigkeit der Titelaufnahme, Mehrheitsaufnahme, evtl. bereits Dortmunder Bestand nachgewiesen u.a.).
  9. Miksa, S.D.: Educators: what are the cataloging issues students get excited about? : professional and intellectual appeals of cataloging and students' misconceptions of cataloging (2008) 0.02
    0.022238752 = product of:
      0.044477504 = sum of:
        0.044477504 = product of:
          0.13343251 = sum of:
            0.13343251 = weight(_text_:objects in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13343251 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32460076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the professional and intellectual appeals demonstrated by cataloging students, as well as some common misconceptions. Given the current digital environment and the "Amazoogle" effect, students face many challenges when striving to complete a basic course in descriptive and subject cataloging. In the process, they face issues of varieties of information objects, how to tame tools such as AACR2 and LCSH, and how MARC encoding fits into the overall process of cataloging. They also must learn to re-conceptualize their ideas of copy cataloging and learn to appreciate the authoritative power that comes with using and applying cataloger's judgment.
  10. Buckland, M.: Document theory (2018) 0.02
    0.022238752 = product of:
      0.044477504 = sum of:
        0.044477504 = product of:
          0.13343251 = sum of:
            0.13343251 = weight(_text_:objects in 4536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13343251 = score(doc=4536,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32460076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4536, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4536)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Document theory examines the concept of a document and how it can serve with other concepts to understand communication, documentation, information, and knowledge. Knowledge organization itself is in practice based on the arrangement of documents representing concepts and knowledge. The word "document" commonly refers to a text or graphic record, but, in a semiotic perspective, non-graphic objects can also be regarded as signifying and, therefore, as documents. The steady increase in the variety and number of documents since prehistoric times enables the development of communities, the division of labor, and reduction of the constraints of space and time. Documents are related to data, facts, texts, works, information, knowledge, signs, and other documents. Documents have physical (material), cognitive, and social aspects.
  11. Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998) 0.02
    0.02068595 = product of:
      0.0413719 = sum of:
        0.0413719 = product of:
          0.0827438 = sum of:
            0.0827438 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0827438 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
  12. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.02
    0.02068595 = product of:
      0.0413719 = sum of:
        0.0413719 = product of:
          0.0827438 = sum of:
            0.0827438 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0827438 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994) 0.02
    0.02068595 = product of:
      0.0413719 = sum of:
        0.0413719 = product of:
          0.0827438 = sum of:
            0.0827438 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0827438 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 4.2020 20:22:29
  14. Miksa, F.: ¬The legacy of the library catalogue for the present (2012) 0.02
    0.019061789 = product of:
      0.038123578 = sum of:
        0.038123578 = product of:
          0.114370726 = sum of:
            0.114370726 = weight(_text_:objects in 5556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.114370726 = score(doc=5556,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32460076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 5556, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5556)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The specter of impending change in library catalogues is strong but not very clear. In an attempt to help the clarification process, the first part of the present report discusses historical themes from the modern library catalogue legacy that has developed since the mid-nineteenth century-the origins and subsequent dominance of the dictionary catalogue for more than a century, considerations of library catalogue users and use over the same period, developments apart from the library catalogue during the twentieth century that have affected it, and aspects of the idea of the objects of a catalogue. In a second part, the general environment for the most recent period of library catalogue development is described, after which aspects of the historical legacy are used as a basis for raising questions relevant to impending library catalogue change.
  15. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.02
    0.017552612 = product of:
      0.035105225 = sum of:
        0.035105225 = product of:
          0.07021045 = sum of:
            0.07021045 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07021045 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  16. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.02
    0.01654876 = product of:
      0.03309752 = sum of:
        0.03309752 = product of:
          0.06619504 = sum of:
            0.06619504 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06619504 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  17. Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.02
    0.01654876 = product of:
      0.03309752 = sum of:
        0.03309752 = product of:
          0.06619504 = sum of:
            0.06619504 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06619504 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
  18. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.02
    0.01654876 = product of:
      0.03309752 = sum of:
        0.03309752 = product of:
          0.06619504 = sum of:
            0.06619504 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06619504 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.02
    0.01654876 = product of:
      0.03309752 = sum of:
        0.03309752 = product of:
          0.06619504 = sum of:
            0.06619504 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06619504 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.02
    0.01654876 = product of:
      0.03309752 = sum of:
        0.03309752 = product of:
          0.06619504 = sum of:
            0.06619504 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06619504 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2138629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.06107176 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22