Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. XFML Core - eXchangeable Faceted Metadata Language (2003) 0.02
    0.015757862 = product of:
      0.10505241 = sum of:
        0.03501747 = weight(_text_:software in 6673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03501747 = score(doc=6673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 6673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6673)
        0.03501747 = weight(_text_:software in 6673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03501747 = score(doc=6673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 6673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6673)
        0.03501747 = weight(_text_:software in 6673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03501747 = score(doc=6673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 6673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6673)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Abstract
    The specification for XFML, a markup language designed to handle faceted classifications. Browsing the site (http://www.xfml.org/) will reveal news about XFML and links to related software and web sites. XFML is not an officially recognized Internet standard, but is the de facto standard.
  2. Louie, A.J.; Maddox, E.L.; Washington, W.: Using faceted classification to provide structure for information architecture (2003) 0.01
    0.007716874 = product of:
      0.051445827 = sum of:
        0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017148608 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
        0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017148608 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
        0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017148608 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the ASIS&T 2003 Information Architecture Summit, Portland, OR, 21-23 March 2003.
  3. Gnoli, C.; Pusterla, L.; Bendiscioli, A.; Recinella, C.: Classification for collections mapping and query expansion (2016) 0.01
    0.007716874 = product of:
      0.051445827 = sum of:
        0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017148608 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
        0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017148608 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
        0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017148608 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Pages
    S.23-31
  4. Robbio, A. de; Maguolo, D.; Marini, A.: Scientific and general subject classifications in the digital world (2001) 0.01
    0.0063031456 = product of:
      0.04202097 = sum of:
        0.014006989 = weight(_text_:software in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014006989 = score(doc=2,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
        0.014006989 = weight(_text_:software in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014006989 = score(doc=2,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
        0.014006989 = weight(_text_:software in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014006989 = score(doc=2,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Abstract
    In the present work we discuss opportunities, problems, tools and techniques encountered when interconnecting discipline-specific subject classifications, primarily organized as search devices in bibliographic databases, with general classifications originally devised for book shelving in public libraries. We first state the fundamental distinction between topical (or subject) classifications and object classifications. Then we trace the structural limitations that have constrained subject classifications since their library origins, and the devices that were used to overcome the gap with genuine knowledge representation. After recalling some general notions on structure, dynamics and interferences of subject classifications and of the objects they refer to, we sketch a synthetic overview on discipline-specific classifications in Mathematics, Computing and Physics, on one hand, and on general classifications on the other. In this setting we present The Scientific Classifications Page, which collects groups of Web pages produced by a pool of software tools for developing hypertextual presentations of single or paired subject classifications from sequential source files, as well as facilities for gathering information from KWIC lists of classification descriptions. Further we propose a concept-oriented methodology for interconnecting subject classifications, with the concrete support of a relational analysis of the whole Mathematics Subject Classification through its evolution since 1959. Finally, we recall a very basic method for interconnection provided by coreference in bibliographic records among index elements from different systems, and point out the advantages of establishing the conditions of a more widespread application of such a method. A part of these contents was presented under the title Mathematics Subject Classification and related Classifications in the Digital World at the Eighth International Conference Crimea 2001, "Libraries and Associations in the Transient World: New Technologies and New Forms of Cooperation", Sudak, Ukraine, June 9-17, 2001, in a special session on electronic libraries, electronic publishing and electronic information in science chaired by Bernd Wegner, Editor-in-Chief of Zentralblatt MATH.
  5. Denton, W.: Putting facets on the Web : an annotated bibliography (2003) 0.01
    0.005571246 = product of:
      0.03714164 = sum of:
        0.012380547 = weight(_text_:software in 2467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012380547 = score(doc=2467,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.15496688 = fieldWeight in 2467, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2467)
        0.012380547 = weight(_text_:software in 2467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012380547 = score(doc=2467,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.15496688 = fieldWeight in 2467, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2467)
        0.012380547 = weight(_text_:software in 2467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012380547 = score(doc=2467,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.15496688 = fieldWeight in 2467, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2467)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Abstract
    Consider movie listings in newspapers. Most Canadian newspapers list movie showtimes in two large blocks, for the two major theatre chains. The listings are ordered by region (in large cities), then theatre, then movie, and finally by showtime. Anyone wondering where and when a particular movie is playing must scan the complete listings. Determining what movies are playing in the next half hour is very difficult. When movie listings went onto the web, most sites used a simple faceted organization, always with movie name and theatre, and perhaps with region or neighbourhood (thankfully, theatre chains were left out). They make it easy to pick a theatre and see what movies are playing there, or to pick a movie and see what theatres are showing it. To complete the system, the sites should allow users to browse by neighbourhood and showtime, and to order the results in any way they desired. Thus could people easily find answers to such questions as, "Where is the new James Bond movie playing?" "What's showing at the Roxy tonight?" "I'm going to be out in in Little Finland this afternoon with three hours to kill starting at 2 ... is anything interesting playing?" A hypertext, faceted classification system makes more useful information more easily available to the user. Reading the books and articles below in chronological order will show a certain progression: suggestions that faceting and hypertext might work well, confidence that facets would work well if only someone would make such a system, and finally the beginning of serious work on actually designing, building, and testing faceted web sites. There is a solid basis of how to make faceted classifications (see Vickery in Recommended), but their application online is just starting. Work on XFML (see Van Dijck's work in Recommended) the Exchangeable Faceted Metadata Language, will make this easier. If it follows previous patterns, parts of the Internet community will embrace the idea and make open source software available for others to reuse. It will be particularly beneficial if professionals in both information studies and computer science can work together to build working systems, standards, and code. Each can benefit from the other's expertise in what can be a very complicated and technical area. One particularly nice thing about this area of research is that people interested in combining facets and the web often have web sites where they post their writings.
    This bibliography is not meant to be exhaustive, but unfortunately it is not as complete as I wanted. Some books and articles are not be included, but they may be used in my future work. (These include two books and one article by B.C. Vickery: Faceted Classification Schemes (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, 1966), Classification and Indexing in Science, 3rd ed. (London: Butterworths, 1975), and "Knowledge Representation: A Brief Review" (Journal of Documentation 42 no. 3 (September 1986): 145-159; and A.C. Foskett's "The Future of Faceted Classification" in The Future of Classification, edited by Rita Marcella and Arthur Maltby (Aldershot, England: Gower, 2000): 69-80). Nevertheless, I hope this bibliography will be useful for those both new to or familiar with faceted hypertext systems. Some very basic resources are listed, as well as some very advanced ones. Some example web sites are mentioned, but there is no detailed technical discussion of any software. The user interface to any web site is extremely important, and this is briefly mentioned in two or three places (for example the discussion of lawforwa.org (see Example Web Sites)). The larger question of how to display information graphically and with hypertext is outside the scope of this bibliography. There are five sections: Recommended, Background, Not Relevant, Example Web Sites, and Mailing Lists. Background material is either introductory, advanced, or of peripheral interest, and can be read after the Recommended resources if the reader wants to know more. The Not Relevant category contains articles that may appear in bibliographies but are not relevant for my purposes.
  6. Hasubick, J.; Wiesenmüller, H.: RVK-Registerbegriffe in der Katalogrecherche : Chancen und Grenzen (2022) 0.00
    0.0038156179 = product of:
      0.038156178 = sum of:
        0.016063396 = weight(_text_:und in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016063396 = score(doc=538,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
        0.022092782 = weight(_text_:der in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022092782 = score(doc=538,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.4911232 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die Registerbegriffe der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) werden bisher in der Regel nur für die Suche nach passenden Systemstellen verwendet. Die vor einigen Jahren erfolgte Verknüpfung der RVK mit der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) und die Aufbereitung der RVK als Normdatei lassen es jedoch denkbar erscheinen, die Registerbegriffe auch im Rahmen der Katalogrecherche zu nutzen - insbesondere für weiterführende und explorierende Recherchen im Anschluss an eine "known-item search". Der Aufsatz stellt die Ergebnisse einer Studie zu einer möglichen Einbindung von RVK-Registerbegriffen in die Katalogrecherche am Beispiel des K10plus vor. Dabei wurde für Notationsstichproben aus fünf Fachsystematiken sowohl der quantitative als auch der qualitative Mehrwert einer Recherche mit entsprechenden Registerbegriffen ermittelt. Es ergaben sich drei Kategorien von Notationen und ihren Registereinträgen: eindeutig geeignete, eindeutig nicht geeignete und ein großer Teil von Fällen, die nur nach umfassenden Vorarbeiten sinnvoll eingebunden werden könnten. Die herausgearbeiteten Fall-Cluster geben einen Überblick über die Chancen und Grenzen einer möglichen Einbindung der RVK-Registerbegriffe in die Katalogrecherche.
  7. Wätjen, H.-J.: Automatisches Sammeln, Klassifizieren und Indexieren von wissenschaftlich relevanten Informationsressourcen im deutschen World Wide Web : das DFG-Projekt GERHARD (1998) 0.00
    0.0026630415 = product of:
      0.026630415 = sum of:
        0.010929758 = weight(_text_:und in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010929758 = score(doc=3066,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
        0.015700657 = weight(_text_:der in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015700657 = score(doc=3066,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Footnote
    Vortrag auf der 20. Online-Tagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation, 5.-7.5.1998. Session 3: WWW-Suchmaschinen
  8. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.00
    0.0020024616 = product of:
      0.020024616 = sum of:
        0.010929758 = weight(_text_:und in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010929758 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
        0.009094859 = product of:
          0.027284576 = sum of:
            0.027284576 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027284576 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Content
    Präsentation zum Vortrag anlässlich des 98. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Erfurt: Ein neuer Blick auf Bibliotheken; TK10: Information erschließen und recherchieren Inhalte erschließen - mit neuen Tools
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  9. Braune-Egloff, D.: Integration der klassifikatorischen Suche in den Online-Katalog der FU Berlin, http://opac.fu-berlin.de : Nachtrag zur Präsentation in Krems am 23.09.2008 (2008) 0.00
    9.420394E-4 = product of:
      0.018840788 = sum of:
        0.018840788 = weight(_text_:der in 6866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018840788 = score(doc=6866,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 6866, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6866)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
  10. Svensson, L.G.: Integrating browsing over DDC notations in library portals (2007) 0.00
    9.420394E-4 = product of:
      0.018840788 = sum of:
        0.018840788 = weight(_text_:der in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018840788 = score(doc=111,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Content
    Vortrag während der EDUG-Konferenz der European DDC users' group am 11.06.2007 in Bern.
  11. Geißelmann, F.: ¬Die Online-Version der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (1997) 0.00
    7.771429E-4 = product of:
      0.015542857 = sum of:
        0.015542857 = weight(_text_:der in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015542857 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
  12. Pika, J.: Universal Decimal Classification at the ETH-Bibliothek Zürich : a Swiss perspective (2007) 0.00
    4.1298367E-4 = product of:
      0.008259674 = sum of:
        0.008259674 = product of:
          0.016519347 = sum of:
            0.016519347 = weight(_text_:29 in 5899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016519347 = score(doc=5899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 29(2007), S.229-251
  13. Panzer, M.: Towards the "webification" of controlled subject vocabulary : a case study involving the Dewey Decimal Classification (2007) 0.00
    3.8857144E-4 = product of:
      0.0077714287 = sum of:
        0.0077714287 = weight(_text_:der in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0077714287 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
  14. Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003) 0.00
    3.6379436E-4 = product of:
      0.007275887 = sum of:
        0.007275887 = product of:
          0.02182766 = sum of:
            0.02182766 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02182766 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Source
    http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
  15. Schallier, W.: Why organize information if you can find it? : UDC and libraries in an Internet world (2007) 0.00
    3.441531E-4 = product of:
      0.0068830615 = sum of:
        0.0068830615 = product of:
          0.013766123 = sum of:
            0.013766123 = weight(_text_:29 in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013766123 = score(doc=549,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 29(2007), S.183-190