Search (44 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Francu, V.: Building a multilingual thesaurus based on UDC (1996) 0.21
    0.20648976 = product of:
      0.24778771 = sum of:
        0.012822312 = weight(_text_:und in 7410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012822312 = score(doc=7410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 7410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7410)
        0.061184157 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 7410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061184157 = score(doc=7410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 7410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7410)
        0.020018218 = weight(_text_:des in 7410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020018218 = score(doc=7410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 7410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7410)
        0.08549531 = weight(_text_:prinzips in 7410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08549531 = score(doc=7410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27041927 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.31615835 = fieldWeight in 7410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.723078 = idf(docFreq=392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7410)
        0.06826771 = product of:
          0.13653542 = sum of:
            0.13653542 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 7410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13653542 = score(doc=7410,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.62530804 = fieldWeight in 7410, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7410)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Abstract
    Once the library has been through a process of transition from traditional library procedures to automated ones, natural language searching became a necessity for both indexers and searchers. Therefore, aside from the precoordinated classified catalogue we started to build a dictionary of terms in order to make postcoordinate search possible in keeping with the UDC notations assigned to each bibliographic record. After a while we came to the conclusion that the dictionary needed a control of its terms so that synonymous concepts and semantic ambuguities be avoided. The project presented in this paper shows how reality imposed the improvement of the quality of indexing and hence of the searching possibilities. Is also shows the reasons why we consider a multilingual thesaurus based on UDC an ideal indexing and searching device. The experiment applied on class 8 of UDC illustrates the way the UDC tables can be quite successfully used in building a thesaurus due to their qulities and how their limitations can be overcome by a thesaurus. An appendix to the paper contains a sample of the multilingual thesaurus given in both alphabetical and systematic layouts
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Reisser, M.: ¬Die Darstellung begrifflicher Kontexte im Online-Retrieval (1995) 0.08
    0.078827344 = product of:
      0.15765469 = sum of:
        0.04397137 = weight(_text_:und in 934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04397137 = score(doc=934,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 934, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=934)
        0.08565781 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08565781 = score(doc=934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=934)
        0.028025504 = weight(_text_:des in 934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028025504 = score(doc=934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=934)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die traditionellen Verfahren der klassifikatorischen sachlichen Erschließung von Medieninhalten heben auf die Eindeutigkeit der Zuordnung von Objekt (Medieninhalt) und Klasse ab. Sie unterscheiden sich damit in der Praxis des Online-Retrievals nur unwesentlich von den Verfahren der verbalen sachlichen Erschließung (z.B. Thesauri, SWD/RSWK). Auf der Grundlage der in der Sacherschließungstheorie vorgenommenen Unterscheidung von klassifikatorischer und verbaler Sacherschließung werden mögliche und bereits in Anwendung befindliche Verfahren diskutiert, welche die begrifflichen Kontexte der Klassen für den Anwender einer bibliothekarischen Klassifikation im Online-Retrieval nutzbar machen
    Imprint
    Oldenburg : Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem
    Source
    Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
  3. Kluck, M.: Weiterentwicklung der Instrumente für die inhaltliche Erschließung und für Recherchen (1996) 0.06
    0.05607783 = product of:
      0.11215566 = sum of:
        0.035534237 = weight(_text_:und in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035534237 = score(doc=4849,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
        0.03202915 = weight(_text_:des in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03202915 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
        0.044592276 = product of:
          0.08918455 = sum of:
            0.08918455 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08918455 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.40844947 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Für die Recherchen in den Datenbanken FORIS und SOLIS bietet das IZ verschiedene Einstiegsmöglichkeiten, die - abhängig von der Fragestellung - einzeln oder kombiniert genutzt werden können: bibliographische Elemente, wie z.B. Namen von Autoren oder Projektleitern, Erscheinungsjahre von Veröffentlichungen oder Laufzeiten von Projekten, sowie inhaltlich orientierte Einstiege, wie z.B. Textrecherchen, Klassifikationen oder Schlagwörter
    Object
    Thesaurus Sozialwissenschaften
    Source
    Informationsservice des IZ Sozialwissenschaften: Datenbankentwicklung und -nutzung, Netzwerke, Wissenschaftsforschung. Hrsg.: J. Krause u. M. Zimmer
  4. Francu, V.: Construirea unui tezaur multilingv bazat pr CZU (1997) 0.04
    0.035354 = product of:
      0.106061995 = sum of:
        0.028025504 = weight(_text_:des in 3221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028025504 = score(doc=3221,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 3221, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3221)
        0.07803649 = product of:
          0.15607297 = sum of:
            0.15607297 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15607297 = score(doc=3221,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.7147866 = fieldWeight in 3221, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3221)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The automation of Bucharest University Central Library involved the compilation of a dictionary of terms to facilitate postcoordinated searching in accordance with the UDC notation attached to every bibliographic record. Describes the project and demonstrates why a multilingual UDC based thesaurus is considered as ideal indexing and searching tool. The experiment, which applied to Class 8 of UDC (Linguisitcs and Literature), illustrates how all UDC tables can be successfully used to build a thesaurus and the ways in which their limitations can be overcome by a thesaurus
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Building a multilingual thesaurus based on UDC
  5. Trinkhaus, M.: Möglichkeiten und Aspekte des sachlichen Zugriffs in Online-Katalogen (1990) 0.03
    0.030521363 = product of:
      0.09156409 = sum of:
        0.043520372 = weight(_text_:und in 1301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043520372 = score(doc=1301,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1301, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1301)
        0.04804372 = weight(_text_:des in 1301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04804372 = score(doc=1301,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 1301, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1301)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek. Forschung und Praxis. 14(1990), S.193-225
  6. Hondt, E. d': ¬Die Anwendung der Dezimalklassifikation (DK) in einer automatisierten theologischen Bibliothek (1990) 0.03
    0.028552605 = product of:
      0.17131563 = sum of:
        0.17131563 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17131563 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.74887794 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  7. Zimmermann, H.H.: Zur Struktur und Nutzung von Klassifikationen im Bibliothekswesen : Beispiel der Klassifikation der Deutschen Bibliothek und der sog. Niederländischen Basiskklassifikation (1994) 0.03
    0.02543447 = product of:
      0.07630341 = sum of:
        0.036266975 = weight(_text_:und in 6027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036266975 = score(doc=6027,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 6027, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6027)
        0.040036436 = weight(_text_:des in 6027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040036436 = score(doc=6027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 6027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6027)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Mehrwert von Information - Professionalisierung der Informationsarbeit: Proceedings des 4. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'94), Graz, 2.-4. November 1994. Hrsg.: W. Rauch u.a
  8. Wätjen, H.-J.: GERHARD : Automatisches Sammeln, Klassifizieren und Indexieren von wissenschaftlich relevanten Informationsressourcen im deutschen World Wide Web (1998) 0.03
    0.02517884 = product of:
      0.07553652 = sum of:
        0.035902474 = weight(_text_:und in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035902474 = score(doc=3064,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
        0.03963405 = weight(_text_:des in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03963405 = score(doc=3064,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.302893 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die intellektuelle Erschließung des Internet befindet sich in einer Krise. Yahoo und andere Dienste können mit dem Wachstum des Web nicht mithalten. GERHARD ist derzeit weltweit der einzige Such- und Navigationsdienst, der die mit einem Roboter gesammelten Internetressourcen mit computerlinguistischen und statistischen Verfahren auch automatisch vollständig klassifiziert. Weit über eine Million HTML-Dokumente von wissenschaftlich relevanten Servern in Deutschland können wie bei anderen Suchmaschinen in der Datenbank gesucht, aber auch über die Navigation in der dreisprachigen Universalen Dezimalklassifikation (ETH-Bibliothek Zürich) recherchiert werden
  9. Lim, E.: Subject Gateways in Südostasien : Anwendung von Klassifikationen (1999) 0.02
    0.024473663 = product of:
      0.14684197 = sum of:
        0.14684197 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14684197 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22876309 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  10. Gödert, W.: Facettenklassifikation im Online-Retrieval (1992) 0.02
    0.0235755 = product of:
      0.0707265 = sum of:
        0.031092454 = weight(_text_:und in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031092454 = score(doc=4574,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
        0.03963405 = weight(_text_:des in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03963405 = score(doc=4574,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.302893 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Facettenklassifikationen wurden bislang vorwiegend im Hinblick auf ihre Verwendungsmöglichkeiten in präkombinierten systematischen Katalogen bzw. Bibliographien betrachtet, nicht so sehr unter dem Aspekt eines möglichen Einsatzes in postkoordinierenden Retrievalsystemen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag soll nachgewiesen werden, daß Facettenklassifikationen anderen Techniken des Online Retrievals überlegen sein können. Hierzu sollten Begriffs- und Facettenanalyse mit einem strukturabbildenden Notationssystem kombiniert werden, um mit Hilfe Boolescher Operatoren (zur Verknüpfung von Facetten unabhängig von einer definierten Citation order) und Truncierung hierarchisch differenzierte Dokumentenmengen für komplexe Fragestellungen zu erhalten. Die Methode wird an zwei Beispielen illustriert: das erste nutzt eine kleine, von B. Buchanan entwickelte Klassifikation, das zweite das für Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) verwendete Klassifikationssystem. Weiter wird am Beispiel PRECIS diskutiert, welche Möglichkeiten des syntaktischen Retrievals Rollenoperatoren bieten können.
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 16(1992) H.3, S.382-395
  11. Koch, T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: DDC and knowledge organization in the digital library : Research and development. Demonstration pages (1999) 0.02
    0.021581864 = product of:
      0.06474559 = sum of:
        0.030773548 = weight(_text_:und in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030773548 = score(doc=942,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
        0.03397204 = weight(_text_:des in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03397204 = score(doc=942,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.25962257 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Der Workshop gibt einen Einblick in die aktuelle Forschung und Entwicklung zur Wissensorganisation in digitalen Bibliotheken. Diane Vizine-Goetz vom OCLC Office of Research in Dublin, Ohio, stellt die Forschungsprojekte von OCLC zur Anpassung und Weiterentwicklung der Dewey Decimal Classification als Wissensorganisationsinstrument fuer grosse digitale Dokumentensammlungen vor. Traugott Koch, NetLab, Universität Lund in Schweden, demonstriert die Ansätze und Lösungen des EU-Projekts DESIRE zum Einsatz von intellektueller und vor allem automatischer Klassifikation in Fachinformationsdiensten im Internet.
    Footnote
    Vortrag anläßlich des Workshops am 21.10.1999, Deutsche Bibliothek, Frankfurt/M.
  12. Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999) 0.02
    0.020908605 = product of:
      0.06272581 = sum of:
        0.043520372 = weight(_text_:und in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043520372 = score(doc=4189,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
        0.01920544 = product of:
          0.03841088 = sum of:
            0.03841088 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03841088 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16546379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Eine ganze Anzahl von Bibliotheken in Europa befaßt sich mit der Entwicklung von Internet Subject Gateways - einer Serviceleistung, die den Nutzern helfen soll, qualitativ hochwertige Internetquellen zu finden. Subject Gateways wie SOSIG (The Social Science Information Gateway) sind bereits seit einigen Jahren im Internet verfügbar und stellen eine Alternative zu Internet-Suchmaschinen wie AltaVista und Verzeichnissen wie Yahoo dar. Bezeichnenderweise stützen sich Subject Gateways auf die Fertigkeiten, Verfahrensweisen und Standards der internationalen Bibliothekswelt und wenden diese auf Informationen aus dem Internet an. Dieses Referat will daher betonen, daß Bibliothekare/innen idealerweise eine vorherrschende Rolle im Aufbau von Suchservices für Internetquellen spielen und daß Information Gateways eine Möglichkeit dafür darstellen. Es wird einige der Subject Gateway-Initiativen in Europa umreißen und die Werkzeuge und Technologien beschreiben, die vom Projekt DESIRE entwickelt wurden, um die Entwicklung neuer Gateways in anderen Ländern zu unterstützen. Es wird auch erörtert, wie IMesh, eine Gruppe für Gateways aus der ganzen Welt eine internationale Strategie für Gateways anstrebt und versucht, Standards zur Umsetzung dieses Projekts zu entwickeln
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:09
  13. Lincicum, S.: Critical appraisal of the use of classification in the future : non traditional uses of classification: report of a panel discussion (1995) 0.01
    0.010386601 = product of:
      0.062319607 = sum of:
        0.062319607 = product of:
          0.12463921 = sum of:
            0.12463921 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12463921 = score(doc=5570,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.5708255 = fieldWeight in 5570, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5570)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Dagobert Soergel opened the discussion by saying, "Users need our help to find and make sense of information." He said that he believes that classification can provide much of the support users need. He sees little distinction between the concept of a thesaurus and that of classification since both seek to provide structure for knowledge bases in order to facilitate information retrieval. Soergel's discussion of his concept of a multifunctional, multilingual thesaurus comprised the bulk of his presentation. This thesaurus would be a database of concepts, terms, and relationships which would include classification. In this context, classification has a much broader set of functions than it currently does in most American libraries where classification serves primarily as a method of shelf arrangement. The thesaurus Soergel envisions would lay out the semantic map of a field and could therefore be used as a learning tool or as a basis for research planning, or to assist users in clarifying terms and concepts. It could support indexing and searching and provide for the organization of knowledge for expert systems and other artificial intelligence applications. Among its other features, such a thesaurus could assist users in making sense of information by providing structured presentation of search results based on user needs and preferences, and it could enhance natural language processing capabilities such as automated indexing and abstracting and machine translation.
  14. Gödert, W.: Systematisches Suchen und Orientierung in Datenbanken (1995) 0.01
    0.0102578495 = product of:
      0.061547097 = sum of:
        0.061547097 = weight(_text_:und in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061547097 = score(doc=1465,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.58770305 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Imprint
    Oldenburg : Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem
    Source
    Zwischen Schreiben und Lesen: Perspektiven für Bibliotheken, Wissenschaft und Kultur. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Hermann Havekost. Hrsg. von H.-J. Wätjen
  15. Geißelmann, F.: ¬Die Online-Version der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (1997) 0.01
    0.009341835 = product of:
      0.05605101 = sum of:
        0.05605101 = weight(_text_:des in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05605101 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.4283554 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Vortrag anläßlich des 24. Österreichischen Bibliothekartages 1996 in Innsbruck
  16. Geißelmann, F.: Online-Version einer Aufstellungssystematik (1995) 0.01
    0.008883559 = product of:
      0.053301353 = sum of:
        0.053301353 = weight(_text_:und in 929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053301353 = score(doc=929,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 929, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=929)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Imprint
    Oldenburg : Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem
    Source
    Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
  17. Gödert, W.: Strukturierung von Klassifikationssystemen und Online-Retrieval (1995) 0.01
    0.0085482085 = product of:
      0.05128925 = sum of:
        0.05128925 = weight(_text_:und in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05128925 = score(doc=922,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Imprint
    Oldenburg : Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem
    Source
    Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
  18. Buxton, A.B.: UDC in online systems (1991) 0.01
    0.0074320463 = product of:
      0.044592276 = sum of:
        0.044592276 = product of:
          0.08918455 = sum of:
            0.08918455 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 7935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08918455 = score(doc=7935,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21834905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04725067 = queryNorm
                0.40844947 = fieldWeight in 7935, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7935)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Examines ho well UDC numbers performs as a subject retrieval device in online systems. Discusses: truncation, coordination, USC as a discipline based scheme, ranges, and requirements in search software. Gives examples of UDC in pre-coordinated and post-coordinated working systems. Discusses the possible use of UDC as a thesaurus. Outlines improvements that would enable its use in online retrieval
  19. Reisser, M.: Anforderungen an bibliothekarische Klassifikationen bei der Verwendung der EDV (1993) 0.01
    0.007328562 = product of:
      0.04397137 = sum of:
        0.04397137 = weight(_text_:und in 5017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04397137 = score(doc=5017,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 5017, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5017)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die Methoden zur formalen und inhaltlichen Erschließung von Medienbeständen in Bibliotheken wurden ausnahmslos vor dem Hintergrund der konventionellen Katalogisierung entwickelt und optimiert. Durch den zunehmenden Einsatz der Computertechnologie in Bibliotheken wird eine kritische Überprüfung der tradierten Erschließungsmethoden erforderlich. Gegenstand dieser Untersuchung ist die bibliothekarische Klassifikation und ihre Verwendung in Online-Publikums-Katalogen (OPAC) und anderen Information-Retrieval-Systemen (IRS). Auf der Grundlage der bibliothekarischen Klassifikationstheorie erfolgt eine Überprüfung der verschiedenen Klassifikationstypen hinsichtlich ihrer Tauglichkeit für die gängigen Recherche-Funktionen in diesen Systemen. Zusätzlich wird ein Anforderungskatalog für die Schlagwort-Register und -indizes entwickelt, der im Online-Dialog den verbalen Zugriff auf die einzelnen Klassen einer bibliothekarischen Klassifikation sicherstellen soll
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 17(1993) H.2, S.137-162
  20. Lischewsky-Weiser, B.: ¬Die Systematik im OPAC (1992) 0.01
    0.0072533954 = product of:
      0.043520372 = sum of:
        0.043520372 = weight(_text_:und in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043520372 = score(doc=4088,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.104724824 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04725067 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Imprint
    Oldenburg : Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität
    Source
    Die Systematik im OPAC: über das Instrumentarium zum Ordnen und Wiederfinden. Vorträge aus den bibliothekarischen Arbeitsgruppen der 16. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Dortmund 1992. Hrsg.: H.-J. Hermes u. H. Havekost