Search (94 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Advances in classification research. Vol.10 : Proceedings of the 10th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, held at the 62nd ASIS Annual Meeting Nov 1-5, 1999, Washington (2001) 0.03 
    0.03211546 = product of:
  0.07493607 = sum of:
    0.014732597 = weight(_text_:m in 1586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014732597 = score(doc=1586,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08930882 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1586, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1586)
    0.05704035 = weight(_text_:u in 1586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05704035 = score(doc=1586,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.1175177 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.48537666 = fieldWeight in 1586, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1586)
    0.003163122 = weight(_text_:a in 1586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003163122 = score(doc=1586,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1586, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1586)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: DAVENPORT, E.: Implicit orders: documentary genres and organizational practice; ANDERSEN, J. u. F.S. CHRISTENSEN: Wittgenstein and indexing theory; OLSON, H.A.: Cultural discourses of classification: indigeous alternatives to the tradition of Aristotle, Dürkheim, and Foucault; FRÂNCU, V.: A universal classification system going through changes; JACOB, E.K. u. U. PRISS: Nontraditional indexing structures for the management of electronic resources; BROOKS, T.A.: Relevance auras: macro patterns and micro scatter; RUIZ, M.E. u. SRINIVASAN, P.: Combining machine learning and hierarchical indexing structures for text categorization; WEEDMAN, J.: Local practice and the growth of knowledge: decisions in subject access to digitized images
    Editor
    Albrechtsen, H. u. J.E. Mai
    Type
    m
  2. Olson, H.A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject access in online catalogs (2001) 0.03 
    0.031003527 = product of:
  0.07234156 = sum of:
    0.024554329 = weight(_text_:m in 4137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024554329 = score(doc=4137,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08930882 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 4137, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4137)
    0.042515367 = weight(_text_:u in 4137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042515367 = score(doc=4137,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1175177 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 4137, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4137)
    0.0052718697 = weight(_text_:a in 4137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052718697 = score(doc=4137,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4137, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4137)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Footnote
    1. Aufl. unter: Aluri, R.D., A. Kemp u. J.J. Boll: Subject analysis in online catalogs. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited 1991. XII,303 S. ISBN 0-87287-670-5
    Type
    m
  3. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.02 
    0.020796053 = product of:
  0.048524123 = sum of:
    0.019643463 = weight(_text_:m in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019643463 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08930882 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
    0.009430609 = weight(_text_:a in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009430609 = score(doc=4869,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
    0.01945005 = product of:
      0.0389001 = sum of:
        0.0389001 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0389001 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12567842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035889357 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
    Type
    a
  4. MacLennan, A.: Classification and the Internet (2000) 0.02 
    0.020658607 = product of:
  0.07230512 = sum of:
    0.05952151 = weight(_text_:u in 3150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05952151 = score(doc=3150,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1175177 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 3150, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3150)
    0.012783607 = weight(_text_:a in 3150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012783607 = score(doc=3150,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 3150, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3150)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Source
    The future of classification. Ed. R. Marcella u. A. Maltby
    Type
    a
  5. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.02 
    0.019093696 = product of:
  0.06682793 = sum of:
    0.042515367 = weight(_text_:u in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042515367 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1175177 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
    0.024312563 = product of:
      0.048625126 = sum of:
        0.048625126 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048625126 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12567842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035889357 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  6. Dumais, S.; Chen, H.: Hierarchical classification of Web content (2000) 0.02 
    0.016384196 = product of:
  0.057344683 = sum of:
    0.05101844 = weight(_text_:u in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05101844 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1175177 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
    0.006326244 = weight(_text_:a in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006326244 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Source
    Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 23rd International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Ed. by N.J. Belkin, P. Ingwersen u. M.K. Leong
    Type
    a
  7. Alex, H.; Heiner-Freiling, M.: Melvil (2005) 0.02 
    0.016241629 = product of:
  0.037897132 = sum of:
    0.01718803 = weight(_text_:m in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01718803 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08930882 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
    0.0036903091 = weight(_text_:a in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0036903091 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
    0.017018795 = product of:
      0.03403759 = sum of:
        0.03403759 = weight(_text_:22 in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03403759 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12567842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035889357 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    Ab Januar 2006 wird Die Deutsche Bibliothek ein neues Webangebot mit dem Namen Melvil starten, das ein Ergebnis ihres Engagements für die DDC und das Projekt DDC Deutsch ist. Der angebotene Webservice basiert auf der Übersetzung der 22. Ausgabe der DDC, die im Oktober 2005 als Druckausgabe im K. G. Saur Verlag erscheint. Er bietet jedoch darüber hinausgehende Features, die den Klassifizierer bei seiner Arbeit unterstützen und erstmals eine verbale Recherche für Endnutzer über DDCerschlossene Titel ermöglichen. Der Webservice Melvil gliedert sich in drei Anwendungen: - MelvilClass, - MelvilSearch und - MelvilSoap.
    Type
    a
  8. National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001) 0.01 
    0.013851939 = product of:
  0.024240892 = sum of:
    0.004910866 = weight(_text_:m in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004910866 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08930882 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.054987464 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
    0.008503073 = weight(_text_:u in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008503073 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1175177 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.07235568 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
    0.0059644403 = weight(_text_:a in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0059644403 = score(doc=2047,freq=64.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
          8.0 = tf(freq=64.0), with freq of:
            64.0 = termFreq=64.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
    0.0048625125 = product of:
      0.009725025 = sum of:
        0.009725025 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009725025 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12567842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035889357 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    Date
    2. 1.2004 10:35:22
    Editor
    Neelameghan, A. u. K.N. Prasad
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.1, S.40-42 (J.-E. Mai): "Introduction: This is a collection of papers presented at the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment held in Bangalore, India, an August 9-11 2001. The collection contains 18 papers dealing with various issues related to knowledge organization and classification theory. The issue of transferring the knowledge, traditions, and theories of bibliographic classification to the digital environment is an important one, and I was excited to learn that proceedings from this seminar were available. Many of us experience frustration an a daily basis due to poorly constructed Web search mechanisms and Web directories. As a community devoted to making information easily accessible we have something to offer the Web community and a seminar an the topic was indeed much needed. Below are brief summaries of the 18 papers presented at the seminar. The order of the summaries follows the order of the papers in the proceedings. The titles of the paper are given in parentheses after the author's name. AHUJA and WESLEY (From "Subject" to "Need": Shift in Approach to Classifying Information an the Internet/Web) argue that traditional bibliographic classification systems fall in the digital environment. One problem is that bibliographic classification systems have been developed to organize library books an shelves and as such are unidimensional and tied to the paper-based environment. Another problem is that they are "subject" oriented in the sense that they assume a relatively stable universe of knowledge containing basic and fixed compartments of knowledge that can be identified and represented. Ahuja and Wesley suggest that classification in the digital environment should be need-oriented instead of subjectoriented ("One important link that binds knowledge and human being is his societal need. ... Hence, it will be ideal to organise knowledge based upon need instead of subject." (p. 10)).
    AHUJA and SATIJA (Relevance of Ranganathan's Classification Theory in the Age of Digital Libraries) note that traditional bibliographic classification systems have been applied in the digital environment with only limited success. They find that the "inherent flexibility of electronic manipulation of documents or their surrogates should allow a more organic approach to allocation of new subjects and appropriate linkages between subject hierarchies." (p. 18). Ahija and Satija also suggest that it is necessary to shift from a "subject" focus to a "need" focus when applying classification theory in the digital environment. They find Ranganathan's framework applicable in the digital environment. Although Ranganathan's focus is "subject oriented and hence emphasise the hierarchical and linear relationships" (p. 26), his framework "can be successfully adopted with certain modifications ... in the digital environment." (p. 26). SHAH and KUMAR (Model for System Unification of Geographical Schedules (Space Isolates)) report an a plan to develop a single schedule for geographical Subdivision that could be used across all classification systems. The authors argue that this is needed in order to facilitate interoperability in the digital environment. SAN SEGUNDO MANUEL (The Representation of Knowledge as a Symbolization of Productive Electronic Information) distills different approaches and definitions of the term "representation" as it relates to representation of knowledge in the library and information science literature and field. SHARADA (Linguistic and Document Classification: Paradigmatic Merger Possibilities) suggests the development of a universal indexing language. The foundation for the universal indexing language is Chomsky's Minimalist Program and Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic classification theory; Acording to the author, based an these approaches, it "should not be a problem" (p. 62) to develop a universal indexing language.
    SELVI (Knowledge Classification of Digital Information Materials with Special Reference to Clustering Technique) finds that it is essential to classify digital material since the amount of material that is becoming available is growing. Selvi suggests using automated classification to "group together those digital information materials or documents that are "most similar" (p. 65). This can be attained by using Cluster analysis methods. PRADHAN and THULASI (A Study of the Use of Classification and Indexing Systems by Web Resource Directories) compare and contrast the classificatory structures of Google, Yahoo, and Looksmart's directories and compare the directories to Dewey Decimal Classification, Library of Congress Classification and Colon Classification's classificatory structures. They find differentes between the directories' and the bibliographic classification systems' classificatory structures and principles. These differentes stem from the fact that bibliographic classification systems are used to "classify academic resources for the research community" (p. 83) and directories "aim to categorize a wider breath of information groups, entertainment, recreation, govt. information, commercial information" (p. 83). NEELAMEGHAN (Hierarchy, Hierarchical Relation and Hierarchical Arrangement) reviews the concept of hierarchy and the formation of hierarchical structures across a variety of domains. NEELAMEGHAN and PRADAD (Digitized Schemes for Subject Classification and Thesauri: Complementary Roles) demonstrate how thesaural relationships (NT, BT, and RT) can be applied to a classification scheme, the Colon Classification in this Gase. NEELAMEGHAN and ASUNDI (Metadata Framework for Describing Embodied Knowledge and Subject Content) propose to use the Generalized Facet Structure framework which is based an Ranganathan's General Theory of Knowledge Classification as a framework for describing the content of documents in a metadata element set for the representation of web documents. CHUDAMANI (Classified Catalogue as a Tool for Subject Based Information Retrieval in both Traditional and Electronic Library Environment) explains why the classified catalogue is superior to the alphabetic cata logue and argues that the same is true in the digital environment.
    PARAMESWARAN (Classification and Indexing: Impact of Classification Theory an PRECIS) reviews the PRECIS system and finds that "it Gould not escape from the impact of the theory of classification" (p. 131). The author further argues that the purpose of classification and subject indexing is the same and that both approaches depends an syntax. This leads to the conclusion that "there is an absolute syntax as the Indian theory of classification points out" (p. 131). SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 1. SA TSAN- A Computer Based Learning Package) and SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 2. Semi-Automatic Synthesis of CC Numbers) present an application to automate classification using a facet classification system, in this Gase, the Colon Classification system. GAIKAIWARI (An Interactive Application for Faceted Classification Systems) presents an application, called SRR, for managing and using a faceted classification scheme in a digital environment. IYER (Use of Instructional Technology to Support Traditional Classroom Learning: A Case Study) describes a course an "Information and Knowledge Organization" that she teaches at the University at Albany (SUNY). The course is a conceptual course that introduces the student to various aspects of knowledge organization. GOPINATH (Universal Classification: How can it be used?) lists fifteen uses of universal classifications and discusses the entities of a number of disciplines. GOPINATH (Knowledge Classification: The Theory of Classification) briefly reviews the foundations for research in automatic classification, summarizes the history of classification, and places Ranganathan's thought in the history of classification.
    Discussion The proceedings of the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment give some insights. However, the depth of analysis and discussion is very uneven across the papers. Some of the papers have substantive research content while others appear to be notes used in the oral presentation. The treatments of the topics are very general in nature. Some papers have a very limited list of references while others have no bibliography. No index has been provided. The transfer of bibliographic knowledge organization theory to the digital environment is an important topic. However, as the papers at this conference have shown, it is also a difficult task. Of the 18 papers presented at this seminar an classification in the digital environment, only 4-5 papers actually deal directly with this important topic. The remaining papers deal with issues that are more or less relevant to classification in the digital environment without explicitly discussing the relation. The reason could be that the authors take up issues in knowledge organization that still need to be investigated and clarified before their application in the digital environment can be considered. Nonetheless, one wishes that the knowledge organization community would discuss the application of classification theory in the digital environment in greater detail. It is obvious from the comparisons of the classificatory structures of bibliographic classification systems and Web directories that these are different and that they probably should be different, since they serve different purposes. Interesting questions in the transformation of bibliographic classification theories to the digital environment are: "Given the existing principles in bibliographic knowledge organization, what are the optimum principles for organization of information, irrespectively of context?" and "What are the fundamental theoretical and practical principles for the construction of Web directories?" Unfortunately, the papers presented at this seminar do not attempt to answer or discuss these questions."
    Type
    m
  9. Gödert, W.: Navigation und Konzepte für ein interaktives Retrieval im OPAC : Oder: Von der Informationserschließung zur Wissenserkundung (2004) 0.01 
    0.010922796 = product of:
  0.038229786 = sum of:
    0.03401229 = weight(_text_:u in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03401229 = score(doc=2195,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1175177 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
    0.004217496 = weight(_text_:a in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004217496 = score(doc=2195,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  10. Gödert, W.: Navigation und Konzepte für ein interaktives Retrieval im OPAC : Oder: Von der Informationserschließung zur Wissenserkundung (2004) 0.01 
    0.010922796 = product of:
  0.038229786 = sum of:
    0.03401229 = weight(_text_:u in 2491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03401229 = score(doc=2491,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1175177 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2491, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2491)
    0.004217496 = weight(_text_:a in 2491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004217496 = score(doc=2491,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2491, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2491)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  11. Sandner, M.; Jahns, Y.: Kurzbericht zum DDC-Übersetzer- und Anwendertreffen bei der IFLA-Konferenz 2005 in Oslo, Norwegen (2005) 0.01 
    0.010790519 = product of:
  0.025177877 = sum of:
    0.008594015 = weight(_text_:m in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008594015 = score(doc=4406,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08930882 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.09622806 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
    0.0018451546 = weight(_text_:a in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0018451546 = score(doc=4406,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.044588212 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
    0.014738708 = product of:
      0.029477416 = sum of:
        0.029477416 = weight(_text_:22 in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029477416 = score(doc=4406,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12567842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035889357 = queryNorm
            0.23454636 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Content
    "Am 16. August 2005 fand in Oslo im Rahmen der heurigen IFLA-Konferenz das alljährliche Treffen der DDC-Übersetzer und der weltweiten DeweyAnwender-Institutionen (Nationalbibliotheken, Ersteller von Nationalbibliografien) statt. Die im Sommer 2005 bereits abgeschlossene deutsche Übersetzung wird in der Druckfassung Ende des Jahres in 4 Bänden vorliegen, beim K. G. Saur Verlag in München erscheinen (ISBN 3-598-11651-9) und 2006 vom ebenfalls erstmals ins Deutsche übersetzten DDC-Lehrbuch (ISBN 3-598-11748-5) begleitet. Pläne für neu startende Übersetzungen der DDC 22 gibt es für folgende Sprachen: Arabisch (mit der wachsenden Notwendigkeit, Klasse 200 Religion zu revidieren), Französisch (es erschien zuletzt eine neue Kurzausgabe 14, nun werden eine vierbändige Druckausgabe und eine frz. Webversion anvisiert), Schwedisch, Vietnamesisch (hierfür wird eine an die Sprache und Schrift angepasste Version des deutschen Übersetzungstools zum Einsatz kommen).
    Allgemein DDC 22 ist im Gegensatz zu den früheren Neuauflagen der Standard Edition eine Ausgabe ohne generelle Überarbeitung einer gesamten Klasse. Sie enthält jedoch zahlreiche Änderungen und Expansionen in fast allen Disziplinen und in vielen Hilfstafeln. Es erschien auch eine Sonderausgabe der Klasse 200, Religion. In der aktuellen Kurzausgabe der DDC 22 (14, aus 2004) sind all diese Neuerungen berücksichtigt. Auch die elektronische Version exisitiert in einer vollständigen (WebDewey) und in einer KurzVariante (Abridged WebDewey) und ist immer auf dem jüngsten Stand der Klassifikation. Ein Tutorial für die Nutzung von WebDewey steht unter www.oclc.org /dewey/ resourcesitutorial zur Verfügung. Der Index enthält in dieser elektronischen Fassung weit mehr zusammengesetzte Notationen und verbale Sucheinstiege (resultierend aus den Titeldaten des "WorldCat") als die Druckausgabe, sowie Mappings zu den aktuellsten Normdatensätzen aus LCSH und McSH. Aktuell Die personelle Zusammensetzung des EPC (Editorial Policy Committee) hat sich im letzten Jahr verändert. Dieses oberste Gremium der DDC hat Prioritäten für den aktuellen Arbeitsplan festgelegt. Es wurde vereinbart, größere Änderungsvorhaben via Dewey-Website künftig wie in einem Stellungnahmeverfahren zur fachlichen Diskussion zu stellen. www.oclc.org/dewey/discussion/."
    Type
    a
  12. Hajdu Barát, A.: Usability and the user interfaces of classical information retrieval languages (2006) 0.01 
    0.010611822 = product of:
  0.037141375 = sum of:
    0.029760756 = weight(_text_:u in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029760756 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1175177 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
    0.0073806182 = weight(_text_:a in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073806182 = score(doc=232,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    This paper examines some traditional information searching methods and their role in Hungarian OPACs. What challenges are there in the digital and online environment? How do users work with them and do they give users satisfactory results? What kinds of techniques are users employing? In this paper I examine the user interfaces of UDC, thesauri, subject headings etc. in the Hungarian library. The key question of the paper is whether a universal system or local solutions is the best approach for searching in the digital environment.
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  13. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.01 
    0.010143234 = product of:
  0.03550132 = sum of:
    0.006326244 = weight(_text_:a in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006326244 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
    0.029175075 = product of:
      0.05835015 = sum of:
        0.05835015 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05835015 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12567842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035889357 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
    Type
    a
  14. LaBarre, K.: ¬A multi faceted view : use of facet analysis in the practice of website organization and access (2006) 0.01 
    0.008203781 = product of:
  0.028713234 = sum of:
    0.021257684 = weight(_text_:u in 257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021257684 = score(doc=257,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1175177 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 257, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=257)
    0.0074555506 = weight(_text_:a in 257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0074555506 = score(doc=257,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 257, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=257)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    In 2001, information architects and knowledge management specialists charged with designing websites and access to corporate knowledge bases seemingly re-discovered a legacy form of information organization and access: faceted analytico-synthetic theory (FAST). Instrumental in creating new and different ways for people to engage with the digital content of the Web, the members of this group have clearly recognized that faceted approaches have the potential to improve access to information on the web. Some of these practitioners explicitly use the forms and language of FAST, while others seem to mimic the forms implicitly (Adkisson, 2003). The focus of this ongoing research study is two-fold. First, access and organizational structures in a stratified random sample of 200 DMOZ websites were examined for evidence of the use of FAST. Second, in the context of unstructured interviews, the understanding and use of FAST among a group of eighteen practitioners is uncovered. This is a preliminary report of the website component capture and interview phases of this research study. Future work will involve formalizing a set of feature guidelines drawn from the initial phases of this research study. Preliminary observations will be drawn from the first phase of this study.
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  15. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: What is a controlled vocabulary? (2002) 0.01 
    0.008022416 = product of:
  0.028078455 = sum of:
    0.019643463 = weight(_text_:m in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019643463 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08930882 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
    0.008434992 = weight(_text_:a in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008434992 = score(doc=2417,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
  16. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Creating a controlled vocabulary (2003) 0.01 
    0.008022416 = product of:
  0.028078455 = sum of:
    0.019643463 = weight(_text_:m in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019643463 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08930882 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
    0.008434992 = weight(_text_:a in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008434992 = score(doc=2461,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
  17. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Controlled vocabularies : a glosso-thesaurus (2003) 0.01 
    0.008022416 = product of:
  0.028078455 = sum of:
    0.019643463 = weight(_text_:m in 2469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019643463 = score(doc=2469,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08930882 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 2469, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2469)
    0.008434992 = weight(_text_:a in 2469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008434992 = score(doc=2469,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2469, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2469)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
  18. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.01 
    0.007967155 = product of:
  0.027885042 = sum of:
    0.008434992 = weight(_text_:a in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008434992 = score(doc=2871,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
    0.01945005 = product of:
      0.0389001 = sum of:
        0.0389001 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0389001 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12567842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035889357 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    This is a report on how Doyle and others made a faceted classification scheme for content management systems and made it browsable on the web (see CMS Review in Example Web Sites, below). They discuss why they did it, how, their use of OPML and XFML, how they did research to find terms and categories, and they also include their taxonomy. It is interesting to see facets used in a business environment.
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
    Type
    a
  19. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Facets and controlled vocabularies : an annotated bibliography (2003) 0.01 
    0.007699538 = product of:
  0.026948381 = sum of:
    0.019643463 = weight(_text_:m in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019643463 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08930882 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
    0.007304918 = weight(_text_:a in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007304918 = score(doc=2900,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
  20. Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: All about facets and controlled vocabularies (2002) 0.01 
    0.007699538 = product of:
  0.026948381 = sum of:
    0.019643463 = weight(_text_:m in 5141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019643463 = score(doc=5141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08930882 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 5141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5141)
    0.007304918 = weight(_text_:a in 5141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007304918 = score(doc=5141,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.041382115 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035889357 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 5141, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5141)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.

Authors

Languages

  • e 77
  • d 16
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 71
  • el 19
  • m 5
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications