Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.15
    0.14781967 = sum of:
      0.025060384 = product of:
        0.100241534 = sum of:
          0.100241534 = weight(_text_:authors in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.100241534 = score(doc=3697,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.12275928 = sum of:
        0.08093592 = weight(_text_:v in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08093592 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
        0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04182336 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
    
    Abstract
    In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
  2. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.06
    0.06137964 = product of:
      0.12275928 = sum of:
        0.12275928 = sum of:
          0.08093592 = weight(_text_:v in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08093592 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04182336 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
    Source
    El profesional de la información, 2007, noviembre-diciembre, v.16, no.6, S.580-589
  3. Broughton, V.; Lane, H.: Classification schemes revisited : applications to Web indexing and searching (2000) 0.05
    0.048490275 = sum of:
      0.0147669725 = product of:
        0.05906789 = sum of:
          0.05906789 = weight(_text_:authors in 2476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05906789 = score(doc=2476,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2476, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2476)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.033723302 = product of:
        0.067446604 = sum of:
          0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 2476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.067446604 = score(doc=2476,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 2476, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2476)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    A short discussion of using classification systems to organize the web, one of many such. The authors are both involved with BC2 and naturally think it is the best system for organizing information online. They list reasons why faceted classifications are best (e.g. no theoretical limits to specificity or exhaustivity; easier to handle complex subjects; flexible enough to accommodate different user needs) and take a brief look at how BC2 works. They conclude with a discussion of how and why it should be applied to online resources, and a plea for recognition of the importance of classification and subject analysis skills, even when full-text searching is available and databases respond instantly.
  4. Broughton, V.; Slavic, A.: Building a faceted classification for the humanities : principles and procedures (2007) 0.04
    0.038792215 = sum of:
      0.011813577 = product of:
        0.04725431 = sum of:
          0.04725431 = weight(_text_:authors in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04725431 = score(doc=2875,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02697864 = product of:
        0.05395728 = sum of:
          0.05395728 = weight(_text_:v in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05395728 = score(doc=2875,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.21528868 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to provide an overview of principles and procedures involved in creating a faceted classification scheme for use in resource discovery in an online environment. Design/methodology/approach - Facet analysis provides an established rigorous methodology for the conceptual organization of a subject field, and the structuring of an associated classification or controlled vocabulary. This paper explains how that methodology was applied to the humanities in the FATKS project, where the objective was to explore the potential of facet analytical theory for creating a controlled vocabulary for the humanities, and to establish the requirements of a faceted classification appropriate to an online environment. A detailed faceted vocabulary was developed for two areas of the humanities within a broader facet framework for the whole of knowledge. Research issues included how to create a data model which made the faceted structure explicit and machine-readable and provided for its further development and use. Findings - In order to support easy facet combination in indexing, and facet searching and browsing on the interface, faceted classification requires a formalized data structure and an appropriate tool for its management. The conceptual framework of a faceted system proper can be applied satisfactorily to humanities, and fully integrated within a vocabulary management system. Research limitations/implications - The procedures described in this paper are concerned only with the structuring of the classification, and do not extend to indexing, retrieval and application issues. Practical implications - Many stakeholders in the domain of resource discovery consider developing their own classification system and supporting tools. The methods described in this paper may clarify the process of building a faceted classification and may provide some useful ideas with respect to the vocabulary maintenance tool. Originality/value - As far as the authors are aware there is no comparable research in this area.
  5. Chandler, A.; LeBlanc, J.: Exploring the potential of a virtual undergraduate library collection based on the hierarchical interface to LC Classification (2006) 0.04
    0.038632046 = sum of:
      0.017720366 = product of:
        0.07088146 = sum of:
          0.07088146 = weight(_text_:authors in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07088146 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02091168 = product of:
        0.04182336 = sum of:
          0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04182336 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Hierarchical Interface to Library of Congress Classification (HILCC) is a system developed by the Columbia University Library to leverage call number data from the MARC holdings records in Columbia's online catalog to create a structured, hierarchical menuing system that provides subject access to the library's electronic resources. In this paper, the authors describe a research initiative at the Cornell University Library to discover if the Columbia HILCC scheme can be used as developed or in modified form to create a virtual undergraduate print collection outside the context of the traditional online catalog. Their results indicate that, with certain adjustments, an HILCC model can indeed, be used to represent the holdings of a large research library's undergraduate collection of approximately 150,000 titles, but that such a model is not infinitely scalable and may require a new approach to browsing such a large information space.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.03
    0.027882243 = product of:
      0.055764485 = sum of:
        0.055764485 = product of:
          0.11152897 = sum of:
            0.11152897 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11152897 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  7. Francu, V.: Construirea unui tezaur multilingv bazat pr CZU (1997) 0.02
    0.023606312 = product of:
      0.047212623 = sum of:
        0.047212623 = product of:
          0.094425246 = sum of:
            0.094425246 = weight(_text_:v in 3221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094425246 = score(doc=3221,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 3221, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3221)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Slavic, A.; Turkulin, B.: Prevajanje klasifikacijskih oznak v naravni jezik (1998) 0.02
    0.023606312 = product of:
      0.047212623 = sum of:
        0.047212623 = product of:
          0.094425246 = sum of:
            0.094425246 = weight(_text_:v in 3229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094425246 = score(doc=3229,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 3229, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3229)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.02
    0.02091168 = product of:
      0.04182336 = sum of:
        0.04182336 = product of:
          0.08364672 = sum of:
            0.08364672 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08364672 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  10. Advances in classification research. Vol.10 : Proceedings of the 10th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, held at the 62nd ASIS Annual Meeting Nov 1-5, 1999, Washington (2001) 0.02
    0.02023398 = product of:
      0.04046796 = sum of:
        0.04046796 = product of:
          0.08093592 = sum of:
            0.08093592 = weight(_text_:v in 1586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08093592 = score(doc=1586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 1586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1586)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: DAVENPORT, E.: Implicit orders: documentary genres and organizational practice; ANDERSEN, J. u. F.S. CHRISTENSEN: Wittgenstein and indexing theory; OLSON, H.A.: Cultural discourses of classification: indigeous alternatives to the tradition of Aristotle, Dürkheim, and Foucault; FRÂNCU, V.: A universal classification system going through changes; JACOB, E.K. u. U. PRISS: Nontraditional indexing structures for the management of electronic resources; BROOKS, T.A.: Relevance auras: macro patterns and micro scatter; RUIZ, M.E. u. SRINIVASAN, P.: Combining machine learning and hierarchical indexing structures for text categorization; WEEDMAN, J.: Local practice and the growth of knowledge: decisions in subject access to digitized images
  11. Broughton, V.: Finding Bliss on the Web : some problems of representing faceted terminologies in digital environments 0.02
    0.02023398 = product of:
      0.04046796 = sum of:
        0.04046796 = product of:
          0.08093592 = sum of:
            0.08093592 = weight(_text_:v in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08093592 = score(doc=3532,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990) 0.02
    0.017426401 = product of:
      0.034852803 = sum of:
        0.034852803 = product of:
          0.069705606 = sum of:
            0.069705606 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069705606 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:22:40
  13. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.02
    0.017426401 = product of:
      0.034852803 = sum of:
        0.034852803 = product of:
          0.069705606 = sum of:
            0.069705606 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069705606 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  14. Francu, V.: Building a multilingual thesaurus based on UDC (1996) 0.02
    0.016861651 = product of:
      0.033723302 = sum of:
        0.033723302 = product of:
          0.067446604 = sum of:
            0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 7410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067446604 = score(doc=7410,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 7410, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7410)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Broughton, V.; Lane, H.: ¬The Bliss Bibliographic Classification in action : moving from a special to a universal faceted classification via a digital platform (2004) 0.02
    0.016861651 = product of:
      0.033723302 = sum of:
        0.033723302 = product of:
          0.067446604 = sum of:
            0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 2633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067446604 = score(doc=2633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 2633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2633)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001) 0.02
    0.016861651 = product of:
      0.033723302 = sum of:
        0.033723302 = product of:
          0.067446604 = sum of:
            0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067446604 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001) 0.02
    0.015324021 = sum of:
      0.008353461 = product of:
        0.033413842 = sum of:
          0.033413842 = weight(_text_:authors in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033413842 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.14246294 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0069705606 = product of:
        0.013941121 = sum of:
          0.013941121 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.013941121 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051448494 = queryNorm
              0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 1.2004 10:35:22
    Footnote
    AHUJA and SATIJA (Relevance of Ranganathan's Classification Theory in the Age of Digital Libraries) note that traditional bibliographic classification systems have been applied in the digital environment with only limited success. They find that the "inherent flexibility of electronic manipulation of documents or their surrogates should allow a more organic approach to allocation of new subjects and appropriate linkages between subject hierarchies." (p. 18). Ahija and Satija also suggest that it is necessary to shift from a "subject" focus to a "need" focus when applying classification theory in the digital environment. They find Ranganathan's framework applicable in the digital environment. Although Ranganathan's focus is "subject oriented and hence emphasise the hierarchical and linear relationships" (p. 26), his framework "can be successfully adopted with certain modifications ... in the digital environment." (p. 26). SHAH and KUMAR (Model for System Unification of Geographical Schedules (Space Isolates)) report an a plan to develop a single schedule for geographical Subdivision that could be used across all classification systems. The authors argue that this is needed in order to facilitate interoperability in the digital environment. SAN SEGUNDO MANUEL (The Representation of Knowledge as a Symbolization of Productive Electronic Information) distills different approaches and definitions of the term "representation" as it relates to representation of knowledge in the library and information science literature and field. SHARADA (Linguistic and Document Classification: Paradigmatic Merger Possibilities) suggests the development of a universal indexing language. The foundation for the universal indexing language is Chomsky's Minimalist Program and Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic classification theory; Acording to the author, based an these approaches, it "should not be a problem" (p. 62) to develop a universal indexing language.
    Discussion The proceedings of the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment give some insights. However, the depth of analysis and discussion is very uneven across the papers. Some of the papers have substantive research content while others appear to be notes used in the oral presentation. The treatments of the topics are very general in nature. Some papers have a very limited list of references while others have no bibliography. No index has been provided. The transfer of bibliographic knowledge organization theory to the digital environment is an important topic. However, as the papers at this conference have shown, it is also a difficult task. Of the 18 papers presented at this seminar an classification in the digital environment, only 4-5 papers actually deal directly with this important topic. The remaining papers deal with issues that are more or less relevant to classification in the digital environment without explicitly discussing the relation. The reason could be that the authors take up issues in knowledge organization that still need to be investigated and clarified before their application in the digital environment can be considered. Nonetheless, one wishes that the knowledge organization community would discuss the application of classification theory in the digital environment in greater detail. It is obvious from the comparisons of the classificatory structures of bibliographic classification systems and Web directories that these are different and that they probably should be different, since they serve different purposes. Interesting questions in the transformation of bibliographic classification theories to the digital environment are: "Given the existing principles in bibliographic knowledge organization, what are the optimum principles for organization of information, irrespectively of context?" and "What are the fundamental theoretical and practical principles for the construction of Web directories?" Unfortunately, the papers presented at this seminar do not attempt to answer or discuss these questions."
  18. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.01
    0.014786793 = product of:
      0.029573586 = sum of:
        0.029573586 = product of:
          0.05914717 = sum of:
            0.05914717 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05914717 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  19. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.01
    0.013941121 = product of:
      0.027882243 = sum of:
        0.027882243 = product of:
          0.055764485 = sum of:
            0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055764485 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
  20. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.01
    0.013941121 = product of:
      0.027882243 = sum of:
        0.027882243 = product of:
          0.055764485 = sum of:
            0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055764485 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051448494 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23