-
Buxton, A.: Computer searching of UDC numbers (1993)
0.07
0.06574251 = product of:
0.13148502 = sum of:
0.13148502 = product of:
0.26297003 = sum of:
0.26297003 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26297003 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.82318354 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.51, [=Suppl.14]
-
Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984)
0.03
0.03253127 = product of:
0.06506254 = sum of:
0.06506254 = product of:
0.13012508 = sum of:
0.13012508 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13012508 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
-
Faceted classification of information (o.J.)
0.03
0.03122611 = product of:
0.06245222 = sum of:
0.06245222 = product of:
0.18735665 = sum of:
0.18735665 = weight(_text_:objects in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18735665 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An explanation of faceted classification meant for people working in knowledge management. An example given for a high-technology company has the fundamental categories Products, Applications, Organizations, People, Domain objects ("technologies applied in the marketplace in which the organization participates"), Events (i.e. time), and Publications.
-
LaBarre, K.: Faceted navigation and browsing features in new OPACs : a more robust solution to problems of information seekers? (2007)
0.03
0.026496232 = product of:
0.052992463 = sum of:
0.052992463 = product of:
0.15897739 = sum of:
0.15897739 = weight(_text_:objects in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15897739 = score(doc=688,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- At the end of 2005, impending digitization efforts and several developments related to the creation of access and discovery tools for informational and cultural objects resulted in a series of responses that continue to ripple throughout the library, museum and archive communities. These developments have broad implications for all three communities because of the goals shared by each in the creation of description, control and enhanced access to informational and cultural objects. This position paper will consider new implementations of faceted navigation and browsing features in online catalogs. It is also a response to challenges to develop interwoven approaches to the study of information seeking and the design and implementation of search and discovery systems. Urgently needed during this time of experimentation, development and implementation is a framework for system evaluation and critical analysis of needed and missing features that is grounded in traditional principles, borne out by practice. Such a framework could extend feature analysis protocols established during the early years of online catalog development.
-
Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000)
0.02
0.02439845 = product of:
0.0487969 = sum of:
0.0487969 = product of:
0.0975938 = sum of:
0.0975938 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0975938 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:47
-
Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990)
0.02
0.020332042 = product of:
0.040664084 = sum of:
0.040664084 = product of:
0.08132817 = sum of:
0.08132817 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08132817 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 12:22:40
-
Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009)
0.02
0.020332042 = product of:
0.040664084 = sum of:
0.040664084 = product of:
0.08132817 = sum of:
0.08132817 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08132817 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 12:54:24
-
Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010)
0.02
0.017252311 = product of:
0.034504622 = sum of:
0.034504622 = product of:
0.069009244 = sum of:
0.069009244 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069009244 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
- Date
- 22. 1.2010 15:06:54
-
Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003)
0.02
0.016265634 = product of:
0.03253127 = sum of:
0.03253127 = product of:
0.06506254 = sum of:
0.06506254 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06506254 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 7.2004 12:22:52
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.02
0.016265634 = product of:
0.03253127 = sum of:
0.03253127 = product of:
0.06506254 = sum of:
0.06506254 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06506254 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
-
Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003)
0.02
0.016265634 = product of:
0.03253127 = sum of:
0.03253127 = product of:
0.06506254 = sum of:
0.06506254 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06506254 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Some thoughts on classification for retrieval (1970)
0.02
0.015613055 = product of:
0.03122611 = sum of:
0.03122611 = product of:
0.093678325 = sum of:
0.093678325 = weight(_text_:objects in 4327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093678325 = score(doc=4327,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 4327, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4327)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The suggestion that classifications for retrieval should be constructed automatically raises some serious problems concerning the sorts of classification which are required, and the way in which formal classification theories should be exploited, given that a retrieval classification is required for a purpose. These difficulties have not been sufficiently considered, and the paper therefore attempts an analysis of them, though no solution of immediate application can be suggested. Starting with the illustrative proposition that a polythetic, multiple, unordered classification is required in automatic thesaurus construction, this is considered in the context of classification in general, where eight sorts of classification can be distinguished, each covering a range of class definitions and class-finding algorithms. The problem which follows is that since there is generally no natural or best classification of a set of objects as such, the evaluation of alternative classifications requires either formal criteria of goodness of fit, or, if a classification is required for a purpose, a precises statement of that purpose. In any case a substantive theory of classification is needed, which does not exist; and since sufficiently precise specifications of retrieval requirements are also lacking, the only currently available approach to automatic classification experiments for information retrieval is to do enough of them
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Some thoughts on classification for retrieval (2005)
0.02
0.015613055 = product of:
0.03122611 = sum of:
0.03122611 = product of:
0.093678325 = sum of:
0.093678325 = weight(_text_:objects in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093678325 = score(doc=4392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper was originally published in 1970 (Journal of documentation. 26(1970), S.89-101), considered the suggestion that classifications for retrieval should be constructed automatically and raised some serious problems concerning the sorts of classification which were required, and the way in which formal classification theories should be exploited, given that a retrieval classification is required for a purpose. These difficulties had not been sufficiently considered, and the paper, therefore, aims to attempt an analysis of them, though no solutions of immediate application could be suggested. Design/methodology/approach - Starting with the illustrative proposition that a polythetic, multiple, unordered classification is required in automatic thesaurus construction, this is considered in the context of classification in general, where eight sorts of classification can be distinguished, each covering a range of class definitions and class-finding algorithms. Findings - Since there is generally no natural or best classification of a set of objects as such, the evaluation of alternative classifications requires either formal criteria of goodness of fit, or, if a classification is required for a purpose, a precise statement of that purpose. In any case a substantive theory of classification is needed, which does not exist; and, since sufficiently precise specifications of retrieval requirements are also lacking, the only currently available approach to automatic classification experiments for information retrieval is to do enough of them. Originality/value - Gives insights into the classification of material for information retrieval.
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001)
0.02
0.015613055 = product of:
0.03122611 = sum of:
0.03122611 = product of:
0.093678325 = sum of:
0.093678325 = weight(_text_:objects in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093678325 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Broughton is one of the key people working on the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2). Her article has a brief, informative history of facets, then discusses semantic vs. syntactic relationships, standard facets used by Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, facet analysis and citation order, and how to build subject indexes out of faceted classifications, all with occasional reference to digital environments and hypertext, but never with any specifics. It concludes by saying of faceted classification that the "capacity which it has to create highly sophisticated structures for the accommodation of complex objects suggests that it is worth investigation as an organizational tool for digital materials, and that the results of such investigation would be knowledge structures of unparalleled utility and elegance." How to build them is left to the reader, but this article provides an excellent starting point. It includes an example that shows how general concepts can be applied to a small set of documents and subjects, and how terms can be adapted to suit the material and users
-
Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989)
0.01
0.01423243 = product of:
0.02846486 = sum of:
0.02846486 = product of:
0.05692972 = sum of:
0.05692972 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05692972 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8.11.1995 11:52:22
-
Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998)
0.01
0.01423243 = product of:
0.02846486 = sum of:
0.02846486 = product of:
0.05692972 = sum of:
0.05692972 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05692972 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998)
0.01
0.01423243 = product of:
0.02846486 = sum of:
0.02846486 = product of:
0.05692972 = sum of:
0.05692972 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05692972 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30.12.2001 16:22:41
-
Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998)
0.01
0.01423243 = product of:
0.02846486 = sum of:
0.02846486 = product of:
0.05692972 = sum of:
0.05692972 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05692972 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Alex, H.; Heiner-Freiling, M.: Melvil (2005)
0.01
0.01423243 = product of:
0.02846486 = sum of:
0.02846486 = product of:
0.05692972 = sum of:
0.05692972 = weight(_text_:22 in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05692972 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ab Januar 2006 wird Die Deutsche Bibliothek ein neues Webangebot mit dem Namen Melvil starten, das ein Ergebnis ihres Engagements für die DDC und das Projekt DDC Deutsch ist. Der angebotene Webservice basiert auf der Übersetzung der 22. Ausgabe der DDC, die im Oktober 2005 als Druckausgabe im K. G. Saur Verlag erscheint. Er bietet jedoch darüber hinausgehende Features, die den Klassifizierer bei seiner Arbeit unterstützen und erstmals eine verbale Recherche für Endnutzer über DDCerschlossene Titel ermöglichen. Der Webservice Melvil gliedert sich in drei Anwendungen: - MelvilClass, - MelvilSearch und - MelvilSoap.
-
Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006)
0.01
0.01423243 = product of:
0.02846486 = sum of:
0.02846486 = product of:
0.05692972 = sum of:
0.05692972 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05692972 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.060026903 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
