Search (248 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Dorst, L.: Restoring the tower of Babel : building a multilingual thesaurus on health promotion (1998) 0.06
    0.056993805 = product of:
      0.0854907 = sum of:
        0.014496619 = weight(_text_:in in 2248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014496619 = score(doc=2248,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 2248, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2248)
        0.07099409 = product of:
          0.14198817 = sum of:
            0.14198817 = weight(_text_:education in 2248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14198817 = score(doc=2248,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.5889057 = fieldWeight in 2248, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In 1994 the International Union for Health Promotion and Health Education, Regional Office for Europe began a thesaurus project in the field of health promotion and health education, in collaboration with terminologists and health promotion specialists from various European countries. Describes the different phases of the international project. Pays special attention to the origin of the project and the international cooperative imperative needed to bring such a project to fruition
  2. Spiteri, L.F.: ¬The use of facet analysis in information retrieval thesauri : an examination of selected guidelines for thesaurus construction (1997) 0.04
    0.04309275 = product of:
      0.06463912 = sum of:
        0.020713769 = weight(_text_:in in 372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020713769 = score(doc=372,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 372, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=372)
        0.043925352 = product of:
          0.087850705 = sum of:
            0.087850705 = weight(_text_:education in 372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087850705 = score(doc=372,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.3643668 = fieldWeight in 372, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=372)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Facet analysis has been used in the construction of faceted thesauri since the publication of the Information Retrieval Thesaurus of Education Terms in 1968. In spite of the growth in the number of faceted thesauri since then, there appears to be little consensus among thesaurus designers regarding how the principles of facet analysis are to be used in thesauri. An examination of various national and international guidelines for thesaurus construction reveals that they emphasize primarily the construction of alphabetical thesauri, but provide little guidance in the use of facet analysis in thesauri.
  3. Kuhr, P.S.: Putting the world back together : mapping multiple vocabularies into a single thesaurus (2003) 0.03
    0.03445773 = product of:
      0.05168659 = sum of:
        0.014036291 = weight(_text_:in in 3813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014036291 = score(doc=3813,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 3813, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3813)
        0.0376503 = product of:
          0.0753006 = sum of:
            0.0753006 = weight(_text_:education in 3813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0753006 = score(doc=3813,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.3123144 = fieldWeight in 3813, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3813)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes an ongoing project in which the subject headings contained in twelve controlled vocabularies covering multiple disciplines from the humanities to the sciences and including law and education among others are being collapsed into a single vocabulary and reference structure. The design of the database, algorithms created to programmatically link like-concepts, and daily maintenance are detailed. The problems and pitfalls of dealing with multiple vocabularies are noted, as well as the difficulties in relying purely an computer generated algorithms. The application of this megathesaurus to bibliographic records and methodology of retrieval is explained.
    Source
    Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  4. Scheven, E.: ¬Die neue Thesaurusnorm ISO 25964 und die GND (2017) 0.03
    0.03416585 = product of:
      0.051248774 = sum of:
        0.0073234225 = weight(_text_:in in 3505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0073234225 = score(doc=3505,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 3505, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3505)
        0.043925352 = product of:
          0.087850705 = sum of:
            0.087850705 = weight(_text_:education in 3505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087850705 = score(doc=3505,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.3643668 = fieldWeight in 3505, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3505)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.13
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  5. Velasco, M.: Algoritmo de filtrado multitermino para la obtencion de relaciones jerarquicas en la construction automatica de un tesauro de descriptores (1999) 0.03
    0.03008706 = product of:
      0.045130588 = sum of:
        0.010462033 = weight(_text_:in in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010462033 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
        0.034668557 = product of:
          0.069337115 = sum of:
            0.069337115 = weight(_text_:22 in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069337115 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Statistical filtering techniques applied to the obtention of hierarchical relationships in the automatic construction of a thesaurus
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.1, S.34-49
  6. Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018) 0.03
    0.029649397 = product of:
      0.044474095 = sum of:
        0.016739251 = weight(_text_:in in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016739251 = score(doc=4721,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2019 19:04:22
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.16
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  7. Eastman, C.M.: Overlaps in postings to thesaurus terms : a preliminary study (1988) 0.03
    0.028137762 = product of:
      0.04220664 = sum of:
        0.017938651 = weight(_text_:in in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017938651 = score(doc=3555,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
        0.02426799 = product of:
          0.04853598 = sum of:
            0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04853598 = score(doc=3555,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The patterns of overlap between terms which are closely related in a thesaurus are considered. The relationships considered are parent/child, in which one term is a broader term of the other, and sibling in which to 2 terms share the same broader term. The patterns of overlap observed in the MeSH thesaurus with respect to selected MEDLINE postings are examined. The implications of the overlap patterns are discussed, in particular, the impact of the overlap patterns on the potential effectiveness of a proposed algorithm for handling negation is considered.
    Date
    25.12.1995 22:52:34
  8. Aitchison, J.; Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Thesaurus : a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future (2004) 0.03
    0.027100964 = product of:
      0.040651444 = sum of:
        0.019850312 = weight(_text_:in in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019850312 = score(doc=5005,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.28515202 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
        0.020801133 = product of:
          0.041602265 = sum of:
            0.041602265 = weight(_text_:22 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041602265 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    After a period of experiment and evolution in the 1950s and 1960s, a fairly standard format for thesauri was established with the publication of the influential Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms (TEST) in 1967. This and other early thesauri relied primarily an the presentation of terms in alphabetical order. The value of a classified presentation was subsequently realised, and in particular the technique of facet analysis has profoundly influenced thesaurus evolution. Thesaurofacet and the Art & Architecture Thesaurus have acted as models for two distinct breeds of thesaurus using faceted displays of terms. As of the 1990s, the expansion of end-user access to vast networked resources is imposing further requirements an the style and structure of controlled vocabularies. The international standards for thesauri, first conceived in a print-based era, are badly in need of updating. Work is in hand in the UK and the USA to revise and develop standards in support of electronic thesauri.
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:46:13
    Footnote
    Auch in: The thesaurus: review, renaissance and revision. Ed. by S.K. Roe u. A.R. Thomas. Binghamton: Haworth 2004.
  9. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.03
    0.027095776 = product of:
      0.040643662 = sum of:
        0.016375672 = weight(_text_:in in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016375672 = score(doc=1149,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
        0.02426799 = product of:
          0.04853598 = sum of:
            0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04853598 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A thesaurus in the controlled vocabulary environment is a tool designed to support effective infonnation retrieval (IR) by guiding indexers and searchers consistently to choose the same terms for expressing a given concept or combination of concepts. Terms in the thesaurus are linked by relationships of three well-known types: equivalence, hierarchical, and associative. The functions and properties of these three basic types and some subcategories are described, as well as some additional relationship types conunonly found in thesauri. Progressive automation of IR processes and the capability for simultaneous searching of vast networked resources are creating some pressures for change in the categorization and consistency of relationships.
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
    Source
    Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
  10. Crouch, C.J.: ¬An approach to the automatic construction of global thesauri (1990) 0.03
    0.025943225 = product of:
      0.038914837 = sum of:
        0.014646845 = weight(_text_:in in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014646845 = score(doc=4042,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
        0.02426799 = product of:
          0.04853598 = sum of:
            0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04853598 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The benefits of a well constructed thesaurus to an information retrieval system have long been recognised by both researchers and practitioners in the field. Examines both early and current approaches to automatic thesaurus construction and describes an approach to the automatic generation of global thesauri based on the term discrimination value model of Salton Yang, and Yu and on an appropriate clustering algorithm. This method has been implemented and applied to 2 document collections. Preliminary results indicate that this method, which produces improvements in retrieval performance in excess of 10 and 15% in the test collections, is viable and worthy of continued investigation.
    Date
    22. 4.1996 3:39:53
  11. Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction : key issues and selected readings (2004) 0.03
    0.025943225 = product of:
      0.038914837 = sum of:
        0.014646845 = weight(_text_:in in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014646845 = score(doc=5006,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
        0.02426799 = product of:
          0.04853598 = sum of:
            0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04853598 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this selected bibliography is to introduce issues and problems in relation to thesaurus construction and to present a set of readings that may be used in practical thesaurus design. The concept of thesaurus is discussed, the purpose of the thesaurus and how the concept has evolved over the years according to new IR technologies. Different approaches to thesaurus construction are introduced, and readings dealing with specific problems and developments in the collection, formation and organisation of thesaurus concepts and terms are presented. Primarily manual construction methods are discussed, but the bibliography also refers to research about techniques for automatic thesaurus construction.
    Date
    18. 5.2006 20:06:22
    Footnote
    Auch in: The thesaurus: review, renaissance and revision. Ed. by S.K. Roe u. A.R. Thomas. Binghamton: Haworth 2004.
  12. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.03
    0.025943225 = product of:
      0.038914837 = sum of:
        0.014646845 = weight(_text_:in in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014646845 = score(doc=4792,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
        0.02426799 = product of:
          0.04853598 = sum of:
            0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04853598 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.11
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  13. Bagheri, M.: Development of thesauri in Iran (2006) 0.02
    0.0249394 = product of:
      0.037409097 = sum of:
        0.016607963 = weight(_text_:in in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016607963 = score(doc=260,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
        0.020801133 = product of:
          0.041602265 = sum of:
            0.041602265 = weight(_text_:22 in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041602265 = score(doc=260,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The need for Persian thesauri became apparent during the late 1960s with the advent of documentation centres in Iran. The first Persian controlled vocabulary was published by IRANDOC in 1977. Other centres worked on translations of existing thesauri, but it was soon realised that these efforts did not meet the needs of the centres. After the Islamic revolution in 1979, the foundation of new centres intensified the need for Persian thesauri, especially in the fields of history and government documents. Also, during the Iran-Iraq war, Iranian research centres produced reports in scientific and technical fields, both to support military requirements and to meet society's needs. In order to provide a comprehensive thesaurus, the Council of Scientific Research of Iran approved a project for the compilation of such a work. Nowadays, 12 Persian thesauri are available and others are being prepared, based on the literary corpus and conformity with characteristics of Iranian culture.
    Source
    Indexer. 25(2006) no.1, S.19-22
  14. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.02
    0.024069648 = product of:
      0.03610447 = sum of:
        0.008369626 = weight(_text_:in in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008369626 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
        0.027734846 = product of:
          0.05546969 = sum of:
            0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05546969 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Most indexed databases now include their thesauri and/or coding in their bibliographic files, searchable at the databases' online connect rates. Assesses the searchability of these on the different hosts. Thesauri and classifications are also available as diskette or CD-ROM products. Describes a number of these, highlighting the diskette thesaurus from IFI/Plenum Data for its flexible databases, the CLAIMS Uniterm and Comprehensive indexes to US chemical patents
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
  15. Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023) 0.02
    0.02322495 = product of:
      0.034837425 = sum of:
        0.014036291 = weight(_text_:in in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014036291 = score(doc=1181,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
        0.020801133 = product of:
          0.041602265 = sum of:
            0.041602265 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041602265 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Nuovo soggettario, the official Italian subject indexing system edited by the National Central Library of Florence, is made up of interactive components, the core of which is a general thesaurus and some rules of a conventional syntax for subject string construction. The Nuovo soggettario Thesaurus is in compliance with ISO 25964: 2011-2013, IFLA LRM, and FAIR principle (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability). Its open data are available in the Zthes, MARC21, and in SKOS formats and allow for interoperability with l library, archive, and museum databases. The Thesaurus's macrostructure is organized into four fundamental macro-categories, thirteen categories, and facets. The facets allow for the orderly development of hierarchies, thereby limiting polyhierarchies and promoting the grouping of homogenous concepts. This paper addresses the main features and peculiarities which have characterized the consistent development of this categorical structure and its effects on the syntactic sphere in a predominantly pre-coordinated usage context.
    Date
    26.11.2023 18:59:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in Themenheft: Implementation of Faceted Vocabularies.
  16. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesaurus and beyond : an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval (1999) 0.02
    0.022237048 = product of:
      0.03335557 = sum of:
        0.012554439 = weight(_text_:in in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012554439 = score(doc=4116,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
        0.020801133 = product of:
          0.041602265 = sum of:
            0.041602265 = weight(_text_:22 in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041602265 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a proposal for a new approach to thesaurus design and construction that could have significant implicantions for change in the way multilingual thesauri are handled and integrated with each other. The formula presented here has its origin in the work of the German Thesaurus Committee and has had input from a number of scientists and practitioners int he field. The emphasis is on the various types of relationships found among concepts, notiions and universals in languages. These relationships are analysed and refined beyond the approach taken in existing thesauri. This proposal is very much at the discussion stage and the author invites the assistance of interested readers through criticisms, discussion and dialogue. Applications of the proposed thesaurus are included and the major goal of this proposal is to provide the basis for improved desing and integration of multilingual thesauri
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.10-22
  17. Busch, J.A.: Building and accessing vocabulary resources for networked resource discovery and navigation (1998) 0.02
    0.021060942 = product of:
      0.03159141 = sum of:
        0.0073234225 = weight(_text_:in in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0073234225 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
        0.02426799 = product of:
          0.04853598 = sum of:
            0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04853598 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Getty has a lenghty history in the research and development of thesauri and other structured vocabulary tools to make the use and exchange of electronic information easier
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  18. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.02
    0.018530875 = product of:
      0.027796311 = sum of:
        0.010462033 = weight(_text_:in in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010462033 = score(doc=2337,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
        0.017334279 = product of:
          0.034668557 = sum of:
            0.034668557 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034668557 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Despite early claims to the contemporary, thesauri continue to find use as access tools for information in the full-text environment. Their mode of use is changing, but this change actually represents an expansion rather than a contrdiction of their utility. Thesauri and similar vocabulary tools can complement full-text access by aiding users in focusing their searches, by supplementing the linguistic analysis of the text search engine, and even by serving as one of the tools used by the linguistic engine for its analysis. While human indexing contunues to be used for many databases, the trend is to increase the use of machine aids for this purpose. All machine-aided indexing (MAI) systems rely on thesauri as the basis for term selection. In the 21st century, the balance of effort between human and machine will change at both input and output, but thesauri will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  19. Burkart, M.: Thesaurus (2004) 0.02
    0.016626267 = product of:
      0.0249394 = sum of:
        0.011071975 = weight(_text_:in in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011071975 = score(doc=2913,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.15905021 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
        0.013867423 = product of:
          0.027734846 = sum of:
            0.027734846 = weight(_text_:22 in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027734846 = score(doc=2913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Der Thesaurus als Dokumentationssprache wird in der DIN 1463-1in seinen wesentlichen Merkmalen beschrieben. Dort wird der Thesaurus im informationswissenschaftlichen Sinne so definiert: "Ein Thesaurus im Bereich der Information und Dokumentation ist eine geordnete Zusammenstellung von Begriffen und ihren (vorwiegend natürlichsprachigen) Bezeichnungen, die in einem Dokumentationsgebiet zum Indexieren, Speichern und Wiederauffinden dient. Er ist durch folgende Merkmale gekennzeichnet: a) Begriffe und Bezeichnungen werden eindeutig aufeinander bezogen ("terminologische Kontrolle"), indem - Synonyme möglichst vollständig erfasst werden, - Homonyme und Polyseme besonders gekennzeichnet werden, - für jeden Begriff eine Bezeichnung (Vorzugsbenennung, Begriffsnummer oder Notation) festgelegt wird, die den Begriff eindeutig vertritt, b) Beziehungen zwischen Begriffen (repräsentiert durch ihre Bezeichnungen) werden dargestellt." Diese Definition wäre zu ergänzen um folgende: c) Der Thesaurus ist präskriptiv, indem er für seinen Geltungsbereich festlegt, welche begrifflichen Einheiten zur Verfügung gestellt werden und durch welche Bezeichnungen diese repräsentiert werden. Im Folgenden sollen die wichtigsten Elemente und Prinzipien von Thesauri und die Thesaurusmethodik vorgestellt werden. Dies kann in diesem Rahmen nur auf eine sehr kursorische und allgemeine Art und Weise geschehen. Außerdem beschränkt sich die Darstellung auf den Thesauruseinsatz im klassischen Bereich von Information und Dokumentation. Auf die Behandlung von Spezialproblemen oder auf besondere Thesaurusformen (z.B. mehrsprachige Thesauri) kann hier nicht eingegangen werden, ebenso auf die erweiterten Anforderungen, die an Thesauri im Kontext von Wissensrepräsentation oder Hypertext zu stellen sind. Allerdings überschneidet sich der klassische IuD-Bereich zunehmend mit erweiterten Formen (etwa im Rahmen von Internetanwendungen). Da der Thesaurus im dokumentarischen Sinn alle Grundelemente des Thesaurusprinzips in klarer Form aufweist, wird dieser Bereich für eine Einführung gewählt. Für eine intensivere Auseinandersetzung mit der Thematik wird die Lektüre von Wersig empfohlen, auf den sich auch die folgenden Ausführungen in weiten Teilen stützen. Eine weitere grundsätzliche Einführung in diesen Bereich, allerdings eher ausgerichtet auf die Spezifika des englischen Sprachraums, findet sich bei Lancaster.
    Date
    5. 4.2013 10:18:22
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
  20. Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989) 0.02
    0.01617866 = product of:
      0.04853598 = sum of:
        0.04853598 = product of:
          0.09707196 = sum of:
            0.09707196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09707196 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051176514 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22

Authors

Languages

Types