Search (87 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007) 0.07
    0.071954 = product of:
      0.107930996 = sum of:
        0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01058886 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
        0.09734213 = sum of:
          0.055206608 = weight(_text_:management in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055206608 = score(doc=2548,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
          0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04213553 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.07
    0.070059046 = product of:
      0.10508856 = sum of:
        0.04890785 = weight(_text_:information in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04890785 = score(doc=4368,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.5375032 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
        0.056180708 = product of:
          0.112361416 = sum of:
            0.112361416 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.112361416 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
    Theme
    Information
  3. Jones, W.: Personal information management (2007) 0.06
    0.061321586 = product of:
      0.09198238 = sum of:
        0.03993309 = weight(_text_:information in 5382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03993309 = score(doc=5382,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 5382, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5382)
        0.052049287 = product of:
          0.10409857 = sum of:
            0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 5382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10409857 = score(doc=5382,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 5382, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5382)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
  4. Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008) 0.06
    0.05627845 = product of:
      0.08441767 = sum of:
        0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02823696 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
        0.056180708 = product of:
          0.112361416 = sum of:
            0.112361416 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.112361416 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:01:26
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42
  5. Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008) 0.06
    0.05627845 = product of:
      0.08441767 = sum of:
        0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02823696 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
        0.056180708 = product of:
          0.112361416 = sum of:
            0.112361416 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.112361416 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 9:30:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.xxx-xxx
  6. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.06
    0.05627845 = product of:
      0.08441767 = sum of:
        0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02823696 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
        0.056180708 = product of:
          0.112361416 = sum of:
            0.112361416 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.112361416 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
  7. Perez-Carballo, J.; Strzalkowski, T.: Natural language information retrieval : progress report (2000) 0.05
    0.05365639 = product of:
      0.080484584 = sum of:
        0.034941453 = weight(_text_:information in 6421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034941453 = score(doc=6421,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 6421, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6421)
        0.045543127 = product of:
          0.09108625 = sum of:
            0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 6421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09108625 = score(doc=6421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.155-205
  8. Martin, B.: Knowledge management (2008) 0.05
    0.053524166 = product of:
      0.08028625 = sum of:
        0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 4230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02823696 = score(doc=4230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4230)
        0.052049287 = product of:
          0.10409857 = sum of:
            0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 4230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10409857 = score(doc=4230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 4230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.xxx-xxx
  9. Spree, U.: Wissensorganisation und Records Management : Was ist der State of the Art? Literaturübersicht (2009) 0.05
    0.045592993 = product of:
      0.06838949 = sum of:
        0.017470727 = weight(_text_:information in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017470727 = score(doc=3132,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
        0.050918765 = product of:
          0.10183753 = sum of:
            0.10183753 = weight(_text_:management in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10183753 = score(doc=3132,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.5829038 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Ordnungssysteme, vor allem in Form von Aktenplänen und business classifications schemes, gelten weiterhin als ein Kernelement von elektronischen Records Management Systemen. Die Rezeption und Nutzung von in den Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften entwickelten normativen Vorgaben und/oder Forschungsergebnissen zu Ordnungssystemen ist in der Records Management Community hingegen noch eher selten und zufällig. Aufgrund der Auswertung aktueller Fachliteratur zum Thema Records Management / Schriftgutverwaltung sowie der Erfahrungen der Autorin in zwei Lehrveranstaltungen, die die Eignung informationswissenschaftlicher Ansätze der Wissensorganisation auf Probleme der Schriftgutverwaltung überprüft haben, lässt sich eine Reihe von konkreten Empfehlungen für die Integration wissensorganisatorischer Expertise bei der Entwicklung von Records Management Systemen auf organisatorischer und inhaltlicher Ebene ableiten.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Recordsmanagement kein Thema für Information Professionals?"
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.6/7, S.339-354
  10. Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003) 0.04
    0.036076665 = product of:
      0.108229995 = sum of:
        0.108229995 = sum of:
          0.052049287 = weight(_text_:management in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052049287 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
          0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056180708 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides a review of cataloging and classification publications that appeared in the last two years. The review considers the papers in two categories. Cataloging Theories and Practices covers descriptive cataloging, authority control, classification, subject cataloging, cataloging nonbook materials, electronic resources and metadata, and international cooperation. The second section covers other issues related to cataloging, including management, and education and training. Throughout the review, the author identifies trends and important developments in the area of cataloging and classification.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.03
    0.032037936 = product of:
      0.0480569 = sum of:
        0.019966545 = weight(_text_:information in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019966545 = score(doc=266,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
        0.028090354 = product of:
          0.056180708 = sum of:
            0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056180708 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Chen, H.; Chau, M.: Web mining : machine learning for Web applications (2003) 0.03
    0.028797261 = product of:
      0.043195892 = sum of:
        0.02367741 = weight(_text_:information in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02367741 = score(doc=4242,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
        0.019518482 = product of:
          0.039036963 = sum of:
            0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039036963 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    With more than two billion pages created by millions of Web page authors and organizations, the World Wide Web is a tremendously rich knowledge base. The knowledge comes not only from the content of the pages themselves, but also from the unique characteristics of the Web, such as its hyperlink structure and its diversity of content and languages. Analysis of these characteristics often reveals interesting patterns and new knowledge. Such knowledge can be used to improve users' efficiency and effectiveness in searching for information an the Web, and also for applications unrelated to the Web, such as support for decision making or business management. The Web's size and its unstructured and dynamic content, as well as its multilingual nature, make the extraction of useful knowledge a challenging research problem. Furthermore, the Web generates a large amount of data in other formats that contain valuable information. For example, Web server logs' information about user access patterns can be used for information personalization or improving Web page design.
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 38(2004), S.289-330
  13. Corbett, L.E.: Serials: review of the literature 2000-2003 (2006) 0.03
    0.027039483 = product of:
      0.08111845 = sum of:
        0.08111845 = sum of:
          0.046005506 = weight(_text_:management in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046005506 = score(doc=1088,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
          0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035112944 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The topic of electronic journals (e-journals) dominated the serials literature from 2000 to 2003. This review is limited to the events and issues within the broad topics of cost, management, and archiving. Coverage of cost includes such initiatives as PEAK, JACC, BioMed Central, SPARC, open access, the "Big Deal," and "going e-only." Librarians combated the continued price increase trend for journals, fueled in part by publisher mergers, with the economies found with bundled packages and consortial subscriptions. Serials management topics include usage statistics; core title lists; staffing needs; the "A-Z list" and other services from such companies as Serials Solutions; "deep linking"; link resolvers such as SFX; development of standards or guidelines, such as COUNTER and ERMI; tracking of license terms; vendor mergers; and the demise of integrated library systems and a subscription agent's bankruptcy. Librarians archived print volumes in storage facilities due to space shortages. Librarians and publishers struggled with electronic archiving concepts, discussing questions of who, where, and how. Projects such as LOCKSS tested potential solutions, but missing online content due to the Tasini court case and retractions posed more archiving difficulties. The serials literature captured much of the upheaval resulting from the rapid pace of changes, many linked to the advent of e-journals.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Fox, E.A.; Urs, S.R.: Digital libraries (2002) 0.02
    0.02112621 = product of:
      0.031689316 = sum of:
        0.018676993 = weight(_text_:information in 4299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018676993 = score(doc=4299,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.20526241 = fieldWeight in 4299, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4299)
        0.013012322 = product of:
          0.026024643 = sum of:
            0.026024643 = weight(_text_:management in 4299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026024643 = score(doc=4299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 4299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The emergence of digital libraries (DLs), at the interface of library and information science with computer and communication technologies, helped to expand significantly the literature in all of these areas during the late 1990s. The pace of development is reflected by the number of special issues of major journals in information science and computer science, and the increasing number of workshops and conferences an digital libraries. For example, starting in 1995, the Communications of the ACM has devoted three special issues to the topic (Fox, Akscyn, Furuta, & Leggett, 1995; Fox & Marchionini, 1998, 2001). The Journal of the American Society for Information Science devoted two issues to digital libraries (H. Chen, 2000; Fox & Lunin, 1993); Information Processing & Management and the Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation each had one special issue (Chen & Fox, 1996; Marchionini & Fox, 1999). The domain of digital libraries, though still evolving, has matured over the last decade, as demonstrated by coverage through D-Lib (http://www.dlib.org), the International Journal an Digital Libraries (http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00799), and two overview works (W Y Arms, 2000; Lesk, 1997; both of which have also served as textbooks). Sun Microsystems published a small book to guide those planning a digital library (Noerr, 2000), and IBM has been developing commercial products for digital libraries since 1994 (IBM, 2000). A number of Web sites have extensive sets of pointers to information an DLs (D-Lib Forum, 2001; Fox, 1998a; Habing, 1998; Hein, 2000; Schwartz, 2001a, 2001b). Further, the field has attracted the attention of diverse academics, research groups, and practitionersmany of whom have attended tutorials, workshops, or conferences, e.g., the Joint Conference an Digital Libraries, which is a sequel to a separate series run by ACM and IEEE-CS. Therefore, it is timely that ARIST publishes this first review focusing specifically an digital libraries. There has been no ARIST chapter to date directly dealing with the area of DLs, though some related domains have been covered-particularly: information retrieval, user interfaces (Marchionini & Komlodi, 1998), social informatics of DLs (Bishop & Star, 1996), and scholarly communication (see Borgman and Furner's chapter in this volume). This chapter provides an overview of the diverse aspects and dimensions of DL research, practice, and literature, identifying trends and delineating research directions.
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.503-590
  15. Khoo, S.G.; Na, J.-C.: Semantic relations in information science (2006) 0.02
    0.018212585 = product of:
      0.027318876 = sum of:
        0.017559636 = weight(_text_:information in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017559636 = score(doc=1978,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.19298252 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
        0.009759241 = product of:
          0.019518482 = sum of:
            0.019518482 = weight(_text_:management in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019518482 = score(doc=1978,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.11172107 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter examines the nature of semantic relations and their main applications in information science. The nature and types of semantic relations are discussed from the perspectives of linguistics and psychology. An overview of the semantic relations used in knowledge structures such as thesauri and ontologies is provided, as well as the main techniques used in the automatic extraction of semantic relations from text. The chapter then reviews the use of semantic relations in information extraction, information retrieval, question-answering, and automatic text summarization applications. Concepts and relations are the foundation of knowledge and thought. When we look at the world, we perceive not a mass of colors but objects to which we automatically assign category labels. Our perceptual system automatically segments the world into concepts and categories. Concepts are the building blocks of knowledge; relations act as the cement that links concepts into knowledge structures. We spend much of our lives identifying regular associations and relations between objects, events, and processes so that the world has an understandable structure and predictability. Our lives and work depend on the accuracy and richness of this knowledge structure and its web of relations. Relations are needed for reasoning and inferencing. Chaffin and Herrmann (1988b, p. 290) noted that "relations between ideas have long been viewed as basic to thought, language, comprehension, and memory." Aristotle's Metaphysics (Aristotle, 1961; McKeon, expounded on several types of relations. The majority of the 30 entries in a section of the Metaphysics known today as the Philosophical Lexicon referred to relations and attributes, including cause, part-whole, same and opposite, quality (i.e., attribute) and kind-of, and defined different types of each relation. Hume (1955) pointed out that there is a connection between successive ideas in our minds, even in our dreams, and that the introduction of an idea in our mind automatically recalls an associated idea. He argued that all the objects of human reasoning are divided into relations of ideas and matters of fact and that factual reasoning is founded on the cause-effect relation. His Treatise of Human Nature identified seven kinds of relations: resemblance, identity, relations of time and place, proportion in quantity or number, degrees in quality, contrariety, and causation. Mill (1974, pp. 989-1004) discoursed on several types of relations, claiming that all things are either feelings, substances, or attributes, and that attributes can be a quality (which belongs to one object) or a relation to other objects.
    Linguists in the structuralist tradition (e.g., Lyons, 1977; Saussure, 1959) have asserted that concepts cannot be defined on their own but only in relation to other concepts. Semantic relations appear to reflect a logical structure in the fundamental nature of thought (Caplan & Herrmann, 1993). Green, Bean, and Myaeng (2002) noted that semantic relations play a critical role in how we represent knowledge psychologically, linguistically, and computationally, and that many systems of knowledge representation start with a basic distinction between entities and relations. Green (2001, p. 3) said that "relationships are involved as we combine simple entities to form more complex entities, as we compare entities, as we group entities, as one entity performs a process on another entity, and so forth. Indeed, many things that we might initially regard as basic and elemental are revealed upon further examination to involve internal structure, or in other words, internal relationships." Concepts and relations are often expressed in language and text. Language is used not just for communicating concepts and relations, but also for representing, storing, and reasoning with concepts and relations. We shall examine the nature of semantic relations from a linguistic and psychological perspective, with an emphasis on relations expressed in text. The usefulness of semantic relations in information science, especially in ontology construction, information extraction, information retrieval, question-answering, and text summarization is discussed. Research and development in information science have focused on concepts and terms, but the focus will increasingly shift to the identification, processing, and management of relations to achieve greater effectiveness and refinement in information science techniques. Previous chapters in ARIST on natural language processing (Chowdhury, 2003), text mining (Trybula, 1999), information retrieval and the philosophy of language (Blair, 2003), and query expansion (Efthimiadis, 1996) provide a background for this discussion, as semantic relations are an important part of these applications.
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.157-228
  16. Gilliland-Swetland, A.: Electronic records management (2004) 0.02
    0.01682619 = product of:
      0.025239285 = sum of:
        0.0122269625 = weight(_text_:information in 4280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0122269625 = score(doc=4280,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 4280, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4280)
        0.013012322 = product of:
          0.026024643 = sum of:
            0.026024643 = weight(_text_:management in 4280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026024643 = score(doc=4280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 4280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    What is an electronic record, how should it best be preserved and made available, and to what extent do traditional, paradigmatic archival precepts such as provenance, original order, and archival custody hold when managing it? Over more than four decades of work in the area of electronic records (formerly known as machine-readable records), theorists and researchers have offered answers to these questions-or at least devised approaches for trying to answer them. However, a set of fundamental questions about the nature of the record and the applicability of traditional archival theory still confronts researchers seeking to advance knowledge and development in this increasingly active, but contested, area of research. For example, which characteristics differentiate a record from other types of information objects (such as publications or raw research data)? Are these characteristics consistently present regardless of the medium of the record? Does the record always have to have a tangible form? How does the record manifest itself within different technological and procedural contexts, and in particular, how do we determine the parameters of electronic records created in relational, distributed, or dynamic environments that bear little resemblance an the surface to traditional paper-based environments? At the heart of electronic records research lies a dual concern with the nature of the record as a specific type of information object and the nature of legal and historical evidence in a digital world. Electronic records research is relevant to the agendas of many communities in addition to that of archivists. Its emphasis an accountability and an establishing trust in records, for example, addresses concerns that are central to both digital government and e-commerce. Research relating to electronic records is still relatively homogeneous in terms of scope, in that most major research initiatives have addressed various combinations of the following: theory building in terms of identifying the nature of the electronic record, developing alternative conceptual models, establishing the determinants of reliability and authenticity in active and preserved electronic records, identifying functional and metadata requirements for record keeping, developing and testing preservation
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 39(2005), S.219-256
  17. Kranich, N.; Schement, J.: Information commons (2008) 0.02
    0.016302617 = product of:
      0.04890785 = sum of:
        0.04890785 = weight(_text_:information in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04890785 = score(doc=3724,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.5375032 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.xxx-xxx
    Theme
    Information
  18. Black, A.: ¬The history of information (2006) 0.02
    0.016302617 = product of:
      0.04890785 = sum of:
        0.04890785 = weight(_text_:information in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04890785 = score(doc=4189,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.5375032 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
    Theme
    Information
  19. Davies, P.H.J.: Intelligence, information technology, and information warfare (2002) 0.02
    0.016302617 = product of:
      0.04890785 = sum of:
        0.04890785 = weight(_text_:information in 3832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04890785 = score(doc=3832,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.5375032 = fieldWeight in 3832, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3832)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.313-352
  20. Day, R.E.: Poststructuralism and information studies (2004) 0.02
    0.016302617 = product of:
      0.04890785 = sum of:
        0.04890785 = weight(_text_:information in 4269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04890785 = score(doc=4269,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.5375032 = fieldWeight in 4269, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4269)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 39(2005), S.347-394
    Theme
    Information

Authors

Languages

  • e 86
  • d 1
  • More… Less…