-
Olson, N.B.; Swanson, E.: ¬The year's work in nonbook processing (1989)
0.17
0.16618817 = sum of:
0.06208932 = product of:
0.18626796 = sum of:
0.18626796 = weight(_text_:objects in 8330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18626796 = score(doc=8330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31719333 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 8330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8330)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.10409885 = product of:
0.2081977 = sum of:
0.2081977 = weight(_text_:maps in 8330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2081977 = score(doc=8330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33534583 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.6208447 = fieldWeight in 8330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reviews the literature, published in 1988, covering the cataloguing of audio-visual materials including: computerised files; music and sound recordings; film and video; graphic materials and 3-dimensional objects; maps; and preservation.
-
Hsueh, D.C.: Recon road maps : retrospective conversion literature, 1980-1990 (1992)
0.12
0.11562131 = product of:
0.23124263 = sum of:
0.23124263 = sum of:
0.16655816 = weight(_text_:maps in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16655816 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33534583 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.4966758 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
0.064684466 = weight(_text_:22 in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064684466 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 14(1992) nos.3/4, S.5-22
-
Will, L.D.: Publications on thesaurus construction and use : including some references to facet analysis, taxonomies, ontologies, topic maps and related issues (2005)
0.07
0.0728692 = product of:
0.1457384 = sum of:
0.1457384 = product of:
0.2914768 = sum of:
0.2914768 = weight(_text_:maps in 3192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2914768 = score(doc=3192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33534583 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.86918265 = fieldWeight in 3192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Galloway, P.: Preservation of digital objects (2003)
0.05
0.04656699 = product of:
0.09313398 = sum of:
0.09313398 = product of:
0.27940193 = sum of:
0.27940193 = weight(_text_:objects in 4275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27940193 = score(doc=4275,freq=18.0), product of:
0.31719333 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.8808569 = fieldWeight in 4275, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4275)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The preservation of digital objects (defined here as objects in digital form that require a computer to support their existence and display) is obviously an important practical issue for the information professions, with its importance growing daily as more information objects are produced in, or converted to, digital form. Yakel's (2001) review of the field provided a much-needed introduction. At the same time, the complexity of new digital objects continues to increase, challenging existing preservation efforts (Lee, Skattery, Lu, Tang, & McCrary, 2002). The field of information science itself is beginning to pay some reflexive attention to the creation of fragile and unpreservable digital objects. But these concerns focus often an the practical problems of short-term repurposing of digital objects rather than actual preservation, by which I mean the activity of carrying digital objects from one software generation to another, undertaken for purposes beyond the original reasons for creating the objects. For preservation in this sense to be possible, information science as a discipline needs to be active in the formulation of, and advocacy for, national information policies. Such policies will need to challenge the predominant cultural expectation of planned obsolescence for information resources, and cultural artifacts in general.
-
Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008)
0.03
0.032342233 = product of:
0.064684466 = sum of:
0.064684466 = product of:
0.12936893 = sum of:
0.12936893 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12936893 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:01:26
-
Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008)
0.03
0.032342233 = product of:
0.064684466 = sum of:
0.064684466 = product of:
0.12936893 = sum of:
0.12936893 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12936893 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 9:30:22
-
Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006)
0.03
0.032342233 = product of:
0.064684466 = sum of:
0.064684466 = product of:
0.12936893 = sum of:
0.12936893 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12936893 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:22:28
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.032342233 = product of:
0.064684466 = sum of:
0.064684466 = product of:
0.12936893 = sum of:
0.12936893 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12936893 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996)
0.03
0.032342233 = product of:
0.064684466 = sum of:
0.064684466 = product of:
0.12936893 = sum of:
0.12936893 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12936893 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.10.1996 14:22:33
-
Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987)
0.03
0.032342233 = product of:
0.064684466 = sum of:
0.064684466 = product of:
0.12936893 = sum of:
0.12936893 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12936893 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
-
Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987)
0.03
0.032342233 = product of:
0.064684466 = sum of:
0.064684466 = product of:
0.12936893 = sum of:
0.12936893 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12936893 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
-
Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987)
0.03
0.032342233 = product of:
0.064684466 = sum of:
0.064684466 = product of:
0.12936893 = sum of:
0.12936893 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12936893 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
-
Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011)
0.03
0.028299453 = product of:
0.056598905 = sum of:
0.056598905 = product of:
0.11319781 = sum of:
0.11319781 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11319781 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27.12.2014 18:54:22
-
Singh, S. (Sewa); Singh, S. (Sukhbir): Colon Classification : a select bibliography (1992)
0.02
0.02081977 = product of:
0.04163954 = sum of:
0.04163954 = product of:
0.08327908 = sum of:
0.08327908 = weight(_text_:maps in 1479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08327908 = score(doc=1479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33534583 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.2483379 = fieldWeight in 1479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1479)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Inhalt: General Classification, Colon Classification, Edition7, Philosophy, Conference, Literature Survey, Features, History. Countries and Areas , Theoru, Design of Classification, Classification Problems , Research in Classification, Trends in Classification, Depth Classification, Automatic Classification, Uses of Classification, Practical Classification, Application of Classification, Standards, Glossary.Teminology, classification and Reference Service, Classificationand Documentation, Classification and Communication, Classification and Retrieval, Comparison to Other Schemes, Canons, Isolates, Common Isolates , Space Isolates, Time Isolates, Special Isolates, Postulates, Fundamental Categories, Facet Formula, Optionl Facets, Rounds and Levels, Basic Subjects, Notation and Symbols, Array and Chanin, Devices, Mnemonics, Phase Relation, Systems and Specials, Book Number, Cooperative Calssification, Teaching of Classification, Classification of Specific Subjects, Book Science, Bibliography, Library and Information Science, Classification, Cataloguing, Mathematics, Cybernetics, Engineering, Computer, Chemistry, Crystallography, Technology. Food Technology, Corrosion, Parasitism, Geology , Agriculture, Zoology, Animal Husbandry, Medicine, Useful Arts, Military Science, Creative Arts, Aiterature, Sanskrit, Marathi, Tamil, Calssics, Linguistics, Philosophy, Ssocial Science, Geography, Maps, History , Political Science, Economics, Sociology, Law,
-
Rader, H.B.: Library orientation and instruction - 1993 (1994)
0.02
0.020213896 = product of:
0.040427793 = sum of:
0.040427793 = product of:
0.080855586 = sum of:
0.080855586 = weight(_text_:22 in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080855586 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Reference services review. 22(1994) no.4, S.81-
-
Rasmussen, E.M.: Indexing images (1997)
0.02
0.018626796 = product of:
0.037253592 = sum of:
0.037253592 = product of:
0.11176077 = sum of:
0.11176077 = weight(_text_:objects in 2215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11176077 = score(doc=2215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31719333 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2215)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of methods available for accessing collections of digital images by means of manual and automatic indexing. Distinguishes between concept based indexing, in which images and the objects represented, are manually identified and described in terms of what they are and represent, and content based indexing, in which features of images (such as colours) are automatically identified and extracted. The main discussion is arranged in 6 sections: studies of image systems and their use; approaches to indexing images; image attributes; concept based indexing; content based indexing; and browsing in image retrieval. The performance of current image retrieval systems is largely untested and they still lack an extensive history and tradition of evaluation and standards for assessing performance. Concludes that there is a significant amount of research to be done before image retrieval systems can reach the state of development of text retrieval systems
-
Davenport, E.; Hall, H.: Organizational Knowledge and Communities of Practice (2002)
0.02
0.018626796 = product of:
0.037253592 = sum of:
0.037253592 = product of:
0.11176077 = sum of:
0.11176077 = weight(_text_:objects in 4293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11176077 = score(doc=4293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31719333 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 4293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4293)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A community of practice has recently been defined as "a flexible group of professionals, informally bound by common interests, who interact through interdependent tasks guided by a common purpose thereby embodying a store of common knowledge" (Jubert, 1999, p. 166). The association of communities of practice with the production of collective knowledge has long been recognized, and they have been objects of study for a number of decades in the context of professional communication, particularly communication in science (Abbott, 1988; Bazerman & Paradis, 1991). Recently, however, they have been invoked in the domain of organization studies as sites where people learn and share insights. If, as Stinchcombe suggests, an organization is "a set of stable social relations, dehberately created, with the explicit intention of continuously accomplishing some specific goals or purposes" (Stinchcombe, 1965, p. 142), where does this "flexible" and "embodied" source of knowledge fit? Can communities of practice be harnessed, engineered, and managed like other organizational groups, or does their strength lie in the fact that they operate outside the stable and persistent social relations that characterize the organization?
-
Khoo, S.G.; Na, J.-C.: Semantic relations in information science (2006)
0.02
0.018626796 = product of:
0.037253592 = sum of:
0.037253592 = product of:
0.11176077 = sum of:
0.11176077 = weight(_text_:objects in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11176077 = score(doc=1978,freq=8.0), product of:
0.31719333 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This chapter examines the nature of semantic relations and their main applications in information science. The nature and types of semantic relations are discussed from the perspectives of linguistics and psychology. An overview of the semantic relations used in knowledge structures such as thesauri and ontologies is provided, as well as the main techniques used in the automatic extraction of semantic relations from text. The chapter then reviews the use of semantic relations in information extraction, information retrieval, question-answering, and automatic text summarization applications. Concepts and relations are the foundation of knowledge and thought. When we look at the world, we perceive not a mass of colors but objects to which we automatically assign category labels. Our perceptual system automatically segments the world into concepts and categories. Concepts are the building blocks of knowledge; relations act as the cement that links concepts into knowledge structures. We spend much of our lives identifying regular associations and relations between objects, events, and processes so that the world has an understandable structure and predictability. Our lives and work depend on the accuracy and richness of this knowledge structure and its web of relations. Relations are needed for reasoning and inferencing. Chaffin and Herrmann (1988b, p. 290) noted that "relations between ideas have long been viewed as basic to thought, language, comprehension, and memory." Aristotle's Metaphysics (Aristotle, 1961; McKeon, expounded on several types of relations. The majority of the 30 entries in a section of the Metaphysics known today as the Philosophical Lexicon referred to relations and attributes, including cause, part-whole, same and opposite, quality (i.e., attribute) and kind-of, and defined different types of each relation. Hume (1955) pointed out that there is a connection between successive ideas in our minds, even in our dreams, and that the introduction of an idea in our mind automatically recalls an associated idea. He argued that all the objects of human reasoning are divided into relations of ideas and matters of fact and that factual reasoning is founded on the cause-effect relation. His Treatise of Human Nature identified seven kinds of relations: resemblance, identity, relations of time and place, proportion in quantity or number, degrees in quality, contrariety, and causation. Mill (1974, pp. 989-1004) discoursed on several types of relations, claiming that all things are either feelings, substances, or attributes, and that attributes can be a quality (which belongs to one object) or a relation to other objects.
-
Cornelius, I.: Theorizing information for information science (2002)
0.02
0.0182173 = product of:
0.0364346 = sum of:
0.0364346 = product of:
0.0728692 = sum of:
0.0728692 = weight(_text_:maps in 4244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0728692 = score(doc=4244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33534583 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.21729566 = fieldWeight in 4244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Shannon provides a model whereby an information source selects a desired message, out of a set of possible messages, that is then formed into a signal. The signal is sent over the communication channel to a receiver, which then transforms the signal back to a message that is relayed to its destination (Shannon & Weaver, 1949/1963, p. 7). Problems connected with this model have remained with us. Some of the concepts are ambiguous; the identification of information with a process has spancelled the debate; the problems of measuring the amount of information, the relation of information to meaning, and questions about the truth value of information have remained. Balancing attention between the process and the act of receiving information, and deterrnining the character of the receiver, has also been the focus of work and debate. Information science has mined work from other disciplines involving information theory and has also produced its own theory. The desire for theory remains (Hjorland, 1998; Saracevic, 1999), but what theory will deliver is unclear. The distinction between data and information, or communication and information, is not of concern here. The convention that data, at some point of use, become information, and that information is transferred in a process of communication suffices for this discussion. Substitution of any of these terms is not a problem. More problematic is the relationship between information and knowledge. It seems accepted that at some point the data by perception, or selection, become information, which feeds and alters knowledge structures in a human recipient. What that process of alteration is, and its implications, remain problematic. This review considers the following questions: 1. What can be gleaned from the history of reviews of information in information science? 2. What current maps, guides, and surveys are available to elaborate our understanding of the issues? 3. Is there a parallel development of work outside information science an information theory of use to us? 4. Is there a dominant view of information within information science? 5. What can we say about issues like measurement, meaning, and misinformation? 6. Is there other current work of relevance that can assist attempts, in information science, to develop a theory of information?
-
Gabbard, R.: Recent literature shows accelerated growth in hypermedia tools : an annotated bibliography (1994)
0.02
0.016171116 = product of:
0.032342233 = sum of:
0.032342233 = product of:
0.064684466 = sum of:
0.064684466 = weight(_text_:22 in 8460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064684466 = score(doc=8460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20898253 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059678096 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8460)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Reference services review. 22(1994) no.2, S.31-40
