Search (176 results, page 9 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Toth, M.B.; Emery, D.: Applying DCMI elements to digital images and text in the Archimedes Palimpsest Program (2008) 0.00
    0.0033017385 = product of:
      0.009905215 = sum of:
        0.009905215 = product of:
          0.029715646 = sum of:
            0.029715646 = weight(_text_:22 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029715646 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Belém, F.M.; Almeida, J.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.: ¬A survey on tag recommendation methods : a review (2017) 0.00
    0.0033017385 = product of:
      0.009905215 = sum of:
        0.009905215 = product of:
          0.029715646 = sum of:
            0.029715646 = weight(_text_:22 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029715646 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:30:22
  3. Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018) 0.00
    0.0033017385 = product of:
      0.009905215 = sum of:
        0.009905215 = product of:
          0.029715646 = sum of:
            0.029715646 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029715646 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
  4. Roy, W.; Gray, C.: Preparing existing metadata for repository batch import : a recipe for a fickle food (2018) 0.00
    0.0033017385 = product of:
      0.009905215 = sum of:
        0.009905215 = product of:
          0.029715646 = sum of:
            0.029715646 = weight(_text_:22 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029715646 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10.11.2018 16:27:22
  5. Schroeder, K.: Persistent Identifiers im Kontext der Langzeitarchivierung : EPICUR auf dem 2. Bibliothekskongress in Leipzig (2004) 0.00
    0.0027448907 = product of:
      0.008234672 = sum of:
        0.008234672 = product of:
          0.024704017 = sum of:
            0.024704017 = weight(_text_:k in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024704017 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  6. Miksa, S.D.; Moen, WE.; Snyder, G.; Polyakov, S.; Eklund, A.: Metadata assistance of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Record's four user tasks : a report on the MARC content designation utilization (MCDU) project (2006) 0.00
    0.0027448907 = product of:
      0.008234672 = sum of:
        0.008234672 = product of:
          0.024704017 = sum of:
            0.024704017 = weight(_text_:k in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024704017 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  7. Alemu, G.: ¬A theory of metadata enriching and filtering (2016) 0.00
    0.0027448907 = product of:
      0.008234672 = sum of:
        0.008234672 = product of:
          0.024704017 = sum of:
            0.024704017 = weight(_text_:k in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024704017 = score(doc=5068,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15658903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a new theory of metadata enriching and filtering. The theory emerged from a rigorous grounded theory data analysis of 57 in-depth interviews with metadata experts, library and information science researchers, librarians as well as academic library users (G. Alemu, A Theory of Digital Library Metadata: The Emergence of Enriching and Filtering, University of Portsmouth PhD thesis, Portsmouth, 2014). Partly due to the novelty of Web 2.0 approaches and mainly due to the absence of foundational theories to underpin socially constructed metadata approaches, this research adapted a social constructivist philosophical approach and a constructivist grounded theory method (K.?Charmaz, Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, SAGE Publications, London, 2006). The theory espouses the importance of enriching information objects with descriptions pertaining to the about-ness of information objects. Such richness and diversity of descriptions, it is argued, could chiefly be achieved by involving users in the metadata creation process. The theory includes four overarching metadata principles - metadata enriching, linking, openness and filtering. The theory proposes a mixed metadata approach where metadata experts provide the requisite basic descriptive metadata, structure and interoperability (a priori metadata) while users continually enrich it with their own interpretations (post-hoc metadata). Enriched metadata is inter- and cross-linked (the principle of linking), made openly accessible (the principle of openness) and presented (the principle of filtering) according to user needs. It is argued that enriched, interlinked and open metadata effectively rises and scales to the challenges presented by the growing digital collections and changing user expectations. This metadata approach allows users to pro-actively engage in co-creating metadata, hence enhancing the findability, discoverability and subsequent usage of information resources. This paper concludes by indicating the current challenges and opportunities to implement the theory of metadata enriching and filtering.
  8. Tappenbeck, I.; Wessel, C.: CARMEN : Content Analysis, Retrieval and Metadata: Effective Net-working. Ein Halbzeitbericht (2001) 0.00
    0.0026653677 = product of:
      0.007996103 = sum of:
        0.007996103 = product of:
          0.023988307 = sum of:
            0.023988307 = weight(_text_:29 in 5900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023988307 = score(doc=5900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5900)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Das Projekt CARMEN startete als Sonderfördermaßnahme im Rahmen von Global lnfo im Oktober 1999 mit einer geplanten Laufzeit von 29 Monaten. Der Schwerpunkt des Projekts liegt in der Weiterentwicklung von Konzepten und Verfahren der Dokumenterschließung, die den Zugriff auf heterogene, dezentral verteilte Informationsbestände und deren Verwaltung nach gemeinsamen Prinzipien ermöglichen sollen. Dabei geht CARMEN gezielt einen anderen Weg als die meisten bisherigen Ansätze in diesem Bereich, die versuchen, Homogenität und Konsistenz in einer dezentralen Informationslandschaft technikorientiert herzustellen, indem Verfahren entwickelt werden, durch die physikalisch auf verschiedene Dokumentenräume gleichzeitig zugegriffen werden kann. Eine rein technische Parallelisierung von Zugriffsmöglichkeiten reicht jedoch nicht aus, denn das Hauptproblem der inhaltlichen, strukturellen und konzeptionellen Differenz der einzelnen Datenbestände wird damit nicht gelöst. Um diese Differenzen zu kompensieren, werden Problemlösungen und Weiterentwicklungen innerhalb des Projekts CARMEN in drei Bereichen erarbeitet: (1) Metadaten (Dokumentbeschreibung, Retrieval, Verwaltung, Archivierung) (2) Methoden des Umgangs mit der verbleibenden Heterogenität der Datenbestände (3) Retrieval für strukturierte Dokumente mit Metadaten und heterogenen Datentypen. Diese drei Aufgabenbereiche hängen eng zusammen. Durch die Entwicklungen im Bereich der Metadaten soll einerseits die verlorengegangene Konsistenz partiell wiederhergestellt und auf eine den neuen Medien gerechte Basis gestellt werden. Andererseits sollen durch Verfahren zur Heterogenitätsbehandlung Dokumente mit unterschiedlicher Datenrelevanz und Inhaltserschließung aufeinander bezogen und retrievalseitig durch ein Rechercheverfahren erganzt werden, das den unterschiedlichen Datentypen gerecht wird Innerhalb des Gesamtprojekts CARMEN werden diese Aspekte arbeitsteilig behandelt. Acht Arbeitspakete (APs) befassen sich in Abstimmung miteinander mit je verschiedenen Schwerpunkten. Um die Koordination der Arbeiten der verschiedenen APs untereinander zu unterstützen, trafen sich die ca. 40 Projektbearbeiter am 1. und 2. Februar 2001 zum "CARMEN middle OfTheRoad Workshop" in Bonn. Anlässlich dieses Workshops wurden die inhaltlichen und technischen Ergebnisse, die in der ersten Hälfte der Projektlaufzeit von den einzelnen APs erzielt worden sind, in insgesamt 17 Präsentationen vorgestellt
  9. Tappenbeck, I.; Wessel, C.: CARMEN : Content Analysis, Retrieval and Metadata: Effective Net-working. Bericht über den middleOfTheRoad Workshop (2001) 0.00
    0.0026653677 = product of:
      0.007996103 = sum of:
        0.007996103 = product of:
          0.023988307 = sum of:
            0.023988307 = weight(_text_:29 in 5901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023988307 = score(doc=5901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5901)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Das Projekt CARMEN startete als Sonderfördermaßnahme im Rahmen von Global lnfo im Oktober 1999 mit einer geplanten Laufzeit von 29 Monaten. Der Schwerpunkt des Projekts liegt in der Weiterentwicklung von Konzepten und Verfahren der Dokumenterschließung, die den Zugriff auf heterogene, dezentral verteilte Informationsbestände und deren Verwaltung nach gemeinsamen Prinzipien ermöglichen sollen. Dabei geht CARMEN gezielt einen anderen Weg als die meisten bisherigen Ansätze in diesem Bereich, die versuchen, Homogenität und Konsistenz in einer dezentralen Informationslandschaft technikorientiert herzustellen, indem Verfahren entwickelt werden, durch die physikalisch auf verschiedene Dokumentenräume gleichzeitig zugegriffen werden kann. Eine rein technische Parallelisierung von Zugriffsmöglichkeiten reicht jedoch nicht aus, denn das Hauptproblem der inhaltlichen, strukturellen und konzeptionellen Differenz der einzelnen Datenbestände wird damit nicht gelöst. Um diese Differenzen zu kompensieren, werden Problemlösungen und Weiterentwicklungen innerhalb des Projekts CARMEN in drei Bereichen erarbeitet: (1) Metadaten (Dokumentbeschreibung, Retrieval, Verwaltung, Archivierung) (2) Methoden des Umgangs mit der verbleibenden Heterogenität der Datenbestände (3) Retrieval für strukturierte Dokumente mit Metadaten und heterogenen Datentypen. Diese drei Aufgabenbereiche hängen eng zusammen. Durch die Entwicklungen im Bereich der Metadaten soll einerseits die verlorengegangene Konsistenz partiell wiederhergestellt und auf eine den neuen Medien gerechte Basis gestellt werden. Andererseits sollen durch Verfahren zur Heterogenitätsbehandlung Dokumente mit unterschiedlicher Datenrelevanz und Inhaltserschließung aufeinander bezogen und retrievalseitig durch ein Rechercheverfahren erganzt werden, das den unterschiedlichen Datentypen gerecht wird Innerhalb des Gesamtprojekts CARMEN werden diese Aspekte arbeitsteilig behandelt. Acht Arbeitspakete (APs) befassen sich in Abstimmung miteinander mit je verschiedenen Schwerpunkten. Um die Koordination der Arbeiten der verschiedenen APs untereinander zu unterstützen, trafen sich die ca. 40 Projektbearbeiter am 1. und 2. Februar 2001 zum "CARMEN middle OfTheRoad Workshop" in Bonn. Anlässlich dieses Workshops wurden die inhaltlichen und technischen Ergebnisse, die in der ersten Hälfte der Projektlaufzeit von den einzelnen APs erzielt worden sind, in insgesamt 17 Präsentationen vorgestellt
  10. Jun, W.: ¬A knowledge network constructed by integrating classification, thesaurus and metadata in a digital library (2003) 0.00
    0.0026653677 = product of:
      0.007996103 = sum of:
        0.007996103 = product of:
          0.023988307 = sum of:
            0.023988307 = weight(_text_:29 in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023988307 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.24-28
  11. Cwiok, J.: ¬The defining element : a discussion of the creator element within metadata schemas (2005) 0.00
    0.0026653677 = product of:
      0.007996103 = sum of:
        0.007996103 = product of:
          0.023988307 = sum of:
            0.023988307 = weight(_text_:29 in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023988307 = score(doc=5732,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15430406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2008 19:13:46
  12. Wessel, C.: "Publishing and sharing your metadata application profile" : 2. SCHEMAS-Workshop in Bonn (2001) 0.00
    0.0026413908 = product of:
      0.007924172 = sum of:
        0.007924172 = product of:
          0.023772515 = sum of:
            0.023772515 = weight(_text_:22 in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023772515 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    11. 3.2001 17:10:22
  13. Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000) 0.00
    0.0026413908 = product of:
      0.007924172 = sum of:
        0.007924172 = product of:
          0.023772515 = sum of:
            0.023772515 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023772515 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:01:22
  14. Rice, R.: Applying DC to institutional data repositories (2008) 0.00
    0.0026413908 = product of:
      0.007924172 = sum of:
        0.007924172 = product of:
          0.023772515 = sum of:
            0.023772515 = weight(_text_:22 in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023772515 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  15. Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012) 0.00
    0.0026413908 = product of:
      0.007924172 = sum of:
        0.007924172 = product of:
          0.023772515 = sum of:
            0.023772515 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023772515 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
  16. Gömpel, R.; Altenhöner, R.; Kunz, M.; Oehlschläger, S.; Werner, C.: Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in Buenos Aires : Aus den Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control, der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC sowie der Information Technology Section (2004) 0.00
    0.0013206954 = product of:
      0.003962086 = sum of:
        0.003962086 = product of:
          0.011886258 = sum of:
            0.011886258 = weight(_text_:22 in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011886258 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15360846 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0438652 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    "Libraries: Tools for Education and Development" war das Motto der 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz, dem Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, der vom 22.-27. August 2004 in Buenos Aires, Argentinien, und damit erstmals in Lateinamerika stattfand. Rund 3.000 Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer, davon ein Drittel aus spanischsprachigen Ländern, allein 600 aus Argentinien, besuchten die von der IFLA und dem nationalen Organisationskomitee gut organisierte Tagung mit mehr als 200 Sitzungen und Veranstaltungen. Aus Deutschland waren laut Teilnehmerverzeichnis leider nur 45 Kolleginnen und Kollegen angereist, womit ihre Zahl wieder auf das Niveau von Boston gesunken ist. Erfreulicherweise gab es nunmehr bereits im dritten Jahr eine deutschsprachige Ausgabe des IFLA-Express. Auch in diesem Jahr soll hier über die Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control berichtet werden. Die Arbeit der Division mit ihren Sektionen Bibliography, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing sowie der neuen Sektion Knowledge Management bildet einen der Schwerpunkte der IFLA-Arbeit, die dabei erzielten konkreten Ergebnisse und Empfehlungen haben maßgeblichen Einfluss auf die tägliche Arbeit der Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. Erstmals wird auch ausführlich über die Arbeit der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC und der Information Technology Section berichtet.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 150
  • d 23
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types