Search (191 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998) 0.05
    0.045279905 = product of:
      0.09055981 = sum of:
        0.09055981 = sum of:
          0.030321142 = weight(_text_:h in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030321142 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11046136 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
          0.060238667 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060238667 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 18:45:36
    Source
    BuB. 50(1998) H.5, S.341-345
  2. Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998) 0.05
    0.045279905 = product of:
      0.09055981 = sum of:
        0.09055981 = sum of:
          0.030321142 = weight(_text_:h in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030321142 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11046136 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
          0.060238667 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060238667 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 32(1998) H.11, S.1931-1938
  3. White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013) 0.04
    0.036223922 = product of:
      0.072447844 = sum of:
        0.072447844 = sum of:
          0.024256913 = weight(_text_:h in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024256913 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11046136 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
          0.048190933 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048190933 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:09:22
  4. Pfister, E.; Wittwer, B.; Wolff, M.: Metadaten - Manuelle Datenpflege vs. Automatisieren : ein Praxisbericht zu Metadatenmanagement an der ETH-Bibliothek (2017) 0.03
    0.031695932 = product of:
      0.063391864 = sum of:
        0.063391864 = sum of:
          0.021224799 = weight(_text_:h in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021224799 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11046136 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
          0.042167064 = weight(_text_:22 in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042167064 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 20(2017) H.1, S.22-25
  5. Rannharter, N.; Teetor, S.: Maintaining an image data base : a use case based on the Digital Research Archive for Byzantium (DIFAB) (2017) 0.03
    0.027280934 = sum of:
      0.018184591 = product of:
        0.10910754 = sum of:
          0.10910754 = weight(_text_:bilder in 3914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10910754 = score(doc=3914,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.22747406 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.116248 = idf(docFreq=720, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.47964826 = fieldWeight in 3914, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.116248 = idf(docFreq=720, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3914)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.009096342 = product of:
        0.018192684 = sum of:
          0.018192684 = weight(_text_:h in 3914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018192684 = score(doc=3914,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11046136 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 3914, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3914)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Mit Metadaten versehene, digital archivierte Bilder sind aufgrund ihrer hohen Komplexität eine ständige Herausforderung für den Aufbau von Metadatenstrukturen und für das Beibehalten von adäquaten Metadatenstandards in Bilddatenbanken. Besonders bei Bildern über eine materielle Kultur zeichnet sich diese Komplexität in den diversen Ebenen ab. Zur Verdeutlichung dieser Problematik dient ein einzelnes Monument mit seiner fotographischen Dokumentation als geisteswissenschaftliches Anwendungsbeispiel aus dem Digitalen Forschungsarchiv Byzanz (DiFAB) der Universität Wien. Unter der grundsätzlichen Berücksichtigung der künftigen Anforderungen und der einfachen Navigation von Metadaten beinhaltet dieser Beitrag u. a. die Herausforderungen mit den diversen analogen und digitalen Formen der Dokumentation, der historischen Geographie, der kulturspezifischen Terminologie sowie mit der kunsthistorischen Bedeutung einer exakten und unscharfen Datierung für Forschungsarchive.
    Form
    Bilder
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 70(2017) H.2, S.208-224
  6. Weber, J.: Nachlässe und Autographen im WWW : Dublin Core in Museen, Archiven und Bibliotheken (2000) 0.03
    0.027167942 = product of:
      0.054335885 = sum of:
        0.054335885 = sum of:
          0.018192684 = weight(_text_:h in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018192684 = score(doc=4458,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11046136 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
          0.0361432 = weight(_text_:22 in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0361432 = score(doc=4458,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 3.2000 19:25:22
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 47(2000) H.1, S.63-69
  7. Rusch-Feja, D.: ¬Die Open Archives Initiative (OAI) : Neue Zugangsformen zu wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten? (2001) 0.03
    0.027167942 = product of:
      0.054335885 = sum of:
        0.054335885 = sum of:
          0.018192684 = weight(_text_:h in 1133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018192684 = score(doc=1133,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11046136 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1133, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1133)
          0.0361432 = weight(_text_:22 in 1133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0361432 = score(doc=1133,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1133, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1133)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2002 12:23:54
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 25(2001) H.3, S.291-300
  8. Keßler, M.: KIM - Kompetenzzentrum Interoperable Metadaten : Gemeinsamer Workshop der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek und des Arbeitskreises Elektronisches Publizieren (AKEP) (2007) 0.03
    0.027167942 = product of:
      0.054335885 = sum of:
        0.054335885 = sum of:
          0.018192684 = weight(_text_:h in 2406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018192684 = score(doc=2406,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11046136 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2406, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2406)
          0.0361432 = weight(_text_:22 in 2406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0361432 = score(doc=2406,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2406, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 20(2008) H.1, S.22-24
  9. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03
    0.025557103 = product of:
      0.051114205 = sum of:
        0.051114205 = product of:
          0.10222841 = sum of:
            0.10222841 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10222841 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04446111 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  10. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.02
    0.024095466 = product of:
      0.048190933 = sum of:
        0.048190933 = product of:
          0.096381865 = sum of:
            0.096381865 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096381865 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04446111 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  11. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.024095466 = product of:
      0.048190933 = sum of:
        0.048190933 = product of:
          0.096381865 = sum of:
            0.096381865 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096381865 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04446111 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  12. Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018) 0.02
    0.022639953 = product of:
      0.045279905 = sum of:
        0.045279905 = sum of:
          0.015160571 = weight(_text_:h in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015160571 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11046136 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
          0.030119333 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030119333 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
  13. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.02
    0.021083532 = product of:
      0.042167064 = sum of:
        0.042167064 = product of:
          0.08433413 = sum of:
            0.08433413 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08433413 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04446111 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  14. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.021083532 = product of:
      0.042167064 = sum of:
        0.042167064 = product of:
          0.08433413 = sum of:
            0.08433413 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08433413 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04446111 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  15. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02
    0.021083532 = product of:
      0.042167064 = sum of:
        0.042167064 = product of:
          0.08433413 = sum of:
            0.08433413 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08433413 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04446111 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  16. Wessel, C.: "Publishing and sharing your metadata application profile" : 2. SCHEMAS-Workshop in Bonn (2001) 0.02
    0.018111961 = product of:
      0.036223922 = sum of:
        0.036223922 = sum of:
          0.0121284565 = weight(_text_:h in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0121284565 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11046136 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
          0.024095466 = weight(_text_:22 in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024095466 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 3.2001 17:10:22
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 35(2001) H.2, S.189-192
  17. Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012) 0.02
    0.018111961 = product of:
      0.036223922 = sum of:
        0.036223922 = sum of:
          0.0121284565 = weight(_text_:h in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0121284565 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11046136 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
          0.024095466 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024095466 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
  18. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02
    0.0180716 = product of:
      0.0361432 = sum of:
        0.0361432 = product of:
          0.0722864 = sum of:
            0.0722864 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0722864 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04446111 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  19. Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany (2008) 0.02
    0.018045865 = product of:
      0.03609173 = sum of:
        0.03609173 = sum of:
          0.015008199 = weight(_text_:h in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015008199 = score(doc=2668,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.11046136 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.13586831 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
          0.021083532 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021083532 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15569523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04446111 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Carol Jean Godby, Devon Smith, Eric Childress: Encoding Application Profiles in a Computational Model of the Crosswalk. - Maria Elisabete Catarino, Ana Alice Baptista: Relating Folksonomies with Dublin Core. - Ed Summers, Antoine Isaac, Clay Redding, Dan Krech: LCSH, SKOS and Linked Data. - Xia Lin, Jiexun Li, Xiaohua Zhou: Theme Creation for Digital Collections. - Boris Lauser, Gudrun Johannsen, Caterina Caracciolo, Willem Robert van Hage, Johannes Keizer, Philipp Mayr: Comparing Human and Automatic Thesaurus Mapping Approaches in the Agricultural Domain. - P. Bryan Heidorn, Qin Wei: Automatic Metadata Extraction From Museum Specimen Labels. - Stuart Allen Sutton, Diny Golder: Achievement Standards Network (ASN): An Application Profile for Mapping K-12 Educational Resources to Achievement Standards. - Allen H. Renear, Karen M. Wickett, Richard J. Urban, David Dubin, Sarah L. Shreeves: Collection/Item Metadata Relationships. - Seth van Hooland, Yves Bontemps, Seth Kaufman: Answering the Call for more Accountability: Applying Data Profiling to Museum Metadata. - Thomas Margaritopoulos, Merkourios Margaritopoulos, Ioannis Mavridis, Athanasios Manitsaris: A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment. - Miao Chen, Xiaozhong Liu, Jian Qin: Semantic Relation Extraction from Socially-Generated Tags: A Methodology for Metadata Generation. - Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G. Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim: The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies. - Martin Malmsten: Making a Library Catalogue Part of the Semantic Web. - Philipp Mayr, Vivien Petras: Building a Terminology Network for Search: The KoMoHe Project. - Michael Panzer: Cool URIs for the DDC: Towards Web-scale Accessibility of a Large Classification System. - Barbara Levergood, Stefan Farrenkopf, Elisabeth Frasnelli: The Specification of the Language of the Field and Interoperability: Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries (CACAO)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/index.php/pubs/issue/view/32/showToc. - Vgl. auch den Bericht über die Tagung in: ZfBB 26(2009) H.1, S.35-37 (C. Frodl u. M. Keßler)
  20. NISO seeking comments : metadata for still images (2001) 0.02
    0.017144596 = product of:
      0.034289192 = sum of:
        0.034289192 = product of:
          0.20573515 = sum of:
            0.20573515 = weight(_text_:bilder in 3526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20573515 = score(doc=3526,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22747406 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.116248 = idf(docFreq=720, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04446111 = queryNorm
                0.9044334 = fieldWeight in 3526, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.116248 = idf(docFreq=720, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3526)
          0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Form
    Bilder

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 182
  • el 8
  • s 6
  • m 4
  • b 2
  • More… Less…