Search (624 results, page 1 of 32)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.17 
    0.16977897 = product of:
  0.25466844 = sum of:
    0.009116441 = weight(_text_:a in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009116441 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
    0.245552 = sum of:
      0.12663707 = weight(_text_:de in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12663707 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.56977195 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.118914925 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.118914925 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
    Type
    a
  2. Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004) 0.09 
    0.09132762 = product of:
  0.13699143 = sum of:
    0.014069905 = weight(_text_:a in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014069905 = score(doc=2848,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
    0.12292153 = sum of:
      0.07387163 = weight(_text_:de in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07387163 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
      0.0490499 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0490499 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
    Type
    a
  3. Barrueco Cruz, J.M.; Krichel, T.: Subject description in the Academic Metadata Format (2003) 0.08 
    0.07541863 = product of:
  0.11312794 = sum of:
    0.0075970334 = weight(_text_:a in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075970334 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
    0.1055309 = product of:
      0.2110618 = sum of:
        0.2110618 = weight(_text_:de in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2110618 = score(doc=3548,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.94961995 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
    Type
    a
  4. Lagoze, C.; Van de Sompel, H.: ¬The making of the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (2003) 0.07 
    0.06704361 = sum of:
  0.025191851 = product of:
    0.100767404 = sum of:
      0.100767404 = weight(_text_:authors in 4771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.100767404 = score(doc=4771,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 4771, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4771)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.010192491 = weight(_text_:a in 4771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
    0.010192491 = score(doc=4771,freq=10.0), product of:
      0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
        1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
        0.051718395 = queryNorm
      0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 4771, product of:
        3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
          10.0 = termFreq=10.0
        1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
        0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4771)
  0.031659268 = product of:
    0.063318536 = sum of:
      0.063318536 = weight(_text_:de in 4771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.063318536 = score(doc=4771,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 4771, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4771)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The authors, who jointly serve as the Open Archives Initiative (OAI) executive, reflect an the three-year history of the OAI. Three years of technical work recently culminated in the release of a stabie production version 2 of the OAI Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH). This technical product, the work that led up to it, and the process that made it possible have attracted some favor from the digital library and information community. The paper explores a number of factors in the history of the OAI that the authors believe have contributed to this positive response. The factors include focus an a defined problem Statement, an operational model in which strong leadership is balanced with solicited participation, a healthy dose of community building and Support, and sensible technical decisions.
    Type
    a
  5. Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008) 0.07 
    0.065238714 = sum of:
  0.020782216 = product of:
    0.08312886 = sum of:
      0.08312886 = weight(_text_:authors in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08312886 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0075206803 = weight(_text_:a in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
    0.0075206803 = score(doc=2294,freq=4.0), product of:
      0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
        1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
        0.051718395 = queryNorm
      0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
        2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
          4.0 = termFreq=4.0
        1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
        0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
  0.036935814 = product of:
    0.07387163 = sum of:
      0.07387163 = weight(_text_:de in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07387163 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.
    Source
    http://dc2008.de/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nkos.pdf
  6. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.05 
    0.049027205 = sum of:
  0.017813329 = product of:
    0.071253315 = sum of:
      0.071253315 = weight(_text_:authors in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.071253315 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.010192491 = weight(_text_:a in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
    0.010192491 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
      0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
        1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
        0.051718395 = queryNorm
      0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
        3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
          10.0 = termFreq=10.0
        1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
        0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
  0.021021385 = product of:
    0.04204277 = sum of:
      0.04204277 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04204277 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
    Type
    a
  7. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.05 
    0.045474857 = product of:
  0.068212286 = sum of:
    0.012155253 = weight(_text_:a in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012155253 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
    0.05605703 = product of:
      0.11211406 = sum of:
        0.11211406 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11211406 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
    Type
    a
  8. Bekaert, J.; Van de Ville, D.; Rogge, B.; Strauven, I.; Kooning, E. de; Van de Walle, R.: Metadata-based access to multimedia architectural and historical archive collections : a review (2002) 0.05 
    0.04515204 = product of:
  0.06772806 = sum of:
    0.012892594 = weight(_text_:a in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012892594 = score(doc=689,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
    0.054835465 = product of:
      0.10967093 = sum of:
        0.10967093 = weight(_text_:de in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10967093 = score(doc=689,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.493437 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This review is a summary of the state-of-the-art for those who have not been intimately dealing with the evolution of digital archives. At the same time this survey will be a useful resource and starting point for archivists, librarians and technicians, who are becoming involved in institutional digitization projects. It presents a brief overview of what is meant by a digital library and a digital archive, and how archival collections can be described. It expresses briefly the different approaches to collections and their descriptions and suggests that a consistent approach to descriptions at collection and item level is an important factor in initiatives which seek to provide integrated access to distributed resources, whether those resources are traditional or digital.
    Type
    a
  9. Martins, S. de Castro: Modelo conceitual de ecossistema semântico de informações corporativas para aplicação em objetos multimídia (2019) 0.04 
    0.043849945 = product of:
  0.06577492 = sum of:
    0.0060776267 = weight(_text_:a in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060776267 = score(doc=117,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
    0.059697293 = product of:
      0.119394585 = sum of:
        0.119394585 = weight(_text_:de in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119394585 = score(doc=117,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.53718615 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Information management in corporate environments is a growing problem as companies' information assets grow and their need to use them in their operations. Several management models have been practiced with application on the most diverse fronts, practices that integrate the so-called Enterprise Content Management. This study proposes a conceptual model of semantic corporate information ecosystem, based on the Universal Document Model proposed by Dagobert Soergel. It focuses on unstructured information objects, especially multimedia, increasingly used in corporate environments, adding semantics and expanding their recovery potential in the composition and reuse of dynamic documents on demand. The proposed model considers stable elements in the organizational environment, such as actors, processes, business metadata and information objects, as well as some basic infrastructures of the corporate information environment. The main objective is to establish a conceptual model that adds semantic intelligence to information assets, leveraging pre-existing infrastructure in organizations, integrating and relating objects to other objects, actors and business processes. The approach methodology considered the state of the art of Information Organization, Representation and Retrieval, Organizational Content Management and Semantic Web technologies, in the scientific literature, as bases for the establishment of an integrative conceptual model. Therefore, the research will be qualitative and exploratory. The predicted steps of the model are: Environment, Data Type and Source Definition, Data Distillation, Metadata Enrichment, and Storage. As a result, in theoretical terms the extended model allows to process heterogeneous and unstructured data according to the established cut-outs and through the processes listed above, allowing value creation in the composition of dynamic information objects, with semantic aggregations to metadata.
    Content
    Tese de Doutorado apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação da Universidade Federal Fluminense como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciência da Informação.
    Imprint
    Niteroi : UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL FLUMINENSE / INSTITUTO DE ARTE E COMUNICAÇÃO SOCIAL / DEPARTAMENTO DE CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO
  10. Tonkin, E.; Baptista, A.A.; Hooland, S. van; Resmini, A.; Mendéz, E.; Neville, L.: Kinds of Tags : a collaborative research study on tag usage and structure (2007) 0.04 
    0.039837208 = product of:
  0.05975581 = sum of:
    0.0075206803 = weight(_text_:a in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075206803 = score(doc=531,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
    0.05223513 = product of:
      0.10447026 = sum of:
        0.10447026 = weight(_text_:de in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10447026 = score(doc=531,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.47003788 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    KoT (Kinds of Tags) is an ongoing joint collaborative research effort with many participants worldwide, including the University of Minho, UKOLN, the University of Bologna, the Université Libre de Bruxelles and La Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. It is focused on the analysis of tags that are in common use in the practice of social tagging, with the aim of discovering how easily tags can be 'normalised' for interoperability with standard metadata environments such as the DC Metadata Terms.
  11. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.04 
    0.039790496 = product of:
  0.059685744 = sum of:
    0.010635847 = weight(_text_:a in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010635847 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
    0.0490499 = product of:
      0.0980998 = sum of:
        0.0980998 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0980998 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
    Type
    a
  12. Andresen, L.: Standardisation of Dublin Core in Europe (2000) 0.04 
    0.037888594 = product of:
  0.056832887 = sum of:
    0.012059918 = weight(_text_:a in 4454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012059918 = score(doc=4454,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 4454, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4454)
    0.044772968 = product of:
      0.089545935 = sum of:
        0.089545935 = weight(_text_:de in 4454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089545935 = score(doc=4454,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.4028896 = fieldWeight in 4454, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4454)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Dublin Core is developed in an open consensus building environment and has also succeeded in many countries and in many domains. The idea of Dublin Core was to establish a de facto standard for metadata for discovery. There is a natural development from de facto standards to formal standards. A very important detail of formal standardisation is the stability and the credibility of an official standard. That was the background for the metadata policy of The Danish National Library Authority, agreed upon in Dec 1997. We decided to work for a formal standardisation of Dublin Core. there was - and is - a need for standardised method of describing Internet resources. And at that time Dublin core seemed to be the best bid for a metadata schema. It was not very widely used in practice, but Dublin Core was what people were talking about
    Type
    a
  13. Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012) 0.04 
    0.037603818 = sum of:
  0.016794568 = product of:
    0.06717827 = sum of:
      0.06717827 = weight(_text_:authors in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06717827 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0067949938 = weight(_text_:a in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
    0.0067949938 = score(doc=367,freq=10.0), product of:
      0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
        1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
        0.051718395 = queryNorm
      0.11394546 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
        3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
          10.0 = termFreq=10.0
        1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
        0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
  0.014014257 = product of:
    0.028028514 = sum of:
      0.028028514 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028028514 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
    Type
    a
  14. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.04 
    0.03635026 = product of:
  0.05452539 = sum of:
    0.014887085 = weight(_text_:a in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014887085 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
    0.039638307 = product of:
      0.079276614 = sum of:
        0.079276614 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079276614 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
    Type
    a
  15. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.03 
    0.0321294 = product of:
  0.048194095 = sum of:
    0.01315845 = weight(_text_:a in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01315845 = score(doc=3280,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
    0.035035644 = product of:
      0.07007129 = sum of:
        0.07007129 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07007129 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
    Type
    a
  16. Lupovici, C.: ¬L'¬information secondaire du document primaire : format MARC ou SGML? (1997) 0.03 
    0.03171444 = product of:
  0.04757166 = sum of:
    0.010635847 = weight(_text_:a in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010635847 = score(doc=892,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
    0.036935814 = product of:
      0.07387163 = sum of:
        0.07387163 = weight(_text_:de in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07387163 = score(doc=892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Secondary information, e.g. MARC based bibliographic records, comprises structured data for identifying, tagging, retrieving and management of primary documents. SGML, the standard format for coding content and structure of primary documents, was introduced in 1986 as a publishing tool but is now being applied to bibliographic records. SGML now comprises standard definitions (DTD) for books, serials, articles and mathematical formulae. A simplified version (HTML) is used for Web pages. Pilot projects to develop SGML as a standard for bibliographic exchange include the Dublin Core, listing 13 descriptive elements for Internet documents; the French GRISELI programme using SGML for exchanging grey literature and US experiments on reformatting USMARC for use with SGML-based records
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.174, S.68-72
    Type
    a
  17. Werf-Davelaar, T.v.d.: ¬De bibliografische beschrijving van elektronische informatiebronnen : 2 (1997) 0.03 
    0.030764487 = product of:
  0.046146728 = sum of:
    0.009210914 = weight(_text_:a in 7395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009210914 = score(doc=7395,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 7395, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7395)
    0.036935814 = product of:
      0.07387163 = sum of:
        0.07387163 = weight(_text_:de in 7395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07387163 = score(doc=7395,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 7395, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7395)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    As the number of publications on the WWW grows exponentially there is an urgent need for a standardised system of bibliographic description. In the Netherlands the PICA national union catalogue has created WebCAT to catalogue online publications from universities and research institutes. However, use of WebCAT is restricted to participating institutions. The DutchESS (Dutch Electronic Subject Service) and SURF-ACE Search Enginges projects provide a partial solution to the problems on indexing online publications. The ultimate solution lies in the development of standardised metadata architecture
    Type
    a
  18. Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany (2008) 0.03 
    0.03063047 = sum of:
  0.010391108 = product of:
    0.04156443 = sum of:
      0.04156443 = weight(_text_:authors in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04156443 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23577455 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.007976886 = weight(_text_:a in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
    0.007976886 = score(doc=2668,freq=18.0), product of:
      0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
        1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
        0.051718395 = queryNorm
      0.13376464 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
        4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
          18.0 = termFreq=18.0
        1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
        0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
  0.012262475 = product of:
    0.02452495 = sum of:
      0.02452495 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02452495 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051718395 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Metadata is a key aspect of our evolving infrastructure for information management, social computing, and scientific collaboration. DC-2008 will focus on metadata challenges, solutions, and innovation in initiatives and activities underlying semantic and social applications. Metadata is part of the fabric of social computing, which includes the use of wikis, blogs, and tagging for collaboration and participation. Metadata also underlies the development of semantic applications, and the Semantic Web - the representation and integration of multimedia knowledge structures on the basis of semantic models. These two trends flow together in applications such as Wikipedia, where authors collectively create structured information that can be extracted and used to enhance access to and use of information sources. Recent discussion has focused on how existing bibliographic standards can be expressed as Semantic Web vocabularies to facilitate the ingration of library and cultural heritage data with other types of data. Harnessing the efforts of content providers and end-users to link, tag, edit, and describe their information in interoperable ways ("participatory metadata") is a key step towards providing knowledge environments that are scalable, self-correcting, and evolvable. DC-2008 will explore conceptual and practical issues in the development and deployment of semantic and social applications to meet the needs of specific communities of practice.
    Content
    Carol Jean Godby, Devon Smith, Eric Childress: Encoding Application Profiles in a Computational Model of the Crosswalk. - Maria Elisabete Catarino, Ana Alice Baptista: Relating Folksonomies with Dublin Core. - Ed Summers, Antoine Isaac, Clay Redding, Dan Krech: LCSH, SKOS and Linked Data. - Xia Lin, Jiexun Li, Xiaohua Zhou: Theme Creation for Digital Collections. - Boris Lauser, Gudrun Johannsen, Caterina Caracciolo, Willem Robert van Hage, Johannes Keizer, Philipp Mayr: Comparing Human and Automatic Thesaurus Mapping Approaches in the Agricultural Domain. - P. Bryan Heidorn, Qin Wei: Automatic Metadata Extraction From Museum Specimen Labels. - Stuart Allen Sutton, Diny Golder: Achievement Standards Network (ASN): An Application Profile for Mapping K-12 Educational Resources to Achievement Standards. - Allen H. Renear, Karen M. Wickett, Richard J. Urban, David Dubin, Sarah L. Shreeves: Collection/Item Metadata Relationships. - Seth van Hooland, Yves Bontemps, Seth Kaufman: Answering the Call for more Accountability: Applying Data Profiling to Museum Metadata. - Thomas Margaritopoulos, Merkourios Margaritopoulos, Ioannis Mavridis, Athanasios Manitsaris: A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment. - Miao Chen, Xiaozhong Liu, Jian Qin: Semantic Relation Extraction from Socially-Generated Tags: A Methodology for Metadata Generation. - Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G. Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim: The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies. - Martin Malmsten: Making a Library Catalogue Part of the Semantic Web. - Philipp Mayr, Vivien Petras: Building a Terminology Network for Search: The KoMoHe Project. - Michael Panzer: Cool URIs for the DDC: Towards Web-scale Accessibility of a Large Classification System. - Barbara Levergood, Stefan Farrenkopf, Elisabeth Frasnelli: The Specification of the Language of the Field and Interoperability: Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries (CACAO)
  19. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.03 
    0.03051965 = product of:
  0.045779474 = sum of:
    0.0107438285 = weight(_text_:a in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0107438285 = score(doc=3281,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
    0.035035644 = product of:
      0.07007129 = sum of:
        0.07007129 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07007129 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
    Type
    a
  20. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.03 
    0.030477291 = product of:
  0.045715936 = sum of:
    0.0060776267 = weight(_text_:a in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060776267 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051718395 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
    0.039638307 = product of:
      0.079276614 = sum of:
        0.079276614 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079276614 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051718395 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 573
  • el 76
  • m 22
  • s 15
  • n 3
  • x 3
  • b 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications