-
Schallier, W.: On the razor's edge : between local and overall needs in knowledge organization (2004)
0.02
0.022552451 = product of:
0.045104902 = sum of:
0.045104902 = product of:
0.090209804 = sum of:
0.090209804 = weight(_text_:network in 2665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.090209804 = score(doc=2665,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22917621 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.3936264 = fieldWeight in 2665, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2665)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- 1. One Institution, one catalogue, one solution? K.U.Leuven University Library has a decentralised structure consisting of several department libraries and one central library. It is part of LIBIS-net, which is the biggest network of academic libraries in Belgium. In this network, maintaining the balance between local and overall needs presents a constant challenge. Standards and overall rules in cataloguing are indispensable for permitting information exchange within and outside the network. On the other hand, overall solutions do not necessarily render the best service to the user of a specific library. This is especially the case for subject cataloguing. It is difficult, and perhaps unreasonable, to convince a department library to use a generally accepted thesaurus like LCSH, if the users are familiar with a local classification that is much better adapted to the collection. The DOBIS/LIBIS library system of K.U.Leuven offered a technical solution for the conflict between overall and local needs. The main part of the bibliographic description was stored an the overall level and was visible for the whole network. For subject cataloguing this was the case for UDC, LCSH and McSH. A UDC authority file was built containing UDC codes linked to descriptors in different languages (Dutch, English and French). The authority file was linked to the UDC codes used in the bibliographic descriptions. This permitted searching by either UDC codes or verbal terms. LCSH were regularly and automatically uploaded in the catalogue to enrich the bibliographic descriptions. Finally, our Library of Biomedical Sciences used McSH. Local information, like thesauri and classifications exclusively used in a specific library, were stored in local files ("local keywords") and could only be seen by that library (up to branch level). For many years, this local information posed no difficulties. 27.04% of all documents and 38.16% of those younger than 1992 have local keywords
-
Zumer, M.; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Consequences of implementing FRBR : are we ready to open pandora's box? (2002)
0.02
0.016914338 = product of:
0.033828676 = sum of:
0.033828676 = product of:
0.06765735 = sum of:
0.06765735 = weight(_text_:network in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06765735 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22917621 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The study Functional Requirements for Bibliograpbic Records (FRBR) was commissioned by IFLA and published in 1998. It defines the core functions of a catalogue (and bibliographic records) as a gateway to information. For that purpose an abstract entity-relationship model of a catalogue is proposed. The FRBR model is revolutionary. The (computer) catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a replica of the traditional card catalogue, but rather as a network of connected entities, enabling the user to perform seamlessly all the necessary functions. So far there has been some theoretical discussion of the model and some limited experiments, but there is a lack of research in how to implement this theoretical model in practice, in new-generation catalogues. In this paper some reactions to the model are analysed. The main focus is an consequences of the model for the OPAC interface design, particularly the searching functionality and display of results.
-
Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009)
0.01
0.013944578 = product of:
0.027889157 = sum of:
0.027889157 = product of:
0.055778313 = sum of:
0.055778313 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055778313 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 18:50:43
-
Horn, M.E.: "Garbage" in, "refuse and refuse disposal" out : making the most of the subject authority file in the OPAC (2002)
0.01
0.012201506 = product of:
0.024403011 = sum of:
0.024403011 = product of:
0.048806023 = sum of:
0.048806023 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048806023 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Beccaria, M.; Scott, D.: Fac-Back-OPAC : an open source interface to your library system (2007)
0.01
0.012201506 = product of:
0.024403011 = sum of:
0.024403011 = product of:
0.048806023 = sum of:
0.048806023 = weight(_text_:22 in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048806023 = score(doc=2207,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 8.2008 11:22:47
-
Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008)
0.01
0.012201506 = product of:
0.024403011 = sum of:
0.024403011 = product of:
0.048806023 = sum of:
0.048806023 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048806023 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000)
0.01
0.010458433 = product of:
0.020916866 = sum of:
0.020916866 = product of:
0.041833732 = sum of:
0.041833732 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041833732 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Li, Y.-O.; Leung, S.W.: Computer cataloging of electronic Journals in unstable Aggregator Databases the Hong Kong Baptist University Library experience (2001)
0.01
0.010458433 = product of:
0.020916866 = sum of:
0.020916866 = product of:
0.041833732 = sum of:
0.041833732 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041833732 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Golderman, G.M.; Connolly, B.: Between the book covers : going beyond OPAC keyword searching with the deep linking capabilities of Google Scholar and Google Book Search (2004/05)
0.01
0.008715361 = product of:
0.017430723 = sum of:
0.017430723 = product of:
0.034861445 = sum of:
0.034861445 = weight(_text_:22 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034861445 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2.12.2007 19:39:22
-
Rädler, K.: Kataloganreicherung mit digitalen Inhaltsverzeichnissen eröffnet neue Geschäftsfelder : Erfahrungen aus der Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek (2008)
0.01
0.008715361 = product of:
0.017430723 = sum of:
0.017430723 = product of:
0.034861445 = sum of:
0.034861445 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034861445 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 17:14:24
-
Tennant, R.: Library catalogs : the wrong solution (2003)
0.01
0.008457169 = product of:
0.016914338 = sum of:
0.016914338 = product of:
0.033828676 = sum of:
0.033828676 = weight(_text_:network in 1558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033828676 = score(doc=1558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22917621 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.14760989 = fieldWeight in 1558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1558)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "MOST INTEGRATED library systems, as they are currently configured and used, should be removed from public view. Before I say why, let me be clean that I think the integrated library system serves a very important, albeit limited, role. An integrated library system should serve as a key piece of the infrastructure of a library, handling such tasks as ma terials acquisition, cataloging (including holdings, of course), and circulation. The integrated library system should be a complete and accurate recording of a local library's holdings. It should not be presented to users as the primary system for locating information. It fails badly at that important job. - Lack of content- The central problem of almost any library catalog system is that it typically includes only information about the books and journals held by a parficular library. Most do not provide access to joumal article indexes, web search engines, or even selective web directories like the Librarians' Index to the Internet. If they do offen such access, it is only via links to these services. The library catalog is far from onestop shopping for information. Although we acknowledge that fact to each other, we still treat it as if it were the best place in the universe to begin a search. Most of us give the catalog a place of great prominente an our web pages. But Information for each book is limited to the author, title, and a few subject headings. Seldom can book reviews, jacket summaries, recommendations, or tables of contents be found-or anything at all to help users determine if they want the material. - Lack of coverage - Most catalogs do not allow patrons to discover even all the books that are available to them. If you're lucky, your catalog may cover the collections of those libraries with which you have close ties-such as a regional network. But that leaves out all those items that could be requested via interlibrary loan. As Steve Coffman pointed out in his "Building Earth's Largest Library" article, we must show our users the universe that is open to them, highlight the items most accessible, and provide an estimate of how long it would take to obtain other items. - Inability to increase coverage - Despite some well-meaning attempts to smash everything of interest into the library catalog, the fact remains that most integrated library systems expect MARC records and MARC records only. This means that whatever we want to put into the catalog must be described using MARC and AACR2 (see "Marc Must Die," LJ 10/15/02, p. 26ff.). This is a barrier to dramatically increasing the scope of a catalog system, even if we decided to do it. How would you, for example, use the Open Archives Initiative Harvesting Protocol to crawl the bibliographic records of remote repositories and make them searchable within your library catalog? It can't be dope, and it shouldn't. The library catalog should be a record of a given library's holdings. Period.
-
Thomas, D.H.: ¬The effect of interface design on item selection in an online catalog (2001)
0.01
0.006972289 = product of:
0.013944578 = sum of:
0.013944578 = product of:
0.027889157 = sum of:
0.027889157 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027889157 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Ikas, W.-V.; Litten, F.: World Wide Web und Catalogue Enrichment : Möglichkeiten des verbesserten Nachweises von mikroverfilmten Handschriften und Inkunabeln (2007)
0.01
0.006972289 = product of:
0.013944578 = sum of:
0.013944578 = product of:
0.027889157 = sum of:
0.027889157 = weight(_text_:22 in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027889157 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2007 11:19:21
-
Greifeneder, E.: Hilfe auf allen Ebenen : ein Beitrag zur Forschung über Online-Hilfen in OPACs (2008)
0.01
0.006972289 = product of:
0.013944578 = sum of:
0.013944578 = product of:
0.027889157 = sum of:
0.027889157 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027889157 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 13:29:15
-
Hahn, U.; Schulze, M.: Katalogerweiterungen, Mashups und Elemente der Bibliothek 2.0" in der Praxis : der Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek der Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (IHSU) Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg (2009)
0.01
0.006972289 = product of:
0.013944578 = sum of:
0.013944578 = product of:
0.027889157 = sum of:
0.027889157 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027889157 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 19:40:38
-
Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004)
0.01
0.006100753 = product of:
0.012201506 = sum of:
0.012201506 = product of:
0.024403011 = sum of:
0.024403011 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024403011 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
-
Oberhauser, O.: Implementierung und Parametrisierung klassifikatorischer Recherchekomponenten im OPAC (2005)
0.01
0.006100753 = product of:
0.012201506 = sum of:
0.012201506 = product of:
0.024403011 = sum of:
0.024403011 = weight(_text_:22 in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024403011 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05146125 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.1, S.22-37
