Search (67 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Welsh, A.: ¬The rare books catalog and the scholarly database (2016) 0.00
    0.0021322283 = product of:
      0.010661141 = sum of:
        0.010661141 = weight(_text_:a in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010661141 = score(doc=5128,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The article is a researcher's eye view of the value of the library catalog not only as a database to be searched for surrogates of objects of study, but as a corpus of text that can be analyzed in its own right, or incorporated within the researcher's own research database. Barriers are identified in the ways in which catalog data can be output and the technical skills researchers currently need to download, ingest, and manipulate data. Research tools and datasets created by, or in collaboration with, the library community are identified.
    Type
    a
  2. Skinner, D.G.: ¬A comparison of searching functionality of a VuFind catalogue implementation and the traditional catalogue (2012) 0.00
    0.0021322283 = product of:
      0.010661141 = sum of:
        0.010661141 = weight(_text_:a in 5568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010661141 = score(doc=5568,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5568, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5568)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    As of spring semester 2010, Georgia Southern University began using a VuFind implementation as the default access to the library catalogue on the library Web page while maintaining a secondary link to the traditional Voyager "classic" catalogue. VuFind is an open-source product that has been adopted and adapted by all the state universities and colleges in the state of Georgia. For approximately ten years, Georgia libraries have used Voyager as their catalogue, and it remains available to users as the "classic" search option. This report examines the local VuFind implementation compared to the more traditional Voyager implementation, emphasizing the differences in the searching capabilities of each.
    Type
    a
  3. Craven, J.; Johnson, F.; Butters, G.: ¬The usability and functionality of an online catalogue (2010) 0.00
    0.002043346 = product of:
      0.01021673 = sum of:
        0.01021673 = weight(_text_:a in 3952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01021673 = score(doc=3952,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 3952, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3952)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the usability of the user interface to an online catalogue and to explore how user assessment of both system usability and functionality can provide recommendations for the improved design. Design/methodology/approach - Drawing on previous studies, the usability testing used a mixture of search tasks, interviews and a structured focus group. Representative users completed tasks designed to test the system's features and a "think aloud" protocol collected data about the users' responses when using the system and on its perceived functionality. Findings - The analysis of the data on users' evaluation, preferences and expectations by a set of usability attributes enabled recommendations to be made with respect to key areas of the system functionality. Practical implications - The usability study helped to improve the "look and feel" of the interface and demonstrates how the user expectation of what constitutes a supported experience can help make recommendations for the design of a system that is both usable and useful. Originality/value - The paper demonstrates the benefits of using a mixture of approaches to test system usability and to gain a better understanding of usability from the perspective of the system's users, their expectations and perceived usefulness of the system.
    Type
    a
  4. Bates, J.; Rowley, J.: Social reproduction and exclusion in subject indexing : a comparison of public library OPACs and LibraryThing folksonomy (2011) 0.00
    0.0019264851 = product of:
      0.009632425 = sum of:
        0.009632425 = weight(_text_:a in 4541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009632425 = score(doc=4541,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4541, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4541)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to highlight limits to the dominant model of social inclusion under which UK public libraries operate, to analyse how and to what extent processes of socio-cultural exclusion emerge in the subject representation and discoverability of "non-dominant" resources in public library OPACs, and to consider folksonomy as a solution to any issues raised. Design/methodology/approach - The paper first develops a critique of the dominant model of "inclusion" within UK public libraries, drawing on feminist and critical theories of identity. It then considers how this critique overlaps with and offers fresh insights into major debates within subject indexing, and develops a theoretical rationale for considering the potential of folksonomy to intervene in more inclusive subject-indexing design. A user-based critical interpretive methodology which understands OPACs as texts open to multiple interpretations is developed, and a comparative reading of standard OPACs and LibraryThing folksonomy is undertaken to evaluate the discoverability and subject representation of LGBTQ and ethnic minority resources. Findings - LibraryThing folksonomy offers benefits over LCSH subject indexing in the discoverability and representation of LGBTQ resources. However, the folksonomy is dominated by US taggers, and this impacts on the tagging of ethnic minority resources. Folksonomy, like traditional indexing, is found to contain its own biases in worldview and subject representation. Originality/value - The importance of subject indexing in developing inclusive library services is highlighted and a new method for evaluating OPACs is developed.
    Type
    a
  5. Golub, K.: Subject access in Swedish discovery services (2018) 0.00
    0.0019264851 = product of:
      0.009632425 = sum of:
        0.009632425 = weight(_text_:a in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009632425 = score(doc=4379,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    While support for subject searching has been traditionally advocated for in library catalogs, often in the form of a catalog objective to find everything that a library has on a certain topic, research has shown that subject access has not been satisfactory. Many existing online catalogs and discovery services do not seem to make good use of the intellectual effort invested into assigning controlled subject index terms and classes. For example, few support hierarchical browsing of classification schemes and other controlled vocabularies with hierarchical structures, few provide end-user-friendly options to choose a more specific concept to increase precision, a broader concept or related concepts to increase recall, to disambiguate homonyms, or to find which term is best used to name a concept. Optimum subject access in library catalogs and discovery services is analyzed from the perspective of earlier research as well as contemporary conceptual models and cataloguing codes. Eighteen proposed features of what this should entail in practice are drawn. In an exploratory qualitative study, the three most common discovery services used in Swedish academic libraries are analyzed against these features. In line with previous research, subject access in contemporary interfaces is demonstrated to less than optimal. This is in spite of the fact that individual collections have been indexed with controlled vocabularies and a significant number of controlled vocabularies have been mapped to each other and are available in interoperable standards. Strategic action is proposed to build research-informed (inter)national standards and guidelines.
    Type
    a
  6. Naun, C.C.: Next generation OPACs : a cataloging viewpoint (2010) 0.00
    0.0018875621 = product of:
      0.009437811 = sum of:
        0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009437811 = score(doc=2987,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Since around 2005 several striking attempts have been made to rethink the design of library catalogs in production systems; the North Carolina State University's (NCSU) Endeca catalog being a notable example. These developments are taking place just as the continued relevance of traditional cataloging is being questioned. This article examines the relationship of these new designs to evolving cataloging practice and the changing discovery environment.
    Type
    a
  7. Gnoli, C.; Pusterla, L.; Bendiscioli, A.; Recinella, C.: Classification for collections mapping and query expansion (2016) 0.00
    0.0018276243 = product of:
      0.009138121 = sum of:
        0.009138121 = weight(_text_:a in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009138121 = score(doc=3102,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Dewey Decimal Classification has been used to organize materials owned by the three scientific libraries at the University of Pavia, and to allow integrated browsing in their union catalogue through SciGator, a home built web-based user interface. Classification acts as a bridge between collections located in different places and shelved according to different local schemes. Furthermore, cross-discipline relationships recorded in the system allow for expanded queries that increase recall. Advantages and possible improvements of such a system are discussed.
    Type
    a
  8. Fujita, M.; Lopes, L.; Moreira, W.; Piovezan dos Santos, L.B.; Andrade e Cruz, M.C.; Rodrigues de Barros Ribas, R.: Construction and evaluation of hierarchical structures of indexing languages for online catalogs of libraries : an experience of the São Paulo State University (UNESP) (2018) 0.00
    0.0016683849 = product of:
      0.008341924 = sum of:
        0.008341924 = weight(_text_:a in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008341924 = score(doc=4307,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The construction and updating of indexing languages depend on the organization of their hierarchical structures in order to determine the classification of related terms and, above all, to allow a constant updating of vocabulary, a condition for knowledge evolution. The elaboration of an indexing language for online catalogs of libraries' networks is important considering the diversity and specificity of knowledge areas. From this perspective, the present paper reports on the work of a team of catalogers and researchers engaged in the construction of a hierarchical structure of an indexing language for an online catalog of a university library's network. The work on hierarchical structures began by defining the categories and subcategories that form the indexing language macrostructure by using the parameters of the Library of Congress Subject Headings , the National Library Terminology and the Vocabulary of the University of São Paulo Library's system. Throughout the stages of the elaboration process of the macrostructure, difficulties and improvements were observed and discussed. The results enabled the assessment of the hierarchical structures of the languages used in the organization of the superordinate and subordinate terms, which has contributed to the systematization of operational procedures contained in an indexing language manual for online catalogs of libraries.
    Type
    a
  9. Lee, Y.Y.; Yang, S.Q.: Folksonomies as subject access : a survey of tagging in library online catalogs and discovery layers (2012) 0.00
    0.0016346768 = product of:
      0.008173384 = sum of:
        0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008173384 = score(doc=309,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a survey on how system vendors and libraries handled tagging in OPACs and discovery layers. Tags are user added subject metadata, also called folksonomies. This survey also investigated user behavior when they face the possibility to tag. The findings indicate that legacy/classic systems have no tagging capability. About 47% of the discovery tools provide tagging function. About 49% of the libraries that have a system with tagging capability have turned the tagging function on in their OPACs and discovery tools. Only 40% of the libraries that turned tagging on actually utilized user added subject metadata as access point to collections. Academic library users are less active in tagging than public library users.
    Type
    a
  10. Le Bceuf, P.: Customized OPACs on the Semantic Web : the OpenCat prototype (2015) 0.00
    0.0016346768 = product of:
      0.008173384 = sum of:
        0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 2554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008173384 = score(doc=2554,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2554, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2554)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  11. Ceynowa, K.: ¬Die Bayerische Staatsbibliothek im mobilen Internet : innovative Informationsangebote für Smartphone und iPad (2010) 0.00
    0.001541188 = product of:
      0.00770594 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 3665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=3665,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3665, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3665)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Neumann, A.: Die Bibliothek in der Hosentasche: der OPACplus mobil der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek. In: BuB. 62(2010) H.9, S.576-577.
    Type
    a
  12. Wieser, M.; Stern-Erlebach, G.: Einsatz von Primo an der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Tirol (2011) 0.00
    0.001541188 = product of:
      0.00770594 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=145,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Location
    A
    Type
    a
  13. Schiller, R.: "Kuugeln" [sprich: "Kuhg(e)ln] statt "Googeln" [sprich: "Guhg(e(ln] : integrierte Suche mit EBSCO Disovery Service im Medienbestand der Universitätsbibliothek der Kunstuniversität Graz (2011) 0.00
    0.001541188 = product of:
      0.00770594 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=189,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Location
    A
    Type
    a
  14. Knitel, M.: ¬Die konsortiale Primo-Instanz der OBVSG im Überblick (2011) 0.00
    0.001541188 = product of:
      0.00770594 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=191,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Location
    A
    Type
    a
  15. Rädler, K.: Neues Suchportal mit AquaBrowser in der Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek (2011) 0.00
    0.001541188 = product of:
      0.00770594 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=194,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Location
    A
    Type
    a
  16. Maylein, L.; Langenstein, A.: Neues vom Relevanz-Ranking im HEIDI-Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg : Perspektiven für bibliothekarische Dienstleistungen (2013) 0.00
    0.001541188 = product of:
      0.00770594 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=775,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  17. Fechter, B.; Gattringer, K.; Wendt, M.: Kataloganreicherung auf Exemplarebene oder Exemplaranreicherung auf Katalogebene? : Mit der Bibliothek Wendelin Schmidt-Dengler auf dem Weg zum Katalog 2.0 (2013) 0.00
    0.001541188 = product of:
      0.00770594 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=1125,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Location
    A
    Type
    a
  18. Hagenbruch, A.; Heise, M.: "suchen" : ein Prototyp zum Vergleich von Discovery-Diensten (2014) 0.00
    0.001541188 = product of:
      0.00770594 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 2115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=2115,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2115, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2115)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  19. Jansen, H.: Discovery-Services : Einführung, Marktübersicht und Trends (2014) 0.00
    0.0013622305 = product of:
      0.0068111527 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 2577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=2577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2577)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  20. Putz, M.: Primo an der Universitätsbibliothek Wien : ein Werkstattbericht (2010) 0.00
    0.0013485396 = product of:
      0.0067426977 = sum of:
        0.0067426977 = weight(_text_:a in 3652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067426977 = score(doc=3652,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 3652, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3652)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Location
    A
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

  • d 40
  • e 26

Types

  • a 63
  • el 7
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…