Search (61 results, page 2 of 4)

Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.01

0.01041677 = product of:
  0.04166708 = sum of:
    0.04166708 = product of:
      0.08333416 = sum of:
        0.08333416 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08333416 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15384912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13

Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.01

0.01041677 = product of:
  0.04166708 = sum of:
    0.04166708 = product of:
      0.08333416 = sum of:
        0.08333416 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08333416 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15384912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28

Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.01

0.01041677 = product of:
  0.04166708 = sum of:
    0.04166708 = product of:
      0.08333416 = sum of:
        0.08333416 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08333416 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15384912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24

Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.01

0.01041677 = product of:
  0.04166708 = sum of:
    0.04166708 = product of:
      0.08333416 = sum of:
        0.08333416 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08333416 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15384912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194

Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.01

0.01041677 = product of:
  0.04166708 = sum of:
    0.04166708 = product of:
      0.08333416 = sum of:
        0.08333416 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08333416 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15384912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180

Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.01

0.01041677 = product of:
  0.04166708 = sum of:
    0.04166708 = product of:
      0.08333416 = sum of:
        0.08333416 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08333416 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15384912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 17.10.2005 13:54:22

Liddy, E.D.; Jorgensen, C.: Modelling information seeking behaviours in index use (1993) 0.01

0.010107215 = product of:
  0.04042886 = sum of:
    0.04042886 = weight(_text_:c in 7920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04042886 = score(doc=7920,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15154591 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043933928 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 7920, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7920)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Jorgensen, C.; Liddy, E.D.: ¬An analysis of information seeking behaviours in index use, or opening Pandora's Box (1994) 0.01

0.010107215 = product of:
  0.04042886 = sum of:
    0.04042886 = weight(_text_:c in 8500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04042886 = score(doc=8500,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15154591 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043933928 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 8500, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8500)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1994) 0.01

0.010107215 = product of:
  0.04042886 = sum of:
    0.04042886 = weight(_text_:c in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04042886 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15154591 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043933928 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1997) 0.01

0.010107215 = product of:
  0.04042886 = sum of:
    0.04042886 = weight(_text_:c in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04042886 = score(doc=3905,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15154591 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043933928 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.01

0.008418023 = product of:
  0.03367209 = sum of:
    0.03367209 = product of:
      0.06734418 = sum of:
        0.06734418 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06734418 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15384912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
Source: Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22

Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.01

0.008418023 = product of:
  0.03367209 = sum of:
    0.03367209 = product of:
      0.06734418 = sum of:
        0.06734418 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06734418 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15384912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote: Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95

Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.01

0.0074405507 = product of:
  0.029762203 = sum of:
    0.029762203 = product of:
      0.059524406 = sum of:
        0.059524406 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059524406 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15384912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83

Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Alphabetische Sachregister und Klassifikation (1986) 0.01
```
0.006408107 = product of:
  0.025632428 = sum of:
    0.025632428 = product of:
      0.051264856 = sum of:
        0.051264856 = weight(_text_:der in 1557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051264856 = score(doc=1557,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.098138146 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.5223744 = fieldWeight in 1557, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1557)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Anhand von 2 alphabetischen Sachregistern der Zeitschrift für Buch- und Druckgeschichte "Het Boek" wird dargestellt, welche Rolle die Klassifikation in Sachregistern spielt bei der Wahl der Erschließungseinheiten und bei der Bestimmung der Indexierungstiefe. Als Hauptfunktion der Klassifikation bei Registern erweist sich jedoch die Erleichterung und Verbesserung des Suchvorganges. Erklärt wird, wie die Methode des ersten Registers, Klassifizierung spezifischer Begriffe unter hierarchisch höhere Begriffe, nicht zum Ziel führt und wie die Kontextmethode einen besseren Zugriff gewährleistet

Source

Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld: Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P.O. Degens

Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994) 0.01

0.0059524407 = product of:
  0.023809763 = sum of:
    0.023809763 = product of:
      0.047619525 = sum of:
        0.047619525 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047619525 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15384912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract: Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings

Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.01

0.0059524407 = product of:
  0.023809763 = sum of:
    0.023809763 = product of:
      0.047619525 = sum of:
        0.047619525 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047619525 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15384912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 8.12.2007 18:41:22

Diedrichs, R.: Arbeitsbericht AG Indexierung der Konferenz für Regelwerksfragen (2000) 0.01
```
0.0057443646 = product of:
  0.022977458 = sum of:
    0.022977458 = product of:
      0.045954917 = sum of:
        0.045954917 = weight(_text_:der in 5526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045954917 = score(doc=5526,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.098138146 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.46826762 = fieldWeight in 5526, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5526)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Vor dem Hintergrund der zunehmenden Verbreitung von Suchmaschinen für bibliothekarische Datenbanken - KvK, KOBV, etc. - ergeben sich aus der unterschiedlichen Konstruktion der angegangenen Indexsysteme einige Probleme: - inkonsistente Suchergebnisse bei scheinbar gleichen Suchschlüsseln Autor: Müller-Udenscheid -> müller, Udenscheid, mueller? - Titelstichworte: sind Zusätze zum Sachtitel indexiert oder nicht? - unterschiedliche Suchschlüssel: Beschränkung auf die kleinste gemeinsame Schnittmenge. Die Verwendung einer einheitlichen Oberfläche gaukelt an dieser Stelle aber konsistente Ergebnisse vor. Auf Grund dieser Ausgangslage hat die KM eine Arbeitsgruppe eingesetzt, die Empfehlungen für eine einheitliche Indexierung bibliothekarischer Datenbanken erarbeiten soll. Diese Arbeitsgruppe hat sich bisher dreimal getroffen und Entwürfe für erste Festlegungen erarbeitet.

Series

Gemeinsamer Kongress der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände e.V. (BDB) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI); Bd.1)(Tagungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V.; Bd.3

Source

Information und Öffentlichkeit: 1. Gemeinsamer Kongress der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände e.V. (BDB) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI), Leipzig, 20.-23.3.2000. Zugleich 90. Deutscher Bibliothekartag, 52. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI). Hrsg.: G. Ruppelt u. H. Neißer
Fassbender, J.: Internationale Indexer-Konferenz 2006 in Toronto (2006) 0.01
```
0.005457986 = product of:
  0.021831945 = sum of:
    0.021831945 = product of:
      0.04366389 = sum of:
        0.04366389 = weight(_text_:der in 6019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04366389 = score(doc=6019,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.098138146 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.4449227 = fieldWeight in 6019, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6019)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Das diesjährige Mekka der weltweiten Indexing-Szene war die von der American Society of Indexers (ASI) und der Indexing and Abstracting Society of Canada/Société canadienne pour l'analyse de documents (IASC/SCAD) gemeinsam organisierte, alle drei Jahre stattfindende Internationale Indexer-Konferenz in Toronto vom 15. bis 17. Juni 2006. Die hervorragend unter der Leitung von Seth Maislin (ASI President) und Ruth Pincoe (IASC) organisierte Konferenz war von nicht weniger als 160 Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmern besucht. Zum ersten Mal dabei waren das Nederlands Indexers Netwerk (NIN) und das Deutsche Netzwerk der Indexer (DNI), jeweils repräsentiert durch Caroline Diepeveen und Jochen Fassbender. Auf dem Internationalen Meeting der Indexer-Verbände am 15. Juni mit Vertretern der ASI, IASC, Society of Indexers (SI) aus Großbritannien, der Australian and New Zealand Society of Indexers (ANZSI) sowie der China Society of Indexers (CSI) wurden das NIN und DNI als Partner in das International Agreement, das die internationale Zusammenarbeit zwischen den Indexer-Verbänden regelt, aufgenommen. Einige der unmittelbaren Vorteile für NIN- und DNI-Mitglieder sind die Teilnahmemöglichkeiten an den verschiedenen Special Interest Groups (SIGs) der einzelnen Indexer-Verbände und ermäßigte Konditionen beim Bezug der von der Society of Indexers herausgegebenen Fachzeitschrift The Indexer. Das umfangreiche Konferenz-Programm umfasste ca. 40 Workshops, Präsentationen und Sessions, die eine breite Themen-Palette abdeckten. Einziger Nachteil dabei war wie stets bei solchen großen Konferenzen, dass einige Programmpunkte parallel abliefen und man nicht an allen teilnehmen konnte.

Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.01

0.005208385 = product of:
  0.02083354 = sum of:
    0.02083354 = product of:
      0.04166708 = sum of:
        0.04166708 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04166708 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15384912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 9. 4.2000 17:22:00

Janssen, E.: Society of Indexers' Training in Indexing (2011) 0.01
```
0.0051911594 = product of:
  0.020764638 = sum of:
    0.020764638 = product of:
      0.041529275 = sum of:
        0.041529275 = weight(_text_:der in 4900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041529275 = score(doc=4900,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.098138146 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043933928 = queryNorm
            0.4231716 = fieldWeight in 4900, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4900)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Die britische Society of Indexers bietet ein Fernstudium im Indexieren an, wie es zur Zeit in Deutschland nicht existiert. Der Kurs, der zur Qualifizierung eines akkreditierten Indexierers führt, basiert auf britischen und internationalen Normen und besteht aus vier Lehrgangseinheiten. Der Kurs setzt keinerlei Wissen über Buchregister oder das Verlagswesen voraus und kann als Fernstudium problemlos von Deutschland aus absolviert werde. Einzige Voraussetzung für die Teilnahme am Kurs ist die Mitgliedschaft in einer Indexierer-Gesellschaft, wie z.B. der britischen Society of Indexers oder dem Deutschen Netzwerk der Indexer (www.d-indexer.org). Der Artikel gibt einen Überblick über den Inhalt des Kurses und enthält Informationen zu Kosten, Kursdauer und Aufbau des Kurses.

Search (61 results, page 2 of 4)

Authors

Years

Languages

Themes