Search (233 results, page 3 of 12)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Jörgensen, C.; Liddy, E.D.: Information access or information anxiety? : an explanatory evaluation of book index features (1996) 0.01
    0.009184326 = product of:
      0.022960816 = sum of:
        0.011797264 = weight(_text_:a in 6855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011797264 = score(doc=6855,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 6855, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6855)
        0.011163551 = product of:
          0.022327103 = sum of:
            0.022327103 = weight(_text_:information in 6855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022327103 = score(doc=6855,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 6855, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6855)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The authors conducted a controlled user study in both print and electronic environments and present here a subset of results from index use in the print format
    Type
    a
  2. Bradshaw, S.; Hammond, K.: Constructing indices from citations in collections of research papers (1999) 0.01
    0.008717269 = product of:
      0.021793172 = sum of:
        0.008258085 = weight(_text_:a in 6682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008258085 = score(doc=6682,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 6682, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6682)
        0.013535086 = product of:
          0.027070172 = sum of:
            0.027070172 = weight(_text_:information in 6682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027070172 = score(doc=6682,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 6682, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6682)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    We describe Rosetta, an indexing and retrieval system for collections of research papers. Rosetta indexes papers in a collection based on the way they have been described when referenced by other papers in the collection. With this technique, indices for papers describe information provided in the same way a query describes information needed. Using Rosetta, simple natural language queries retrieve high-precision results in which descriptions based on citations clearly summarize retrieved papers; allowing users to quickly determine which papers most closely meet their information needs
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
    Type
    a
  3. Liddy, E.C.; Jorgensen, C.L.: Reality check! : Book index characteristics that ficilitate information access (1993) 0.01
    0.008627858 = product of:
      0.021569645 = sum of:
        0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 7769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008173384 = score(doc=7769,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 7769, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7769)
        0.013396261 = product of:
          0.026792523 = sum of:
            0.026792523 = weight(_text_:information in 7769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026792523 = score(doc=7769,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 7769, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7769)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Indexing, providing access to information: looking back, looking ahead. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers. Ed.: N.C. Mulvany
    Type
    a
  4. Jorgensen, C.; Liddy, E.D.: ¬An analysis of information seeking behaviours in index use, or opening Pandora's Box (1994) 0.01
    0.008499779 = product of:
      0.021249447 = sum of:
        0.011678694 = weight(_text_:a in 8500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011678694 = score(doc=8500,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 8500, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8500)
        0.009570752 = product of:
          0.019141505 = sum of:
            0.019141505 = weight(_text_:information in 8500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019141505 = score(doc=8500,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 8500, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8500)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Gives an overview of a research project which had aimed to: empirically investigate book-index usage behaviours and the extent to which specific print index features affect a user's search for information; and to examine these same features in an electronic environment. Aims to determine the optimum specifications for indexes in electronic texts by gathering evidence from a controlled user study. Presents a subset of results from index use in both print and electronic formats. Suggests a preliminay model representing users' behaviours when using an index and suggests implications for system design
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Learned Information
    Type
    a
  5. Kumar, T.V.R.; Parameswaran, M.: Chain procedure and dictionary catalogue (1998) 0.01
    0.008412599 = product of:
      0.021031497 = sum of:
        0.01155891 = weight(_text_:a in 6205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01155891 = score(doc=6205,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 6205, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6205)
        0.009472587 = product of:
          0.018945174 = sum of:
            0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 6205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018945174 = score(doc=6205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 6205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6205)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 35(1998) no.4, S.241-246
    Type
    a
  6. Rowland, M.J.: <Meta> tags (2000) 0.01
    0.008412599 = product of:
      0.021031497 = sum of:
        0.01155891 = weight(_text_:a in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01155891 = score(doc=222,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
        0.009472587 = product of:
          0.018945174 = sum of:
            0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018945174 = score(doc=222,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    <META> tags are used to create meta-information, or information about the information in a Web site. There are many types of <META> tags, but those most relevant to indexing are the description and keyword tags. Description tags provide a short summary of the site contents that are often displayed by search engines when they list search results. Keyword tags are used to define words or phrases that someone using a search engine might use to look for relevant sites. <META> tags are of interest to indexers for two reasons. They provide a means of making your indexing business Web site more visible to those searching the Web for indexing services, and they offer indexers a potential new source of work: writing keyword and description tags for Web site developers and companies with Web sites. <META> tag writing makes good use of an indexer's ability to choose relevant key terms, and the closely related skill of abstracting: conveying the essence of a document in a sentence or two.
    Imprint
    Phoenix, AZ : American Society of Indexers / Information Today
    Type
    a
  7. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing, teaching of, See: Information retrieval design (2002) 0.01
    0.008234787 = product of:
      0.020586967 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
        0.011051352 = product of:
          0.022102704 = sum of:
            0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022102704 = score(doc=550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Fassbender, J.: Editorial (2007) 0.01
    0.008234787 = product of:
      0.020586967 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 1879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=1879,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1879, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1879)
        0.011051352 = product of:
          0.022102704 = sum of:
            0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 1879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022102704 = score(doc=1879,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1879, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1879)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.385-386
    Type
    a
  9. Hodges, J.E.: Automated systems for the generation of document indexes (2000) 0.01
    0.008234787 = product of:
      0.020586967 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
        0.011051352 = product of:
          0.022102704 = sum of:
            0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022102704 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.66, [=Suppl.29]
    Type
    a
  10. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.01
    0.008208756 = product of:
      0.02052189 = sum of:
        0.0048162127 = weight(_text_:a in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048162127 = score(doc=5775,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
        0.015705677 = product of:
          0.031411353 = sum of:
            0.031411353 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031411353 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
    Type
    a
  11. Holbert, S.: How to index Windows-based online help (2000) 0.01
    0.007909955 = product of:
      0.019774888 = sum of:
        0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008173384 = score(doc=224,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
        0.011601503 = product of:
          0.023203006 = sum of:
            0.023203006 = weight(_text_:information in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023203006 = score(doc=224,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Today, more and more software packages come with online documentation. Some have complete manuals as well. Others have basic documentation on paper and more advanced information online. I recently purchased a computer that came with 20 software programs and not one page of written documentation. More and more, users have to find information by searching online. Most documentation teams focus on writing and ignore the problems of information retrieval, making information in printed documents difficult to find, and online information impossible to find. With online Help, you cannot browse the documentation. You cannot even browse more than a couple of inches of the index at a time. If online users do not get superb guidance into the jungle of online Help, they go away like the hero of Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, saying "Oh, the horror! The horror!" How does an online Help index work? The following examples are based on the Windows 95 Help-type system, but do not represent actual Help screens
    Imprint
    Phoenix, AZ : American Society of Indexers / Information Today
    Type
    a
  12. Olanlokun, S.O.; Ojo, J.A.: ¬A survey of the effectiveness and coverage of indexing of Nigerian publications from 1986 to 1996 (1998) 0.01
    0.007876435 = product of:
      0.019691087 = sum of:
        0.011797264 = weight(_text_:a in 4646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011797264 = score(doc=4646,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 4646, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4646)
        0.007893822 = product of:
          0.015787644 = sum of:
            0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 4646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015787644 = score(doc=4646,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4646, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4646)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the coverage and effectiveness of Nigerian publications indexed within a 10 year period
    Source
    African journal of library, archives and information science. 8(1998) no.2, S.97-104
    Type
    a
  13. Parsons, J.: Finding your way around the information maze : indexes as a signpost to information retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.0074575767 = product of:
      0.018643942 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=3053,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
        0.010938003 = product of:
          0.021876005 = sum of:
            0.021876005 = weight(_text_:information in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021876005 = score(doc=3053,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Information management and technology. 25(1992) no.3, S.120-122
    Type
    a
  14. Craven, T.C.: Adapting of string indexing systems for retrieval using proximity operators (1988) 0.01
    0.007399688 = product of:
      0.01849922 = sum of:
        0.012184162 = weight(_text_:a in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012184162 = score(doc=705,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
        0.006315058 = product of:
          0.012630116 = sum of:
            0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012630116 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the idea of using a conventional string indexing source description, together with a special phrase generator, to generate multiple descriptor phrases for inclusion in a database record for online retrieval. For use with proximity operators, these multiple descriptor phrases should attempt to meet such objectives as bringing together groups of syntactically related words. Software for generating multiple descriptor phrases from source descriptions in a specific existing string indexing system is briefly described
    Source
    Information processing and management. 24(1988), S.133-140
    Type
    a
  15. Weinberg, B.H.: Indexes: a chapter from The Chicago manual of Style, 14th edition : a review (1994) 0.01
    0.007399688 = product of:
      0.01849922 = sum of:
        0.012184162 = weight(_text_:a in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012184162 = score(doc=1425,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
        0.006315058 = product of:
          0.012630116 = sum of:
            0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012630116 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The chapter on indexes in The Chicago Manual of Style serves as a standard for index format and as a self teaching tool for authors and novice indexers. Reviews the 14th ed. for logical sequence, accordance of the guidelines and rules with those of other manuals and authorities, and the quality of its index. It is found wanting in all these areas, but contains much useful information on the indexing process and book index format
    Type
    a
  16. Kaskus, M.A.: Indexing in theory and practice (1996) 0.01
    0.007399688 = product of:
      0.01849922 = sum of:
        0.012184162 = weight(_text_:a in 4448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012184162 = score(doc=4448,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4448, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4448)
        0.006315058 = product of:
          0.012630116 = sum of:
            0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 4448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012630116 = score(doc=4448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Sketches the events and people that have impacted on the field of indexing, considering the indexing literature, indexers as information professionals, professional organizations; automatic indexing; and indexing evaluation. Notes on some of the challenges facing indexers, including electronic periodicals which themselves pose a serious challenge in terms of bibliographic description
    Source
    Technical services management: 1965-1990. A quarter of a century of change and a look into the future. Festschrift for Kathryn Luther Henderson. Ed.: L.C. Smith et al
    Type
    a
  17. Hedden, H.: Creating an index for your Web site to make info easier to see (2006) 0.01
    0.007399688 = product of:
      0.01849922 = sum of:
        0.012184162 = weight(_text_:a in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012184162 = score(doc=2189,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
        0.006315058 = product of:
          0.012630116 = sum of:
            0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012630116 = score(doc=2189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Most libraries have long had their own Web sites. The longer a library has had a Web site the more likely it is that the number of pages, and the amount of information within those pages, has grown beyond what users can find simply with the navigation menu. Building a site index is a great way to help seekers find all those bits of data they might otherwise miss.
    Type
    a
  18. BIOSIS introduces new relational indexing scheme and additional information in 1998 (1998) 0.01
    0.0073474604 = product of:
      0.01836865 = sum of:
        0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009437811 = score(doc=2595,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
        0.0089308405 = product of:
          0.017861681 = sum of:
            0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017861681 = score(doc=2595,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In 1998 BIOSIS will introduce a new relational indexing system to provide more specific natural language retrieval for its electronic products. Printed publications will have a redesigned subject index to replace the KWIC index and an organism index, replacing the current generic and biosystematic indexes, will allow hierarchical access to kingdom, family and common genus species names
    Source
    Information today. 15(1998) no.4, S.11
    Type
    a
  19. Jones, R.: Indexing the British Medical Journal (1994) 0.01
    0.0072560436 = product of:
      0.01814011 = sum of:
        0.012614433 = weight(_text_:a in 7924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012614433 = score(doc=7924,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 7924, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7924)
        0.005525676 = product of:
          0.011051352 = sum of:
            0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 7924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011051352 = score(doc=7924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 7924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    As a general medical journal, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) contains a wide range of subject matter, and many types of information need to be incorporated in its semi-annual index, Index Medicus vocabulary can be used for clinical articles, but non-clinical matter presents problems of soft language. A weekly publication, the BMJ runs to about 1.600 pages a volume; so succint indexing is important, as is keeping to schedule. The number of authors and the vagueness of the journal users present particular problems that can be ameliorated by the design of the index. Medicine is a useful adjunct for subject access. Both the journal and the index have changed during a decade in which social and political aspects of medicine have assumed greater importance
    Type
    a
  20. Clarke, M.: Retrieving information from scientific periodicals (1996) 0.01
    0.007189882 = product of:
      0.017974705 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=7185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
        0.011163551 = product of:
          0.022327103 = sum of:
            0.022327103 = weight(_text_:information in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022327103 = score(doc=7185,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the indexing of scientific and medical periodicals, covering the need for indexes, the effect on information retrieval of the electronic revolution, types of journals and entries, the process of indexing, cumulation and publisher-indexer relations
    Type
    a

Languages

  • e 208
  • d 24
  • f 1
  • More… Less…