Search (74 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.01 
    0.0122208325 = product of:
  0.07332499 = sum of:
    0.07332499 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07332499 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16751242 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  2. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.01 
    0.0122208325 = product of:
  0.07332499 = sum of:
    0.07332499 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07332499 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16751242 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  3. Dienelt, O.: ¬Ein Workshop über Indexing (2003) 0.01 
    0.012101997 = product of:
  0.03630599 = sum of:
    0.013622229 = weight(_text_:4 in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013622229 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12981161 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.10493845 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
    0.022683762 = weight(_text_:22 in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022683762 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16751242 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    "Unter der Leitung von Frank Merrett von der Socieryy of Indexers (www.indexers.org.uk), die in Sheffield ihren Hauptsitz hat, fand am 22. Januar in London ein Workshop statt, in dem Einblicke in das Indexing (Registererstellung) ermöglicht wurden. SechsTeilnehmerinnen und drei Teilnehmer (Bibliothekare, Katalogisierer, angehende Indexer, Benutzer von Indices) bekamen durch Merrett neben den grundlegenden Dingen auch ein wenig Einblick in die Berufswirklichkeit eines Indexers vermittelt. Zunächst wurden einige Definitionen dessen, was ein Index ist, angesprochen: Ein Index (Register) ist eine systematische Anordnung von Eintragungen, die es dem Benutzer ermöglichen, Informationen in einem Dokument zu finden (nach Norm BS ISO 999,1996). Auch andere Definitionen besagen, dass die im Hauptteil eines Dokuments enthaltenen Informationen so herausgefiltert werden sollen, dass durch die Benutzung des Registers ein möglichst benutzerfreundlicher Zugang zum Hauptteil erfolgen kann. Ein Index soll den einen Benutzer entscheiden lassen, ob ein Dokument etwas für ihn Interessantes enthält. Dem anderen soll es dazu dienen, das Gelesene wieder aufzufrischen. Ein Index muss beiden gerecht werden. Nach Eintreffen des Materials vom Verlag (sehr oft als Papierausdruck) beginnt der erste Schritt, der vom persönlichen Arbeitsstil des Indexers abhängt. Manche beginnen sofort beim Lesen mit dem Niederschreiben von Begriffen, oft unter Verwendung von Software (Macrex, Cindex), andere markieren oder unterstreichen zunächst die relevanten Begriffe. Hier beginnt die eigentliche Arbeit, die darin besteht, wichtige Informationen aus dem Text herauszufiltern und so aufzubereiten, dass ein Buchleser zu Wichtigem hingeführt wird. Dazu gehören Entscheidungen wie zum Beispiel »was ist wichtig«, »was kann/ muss weggelassen werden«, »wo müssen Siehe- beziehungsweise Siehe-auch-Verweise eingebrachtwerden«. Bibliothekarisch gesehen, ist dies Sacherschließung und zugleich formale Erfassung, letztlich das Aufbauen eines Kreuzkatalogs. So wie ein Sacherschließer muss auch ein Indexer ständig überlegen, mit welchen Begriffen er dem Benutzer des Registers einen guten Zugang zur Information verschaffen kann. Ein gutes Verständnis des Faches, das in der Vorlage behandelt wird, ist deshalb unbedingt notwendig. Das wurde anhand einiger Seiten geübt, genauso wie das Aufbe-reiten des Index. Äußerste Genauigkeit ist hier nötig. Anhand eines fertigen Index mit eingebauten Ungenauigkeiten wurde geübt, sehr genau hinzuschauen und kleinste Ungenauigkeiten zu erkennen. Merrett sagte, dass ein gut geschriebenes Buch besser zu bearbeiten sei als eines, das einen weniger guten Hauptteil hat. Oft hat ein Indexer nur zwei Wochen Zeit für die Erstellung eines Registers. Die wenigsten dürften allerdings ständig von morgens bis abends an einem Index arbeiten, und nur sehr wenige verdienen ausschließlich mit dem Erstellen von Registern ihren Lebensunterhalt. Meistens ist dies ein Nebenjob. Nach Frank Merrett sind die Verhandlungen mit einem Verlag über einen zu erstellenden Index recht vorsichtig zu führen. Insbesondere über die Termine (Eintreffen des Manuskripts, Abliefern des Produkts) sowie die Form der Vorlage (welches Format, welcher Umfang) muss sich ein Indexer absichern, um keine Überraschungen zu erleben. So kann es sein, dass die Vorlage nicht als Buch, sondern als ein Stapel von Druckbogen, ungefalzt und unsortiert, ankommt. Auch das Honorar muß vom Indexer in Anbetracht des zu erwartenden Aufwandes verhandelt werden. Indexer ist keine geschützte Bezeichnung, deshalb kann sich jeder so nennen. Die Prüfungen, die man bei der Sociery of Indexers ablegen kann, sind aber ein Qualitätsnachweis. Die Society kann durch das Aufführen der Namen und Spezialgebiete auf der Homepage beziehungsweise in einem Verzeichnis einiges für die Mitglieder tun. Die Sociery legt auf das Kontakthalten mit Verlegern großen Wert, um dort auf die Dienste der Indexer hinzuweisen. Um Aufträge muß sich aber jeder selbst kümmern.
    Source
    BuB. 55(2003) H.4, S.224
  4. Kumar, T.V.R.; Parameswaran, M.: Chain procedure and dictionary catalogue (1998) 0.01 
    0.011008425 = product of:
  0.066050544 = sum of:
    0.066050544 = weight(_text_:4 in 6205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066050544 = score(doc=6205,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12981161 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.50881845 = fieldWeight in 6205, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6205)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    4. 8.2001 9:35:53
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 35(1998) no.4, S.241-246
  5. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.01 
    0.010801792 = product of:
  0.06481075 = sum of:
    0.06481075 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06481075 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16751242 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  6. Armitage, J.E.; Lynch, M.F.: Some structural characteristics of articulated subject indexes (1968) 0.01 
    0.010378841 = product of:
  0.062273048 = sum of:
    0.062273048 = weight(_text_:4 in 2303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062273048 = score(doc=2303,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12981161 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.47971863 = fieldWeight in 2303, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2303)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 4(1968) no.2, S.101-111
  7. Gordon, J.A.: Training in indexing : some recent development (1981) 0.01 
    0.010378841 = product of:
  0.062273048 = sum of:
    0.062273048 = weight(_text_:4 in 6175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062273048 = score(doc=6175,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12981161 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.47971863 = fieldWeight in 6175, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6175)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 12(1981) no.4, S.205
  8. Rodberg, L.R.: Textbook indexes : many uses, many users (1993) 0.01 
    0.010378841 = product of:
  0.062273048 = sum of:
    0.062273048 = weight(_text_:4 in 6353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062273048 = score(doc=6353,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12981161 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.47971863 = fieldWeight in 6353, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6353)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Keywords. 1(1993) no.4, S.23-24
  9. Henninger, M.: What makes a good Web index? (1999) 0.01 
    0.010378841 = product of:
  0.062273048 = sum of:
    0.062273048 = weight(_text_:4 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062273048 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12981161 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.47971863 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 21(1999) no.4, S.182-183
  10. Williams, P.L.; Bakewell, K.G.B.: Indexing children's information books (1999) 0.01 
    0.010378841 = product of:
  0.062273048 = sum of:
    0.062273048 = weight(_text_:4 in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062273048 = score(doc=3942,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12981161 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.47971863 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 21(1999) no.4, S.174-179
  11. Wittmann, C.: Limitations of indexing modules in word-processing software (1991) 0.01 
    0.009081487 = product of:
  0.054488916 = sum of:
    0.054488916 = weight(_text_:4 in 8076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054488916 = score(doc=8076,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12981161 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.4197538 = fieldWeight in 8076, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8076)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 17(1991) no.4, S.235-238
  12. Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991) 0.01 
    0.008641433 = product of:
  0.051848598 = sum of:
    0.051848598 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051848598 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16751242 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
  13. Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994) 0.01 
    0.008641433 = product of:
  0.051848598 = sum of:
    0.051848598 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051848598 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16751242 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
  14. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.01 
    0.008641433 = product of:
  0.051848598 = sum of:
    0.051848598 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051848598 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16751242 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  15. Canganelli, P.: Sonar bookends : index generation (1994) 0.01 
    0.007784131 = product of:
  0.046704784 = sum of:
    0.046704784 = weight(_text_:4 in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046704784 = score(doc=599,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12981161 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.35978895 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Electronic library. 12(1994) no.4, S.253-254
  16. Bonura, L.S.: ¬The art of indexing (1994) 0.01 
    0.007784131 = product of:
  0.046704784 = sum of:
    0.046704784 = weight(_text_:4 in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046704784 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12981161 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.35978895 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Isbn
    0-471-01449-4
  17. Wallis, E.; Lavall, C.: Naming the indexer : where credit is due (1995) 0.01 
    0.007784131 = product of:
  0.046704784 = sum of:
    0.046704784 = weight(_text_:4 in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046704784 = score(doc=2961,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12981161 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.35978895 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 19(1995) no.4, S.266-268
  18. Moys, E.M.: Computer-assisted indexing of looseleaf supplements (1995) 0.01 
    0.007784131 = product of:
  0.046704784 = sum of:
    0.046704784 = weight(_text_:4 in 2966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046704784 = score(doc=2966,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12981161 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.35978895 = fieldWeight in 2966, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2966)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 19(1995) no.4, S.283-286
  19. Mulvany, N.C.: Software tools for indexing : revisited (1999) 0.01 
    0.007784131 = product of:
  0.046704784 = sum of:
    0.046704784 = weight(_text_:4 in 6451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046704784 = score(doc=6451,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12981161 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.35978895 = fieldWeight in 6451, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6451)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 21(1999) no.4, S.160-163
  20. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.01 
    0.0075612543 = product of:
  0.045367524 = sum of:
    0.045367524 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045367524 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16751242 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047835685 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 66
  • d 7
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 56
  • m 15
  • s 4
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications