-
Oberhauser, O.: Relevance Ranking in den Online-Katalogen der "nächsten Generation" (2010)
0.00
0.004361676 = product of:
0.017446704 = sum of:
0.017446704 = product of:
0.03489341 = sum of:
0.03489341 = weight(_text_:online in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03489341 = score(doc=4308,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.284522 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Relevance Ranking in Online-Katalogen ist zwar kein neues Thema, doch liegt dazu nicht allzu viel Literatur vor, die das Prädikat "ernstzunehmen" verdient. Dies ist zum einen darin begründet, dass das Interesse an der Ausgabe ranggereihter Ergebnislisten auf Seiten aller Beteiligter (Bibliothekare, Softwarehersteller, Benutzer) traditionell gering war. Zum anderen ging die seit einigen Jahren populär gewordene Kritik an den bestehenden OPACs vielfach von einer unzureichenden Wissensbasis aus und produzierte oft nur polemische oder emotional gefärbte Beiträge, die zum Thema Ranking wenig beitrugen. ... Der hier beschriebene Test ist natürlich in keiner Weise erschöpfend oder repräsentativ. Dennoch gibt er, wie ich glaube, Anlass zu einiger Hoffnung. Er lässt vermuten, dass die "neuen" OPACs - zumindest was das Relevance Ranking betrifft - auf dem Weg in die richtige Richtung sind. Wie gut es wirklich gelingen wird, die Rankingleistung von Suchmaschinen wie Google, die unter völlig anderen Voraussetzungen arbeiten, einzuholen, wird aber erst die Zukunft zeigen.
-
Maylein, L.; Langenstein, A.: Neues vom Relevanz-Ranking im HEIDI-Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg : Perspektiven für bibliothekarische Dienstleistungen (2013)
0.00
0.0036830807 = product of:
0.014732323 = sum of:
0.014732323 = product of:
0.044196967 = sum of:
0.044196967 = weight(_text_:29 in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044196967 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 6.2013 18:06:23
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.00
0.0036499486 = product of:
0.0145997945 = sum of:
0.0145997945 = product of:
0.04379938 = sum of:
0.04379938 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04379938 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Jacucci, G.; Barral, O.; Daee, P.; Wenzel, M.; Serim, B.; Ruotsalo, T.; Pluchino, P.; Freeman, J.; Gamberini, L.; Kaski, S.; Blankertz, B.: Integrating neurophysiologic relevance feedback in intent modeling for information retrieval (2019)
0.00
0.0036347301 = product of:
0.0145389205 = sum of:
0.0145389205 = product of:
0.029077841 = sum of:
0.029077841 = weight(_text_:online in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029077841 = score(doc=5356,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The use of implicit relevance feedback from neurophysiology could deliver effortless information retrieval. However, both computing neurophysiologic responses and retrieving documents are characterized by uncertainty because of noisy signals and incomplete or inconsistent representations of the data. We present the first-of-its-kind, fully integrated information retrieval system that makes use of online implicit relevance feedback generated from brain activity as measured through electroencephalography (EEG), and eye movements. The findings of the evaluation experiment (N = 16) show that we are able to compute online neurophysiology-based relevance feedback with performance significantly better than chance in complex data domains and realistic search tasks. We contribute by demonstrating how to integrate in interactive intent modeling this inherently noisy implicit relevance feedback combined with scarce explicit feedback. Although experimental measures of task performance did not allow us to demonstrate how the classification outcomes translated into search task performance, the experiment proved that our approach is able to generate relevance feedback from brain signals and eye movements in a realistic scenario, thus providing promising implications for future work in neuroadaptive information retrieval (IR).
-
Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015)
0.00
0.003226129 = product of:
0.012904516 = sum of:
0.012904516 = product of:
0.03871355 = sum of:
0.03871355 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03871355 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 18:22:56
-
Li, H.; Wu, H.; Li, D.; Lin, S.; Su, Z.; Luo, X.: PSI: A probabilistic semantic interpretable framework for fine-grained image ranking (2018)
0.00
0.0030841706 = product of:
0.0123366825 = sum of:
0.0123366825 = product of:
0.024673365 = sum of:
0.024673365 = weight(_text_:online in 4577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024673365 = score(doc=4577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 4577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4577)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Image Ranking is one of the key problems in information science research area. However, most current methods focus on increasing the performance, leaving the semantic gap problem, which refers to the learned ranking models are hard to be understood, remaining intact. Therefore, in this article, we aim at learning an interpretable ranking model to tackle the semantic gap in fine-grained image ranking. We propose to combine attribute-based representation and online passive-aggressive (PA) learning based ranking models to achieve this goal. Besides, considering the highly localized instances in fine-grained image ranking, we introduce a supervised constrained clustering method to gather class-balanced training instances for local PA-based models, and incorporate the learned local models into a unified probabilistic framework. Extensive experiments on the benchmark demonstrate that the proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of accuracy and speed.
-
Mayr, P.: Bradfordizing als Re-Ranking-Ansatz in Literaturinformationssystemen (2011)
0.00
0.0027623107 = product of:
0.011049243 = sum of:
0.011049243 = product of:
0.033147726 = sum of:
0.033147726 = weight(_text_:29 in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033147726 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 9. 2.2011 17:47:29
-
Costa Carvalho, A. da; Rossi, C.; Moura, E.S. de; Silva, A.S. da; Fernandes, D.: LePrEF: Learn to precompute evidence fusion for efficient query evaluation (2012)
0.00
0.0023019253 = product of:
0.009207701 = sum of:
0.009207701 = product of:
0.027623104 = sum of:
0.027623104 = weight(_text_:29 in 278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027623104 = score(doc=278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=278)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 24. 6.2012 14:29:10
-
Silva, R.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Veloso, A.: ¬A Two-stage active learning method for learning to rank (2014)
0.00
0.0023019253 = product of:
0.009207701 = sum of:
0.009207701 = product of:
0.027623104 = sum of:
0.027623104 = weight(_text_:29 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027623104 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26. 1.2014 20:29:57
-
Zhu, J.; Han, L.; Gou, Z.; Yuan, X.: ¬A fuzzy clustering-based denoising model for evaluating uncertainty in collaborative filtering recommender systems (2018)
0.00
0.0023019253 = product of:
0.009207701 = sum of:
0.009207701 = product of:
0.027623104 = sum of:
0.027623104 = weight(_text_:29 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027623104 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 9.2018 12:32:59
-
Baloh, P.; Desouza, K.C.; Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems : a design science perspectiveA domain analysis (2012)
0.00
0.0022812178 = product of:
0.009124871 = sum of:
0.009124871 = product of:
0.027374614 = sum of:
0.027374614 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027374614 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 11. 6.2012 14:22:34
-
Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013)
0.00
0.0022812178 = product of:
0.009124871 = sum of:
0.009124871 = product of:
0.027374614 = sum of:
0.027374614 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027374614 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:34:49
-
Ayadi, H.; Torjmen-Khemakhem, M.; Daoud, M.; Xiangji Huang, J.; Ben Jemaa, M.: MF-Re-Rank : a modality feature-based re-ranking model for medical image retrieval (2018)
0.00
0.0018415403 = product of:
0.0073661613 = sum of:
0.0073661613 = product of:
0.022098484 = sum of:
0.022098484 = weight(_text_:29 in 4459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022098484 = score(doc=4459,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 4459, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4459)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 9.2018 11:43:31
