-
Baloh, P.; Desouza, K.C.; Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems : a design science perspectiveA domain analysis (2012)
0.03
0.026540902 = product of:
0.0796227 = sum of:
0.0796227 = sum of:
0.046076145 = weight(_text_:form in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046076145 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20323196 = queryWeight, product of:
4.104017 = idf(docFreq=1983, maxDocs=44218)
0.049520254 = queryNorm
0.22671703 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.104017 = idf(docFreq=1983, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.033546552 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033546552 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17341149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049520254 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- We address how individuals' (workers) knowledge needs influence the design of knowledge management systems (KMS), enabling knowledge creation and utilization. It is evident that KMS technologies and activities are indiscriminately deployed in most organizations with little regard to the actual context of their adoption. Moreover, it is apparent that the extant literature pertaining to knowledge management projects is frequently deficient in identifying the variety of factors indicative for successful KMS. This presents an obvious business practice and research gap that requires a critical analysis of the necessary intervention that will actually improve how workers can leverage and form organization-wide knowledge. This research involved an extensive review of the literature, a grounded theory methodological approach and rigorous data collection and synthesis through an empirical case analysis (Parsons Brinckerhoff and Samsung). The contribution of this study is the formulation of a model for designing KMS based upon the design science paradigm, which aspires to create artifacts that are interdependent of people and organizations. The essential proposition is that KMS design and implementation must be contextualized in relation to knowledge needs and that these will differ for various organizational settings. The findings present valuable insights and further understanding of the way in which KMS design efforts should be focused.
- Date
- 11. 6.2012 14:22:34
-
Biskri, I.; Rompré, L.: Using association rules for query reformulation (2012)
0.01
0.00921523 = product of:
0.02764569 = sum of:
0.02764569 = product of:
0.05529138 = sum of:
0.05529138 = weight(_text_:form in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05529138 = score(doc=92,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20323196 = queryWeight, product of:
4.104017 = idf(docFreq=1983, maxDocs=44218)
0.049520254 = queryNorm
0.27206045 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.104017 = idf(docFreq=1983, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this paper the authors will present research on the combination of two methods of data mining: text classification and maximal association rules. Text classification has been the focus of interest of many researchers for a long time. However, the results take the form of lists of words (classes) that people often do not know what to do with. The use of maximal association rules induced a number of advantages: (1) the detection of dependencies and correlations between the relevant units of information (words) of different classes, (2) the extraction of hidden knowledge, often relevant, from a large volume of data. The authors will show how this combination can improve the process of information retrieval.
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.008945748 = product of:
0.026837243 = sum of:
0.026837243 = product of:
0.053674486 = sum of:
0.053674486 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053674486 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17341149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049520254 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014)
0.01
0.008945748 = product of:
0.026837243 = sum of:
0.026837243 = product of:
0.053674486 = sum of:
0.053674486 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053674486 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17341149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049520254 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 13. 9.2014 14:45:22
-
Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015)
0.01
0.0079069985 = product of:
0.023720995 = sum of:
0.023720995 = product of:
0.04744199 = sum of:
0.04744199 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04744199 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17341149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049520254 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 18:22:56
-
Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013)
0.01
0.005591092 = product of:
0.016773276 = sum of:
0.016773276 = product of:
0.033546552 = sum of:
0.033546552 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033546552 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17341149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049520254 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:34:49
