Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Quint, B.: Check out the new RANK command on DIALOG (1993) 0.04 
    0.0432256 = product of:
  0.1729024 = sum of:
    0.1729024 = weight(_text_:fields in 6640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1729024 = score(doc=6640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.54708534 = fieldWeight in 6640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6640)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Describes the RANK command on DIALOG online information service. RANK conducts statistical analysis on an existing set of search results for fields specified by searchers. Details how to use RANK and applications. Points out drawbacks to its use
  2. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.03 
    0.034590032 = product of:
  0.13836013 = sum of:
    0.13836013 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13836013 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  3. Ojala, M.: Decisions, decisions, RANK decisions (1994) 0.03 
    0.03458048 = product of:
  0.13832192 = sum of:
    0.13832192 = weight(_text_:fields in 8226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13832192 = score(doc=8226,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.43766826 = fieldWeight in 8226, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8226)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Describes the RANK command which enables searchers of DIALOG databases do statistical analysis online. Describes the basic features of the ranking command. The fields to which this command can be applied run into the thousands. Shows how RANK can be used for content analysis. Details the limitations of the command and compares it with the SORT command. Offers advice on ranking results without using this command
  4. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.03 
    0.030266277 = product of:
  0.12106511 = sum of:
    0.12106511 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12106511 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  5. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.03 
    0.030266277 = product of:
  0.12106511 = sum of:
    0.12106511 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12106511 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  6. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.03 
    0.025942523 = product of:
  0.10377009 = sum of:
    0.10377009 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10377009 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  7. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.03 
    0.025942523 = product of:
  0.10377009 = sum of:
    0.10377009 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10377009 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  8. Rokaya, M.; Atlam, E.; Fuketa, M.; Dorji, T.C.; Aoe, J.-i.: Ranking of field association terms using Co-word analysis (2008) 0.03 
    0.02593536 = product of:
  0.10374144 = sum of:
    0.10374144 = weight(_text_:fields in 2060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10374144 = score(doc=2060,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.32825118 = fieldWeight in 2060, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2060)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Information retrieval involves finding some desired information in a store of information or a database. In this paper, Co-word analysis will be used to achieve a ranking of a selected sample of FA terms. Based on this ranking a better arranging of search results can be achieved. Experimental results achieved using 41 MB of data (7660 documents) in the field of sports. The corpus was collected from CNN newspaper, sports field. This corpus was chosen to be distributed over 11 sub-fields of the field sports from the experimental results, the average precision increased by 18.3% after applying the proposed arranging scheme depending on the absolute frequency to count the terms weights, and the average precision increased by 17.2% after applying the proposed arranging scheme depending on a formula based on "TF*IDF" to count the terms weights.
  9. Urbain, J.; Goharian, N.; Frieder, O.: Probabilistic passage models for semantic search of genomics literature (2008) 0.02 
    0.0216128 = product of:
  0.0864512 = sum of:
    0.0864512 = weight(_text_:fields in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0864512 = score(doc=2380,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.27354267 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    We explore unsupervised learning techniques for extracting semantic information about biomedical concepts and topics, and introduce a passage retrieval model for using these semantics in context to improve genomics literature search. Our contributions include a new passage retrieval model based on an undirected graphical model (Markov Random Fields), and new methods for modeling passage-concepts, document-topics, and passage-terms as potential functions within the model. Each potential function includes distributional evidence to disambiguate topics, concepts, and terms in context. The joint distribution across potential functions in the graph represents the probability of a passage being relevant to a biologist's information need. Relevance ranking within each potential function simplifies normalization across potential functions and eliminates the need for tuning of passage retrieval model parameters. Our dimensional indexing model facilitates efficient aggregation of topic, concept, and term distributions. The proposed passage-retrieval model improves search results in the presence of varying levels of semantic evidence, outperforming models of query terms, concepts, or document topics alone. Our results exceed the state-of-the-art for automatic document retrieval by 14.46% (0.3554 vs. 0.3105) and passage retrieval by 15.57% (0.1128 vs. 0.0976) as assessed by the TREC 2007 Genomics Track, and automatic document retrieval by 18.56% (0.3424 vs. 0.2888) as assessed by the TREC 2005 Genomics Track. Automatic document retrieval results for TREC 2007 and TREC 2005 are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level (p = .0359 and .0253, respectively). Passage retrieval is significant at the 90% confidence level (p = 0.0893).
  10. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.02 
    0.017295016 = product of:
  0.069180064 = sum of:
    0.069180064 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069180064 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  11. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.02 
    0.017295016 = product of:
  0.069180064 = sum of:
    0.069180064 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069180064 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  12. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.02 
    0.017295016 = product of:
  0.069180064 = sum of:
    0.069180064 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069180064 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  13. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.02 
    0.017295016 = product of:
  0.069180064 = sum of:
    0.069180064 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069180064 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  14. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.02 
    0.017295016 = product of:
  0.069180064 = sum of:
    0.069180064 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069180064 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  15. Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.02 
    0.015286778 = product of:
  0.061147112 = sum of:
    0.061147112 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061147112 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    18. 9.2018 18:22:56
  16. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.02 
    0.015133139 = product of:
  0.060532555 = sum of:
    0.060532555 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060532555 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  17. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.02 
    0.015133139 = product of:
  0.060532555 = sum of:
    0.060532555 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060532555 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
  18. Joss, M.W.; Wszola, S.: ¬The engines that can : text search and retrieval software, their strategies, and vendors (1996) 0.01 
    0.0129712615 = product of:
  0.051885046 = sum of:
    0.051885046 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051885046 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    12. 9.1996 13:56:22
  19. Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996) 0.01 
    0.0129712615 = product of:
  0.051885046 = sum of:
    0.051885046 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051885046 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  20. Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003) 0.01 
    0.0129712615 = product of:
  0.051885046 = sum of:
    0.051885046 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051885046 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06382575 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:36

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 29
  • d 4

Types

  • a 31
  • m 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications