Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.05
    0.05356268 = sum of:
      0.03244015 = product of:
        0.09732044 = sum of:
          0.09732044 = weight(_text_:objects in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09732044 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27620956 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051967237 = queryNorm
              0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.02112253 = product of:
        0.04224506 = sum of:
          0.04224506 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04224506 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051967237 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The digital library system Daffodil is targeted at strategic support of users during the information search process. For searching, exploring and managing digital library objects it provides user-customisable information seeking patterns over a federation of heterogeneous digital libraries. In this paper evaluation results with respect to retrieval effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction are presented. The analysis focuses on strategic support for the scientific work-flow. Daffodil supports the whole work-flow, from data source selection over information seeking to the representation, organisation and reuse of information. By embedding high level search functionality into the scientific work-flow, the user experiences better strategic system support due to a more systematic work process. These ideas have been implemented in Daffodil followed by a qualitative evaluation. The evaluation has been conducted with 28 participants, ranging from information seeking novices to experts. The results are promising, as they support the chosen model.
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
  2. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.03
    0.028163373 = product of:
      0.056326747 = sum of:
        0.056326747 = product of:
          0.112653494 = sum of:
            0.112653494 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.112653494 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  3. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.02
    0.024642952 = product of:
      0.049285904 = sum of:
        0.049285904 = product of:
          0.09857181 = sum of:
            0.09857181 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09857181 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  4. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02
    0.024642952 = product of:
      0.049285904 = sum of:
        0.049285904 = product of:
          0.09857181 = sum of:
            0.09857181 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09857181 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  5. Kulyukin, V.A.; Settle, A.: Ranked retrieval with semantic networks and vector spaces (2001) 0.02
    0.021626763 = product of:
      0.043253526 = sum of:
        0.043253526 = product of:
          0.12976058 = sum of:
            0.12976058 = weight(_text_:objects in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12976058 = score(doc=6934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27620956 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The equivalence of semantic networks with spreading activation and vector spaces with dot product is investigated under ranked retrieval. Semantic networks are viewed as networks of concepts organized in terms of abstraction and packaging relations. It is shown that the two models can be effectively constructed from each other. A formal method is suggested to analyze the models in terms of their relative performance in the same universe of objects
  6. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.02112253 = product of:
      0.04224506 = sum of:
        0.04224506 = product of:
          0.08449012 = sum of:
            0.08449012 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08449012 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  7. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.02112253 = product of:
      0.04224506 = sum of:
        0.04224506 = product of:
          0.08449012 = sum of:
            0.08449012 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08449012 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  8. Srinivasan, P.: Intelligent information retrieval using rough set approximations (1989) 0.02
    0.018923419 = product of:
      0.037846837 = sum of:
        0.037846837 = product of:
          0.11354051 = sum of:
            0.11354051 = weight(_text_:objects in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11354051 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27620956 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The theory of rough sets was introduced in 1982. It allows the classification of objects into sets of equivalent members based on their attributes. Any combination of the same objetcts (or even their attributes) may be examined using the resultant classification. The theory has direct applications in the design and evaluation of classification schemes and the selection of discriminating attributes. Introductory papers discuss its application in the domain of medical diagnostic systems and the design of information retrieval systems accessing collections of documents. Advantages offered by the theory are: the implicit inclusion of Boolean logic; term weighting; and the ability to rank retrieved documents.
  9. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.014081687 = product of:
      0.028163373 = sum of:
        0.028163373 = product of:
          0.056326747 = sum of:
            0.056326747 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056326747 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  10. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.01
    0.014081687 = product of:
      0.028163373 = sum of:
        0.028163373 = product of:
          0.056326747 = sum of:
            0.056326747 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056326747 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  11. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.01
    0.014081687 = product of:
      0.028163373 = sum of:
        0.028163373 = product of:
          0.056326747 = sum of:
            0.056326747 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056326747 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  12. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.01
    0.014081687 = product of:
      0.028163373 = sum of:
        0.028163373 = product of:
          0.056326747 = sum of:
            0.056326747 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056326747 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  13. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.01
    0.014081687 = product of:
      0.028163373 = sum of:
        0.028163373 = product of:
          0.056326747 = sum of:
            0.056326747 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056326747 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  14. Calegari, S.; Sanchez, E.: Object-fuzzy concept network : an enrichment of ontologies in semantic information retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.013516728 = product of:
      0.027033456 = sum of:
        0.027033456 = product of:
          0.08110037 = sum of:
            0.08110037 = weight(_text_:objects in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08110037 = score(doc=2393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27620956 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article shows how a fuzzy ontology-based approach can improve semantic documents retrieval. After formally defining a fuzzy ontology and a fuzzy knowledge base, a special type of new fuzzy relationship called (semantic) correlation, which links the concepts or entities in a fuzzy ontology, is discussed. These correlations, first assigned by experts, are updated after querying or when a document has been inserted into a database. Moreover, in order to define a dynamic knowledge of a domain adapting itself to the context, it is shown how to handle a tradeoff between the correct definition of an object, taken in the ontology structure, and the actual meaning assigned by individuals. The notion of a fuzzy concept network is extended, incorporating database objects so that entities and documents can similarly be represented in the network. Information retrieval (IR) algorithm, using an object-fuzzy concept network (O-FCN), is introduced and described. This algorithm allows us to derive a unique path among the entities involved in the query to obtain maxima semantic associations in the knowledge domain. Finally, the study has been validated by querying a database using fuzzy recall, fuzzy precision, and coefficient variant measures in the crisp and fuzzy cases.
  15. Schaefer, A.; Jordan, M.; Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.: Active support for query formulation in virtual digital libraries : a case study with DAFFODIL (2005) 0.01
    0.013516728 = product of:
      0.027033456 = sum of:
        0.027033456 = product of:
          0.08110037 = sum of:
            0.08110037 = weight(_text_:objects in 4296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08110037 = score(doc=4296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27620956 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 4296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4296)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Daffodil is a front-end to federated, heterogeneous digital libraries targeting at strategic support of users during the information seeking process. This is done by offering a variety of functions for searching, exploring and managing digital library objects. However, the distributed search increases response time and the conceptual model of the underlying search processes is inherently weaker. This makes query formulation harder and the resulting waiting times can be frustrating. In this paper, we investigate the concept of proactive support during the user's query formulation. For improving user efficiency and satisfaction, we implemented annotations, proactive support and error markers on the query form itself. These functions decrease the probability for syntactical or semantical errors in queries. Furthermore, the user is able to make better tactical decisions and feels more confident that the system handles the query properly. Evaluations with 30 subjects showed that user satisfaction is improved, whereas no conclusive results were received for efficiency.
  16. Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.01
    0.01244657 = product of:
      0.02489314 = sum of:
        0.02489314 = product of:
          0.04978628 = sum of:
            0.04978628 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04978628 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    18. 9.2018 18:22:56
  17. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.012321476 = product of:
      0.024642952 = sum of:
        0.024642952 = product of:
          0.049285904 = sum of:
            0.049285904 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049285904 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  18. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.01
    0.012321476 = product of:
      0.024642952 = sum of:
        0.024642952 = product of:
          0.049285904 = sum of:
            0.049285904 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049285904 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
  19. Joss, M.W.; Wszola, S.: ¬The engines that can : text search and retrieval software, their strategies, and vendors (1996) 0.01
    0.010561265 = product of:
      0.02112253 = sum of:
        0.02112253 = product of:
          0.04224506 = sum of:
            0.04224506 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04224506 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 9.1996 13:56:22
  20. Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996) 0.01
    0.010561265 = product of:
      0.02112253 = sum of:
        0.02112253 = product of:
          0.04224506 = sum of:
            0.04224506 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04224506 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18198042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051967237 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon

Years

Languages

  • e 29
  • d 4

Types

  • a 31
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…