Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.03 
    0.025223158 = product of:
  0.1765621 = sum of:
    0.1765621 = sum of:
      0.115918346 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.115918346 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18058759 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03730009 = queryNorm
          0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
      0.060643762 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060643762 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03730009 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
    Source
    Automatische Indexierung zwischen Forschung und Anwendung, Hrsg.: G. Lustig
  2. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.01 
    0.0057755974 = product of:
  0.04042918 = sum of:
    0.04042918 = product of:
      0.08085836 = sum of:
        0.08085836 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08085836 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  3. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.01 
    0.005053647 = product of:
  0.035375528 = sum of:
    0.035375528 = product of:
      0.070751056 = sum of:
        0.070751056 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070751056 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  4. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.01 
    0.005053647 = product of:
  0.035375528 = sum of:
    0.035375528 = product of:
      0.070751056 = sum of:
        0.070751056 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070751056 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  5. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.00 
    0.0043316977 = product of:
  0.030321881 = sum of:
    0.030321881 = product of:
      0.060643762 = sum of:
        0.060643762 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060643762 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  6. Marcus, S.: Textvergleich mit mehreren Mustern (2005) 0.00 
    0.0039031738 = product of:
  0.027322216 = sum of:
    0.027322216 = product of:
      0.054644432 = sum of:
        0.054644432 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054644432 = score(doc=862,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18058759 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.3025924 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Das Gebiet des Pattern-Matching besitzt in vielen wissenschaftlichen Bereichen eine hohe Relevanz. Aufgrund unterschiedlicher Einsatzgebiete sind auch Umsetzung und Anwendung des Pattern-Matching sehr verschieden. Die allen Anwendungen des Pattern-Matching inhärente Aufgabe besteht darin, in einer Vielzahl von Eingabedaten bestimmte Muster wieder zu erkennen. Dies ist auch der deutschen Bezeichnung Mustererkennung zu entnehmen. In der Medizin findet Pattern-Matching zum Beispiel bei der Untersuchung von Chromosomensträngen auf bestimmte Folgen von Chromosomen Verwendung. Auf dem Gebiet der Bildverarbeitung können mit Hilfe des Pattern-Matching ganze Bilder verglichen oder einzelne Bildpunkte betrachtet werden, die durch ein Muster identifizierbar sind. Ein weiteres Einsatzgebiet des Pattern-Matching ist das Information-Retrieval, bei dem in gespeicherten Daten nach relevanten Informationen gesucht wird. Die Relevanz der zu suchenden Daten wird auch hier anhand eines Musters, zum Beispiel einem bestimmten Schlagwort, beurteilt. Ein vergleichbares Verfahren findet auch im Internet Anwendung. Internet-Benutzer, die mittels einer Suchmaschine nach bedeutsamen Informationen suchen, erhalten diese durch den Einsatz eines Pattern-Matching-Automaten. Die in diesem Zusammenhang an den Pattern-Matching-Automaten gestellten Anforderungen variieren mit der Suchanfrage, die an eine Suchmaschine gestellt wird. Eine solche Suchanfrage kann im einfachsten Fall aus genau einem Schlüsselwort bestehen. Im komplexeren Fall enthält die Anfrage mehrere Schlüsselwörter. Dabei muss für eine erfolgreiche Suche eine Konkatenation der in der Anfrage enthaltenen Wörter erfolgen. Zu Beginn dieser Arbeit wird in Kapitel 2 eine umfassende Einführung in die Thematik des Textvergleichs gegeben, wobei die Definition einiger grundlegender Begriffe vorgenommen wird. Anschließend werden in Kapitel 3 Verfahren zum Textvergleich mit mehreren Mustern vorgestellt. Dabei wird zunächst ein einfaches Vorgehen erläutert, um einen Einsteig in das Thema des Textvergleichs mit mehreren Mustern zu erleichtern. Danach wird eine komplexe Methode des Textvergleichs vorgestellt und anhand von Beispielen verdeutlicht.
  7. Fuhr, N.: Modelle im Information Retrieval (2023) 0.00 
    0.0034499508 = product of:
  0.024149654 = sum of:
    0.024149654 = product of:
      0.04829931 = sum of:
        0.04829931 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04829931 = score(doc=800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18058759 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=800)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Information-Retrieval-Modelle -(IR-Modelle) spezifizieren, wie zu einer gegebenen Anfrage die Antwortdokumente aus einer Dokumentenkollektion bestimmt werden. Ausgangsbasis jedes Modells sind dabei zunächst bestimmte Annahmen über die Wissensrepräsentation (s. Teil B Methoden und Systeme der Inhaltserschließung) von Fragen und Dokumenten. Hier bezeichnen wir die Elemente dieser Repräsentationen als Terme, wobei es aus der Sicht des Modells egal ist, wie diese Terme aus dem Dokument (und analog aus der von Benutzenden eingegebenen Anfrage) abgeleitet werden: Bei Texten werden hierzu häufig computerlinguistische Methoden eingesetzt, aber auch komplexere automatische oder manuelle Erschließungsverfahren können zur Anwendung kommen. Repräsentationen besitzen ferner eine bestimmte Struktur. Ein Dokument wird meist als Menge oder Multimenge von Termen aufgefasst, wobei im zweiten Fall das Mehrfachvorkommen berücksichtigt wird. Diese Dokumentrepräsentation wird wiederum auf eine sogenannte Dokumentbeschreibung abgebildet, in der die einzelnen Terme gewichtet sein können. Im Folgenden unterscheiden wir nur zwischen ungewichteter (Gewicht eines Terms ist entweder 0 oder 1) und gewichteter Indexierung (das Gewicht ist eine nichtnegative reelle Zahl). Analog dazu gibt es eine Fragerepräsentation; legt man eine natürlichsprachige Anfrage zugrunde, so kann man die o. g. Verfahren für Dokumenttexte anwenden. Alternativ werden auch grafische oder formale Anfragesprachen verwendet, wobei aus Sicht der Modelle insbesondere deren logische Struktur (etwa beim Booleschen Retrieval) relevant ist. Die Fragerepräsentation wird dann in eine Fragebeschreibung überführt.
  8. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.00 
    0.0028877987 = product of:
  0.02021459 = sum of:
    0.02021459 = product of:
      0.04042918 = sum of:
        0.04042918 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04042918 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  9. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.00 
    0.0028877987 = product of:
  0.02021459 = sum of:
    0.02021459 = product of:
      0.04042918 = sum of:
        0.04042918 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04042918 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  10. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.00 
    0.0028877987 = product of:
  0.02021459 = sum of:
    0.02021459 = product of:
      0.04042918 = sum of:
        0.04042918 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04042918 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  11. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.00 
    0.0028877987 = product of:
  0.02021459 = sum of:
    0.02021459 = product of:
      0.04042918 = sum of:
        0.04042918 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04042918 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  12. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.00 
    0.0028877987 = product of:
  0.02021459 = sum of:
    0.02021459 = product of:
      0.04042918 = sum of:
        0.04042918 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04042918 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  13. Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.00 
    0.0025524772 = product of:
  0.01786734 = sum of:
    0.01786734 = product of:
      0.03573468 = sum of:
        0.03573468 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03573468 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    18. 9.2018 18:22:56
  14. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.00 
    0.0025268234 = product of:
  0.017687764 = sum of:
    0.017687764 = product of:
      0.035375528 = sum of:
        0.035375528 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035375528 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  15. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.00 
    0.0025268234 = product of:
  0.017687764 = sum of:
    0.017687764 = product of:
      0.035375528 = sum of:
        0.035375528 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035375528 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
  16. Joss, M.W.; Wszola, S.: ¬The engines that can : text search and retrieval software, their strategies, and vendors (1996) 0.00 
    0.0021658489 = product of:
  0.015160941 = sum of:
    0.015160941 = product of:
      0.030321881 = sum of:
        0.030321881 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030321881 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    12. 9.1996 13:56:22
  17. Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996) 0.00 
    0.0021658489 = product of:
  0.015160941 = sum of:
    0.015160941 = product of:
      0.030321881 = sum of:
        0.030321881 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030321881 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  18. Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003) 0.00 
    0.0021658489 = product of:
  0.015160941 = sum of:
    0.015160941 = product of:
      0.030321881 = sum of:
        0.030321881 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030321881 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:36
  19. Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004) 0.00 
    0.0021658489 = product of:
  0.015160941 = sum of:
    0.015160941 = product of:
      0.030321881 = sum of:
        0.030321881 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030321881 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    31. 5.2004 19:22:06
  20. Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003) 0.00 
    0.0021658489 = product of:
  0.015160941 = sum of:
    0.015160941 = product of:
      0.030321881 = sum of:
        0.030321881 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030321881 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061856 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03730009 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    11. 9.2004 17:32:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 25
  • d 6
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 28
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications