Search (165 results, page 2 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Iivonen, M.: Factors lowering the consistency in online searching (1995) 0.02
    0.020902308 = product of:
      0.05225577 = sum of:
        0.019130927 = weight(_text_:m in 3869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019130927 = score(doc=3869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09940409 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 3869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3869)
        0.03312484 = weight(_text_:u in 3869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03312484 = score(doc=3869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080163 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 3869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3869)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Online information 95: Proceedings of the 19th International online information meeting, London, 5-7 December 1995. Ed.: D.I. Raitt u. B. Jeapes
  2. Kuriyama, K.; Kando, N.; Nozue, T.; Eguchi, K.: Pooling for a large-scale test collection : an analysis of the search results from the First NTCIR Workshop (2002) 0.02
    0.01969156 = product of:
      0.0984578 = sum of:
        0.0984578 = weight(_text_:n in 3830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0984578 = score(doc=3830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17223433 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.57165027 = fieldWeight in 3830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3830)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  3. Shafique, M.; Chaudhry, A.S.: Intelligent agent-based online information retrieval (1995) 0.02
    0.017916264 = product of:
      0.04479066 = sum of:
        0.016397936 = weight(_text_:m in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016397936 = score(doc=3851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09940409 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
        0.028392723 = weight(_text_:u in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028392723 = score(doc=3851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080163 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Online information 95: Proceedings of the 19th International online information meeting, London, 5-7 December 1995. Ed.: D.I. Raitt u. B. Jeapes
  4. Colace, F.; Santo, M. de; Greco, L.; Napoletano, P.: Improving relevance feedback-based query expansion by the use of a weighted word pairs approach (2015) 0.02
    0.017916264 = product of:
      0.04479066 = sum of:
        0.016397936 = weight(_text_:m in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016397936 = score(doc=2263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09940409 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
        0.028392723 = weight(_text_:u in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028392723 = score(doc=2263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080163 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  5. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.02
    0.017405022 = product of:
      0.043512553 = sum of:
        0.021863915 = weight(_text_:m in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021863915 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09940409 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
        0.02164864 = product of:
          0.04329728 = sum of:
            0.04329728 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04329728 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13988481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03994621 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  6. Biebricher, P.; Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Der AIR-Retrievaltest (1986) 0.02
    0.016409634 = product of:
      0.08204816 = sum of:
        0.08204816 = weight(_text_:n in 4040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08204816 = score(doc=4040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17223433 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 4040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4040)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  7. Gauch, S.; Wang, J.: Corpus analysis for TREC 5 query expansion (1997) 0.02
    0.016061349 = product of:
      0.080306746 = sum of:
        0.080306746 = weight(_text_:u in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080306746 = score(doc=5800,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13080163 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.6139583 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5). Ed.: E.M. Voorhees u. D.K. Harman
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  8. Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC test collections (2005) 0.01
    0.0132499365 = product of:
      0.06624968 = sum of:
        0.06624968 = weight(_text_:u in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06624968 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080163 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  9. Buckley, C.; Voorhees, E.M.: Retrieval system evaluation (2005) 0.01
    0.0132499365 = product of:
      0.06624968 = sum of:
        0.06624968 = weight(_text_:u in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06624968 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080163 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  10. Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC ad hoc experiments (2005) 0.01
    0.0132499365 = product of:
      0.06624968 = sum of:
        0.06624968 = weight(_text_:u in 5711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06624968 = score(doc=5711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080163 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 5711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5711)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  11. Robertson, S.; Callan, J.: Routing and filtering (2005) 0.01
    0.0132499365 = product of:
      0.06624968 = sum of:
        0.06624968 = weight(_text_:u in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06624968 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080163 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  12. Harman, D.K.: Beyond English (2005) 0.01
    0.0132499365 = product of:
      0.06624968 = sum of:
        0.06624968 = weight(_text_:u in 4850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06624968 = score(doc=4850,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080163 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 4850, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4850)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  13. Voorhees, E.M.; Garofolo, J.S.: Retrieving noisy text (2005) 0.01
    0.0132499365 = product of:
      0.06624968 = sum of:
        0.06624968 = weight(_text_:u in 5084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06624968 = score(doc=5084,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080163 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 5084, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5084)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  14. Järvelin, K.: Evaluation (2011) 0.01
    0.0132499365 = product of:
      0.06624968 = sum of:
        0.06624968 = weight(_text_:u in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06624968 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080163 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Interactive information seeking, behaviour and retrieval. Eds.: Ruthven, I. u. D. Kelly
  15. Frei, H.P.; Meienberg, S.; Schäuble, P.: ¬The perils of interpreting recall and precision values (1991) 0.01
    0.013127707 = product of:
      0.065638535 = sum of:
        0.065638535 = weight(_text_:n in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065638535 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17223433 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.38110018 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: GI/GMD-Workshop, Darmstadt, 23.-24.6.1991: Proceedings. Ed.: N. Fuhr
  16. Schirrmeister, N.-P.; Keil, S.: Aufbau einer Infrastruktur für Information Retrieval-Evaluationen (2012) 0.01
    0.013127707 = product of:
      0.065638535 = sum of:
        0.065638535 = weight(_text_:n in 3097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065638535 = score(doc=3097,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17223433 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.38110018 = fieldWeight in 3097, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3097)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  17. Balog, K.; Schuth, A.; Dekker, P.; Tavakolpoursaleh, N.; Schaer, P.; Chuang, P.-Y.: Overview of the TREC 2016 Open Search track Academic Search Edition (2016) 0.01
    0.013127707 = product of:
      0.065638535 = sum of:
        0.065638535 = weight(_text_:n in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065638535 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17223433 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.38110018 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  18. Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995) 0.01
    0.013053766 = product of:
      0.032634415 = sum of:
        0.016397936 = weight(_text_:m in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016397936 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09940409 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
        0.016236478 = product of:
          0.032472957 = sum of:
            0.032472957 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032472957 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13988481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03994621 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
  19. Lancaster, F.W.; Connell, T.H.; Bishop, N.; McCowan, S.: Identifying barriers to effective subject access in library catalogs (1991) 0.01
    0.011486744 = product of:
      0.057433717 = sum of:
        0.057433717 = weight(_text_:n in 2259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057433717 = score(doc=2259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17223433 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 2259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2259)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  20. Kilgour, F.G.: Retrieval on information from computerized book texts (1989) 0.01
    0.0113570895 = product of:
      0.056785446 = sum of:
        0.056785446 = weight(_text_:u in 2965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056785446 = score(doc=2965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13080163 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03994621 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 2965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2965)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Academic librarianship past, present, and future. A festschrift in honor of David Kaser: Ed. by J. Richardson u. J.Y. Davis

Languages

  • e 142
  • d 19
  • chi 2
  • f 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…