Search (97 results, page 5 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. López-Ostenero, F.; Peinado, V.; Gonzalo, J.; Verdejo, F.: Interactive question answering : Is Cross-Language harder than monolingual searching? (2008) 0.01
    0.0076358644 = product of:
      0.015271729 = sum of:
        0.015271729 = product of:
          0.030543458 = sum of:
            0.030543458 = weight(_text_:j in 2023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030543458 = score(doc=2023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2023)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Rokaya, M.; Atlam, E.; Fuketa, M.; Dorji, T.C.; Aoe, J.-i.: Ranking of field association terms using Co-word analysis (2008) 0.01
    0.0076358644 = product of:
      0.015271729 = sum of:
        0.015271729 = product of:
          0.030543458 = sum of:
            0.030543458 = weight(_text_:j in 2060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030543458 = score(doc=2060,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2060, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2060)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Abdou, S.; Savoy, J.: Searching in Medline : query expansion and manual indexing evaluation (2008) 0.01
    0.0076358644 = product of:
      0.015271729 = sum of:
        0.015271729 = product of:
          0.030543458 = sum of:
            0.030543458 = weight(_text_:j in 2062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030543458 = score(doc=2062,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2062, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2062)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Song, D.; Wu, Y.: Understanding an enriched multidimensional user relevance model by analyzing query logs (2017) 0.01
    0.0076358644 = product of:
      0.015271729 = sum of:
        0.015271729 = product of:
          0.030543458 = sum of:
            0.030543458 = weight(_text_:j in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030543458 = score(doc=3961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Munkelt, J.; Schaer, P.; Lepsky, K.: Towards an IR test collection for the German National Library (2018) 0.01
    0.0076358644 = product of:
      0.015271729 = sum of:
        0.015271729 = product of:
          0.030543458 = sum of:
            0.030543458 = weight(_text_:j in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030543458 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Wildemuth, B.M.; Jacob, E.K.; Fullington, A.;; Bliek, R. de; Friedman, C.P.: ¬A detailed analysis of end-user search behaviours (1991) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=2423,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ASIS'91: systems understanding people. Proc. of the 54th Annual Meeting of the ASIS, vol.28, Washington, DC, 27.-31.10.1991. Ed.: J.-M. Griffiths
  7. Hansen, P.; Karlgren, J.: Effects of foreign language and task scenario on relevance assessment (2005) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=4393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Kekäläinen, J.; Järvelin, K.: Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation (2002) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 5225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=5225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Talvensaari, T.; Laurikkala, J.; Järvelin, K.; Juhola, M.: ¬A study on automatic creation of a comparable document collection in cross-language information retrieval (2006) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 5601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=5601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Dang, E.K.F.; Luk, R.W.P.; Allan, J.: ¬A context-dependent relevance model (2016) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 2778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=2778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Losada, D.E.; Parapar, J.; Barreiro, A.: When to stop making relevance judgments? : a study of stopping methods for building information retrieval test collections (2019) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 4674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=4674,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4674, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4674)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Losada, D.E.; Parapar, J.; Barreiro, A.: Multi-armed bandits for adjudicating documents in pooling-based evaluation of information retrieval systems (2017) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 5098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=5098,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5098, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5098)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Parapar, J.; Losada, D.E.; Presedo-Quindimil, M.A.; Barreiro, A.: Using score distributions to compare statistical significance tests for information retrieval evaluation (2020) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 5506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=5506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Larsen, B.; Ingwersen, P.; Lund, B.: Data fusion according to the principle of polyrepresentation (2009) 0.01
    0.006182823 = product of:
      0.012365646 = sum of:
        0.012365646 = product of:
          0.024731291 = sum of:
            0.024731291 = weight(_text_:22 in 2752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024731291 = score(doc=2752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:48:28
  15. Bateman, J.: Modelling the importance of end-user relevance criteria (1999) 0.01
    0.005090576 = product of:
      0.010181152 = sum of:
        0.010181152 = product of:
          0.020362305 = sum of:
            0.020362305 = weight(_text_:j in 6606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020362305 = score(doc=6606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 6606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6606)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Cleverdon, C.W.; Mills, J.: ¬The testing of index language devices (1985) 0.01
    0.005090576 = product of:
      0.010181152 = sum of:
        0.010181152 = product of:
          0.020362305 = sum of:
            0.020362305 = weight(_text_:j in 3643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020362305 = score(doc=3643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 3643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Lioma, C.; Ounis, I.: ¬A syntactically-based query reformulation technique for information retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.005090576 = product of:
      0.010181152 = sum of:
        0.010181152 = product of:
          0.020362305 = sum of:
            0.020362305 = weight(_text_:j in 2031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020362305 = score(doc=2031,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 2031, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2031)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Whereas in language words of high frequency are generally associated with low content [Bookstein, A., & Swanson, D. (1974). Probabilistic models for automatic indexing. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 25(5), 312-318; Damerau, F. J. (1965). An experiment in automatic indexing. American Documentation, 16, 283-289; Harter, S. P. (1974). A probabilistic approach to automatic keyword indexing. PhD thesis, University of Chicago; Sparck-Jones, K. (1972). A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 28, 11-21; Yu, C., & Salton, G. (1976). Precision weighting - an effective automatic indexing method. Journal of the Association for Computer Machinery (ACM), 23(1), 76-88], shallow syntactic fragments of high frequency generally correspond to lexical fragments of high content [Lioma, C., & Ounis, I. (2006). Examining the content load of part of speech blocks for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the international committee on computational linguistics and the association for computational linguistics (COLING/ACL 2006), Sydney, Australia]. We implement this finding to Information Retrieval, as follows. We present a novel automatic query reformulation technique, which is based on shallow syntactic evidence induced from various language samples, and used to enhance the performance of an Information Retrieval system. Firstly, we draw shallow syntactic evidence from language samples of varying size, and compare the effect of language sample size upon retrieval performance, when using our syntactically-based query reformulation (SQR) technique. Secondly, we compare SQR to a state-of-the-art probabilistic pseudo-relevance feedback technique. Additionally, we combine both techniques and evaluate their compatibility. We evaluate our proposed technique across two standard Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) English test collections, and three statistically different weighting models. Experimental results suggest that SQR markedly enhances retrieval performance, and is at least comparable to pseudo-relevance feedback. Notably, the combination of SQR and pseudo-relevance feedback further enhances retrieval performance considerably. These collective experimental results confirm the tenet that high frequency shallow syntactic fragments correspond to content-bearing lexical fragments.

Languages

  • e 83
  • d 11
  • f 2
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…