Search (131 results, page 2 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval (2005) 0.01 
    0.011655438 = product of:
  0.023310876 = sum of:
    0.023310876 = product of:
      0.034966312 = sum of:
        0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031998128 = score(doc=636,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
        0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029681858 = score(doc=636,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: 1. The Text REtrieval Conference - Ellen M. Voorhees and Donna K. Harman 2. The TREC Test Collections - Donna K. Harman 3. Retrieval System Evaluation - Chris Buckley and Ellen M. Voorhees 4. The TREC Ad Hoc Experiments - Donna K. Harman 5. Routing and Filtering - Stephen Robertson and Jamie Callan 6. The TREC Interactive Tracks: Putting the User into Search - Susan T. Dumais and Nicholas J. Belkin 7. Beyond English - Donna K. Harman 8. Retrieving Noisy Text - Ellen M. Voorhees and John S. Garofolo 9.The Very Large Collection and Web Tracks - David Hawking and Nick Craswell 10. Question Answering in TREC - Ellen M. Voorhees 11. The University of Massachusetts and a Dozen TRECs - James Allan, W. Bruce Croft and Jamie Callan 12. How Okapi Came to TREC - Stephen Robertson 13. The SMART Project at TREC - Chris Buckley 14. Ten Years of Ad Hoc Retrieval at TREC Using PIRCS - Kui-Lam Kwok 15. MultiText Experiments for TREC - Gordon V. Cormack, Charles L. A. Clarke, Christopher R. Palmer and Thomas R. Lynam 16. A Language-Modeling Approach to TREC - Djoerd Hiemstra and Wessel Kraaij 17. BM Research Activities at TREC - Eric W. Brown, David Carmel, Martin Franz, Abraham Ittycheriah, Tapas Kanungo, Yoelle Maarek, J. Scott McCarley, Robert L. Mack, John M. Prager, John R. Smith, Aya Soffer, Jason Y. Zien and Alan D. Marwick Epilogue: Metareflections on TREC - Karen Sparck Jones
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.6, S.910-911 (J.L. Vicedo u. J. Gomez): "The Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) is a yearly workshop hosted by the U.S. government's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) that fosters and supports research in information retrieval as well as speeding the transfer of technology between research labs and industry. Since 1992, TREC has provided the infrastructure necessary for large-scale evaluations of different text retrieval methodologies. TREC impact has been very important and its success has been mainly supported by its continuous adaptation to the emerging information retrieval needs. Not in vain, TREC has built evaluation benchmarks for more than 20 different retrieval problems such as Web retrieval, speech retrieval, or question-answering. The large and intense trajectory of annual TREC conferences has resulted in an immense bulk of documents reflecting the different eval uation and research efforts developed. This situation makes it difficult sometimes to observe clearly how research in information retrieval (IR) has evolved over the course of TREC. TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval succeeds in organizing and condensing all this research into a manageable volume that describes TREC history and summarizes the main lessons learned. The book is organized into three parts. The first part is devoted to the description of TREC's origin and history, the test collections, and the evaluation methodology developed. The second part describes a selection of the major evaluation exercises (tracks), and the third part contains contributions from research groups that had a large and remarkable participation in TREC. Finally, Karen Spark Jones, one of the main promoters of research in IR, closes the book with an epilogue that analyzes the impact of TREC on this research field.
    Pages
    X, 462 S
    Type
    s
  2. King, D.W.: Blazing new trails : in celebration of an audacious career (2000) 0.01 
    0.01125326 = product of:
  0.02250652 = sum of:
    0.02250652 = product of:
      0.03375978 = sum of:
        0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029681858 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
        0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030791596 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Pages
    S.59-78
  3. Petrelli, D.: On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval (2008) 0.01 
    0.01125326 = product of:
  0.02250652 = sum of:
    0.02250652 = product of:
      0.03375978 = sum of:
        0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029681858 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
        0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030791596 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.22-38
  4. Lioma, C.; Ounis, I.: ¬A syntactically-based query reformulation technique for information retrieval (2008) 0.01 
    0.009652208 = product of:
  0.019304415 = sum of:
    0.019304415 = product of:
      0.028956622 = sum of:
        0.025598504 = weight(_text_:k in 2031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025598504 = score(doc=2031,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 2031, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2031)
        0.003358119 = weight(_text_:s in 2031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003358119 = score(doc=2031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 2031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2031)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Whereas in language words of high frequency are generally associated with low content [Bookstein, A., & Swanson, D. (1974). Probabilistic models for automatic indexing. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 25(5), 312-318; Damerau, F. J. (1965). An experiment in automatic indexing. American Documentation, 16, 283-289; Harter, S. P. (1974). A probabilistic approach to automatic keyword indexing. PhD thesis, University of Chicago; Sparck-Jones, K. (1972). A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 28, 11-21; Yu, C., & Salton, G. (1976). Precision weighting - an effective automatic indexing method. Journal of the Association for Computer Machinery (ACM), 23(1), 76-88], shallow syntactic fragments of high frequency generally correspond to lexical fragments of high content [Lioma, C., & Ounis, I. (2006). Examining the content load of part of speech blocks for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the international committee on computational linguistics and the association for computational linguistics (COLING/ACL 2006), Sydney, Australia]. We implement this finding to Information Retrieval, as follows. We present a novel automatic query reformulation technique, which is based on shallow syntactic evidence induced from various language samples, and used to enhance the performance of an Information Retrieval system. Firstly, we draw shallow syntactic evidence from language samples of varying size, and compare the effect of language sample size upon retrieval performance, when using our syntactically-based query reformulation (SQR) technique. Secondly, we compare SQR to a state-of-the-art probabilistic pseudo-relevance feedback technique. Additionally, we combine both techniques and evaluate their compatibility. We evaluate our proposed technique across two standard Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) English test collections, and three statistically different weighting models. Experimental results suggest that SQR markedly enhances retrieval performance, and is at least comparable to pseudo-relevance feedback. Notably, the combination of SQR and pseudo-relevance feedback further enhances retrieval performance considerably. These collective experimental results confirm the tenet that high frequency shallow syntactic fragments correspond to content-bearing lexical fragments.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.143-162
  5. Ruthven, I.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, K. van: Combining and selecting characteristics of information use (2002) 0.01 
    0.009324351 = product of:
  0.018648703 = sum of:
    0.018648703 = product of:
      0.027973052 = sum of:
        0.025598504 = weight(_text_:k in 5208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025598504 = score(doc=5208,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 5208, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5208)
        0.0023745487 = weight(_text_:s in 5208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0023745487 = score(doc=5208,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5208, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5208)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.5, S.378-396
  6. Larsen, B.; Ingwersen, P.; Lund, B.: Data fusion according to the principle of polyrepresentation (2009) 0.01 
    0.009002609 = product of:
  0.018005218 = sum of:
    0.018005218 = product of:
      0.027007826 = sum of:
        0.0023745487 = weight(_text_:s in 2752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0023745487 = score(doc=2752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2752)
        0.024633277 = weight(_text_:22 in 2752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024633277 = score(doc=2752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2752)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:48:28
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.646-654
  7. Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis : ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005 (2006) 0.00 
    0.0049518906 = product of:
  0.009903781 = sum of:
    0.009903781 = product of:
      0.014855672 = sum of:
        0.012799252 = weight(_text_:k in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012799252 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.078881696 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
        0.0020564196 = weight(_text_:s in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020564196 = score(doc=5973,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.04161215 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 57(2006) H.5, S.290-291 (C. Schindler): "Weniger als ein Jahr nach dem "Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop" (HIER 2005) im Juli 2005 ist der dazugehörige Tagungsband erschienen. Eingeladen hatte die Hildesheimer Informationswissenschaft um ihre Forschungsergebnisse und die einiger externer Experten zum Thema Information Retrieval einem Fachpublikum zu präsentieren und zur Diskussion zu stellen. Unter dem Titel "Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis" sind nahezu sämtliche Beiträge des Workshops in dem nun erschienenen, 15 Beiträge umfassenden Band gesammelt. Mit dem Schwerpunkt Information Retrieval (IR) wird ein Teilgebiet der Informationswissenschaft vorgestellt, das schon immer im Zentrum informationswissenschaftlicher Forschung steht. Ob durch den Leistungsanstieg von Prozessoren und Speichermedien, durch die Verbreitung des Internet über nationale Grenzen hinweg oder durch den stetigen Anstieg der Wissensproduktion, festzuhalten ist, dass in einer zunehmend wechselseitig vernetzten Welt die Orientierung und das Auffinden von Dokumenten in großen Wissensbeständen zu einer zentralen Herausforderung geworden sind. Aktuelle Verfahrensweisen zu diesem Thema, dem Information Retrieval, präsentiert der neue Band anhand von praxisbezogenen Projekten und theoretischen Diskussionen. Das Kernthema Information Retrieval wird in dem Sammelband in die Bereiche Retrieval-Systeme, Digitale Bibliothek, Evaluierung und Multilinguale Systeme untergliedert. Die Artikel der einzelnen Sektionen sind insgesamt recht heterogen und bieten daher keine Überschneidungen inhaltlicher Art. Jedoch ist eine vollkommene thematische Abdeckung der unterschiedlichen Bereiche ebenfalls nicht gegeben, was bei der Präsentation von Forschungsergebnissen eines Institutes und seiner Kooperationspartner auch nur bedingt erwartet werden kann. So lässt sich sowohl in der Gliederung als auch in den einzelnen Beiträgen eine thematische Verdichtung erkennen, die das spezielle Profil und die Besonderheit der Hildesheimer Informationswissenschaft im Feld des Information Retrieval wiedergibt. Teil davon ist die mehrsprachige und interdisziplinäre Ausrichtung, die die Schnittstellen zwischen Informationswissenschaft, Sprachwissenschaft und Informatik in ihrer praxisbezogenen und internationalen Forschung fokussiert.
    "Evaluierung", das Thema des dritten Kapitels, ist in seiner Breite nicht auf das Information Retrieval beschränkt sondern beinhaltet ebenso einzelne Aspekte der Bereiche Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion sowie des E-Learning. Michael Muck und Marco Winter von der Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik sowie dem Informationszentrum Sozialwissenschaften thematisieren in ihrem Beitrag den Einfluss der Fragestellung (Topic) auf die Bewertung von Relevanz und zeigen Verfahrensweisen für die Topic-Erstellung auf, die beim Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF) Anwendung finden. Im darauf folgenden Aufsatz stellt Thomas Mandl verschiedene Evaluierungsinitiativen im Information Retrieval und aktuelle Entwicklungen dar. Joachim Pfister erläutert in seinem Beitrag das automatisierte Gruppieren, das sogenannte Clustering, von Patent-Dokumenten in den Datenbanken des Fachinformationszentrums Karlsruhe und evaluiert unterschiedliche Clusterverfahren auf Basis von Nutzerbewertungen. Ralph Kölle, Glenn Langemeier und Wolfgang Semar widmen sich dem kollaborativen Lernen unter den speziellen Bedingungen des Programmierens. Dabei werden das System VitaminL zur synchronen Bearbeitung von Programmieraufgaben und das Kennzahlensystem K-3 für die Bewertung kollaborativer Zusammenarbeit in einer Lehrveranstaltung angewendet. Der aktuelle Forschungsschwerpunkt der Hildesheimer Informationswissenschaft zeichnet sich im vierten Kapitel unter dem Thema "Multilinguale Systeme" ab. Hier finden sich die meisten Beiträge des Tagungsbandes wieder. Olga Tartakovski und Margaryta Shramko beschreiben und prüfen das System Langldent, das die Sprache von mono- und multilingualen Texten identifiziert. Die Eigenheiten der japanischen Schriftzeichen stellt Nina Kummer dar und vergleicht experimentell die unterschiedlichen Techniken der Indexierung. Suriya Na Nhongkai und Hans-Joachim Bentz präsentieren und prüfen eine bilinguale Suche auf Basis von Konzeptnetzen, wobei die Konzeptstruktur das verbindende Elemente der beiden Textsammlungen darstellt. Das Entwickeln und Evaluieren eines mehrsprachigen Question-Answering-Systems im Rahmen des Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF), das die alltagssprachliche Formulierung von konkreten Fragestellungen ermöglicht, wird im Beitrag von Robert Strötgen, Thomas Mandl und Rene Schneider thematisiert. Den Schluss bildet der Aufsatz von Niels Jensen, der ein mehrsprachiges Web-Retrieval-System ebenfalls im Zusammenhang mit dem CLEF anhand des multilingualen EuroGOVKorpus evaluiert.
    Pages
    VIII, 244 S
    Type
    s
  8. Rao, A.; Lu, A.; Meier, E.; Ahmed, S.; Pliske, D.: Query processing in TREC6 (2000) 0.00 
    0.001958903 = product of:
  0.003917806 = sum of:
    0.003917806 = product of:
      0.011753417 = sum of:
        0.011753417 = weight(_text_:s in 6420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011753417 = score(doc=6420,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 6420, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6420)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.179-186
  9. Robertson, S.; Callan, J.: Routing and filtering (2005) 0.00 
    0.001958903 = product of:
  0.003917806 = sum of:
    0.003917806 = product of:
      0.011753417 = sum of:
        0.011753417 = weight(_text_:s in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011753417 = score(doc=4688,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.99-122
  10. Robertson, S.E.; Walker, S.; Beaulieu, M.: Experimentation as a way of life : Okapi at TREC (2000) 0.00 
    0.0016790595 = product of:
  0.003358119 = sum of:
    0.003358119 = product of:
      0.010074357 = sum of:
        0.010074357 = weight(_text_:s in 6030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010074357 = score(doc=6030,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 6030, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6030)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.95-108
  11. Robertson, S.: How Okapi came to TREC (2005) 0.00 
    0.0016790595 = product of:
  0.003358119 = sum of:
    0.003358119 = product of:
      0.010074357 = sum of:
        0.010074357 = weight(_text_:s in 5087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010074357 = score(doc=5087,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 5087, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5087)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.287-300
  12. Foster, A.; Ford, N.: Serendipity and information seeking : an empirical study (2003) 0.00 
    0.0013851533 = product of:
  0.0027703065 = sum of:
    0.0027703065 = product of:
      0.00831092 = sum of:
        0.00831092 = weight(_text_:s in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00831092 = score(doc=1083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 59(2003) no.3, S.321-340
  13. Wilbur, W.J.: Global term weights for document retrieval learned from TREC data (2001) 0.00 
    0.0013851533 = product of:
  0.0027703065 = sum of:
    0.0027703065 = product of:
      0.00831092 = sum of:
        0.00831092 = weight(_text_:s in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00831092 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 27(2001) no.5, S.303-310
  14. Hersh, W.R.; Over, P.: Interactivity at the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) (2001) 0.00 
    0.0013851533 = product of:
  0.0027703065 = sum of:
    0.0027703065 = product of:
      0.00831092 = sum of:
        0.00831092 = weight(_text_:s in 5486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00831092 = score(doc=5486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 5486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5486)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.3, S.365-367
  15. Over, P.: ¬The TREC interactive track : an annotated bibliography (2001) 0.00 
    0.0013851533 = product of:
  0.0027703065 = sum of:
    0.0027703065 = product of:
      0.00831092 = sum of:
        0.00831092 = weight(_text_:s in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00831092 = score(doc=5572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.3, S.369-381
  16. Voorhees, E.M.: Variations in relevance judgements and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness (2000) 0.00 
    0.0013851533 = product of:
  0.0027703065 = sum of:
    0.0027703065 = product of:
      0.00831092 = sum of:
        0.00831092 = weight(_text_:s in 8710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00831092 = score(doc=8710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 8710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8710)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.5, S.697-716
  17. Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC test collections (2005) 0.00 
    0.0013851533 = product of:
  0.0027703065 = sum of:
    0.0027703065 = product of:
      0.00831092 = sum of:
        0.00831092 = weight(_text_:s in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00831092 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.21-52
  18. Buckley, C.; Voorhees, E.M.: Retrieval system evaluation (2005) 0.00 
    0.0013851533 = product of:
  0.0027703065 = sum of:
    0.0027703065 = product of:
      0.00831092 = sum of:
        0.00831092 = weight(_text_:s in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00831092 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.53-78
  19. Voiskunskii, V.G.: Evaluation of search results (2000) 0.00 
    0.0013851533 = product of:
  0.0027703065 = sum of:
    0.0027703065 = product of:
      0.00831092 = sum of:
        0.00831092 = weight(_text_:s in 4670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00831092 = score(doc=4670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4670)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.118-138
  20. Harman, D.K.: ¬The TREC ad hoc experiments (2005) 0.00 
    0.0013851533 = product of:
  0.0027703065 = sum of:
    0.0027703065 = product of:
      0.00831092 = sum of:
        0.00831092 = weight(_text_:s in 5711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00831092 = score(doc=5711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04545348 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 5711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5711)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.79-98

Authors

Languages

  • e 106
  • d 23
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 121
  • m 5
  • el 3
  • s 3
  • r 2
  • x 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications