-
Becks, D.; Mandl, T.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Spezielle Anforderungen bei der Evaluierung von Patent-Retrieval-Systemen (2010)
0.03
0.026081134 = product of:
0.06520283 = sum of:
0.03162189 = weight(_text_:j in 4667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03162189 = score(doc=4667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4667)
0.03358094 = weight(_text_:u in 4667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03358094 = score(doc=4667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 4667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4667)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
-
Reichert, S.; Mayr, P.: Untersuchung von Relevanzeigenschaften in einem kontrollierten Eyetracking-Experiment (2012)
0.02
0.017425805 = product of:
0.043564513 = sum of:
0.027104476 = weight(_text_:j in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027104476 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
0.016460039 = product of:
0.032920077 = sum of:
0.032920077 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032920077 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2012.63.issue-3/iwp-2012-0029/iwp-2012-0029.xml?format=INT. Vgl. auch: http://www.ib.hu-berlin.de/~mayr/arbeiten/iwp-2012-final.pdf.
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:25:54
-
Wildemuth, B.; Freund, L.; Toms, E.G.: Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies (2014)
0.02
0.01671934 = product of:
0.04179835 = sum of:
0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02808165 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
0.0137167005 = product of:
0.027433401 = sum of:
0.027433401 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027433401 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 6. 4.2015 19:31:22
-
Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011)
0.01
0.014521505 = product of:
0.036303762 = sum of:
0.022587063 = weight(_text_:j in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022587063 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.0137167005 = product of:
0.027433401 = sum of:
0.027433401 = weight(_text_:22 in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027433401 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:20:56
-
Järvelin, K.: Evaluation (2011)
0.01
0.013432376 = product of:
0.06716188 = sum of:
0.06716188 = weight(_text_:u in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06716188 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Interactive information seeking, behaviour and retrieval. Eds.: Ruthven, I. u. D. Kelly
-
Munkelt, J.; Schaer, P.: Towards an IR test collection for the German National Library (2018)
0.01
0.012648756 = product of:
0.06324378 = sum of:
0.06324378 = weight(_text_:j in 5780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06324378 = score(doc=5780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 5780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5780)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Womser-Hacker, C.: Evaluierung im Information Retrieval (2013)
0.01
0.009594555 = product of:
0.047972776 = sum of:
0.047972776 = weight(_text_:u in 728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047972776 = score(doc=728,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 728, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=728)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
-
Munkelt, J.: Erstellung einer DNB-Retrieval-Testkollektion (2018)
0.01
0.006324378 = product of:
0.03162189 = sum of:
0.03162189 = weight(_text_:j in 4310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03162189 = score(doc=4310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4310)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Colace, F.; Santo, M. de; Greco, L.; Napoletano, P.: Improving relevance feedback-based query expansion by the use of a weighted word pairs approach (2015)
0.01
0.0057567325 = product of:
0.028783662 = sum of:
0.028783662 = weight(_text_:u in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028783662 = score(doc=2263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Sarigil, E.; Sengor Altingovde, I.; Blanco, R.; Barla Cambazoglu, B.; Ozcan, R.; Ulusoy, Ö.: Characterizing, predicting, and handling web search queries that match very few or no results (2018)
0.01
0.00561633 = product of:
0.02808165 = sum of:
0.02808165 = weight(_text_:b in 4039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02808165 = score(doc=4039,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 4039, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4039)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Song, D.; Wu, Y.: Understanding an enriched multidimensional user relevance model by analyzing query logs (2017)
0.01
0.0054208953 = product of:
0.027104476 = sum of:
0.027104476 = weight(_text_:j in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027104476 = score(doc=3961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Munkelt, J.; Schaer, P.; Lepsky, K.: Towards an IR test collection for the German National Library (2018)
0.01
0.0054208953 = product of:
0.027104476 = sum of:
0.027104476 = weight(_text_:j in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027104476 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
White, H.D.: Relevance theory and distributions of judgments in document retrieval (2017)
0.00
0.0047972775 = product of:
0.023986388 = sum of:
0.023986388 = weight(_text_:u in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023986388 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13260265 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This article extends relevance theory (RT) from linguistic pragmatics into information retrieval. Using more than 50 retrieval experiments from the literature as examples, it applies RT to explain the frequency distributions of documents on relevance scales with three or more points. The scale points, which judges in experiments must consider in addition to queries and documents, are communications from researchers. In RT, the relevance of a communication varies directly with its cognitive effects and inversely with the effort of processing it. Researchers define and/or label the scale points to measure the cognitive effects of documents on judges. However, they apparently assume that all scale points as presented are equally easy for judges to process. Yet the notion that points cost variable effort explains fairly well the frequency distributions of judgments across them. By hypothesis, points that cost more effort are chosen by judges less frequently. Effort varies with the vagueness or strictness of scale-point labels and definitions. It is shown that vague scales tend to produce U- or V-shaped distributions, while strict scales tend to produce right-skewed distributions. These results reinforce the paper's more general argument that RT clarifies the concept of relevance in the dialogues of retrieval evaluation.
-
Dang, E.K.F.; Luk, R.W.P.; Allan, J.: ¬A context-dependent relevance model (2016)
0.00
0.0045174127 = product of:
0.022587063 = sum of:
0.022587063 = weight(_text_:j in 2778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022587063 = score(doc=2778,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2778, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2778)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Losada, D.E.; Parapar, J.; Barreiro, A.: When to stop making relevance judgments? : a study of stopping methods for building information retrieval test collections (2019)
0.00
0.0045174127 = product of:
0.022587063 = sum of:
0.022587063 = weight(_text_:j in 4674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022587063 = score(doc=4674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4674)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Losada, D.E.; Parapar, J.; Barreiro, A.: Multi-armed bandits for adjudicating documents in pooling-based evaluation of information retrieval systems (2017)
0.00
0.0045174127 = product of:
0.022587063 = sum of:
0.022587063 = weight(_text_:j in 5098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022587063 = score(doc=5098,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12867662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5098, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5098)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Naderi, H.; Rumpler, B.: PERCIRS: a system to combine personalized and collaborative information retrieval (2010)
0.00
0.004493064 = product of:
0.022465318 = sum of:
0.022465318 = weight(_text_:b in 3960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022465318 = score(doc=3960,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 3960, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3960)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Dzeyk, W.: Effektiv und nutzerfreundlich : Einsatz von semantischen Technologien und Usability-Methoden zur Verbesserung der medizinischen Literatursuche (2010)
0.00
0.0039314306 = product of:
0.019657154 = sum of:
0.019657154 = weight(_text_:b in 4416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019657154 = score(doc=4416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1434766 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.13700598 = fieldWeight in 4416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4416)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Bei einem Vergleich unter Berücksichtigung aller verfügbaren Quellen gelang es mithilfe der MorphoSaurus-Technik - bei wesentlich geringerem Datenbestand - ähnlich gute Resul-tate zu erzielen, wie mit den Suchmaschinen Google oder Google Scholar. Die Ergebnisse der Evaluation lassen den Schluss zu, dass durch den MorphoSaurus-Ansatz die Leistungsfähigkeit von Google oder Google Scholar im Bereich der medizinischen Literatursuche durch eine Erweiterung der vorhandenen Datenbasis sogar deutlich übertroffen werden kann. Zusätzlich zu den Retrieval-Tests wurde eine Usability-Untersuchung der Testsuchmaschine mit Probanden aus der Medizin durchgeführt. Die Testpersonen attestierten dem Such-interface eine hohe Gebrauchstauglichkeit und Nützlichkeit. Der szenariobasierte Usability-Test hat zudem gezeigt, dass die Testpersonen bzw. User die integrierten Unterstützungs-maßnahmen zur Erhöhung der Benutzerfreundlichkeit während der Suche als sehr positiv und nützlich bewerten. In der Testsuchmaschine wurde diese Unterstützung z. B. durch das Aufklappen und Präsentieren von verwandten MeSH- und ICD-10-Begriffen realisiert. Die Einführung eines Schiebereglers zur effektiven Eingrenzung des Suchraums wurde ebenfalls überwiegend positiv bewertet. Zudem wurden nach Abschicken der Suchanfrage sogenannte Verwandte Suchbegriffe aus verschiedenen medizinischen Teilbereichen angezeigt. Diese Facetten-Funktion diente der Eingrenzung bzw. Verfeinerung der Suche und wurde von den Testpersonen mehrheitlich als ein sinnvolles Hilfsangebot bewertet. Insgesamt stellt das MorphoSaurus-Projekt - mit seinem spezifischen Ansatz - ein gelungenes Beispiel für die Innovationsfähigkeit von Bibliotheken im Bereich der öffentlichen Informationsversorgung dar. Durch die mögliche Anpassung der MorphoSaurus-Technologie mittels fachspezifischer Thesauri ist zudem eine hohe Anschlussfähigkeit für Suchmaschinen-projekte anderer Inhaltsdomänen gegeben.
-
Chu, H.: Factors affecting relevance judgment : a report from TREC Legal track (2011)
0.00
0.00274334 = product of:
0.0137167005 = sum of:
0.0137167005 = product of:
0.027433401 = sum of:
0.027433401 = weight(_text_:22 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027433401 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 12. 7.2011 18:29:22
-
Ravana, S.D.; Taheri, M.S.; Rajagopal, P.: Document-based approach to improve the accuracy of pairwise comparison in evaluating information retrieval systems (2015)
0.00
0.00274334 = product of:
0.0137167005 = sum of:
0.0137167005 = product of:
0.027433401 = sum of:
0.027433401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027433401 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1418109 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04049623 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
