Search (51 results, page 2 of 3)

0.0069548762 = product of:
  0.0139097525 = sum of:
    0.0139097525 = product of:
      0.041729257 = sum of:
        0.041729257 = weight(_text_:c in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041729257 = score(doc=1643,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.006884975 = product of:
  0.01376995 = sum of:
    0.01376995 = product of:
      0.04130985 = sum of:
        0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 3791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04130985 = score(doc=3791,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 3791, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3791)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.006884975 = product of:
  0.01376995 = sum of:
    0.01376995 = product of:
      0.04130985 = sum of:
        0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 4868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04130985 = score(doc=4868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 4868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4868)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.006884975 = product of:
  0.01376995 = sum of:
    0.01376995 = product of:
      0.04130985 = sum of:
        0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04130985 = score(doc=259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=259)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.006082151 = product of:
  0.012164302 = sum of:
    0.012164302 = product of:
      0.036492907 = sum of:
        0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036492907 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30.12.2008 18:22:46

0.0059014075 = product of:
  0.011802815 = sum of:
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.035408445 = sum of:
        0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 1761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035408445 = score(doc=1761,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1761, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1761)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0059014075 = product of:
  0.011802815 = sum of:
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.035408445 = sum of:
        0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035408445 = score(doc=4260,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0059014075 = product of:
  0.011802815 = sum of:
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.035408445 = sum of:
        0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035408445 = score(doc=240,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 240, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=240)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0059014075 = product of:
  0.011802815 = sum of:
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.035408445 = sum of:
        0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 2479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035408445 = score(doc=2479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2479)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Editor

Petrie, C. et al.

0.0059014075 = product of:
  0.011802815 = sum of:
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.035408445 = sum of:
        0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035408445 = score(doc=3404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B758F-4TDJGCF-1&_user=10&_coverDate=09%2F30%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1352884236&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=3285f9101276b6f41185a30c1b39d1d0.

0.0059014075 = product of:
  0.011802815 = sum of:
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.035408445 = sum of:
        0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 4337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035408445 = score(doc=4337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4337)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0059014075 = product of:
  0.011802815 = sum of:
    0.011802815 = product of:
      0.035408445 = sum of:
        0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035408445 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Proceedings of the First European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWS2004), Eds.: C. Bussler, J. Davies, D. Fensel and R. Studer. 2004. S.299-311

0.0058798613 = product of:
  0.011759723 = sum of:
    0.011759723 = product of:
      0.035279166 = sum of:
        0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 3152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035279166 = score(doc=3152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 3152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3152)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Table of Contents Part I: Accepted Papers Christoph Tempich and Raphael Volz: Towards a benchmark for Semantic Web reasoners - an analysis of the DAML ontology library M. Carmen Suarez-Figueroa and Asuncion Gomez-Perez: Results of Taxonomic Evaluation of RDF(S) and DAML+OIL ontologies using RDF(S) and DAML+OIL Validation Tools and Ontology Platforms import services Volker Haarslev and Ralf Möller: Racer: A Core Inference Engine for the Semantic Web Mikhail Kazakov and Habib Abdulrab: DL-workbench: a metamodeling approach to ontology manipulation Thorsten Liebig and Olaf Noppens: OntoTrack: Fast Browsing and Easy Editing of Large Ontologie Frederic Fürst, Michel Leclere, and Francky Trichet: TooCoM : a Tool to Operationalize an Ontology with the Conceptual Graph Model Naoki Sugiura, Masaki Kurematsu, Naoki Fukuta, Noriaki Izumi, and Takahira Yamaguchi: A domain ontology engineering tool with general ontologies and text corpus Howard Goldberg, Alfredo Morales, David MacMillan, and Matthew Quinlan: An Ontology-Driven Application to Improve the Prescription of Educational Resources to Parents of Premature Infants Part II: Experiment Contributions Domain natural language description for the experiment Raphael Troncy, Antoine Isaac, and Veronique Malaise: Using XSLT for Interoperability: DOE and The Travelling Domain Experiment Christian Fillies: SemTalk EON2003 Semantic Web Export / Import Interface Test Óscar Corcho, Asunción Gómez-Pérez, Danilo José Guerrero-Rodríguez, David Pérez-Rey, Alberto Ruiz-Cristina, Teresa Sastre-Toral, M. Carmen Suárez-Figueroa: Evaluation experiment of ontology tools' interoperability with the WebODE ontology engineering workbench Holger Knublauch: Case Study: Using Protege to Convert the Travel Ontology to UML and OWL Franz Calvo and John Gennari: Interoperability of Protege 2.0 beta and OilEd 3.5 in the Domain Knowledge of Osteoporosis

0.0058798613 = product of:
  0.011759723 = sum of:
    0.011759723 = product of:
      0.035279166 = sum of:
        0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 3244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035279166 = score(doc=3244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 3244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3244)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.005734307 = product of:
  0.011468614 = sum of:
    0.011468614 = product of:
      0.034405842 = sum of:
        0.034405842 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034405842 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.0049178395 = product of:
  0.009835679 = sum of:
    0.009835679 = product of:
      0.029507035 = sum of:
        0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 4687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029507035 = score(doc=4687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4687)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Editor

Smith, M.K., C. Welty u. D.L. Mc Guinness

0.0048684133 = product of:
  0.009736827 = sum of:
    0.009736827 = product of:
      0.029210478 = sum of:
        0.029210478 = weight(_text_:c in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029210478 = score(doc=553,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.18863934 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Currently, a number of efforts are being carried out to integrate collections from different institutions and containing heterogeneous material. Examples of such projects are The European Library [1] and the Memory of the Netherlands [2]. A crucial point for the success of these is the availability to provide a unified access on top of the different collections, e.g. using one single vocabulary for querying or browsing the objects they contain. This is made difficult by the fact that the objects from different collections are often described using different vocabularies - thesauri, classification schemes - and are therefore not interoperable at the semantic level. To solve this problem, one can turn to semantic links - mappings - between the elements of the different vocabularies. If one knows that a concept C from a vocabulary V is semantically equivalent to a concept to a concept D from vocabulary W, then an appropriate search engine can return all the objects that were indexed against D for a query for objects described using C. We thus have an access to other collections, using a single one vocabulary. This is however an ideal situation, and hard alignment work is required to reach it. Several projects in the past have tried to implement such a solution, like MACS [3] and Renardus [4]. They have demonstrated very interesting results, but also highlighted the difficulty of aligning manually all the different vocabularies involved in practical cases, which sometimes contain hundreds of thousands of concepts. To alleviate this problem, a number of tools have been proposed in order to provide with candidate mappings between two input vocabularies, making alignment a (semi-) automatic task. Recently, the Semantic Web community has produced a lot of these alignment tools'. Several techniques are found, depending on the material they exploit: labels of concepts, structure of vocabularies, collection objects and external knowledge sources. Throughout our presentation, we will present a concrete heterogeneity case where alignment techniques have been applied to build a (pilot) browser, developed in the context of the STITCH project [5]. This browser enables a unified access to two collections of illuminated manuscripts, using the description vocabulary used in the first collection, Mandragore [6], or the one used by the second, Iconclass [7]. In our talk, we will also make the point for using unified representations the vocabulary semantic and lexical information. Additionally to ease the use of the alignment tools that have these vocabularies as input, turning to a standard representation format helps designing applications that are more generic, like the browser we demonstrate. We give pointers to SKOS [8], an open and web-enabled format currently developed by the Semantic Web community.

0.0048684133 = product of:
  0.009736827 = sum of:
    0.009736827 = product of:
      0.029210478 = sum of:
        0.029210478 = weight(_text_:c in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029210478 = score(doc=1397,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.18863934 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: Greenberg, J., E.M. Méndez Rodríguez: Introduction: toward a more library-like Web via semantic knitting (S.1-8). - Campbell, D.G.: The birth of the new Web: a Foucauldian reading (S.9-20). - McCathieNevile, C., E.M. Méndez Rodríguez: Library cards for the 21st century (S.21-45). - Harper, C.A., B.B. Tillett: Library of Congress controlled vocabularies and their application to the Semantic Web (S.47-68). - Miles, A., J.R. Pérez-Agüera: SKOS: Simple Knowledge Organisation for the Web (S.69-83). - Tennis, J.T.: Scheme versioning in the Semantic Web (S.85-104). - Rogers, G.P.: Roles for semantic technologies and tools in libraries (S.105-125). - Severiens, T., C. Thiemann: RDF database for PhysNet and similar portals (S.127-147). - Michon, J.: Biomedicine and the Semantic Web: a knowledge model for visual phenotype (S.149-160). - Liang, A., G. Salokhe u. M. Sini u.a.: Towards an infrastructure for semantic applications: methodologies for semantic integration of heterogeneous resources (S.161-189). - Graves, M., A. Constabaris u. D. Brickley: FOAF: connecting people on the Semantic Web (S.191-202). - Greenberg, J.: Advancing Semantic Web via library functions (S.203-225). - Weibel, S.L.: Social Bibliography: a personal perspective on libraries and the Semantic Web (S.227-236)

0.0047038887 = product of:
  0.009407777 = sum of:
    0.009407777 = product of:
      0.028223332 = sum of:
        0.028223332 = weight(_text_:i in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028223332 = score(doc=3000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0047038887 = product of:
  0.009407777 = sum of:
    0.009407777 = product of:
      0.028223332 = sum of:
        0.028223332 = weight(_text_:i in 700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028223332 = score(doc=700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044891298 = queryNorm
            0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=700)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)