Search (162 results, page 3 of 9)

0.007215656 = product of:
  0.014431312 = sum of:
    0.014431312 = product of:
      0.043293934 = sum of:
        0.043293934 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043293934 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

11. 5.2013 19:22:18

0.007215656 = product of:
  0.014431312 = sum of:
    0.014431312 = product of:
      0.043293934 = sum of:
        0.043293934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043293934 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0066356524 = product of:
  0.013271305 = sum of:
    0.013271305 = product of:
      0.019906957 = sum of:
        0.010896005 = weight(_text_:h in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010896005 = score(doc=553,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.096073404 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
        0.009010953 = weight(_text_:d in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009010953 = score(doc=553,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.10389925 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Currently, a number of efforts are being carried out to integrate collections from different institutions and containing heterogeneous material. Examples of such projects are The European Library [1] and the Memory of the Netherlands [2]. A crucial point for the success of these is the availability to provide a unified access on top of the different collections, e.g. using one single vocabulary for querying or browsing the objects they contain. This is made difficult by the fact that the objects from different collections are often described using different vocabularies - thesauri, classification schemes - and are therefore not interoperable at the semantic level. To solve this problem, one can turn to semantic links - mappings - between the elements of the different vocabularies. If one knows that a concept C from a vocabulary V is semantically equivalent to a concept to a concept D from vocabulary W, then an appropriate search engine can return all the objects that were indexed against D for a query for objects described using C. We thus have an access to other collections, using a single one vocabulary. This is however an ideal situation, and hard alignment work is required to reach it. Several projects in the past have tried to implement such a solution, like MACS [3] and Renardus [4]. They have demonstrated very interesting results, but also highlighted the difficulty of aligning manually all the different vocabularies involved in practical cases, which sometimes contain hundreds of thousands of concepts. To alleviate this problem, a number of tools have been proposed in order to provide with candidate mappings between two input vocabularies, making alignment a (semi-) automatic task. Recently, the Semantic Web community has produced a lot of these alignment tools'. Several techniques are found, depending on the material they exploit: labels of concepts, structure of vocabularies, collection objects and external knowledge sources. Throughout our presentation, we will present a concrete heterogeneity case where alignment techniques have been applied to build a (pilot) browser, developed in the context of the STITCH project [5]. This browser enables a unified access to two collections of illuminated manuscripts, using the description vocabulary used in the first collection, Mandragore [6], or the one used by the second, Iconclass [7]. In our talk, we will also make the point for using unified representations the vocabulary semantic and lexical information. Additionally to ease the use of the alignment tools that have these vocabularies as input, turning to a standard representation format helps designing applications that are more generic, like the browser we demonstrate. We give pointers to SKOS [8], an open and web-enabled format currently developed by the Semantic Web community.
References [1] http:// www.theeuropeanlibrary.org [2] http://www.geheugenvannederland.nl [3] http://macs.cenl.org [4] Day, M., Koch, T., Neuroth, H.: Searching and browsing multiple subject gateways in the Renardus service. In Proceedings of the RC33 Sixth International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Amsterdam , 2005. [5] http://stitch.cs.vu.nl [6] http://mandragore.bnf.fr [7] http://www.iconclass.nl [8] www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/ 1 The Semantic Web vision supposes sharing data using different conceptualizations (ontologies), and therefore implies to tackle the semantic interoperability problem

0.0065781754 = product of:
  0.013156351 = sum of:
    0.013156351 = product of:
      0.019734526 = sum of:
        0.012452577 = weight(_text_:h in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012452577 = score(doc=870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
        0.0072819493 = weight(_text_:d in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072819493 = score(doc=870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language

d

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 53(2002) H.5, S.300

0.0065781754 = product of:
  0.013156351 = sum of:
    0.013156351 = product of:
      0.019734526 = sum of:
        0.012452577 = weight(_text_:h in 5713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012452577 = score(doc=5713,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 5713, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5713)
        0.0072819493 = weight(_text_:d in 5713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072819493 = score(doc=5713,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 5713, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5713)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language

d

0.006226288 = product of:
  0.012452576 = sum of:
    0.012452576 = product of:
      0.03735773 = sum of:
        0.03735773 = weight(_text_:h in 4366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03735773 = score(doc=4366,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 4366, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4366)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.006184848 = product of:
  0.012369696 = sum of:
    0.012369696 = product of:
      0.03710909 = sum of:
        0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03710909 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006

0.006184848 = product of:
  0.012369696 = sum of:
    0.012369696 = product of:
      0.03710909 = sum of:
        0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03710909 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30.12.2008 18:22:46

0.006184848 = product of:
  0.012369696 = sum of:
    0.012369696 = product of:
      0.03710909 = sum of:
        0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03710909 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

26.12.2011 13:40:22

0.006184848 = product of:
  0.012369696 = sum of:
    0.012369696 = product of:
      0.03710909 = sum of:
        0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03710909 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2013 19:29:20

0.006184848 = product of:
  0.012369696 = sum of:
    0.012369696 = product of:
      0.03710909 = sum of:
        0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03710909 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.18-22

0.006184848 = product of:
  0.012369696 = sum of:
    0.012369696 = product of:
      0.03710909 = sum of:
        0.03710909 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03710909 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

24. 8.2016 14:03:22

0.005831131 = product of:
  0.011662262 = sum of:
    0.011662262 = product of:
      0.034986783 = sum of:
        0.034986783 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034986783 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.005755903 = product of:
  0.011511806 = sum of:
    0.011511806 = product of:
      0.01726771 = sum of:
        0.010896005 = weight(_text_:h in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010896005 = score(doc=1210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.096073404 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
        0.0063717053 = weight(_text_:d in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063717053 = score(doc=1210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.07346786 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

D-Lib magazine. 8(2002) no.5, x S

0.005755903 = product of:
  0.011511806 = sum of:
    0.011511806 = product of:
      0.01726771 = sum of:
        0.010896005 = weight(_text_:h in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010896005 = score(doc=167,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.096073404 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
        0.0063717053 = weight(_text_:d in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063717053 = score(doc=167,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.07346786 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Inhalt: 1. Einleitung (A. Dengel, A. Bernardi) 2. Wissensrepräsentation (A. Dengel, A. Bernardi, L. van Elst) 3. Semantische Netze, Thesauri und Topic Maps (O. Rostanin, G. Weber) 4. Das Ressource Description Framework (T. Roth-Berghofer) 5. Ontologien und Ontologie-Abgleich in verteilten Informationssystemen (L. van Elst) 6. Anfragesprachen und Reasoning (M. Sintek) 7. Linked Open Data, Semantic Web Datensätze (G.A. Grimnes, O. Hartig, M. Kiesel, M. Liwicki) 8. Semantik in der Informationsextraktion (B. Adrian, B. Endres-Niggemeyer) 9. Semantische Suche (K. Schumacher, B. Forcher, T. Tran) 10. Erklärungsfähigkeit semantischer Systeme (B. Forcher, T. Roth-Berghofer, S. Agne) 11. Semantische Webservices zur Steuerung von Prooduktionsprozessen (M. Loskyll, J. Schlick, S. Hodeck, L. Ollinger, C. Maxeiner) 12. Wissensarbeit am Desktop (S. Schwarz, H. Maus, M. Kiesel, L. Sauermann) 13. Semantische Suche für medizinische Bilder (MEDICO) (M. Möller, M. Sintek) 14. Semantische Musikempfehlungen (S. Baumann, A. Passant) 15. Optimierung von Instandhaltungsprozessen durch Semantische Technologien (P. Stephan, M. Loskyll, C. Stahl, J. Schlick)

Language

d

0.0056877024 = product of:
  0.011375405 = sum of:
    0.011375405 = product of:
      0.017063107 = sum of:
        0.009339432 = weight(_text_:h in 3352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009339432 = score(doc=3352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.08234863 = fieldWeight in 3352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3352)
        0.007723674 = weight(_text_:d in 3352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007723674 = score(doc=3352,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.0890565 = fieldWeight in 3352, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3352)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language

d

Location

D

Source

BuB. 64(2013) H.2, S.96

0.0056877024 = product of:
  0.011375405 = sum of:
    0.011375405 = product of:
      0.017063107 = sum of:
        0.009339432 = weight(_text_:h in 4532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009339432 = score(doc=4532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.08234863 = fieldWeight in 4532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4532)
        0.007723674 = weight(_text_:d in 4532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007723674 = score(doc=4532,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.0890565 = fieldWeight in 4532, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4532)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language

d

Location

D

Source

BuB. 63(2011) H.3, S.160-161

0.0051859487 = product of:
  0.010371897 = sum of:
    0.010371897 = product of:
      0.015557846 = sum of:
        0.011006627 = weight(_text_:h in 641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011006627 = score(doc=641,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.0970488 = fieldWeight in 641, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=641)
        0.0045512184 = weight(_text_:d in 641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0045512184 = score(doc=641,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.052477043 = fieldWeight in 641, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=641)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 60(2007)H.3, S.80-81 (J. Bertram): "Wie aus dem Titel der Publikation hervorgeht, will der Autor eine Bestandsaufnahme zum Einsatz semantischer Technologien im BID-Bereich (Bibliothek - Information - Dokumentation) bzw. BAM-Bereich (Bibliothek - Archiv - Museum) vornehmen. einigem Befremden, dass eines von insgesamt drei Vorwörtern für ein einschlägiges Softwareprodukt wirbt und von einer Firmenmitarbeiterin verfasst worden ist. Nach einer Skizze des gegenwärtigen Standes nationaler und europäischer Bibliothekspolitik folgen kurze Definitionen zu den beteiligten Branchen, zu semantischen Technologien und zu Precision und Recall. Die Ausführungen zu semantischen Technologien hätten durchaus gleich an den Anfang gestellt werden können, schließlich sollen sie ja das Hauptthema der vorliegenden Publikation abgeben. Zudem hätten sie konkreter, trennschärfer und ausführlicher ausfallen können. Der Autor moniert zu Recht das Fehlen einer einheitlichen Auffassung, was unter semantischen Technologien denn nun genau zu verstehen sei. Seine Definition lässt allerdings Fragen offen. So wird z.B. nicht geklärt, was besagte Technologien von den hier auch immer wieder erwähnten semantischen Tools unterscheidet. Das nachfolgende Kapitel über bibliographische Tools vereint eine Aufzählung konkreter Beispiele für Austauschformate, Dokumentationssysteme, Suchmaschinen, Informationsportale und OPACs. Im Anschluss daran stellt der Autor Methoden semantischer Anreicherung (bibliographischer) Daten vor und präsentiert Projekte im Bibliotheksbereich. Der aufzählende Charakter dieses und des vorangestellten Kapitels mag einem schnellen Überblick über die fraglichen Gegenstände dienlich sein, für eine systematische Lektüre eignen sich diese Passagen weniger. Auch wird der Bezug zu semantischen Technologien nicht durchgängig hergestellt.

Language

d

0.0051022395 = product of:
  0.010204479 = sum of:
    0.010204479 = product of:
      0.030613437 = sum of:
        0.030613437 = weight(_text_:22 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030613437 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15985602 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17.12.2013 12:51:22

0.004739752 = product of:
  0.009479504 = sum of:
    0.009479504 = product of:
      0.014219256 = sum of:
        0.007782861 = weight(_text_:h in 4398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007782861 = score(doc=4398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113413334 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 4398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4398)
        0.006436395 = weight(_text_:d in 4398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006436395 = score(doc=4398,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0867278 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045649286 = queryNorm
            0.07421375 = fieldWeight in 4398, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4398)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language

d

Location

D

Source

BuB. 62(2010) H.2, S.108-109