Search (79 results, page 1 of 4)

0.08060205 = product of:
  0.1612041 = sum of:
    0.040301025 = product of:
      0.120903075 = sum of:
        0.120903075 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.120903075 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32268468 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.120903075 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.120903075 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32268468 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038061365 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

0.017458716 = product of:
  0.034917433 = sum of:
    0.014290273 = product of:
      0.04287082 = sum of:
        0.04287082 = weight(_text_:k in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04287082 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.02062716 = product of:
      0.04125432 = sum of:
        0.04125432 = weight(_text_:22 in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04125432 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13328442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

15. 3.2011 19:21:22

0.01609679 = product of:
  0.03219358 = sum of:
    0.008841655 = product of:
      0.026524965 = sum of:
        0.026524965 = weight(_text_:k in 1981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026524965 = score(doc=1981,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.19522223 = fieldWeight in 1981, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1981)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.023351924 = product of:
      0.04670385 = sum of:
        0.04670385 = weight(_text_:intelligent in 1981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04670385 = score(doc=1981,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21440355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.2178315 = fieldWeight in 1981, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1981)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

As the World Wide Web continues to expand, it becomes increasingly difficult for users to obtain information efficiently. Because most search engines read format languages such as HTML or SGML, search results reflect formatting tags more than actual page content, which is expressed in natural language. Spinning the Semantic Web describes an exciting new type of hierarchy and standardization that will replace the current "Web of links" with a "Web of meaning." Using a flexible set of languages and tools, the Semantic Web will make all available information - display elements, metadata, services, images, and especially content - accessible. The result will be an immense repository of information accessible for a wide range of new applications. This first handbook for the Semantic Web covers, among other topics, software agents that can negotiate and collect information, markup languages that can tag many more types of information in a document, and knowledge systems that enable machines to read Web pages and determine their reliability. The truly interdisciplinary Semantic Web combines aspects of artificial intelligence, markup languages, natural language processing, information retrieval, knowledge representation, intelligent agents, and databases.

Classification

TVK (FH K)

GHBS

TVK (FH K)

0.013343956 = product of:
  0.053375825 = sum of:
    0.053375825 = product of:
      0.10675165 = sum of:
        0.10675165 = weight(_text_:intelligent in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10675165 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21440355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.49790058 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This document specifies usage scenarios, goals and requirements for a web ontology language. An ontology formally defines a common set of terms that are used to describe and represent a domain. Ontologies can be used by automated tools to power advanced services such as more accurate web search, intelligent software agents and knowledge management.

0.011794503 = product of:
  0.04717801 = sum of:
    0.04717801 = product of:
      0.09435602 = sum of:
        0.09435602 = weight(_text_:intelligent in 850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09435602 = score(doc=850,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21440355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.4400861 = fieldWeight in 850, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=850)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Primitive thinking forms affected the organization of knowledge, and at a later date writing also affected organization. Currently, the web requires new forms of learning and knowledge; with the globalization of information, connectivity and virtuality have a bearing on human thought. Digital thinking is shaping our reality and its organizational form. Natural memory, considered to be a process that requires the structure of natural language and human capabilities, is interwoven with a subject and a conscience; memory preserved through writing required other tools to assist it, and classifications, cataloguing, organization or other KOS were created. The new tool for recovering digital memory is the semantic web. This points to information's future on the Internet and seems to approach the utopia of global, organized information and attempts to give the website greater significance. The Web 3.0 incorporates a proliferation of languages, concepts and tools that are difficult to govern and are created by users. The semantic web seems to be a natural evolution of the participative web in which we find ourselves, and if an effective combination is achieved between the inclusion of semantic content in web pages and the use of artificial intelligence it will be a revolution; semantic codification will be a fact when it is totally automated. Based on this, a collective digital intelligence is being constituted. We find ourselves before intelligent multitudes with broad access to enormous amounts of information. The intelligent multitude emerges when technologies interconnect. In this global interconnection of semantic information an exponential pattern of technological growth can take place.

0.011794503 = product of:
  0.04717801 = sum of:
    0.04717801 = product of:
      0.09435602 = sum of:
        0.09435602 = weight(_text_:intelligent in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09435602 = score(doc=3297,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21440355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.4400861 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Ontologies have proven to be an essential element in many applications. They are used in agent systems, knowledge management systems, and e-commerce platforms. They can also generate natural language, integrate intelligent information, provide semantic-based access to the Internet, and extract information from texts in addition to being used in many other applications to explicitly declare the knowledge embedded in them. However, not only are ontologies useful for applications in which knowledge plays a key role, but they can also trigger a major change in current Web contents. This change is leading to the third generation of the Web-known as the Semantic Web-which has been defined as "the conceptual structuring of the Web in an explicit machine-readable way."1 This definition does not differ too much from the one used for defining an ontology: "An ontology is an explicit, machinereadable specification of a shared conceptualization."2 In fact, new ontology-based applications and knowledge architectures are developing for this new Web. A common claim for all of these approaches is the need for languages to represent the semantic information that this Web requires-solving the heterogeneous data exchange in this heterogeneous environment. Here, we don't decide which language is best of the Semantic Web. Rather, our goal is to help developers find the most suitable language for their representation needs. The authors analyze the most representative ontology languages created for the Web and compare them using a common framework.

Source

IEEE intelligent systems 2002, Jan./Feb., S.54-60

0.011675962 = product of:
  0.04670385 = sum of:
    0.04670385 = product of:
      0.0934077 = sum of:
        0.0934077 = weight(_text_:intelligent in 2547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0934077 = score(doc=2547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21440355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.435663 = fieldWeight in 2547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2547)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

IEEE intelligent systems. 16(2001) no.2, S.54-59

0.010007967 = product of:
  0.04003187 = sum of:
    0.04003187 = product of:
      0.08006374 = sum of:
        0.08006374 = weight(_text_:intelligent in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08006374 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21440355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.37342542 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Inhalt: 1. From traditional Knowledge Organization Systems (authority files, classifications, thesauri) towards ontologies on the web (Alexander Sigel) (Tutorial. Paper with Slides interspersed) pp. 3-53 2. Introduction to Integrative Cross-Language Ontology (ICLO): Formalizing and interrelating textual knowledge to enable intelligent action and knowledge sharing (Winfried Schmitz-Esser) pp. 54-113 3. First Idea Sketch on Modelling ICLO with Topic Maps (Alexander Sigel) (Work in progress paper. Topic maps available from the author) pp. 114-130

0.009024382 = product of:
  0.036097527 = sum of:
    0.036097527 = product of:
      0.07219505 = sum of:
        0.07219505 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07219505 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13328442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 9.2007 15:41:14

0.008339973 = product of:
  0.033359893 = sum of:
    0.033359893 = product of:
      0.066719785 = sum of:
        0.066719785 = weight(_text_:intelligent in 2507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066719785 = score(doc=2507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21440355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.31118786 = fieldWeight in 2507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2507)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

The highly-structured data standards of the Semantic Web contain a promising venue for the migration of library subject access standards onto the World Wide Web. The new functionalities of the Web, however, along with the anticipated capabilities of intelligent Web agents, suggest that information on the Semantic Web will have much more flexibility, diversity and mutability. We need, therefore, a method for recognizing and assessing the principles whereby Semantic Web information can combine together in productive and useful ways. This paper will argue that the concept of warrant in traditional library science, can provide a useful means of translating library knowledge structures into Web-based knowledge structures. Using Derrida's concept of logocentrism, this paper suggests that what while "warrant" in library science traditionally alludes to the principles by which concepts are admitted into the design of a classification or access system, "warrant" on the Semantic Web alludes to the principles by which Web resources can be admitted into a network of information uses. Furthermore, library information practice suggests a far more complex network of warrant concepts that provide a subtlety and richness to knowledge organization that the Semantic Web has not yet attained.

0.008339973 = product of:
  0.033359893 = sum of:
    0.033359893 = product of:
      0.066719785 = sum of:
        0.066719785 = weight(_text_:intelligent in 5300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066719785 = score(doc=5300,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21440355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.31118786 = fieldWeight in 5300, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5300)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The web has been, in the last decades, the place where information retrieval achieved its maximum importance, given its ubiquity and the sheer volume of information. However, its exponential growth made the retrieval task increasingly hard, relying in its effectiveness on idiosyncratic and somewhat biased ranking algorithms. To deal with this problem, a "new" web, called the Semantic Web (SW), was proposed, bringing along concepts like "Web of Data" and "Linked Data," although the definitions and connections among these concepts are often unclear. Based on a qualitative approach built over a literature review, a definition of SW is presented, discussing the related concepts sometimes used as synonyms. It concludes that the SW is a comprehensive and ambitious construct that includes the great purpose of making the web a global database. It also follows the specifications developed and/or associated with its operationalization and the necessary procedures for the connection of data in an open format on the web. The goals of this comprehensive SW are the union of two outcomes still tenuously connected: the virtually unlimited possibility of connections between data-the web domain-with the potentiality of the automated inference of "intelligent" systems-the semantic component.

0.0077351844 = product of:
  0.030940738 = sum of:
    0.030940738 = product of:
      0.061881475 = sum of:
        0.061881475 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061881475 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13328442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 9.2007 15:41:14

0.0077351844 = product of:
  0.030940738 = sum of:
    0.030940738 = product of:
      0.061881475 = sum of:
        0.061881475 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061881475 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13328442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 9.2007 15:41:14

0.0070767016 = product of:
  0.028306806 = sum of:
    0.028306806 = product of:
      0.056613613 = sum of:
        0.056613613 = weight(_text_:intelligent in 4401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056613613 = score(doc=4401,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21440355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.26405165 = fieldWeight in 4401, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4401)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

With the current changes driven by the expansion of the World Wide Web, this book uses a different approach from other books on the market: it applies ontologies to electronically available information to improve the quality of knowledge management in large and distributed organizations. Ontologies are formal theories supporting knowledge sharing and reuse. They can be used to explicitly represent semantics of semi-structured information. These enable sophisticated automatic support for acquiring, maintaining and accessing information. Methodology and tools are developed for intelligent access to large volumes of semi-structured and textual information sources in intra- and extra-, and internet-based environments to employ the full power of ontologies in supporting knowledge management from the information client perspective and the information provider. The aim of the book is to support efficient and effective knowledge management and focuses on weakly-structured online information sources. It is aimed primarily at researchers in the area of knowledge management and information retrieval and will also be a useful reference for students in computer science at the postgraduate level and for business managers who are aiming to increase the corporations' information infrastructure. The Semantic Web is a very important initiative affecting the future of the WWW that is currently generating huge interest. The book covers several highly significant contributions to the semantic web research effort, including a new language for defining ontologies, several novel software tools and a coherent methodology for the application of the tools for business advantage. It also provides 3 case studies which give examples of the real benefits to be derived from the adoption of semantic-web based ontologies in "real world" situations. As such, the book is an excellent mixture of theory, tools and applications in an important area of WWW research. * Provides guidelines for introducing knowledge management concepts and tools into enterprises, to help knowledge providers present their knowledge efficiently and effectively. * Introduces an intelligent search tool that supports users in accessing information and a tool environment for maintenance, conversion and acquisition of information sources. * Discusses three large case studies which will help to develop the technology according to the actual needs of large and or virtual organisations and will provide a testbed for evaluating tools and methods. The book is aimed at people with at least a good understanding of existing WWW technology and some level of technical understanding of the underpinning technologies (XML/RDF). It will be of interest to graduate students, academic and industrial researchers in the field, and the many industrial personnel who are tracking WWW technology developments in order to understand the business implications. It could also be used to support undergraduate courses in the area but is not itself an introductory text.

0.006671978 = product of:
  0.026687913 = sum of:
    0.026687913 = product of:
      0.053375825 = sum of:
        0.053375825 = weight(_text_:intelligent in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053375825 = score(doc=3000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21440355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.24895029 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Six years ago in this magazine, Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler and Ora Lassila unveiled a nascent vision of the Semantic Web: a highly interconnected network of data that could be easily accessed and understood by any desktop or handheld machine. They painted a future of intelligent software agents that would head out on the World Wide Web and automatically book flights and hotels for our trips, update our medical records and give us a single, customized answer to a particular question without our having to search for information or pore through results. They also presented the young technologies that would make this vision come true: a common language for representing data that could be understood by all kinds of software agents; ontologies--sets of statements--that translate information from disparate databases into common terms; and rules that allow software agents to reason about the information described in those terms. The data format, ontologies and reasoning software would operate like one big application on the World Wide Web, analyzing all the raw data stored in online databases as well as all the data about the text, images, video and communications the Web contained. Like the Web itself, the Semantic Web would grow in a grassroots fashion, only this time aided by working groups within the World Wide Web Consortium, which helps to advance the global medium. Since then skeptics have said the Semantic Web would be too difficult for people to understand or exploit. Not so. The enabling technologies have come of age. A vibrant community of early adopters has agreed on standards that have steadily made the Semantic Web practical to use. Large companies have major projects under way that will greatly improve the efficiencies of in-house operations and of scientific research. Other firms are using the Semantic Web to enhance business-to-business interactions and to build the hidden data-processing structures, or back ends, behind new consumer services. And like an iceberg, the tip of this large body of work is emerging in direct consumer applications, too.

0.006671978 = product of:
  0.026687913 = sum of:
    0.026687913 = product of:
      0.053375825 = sum of:
        0.053375825 = weight(_text_:intelligent in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053375825 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21440355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.24895029 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

With the terrific growth of data volume and data being produced every second on millions of devices across the globe, there is a desperate need to manage the unstructured data available on web pages efficiently. Semantic Web or also known as Web of Trust structures the scattered data on the Internet according to the needs of the user. It is an extension of the World Wide Web (WWW) which focuses on manipulating web data on behalf of Humans. Due to the ability of the Semantic Web to integrate data from disparate sources and hence makes it more user-friendly, it is an emerging trend. Tim Berners-Lee first introduced the term Semantic Web and since then it has come a long way to become a more intelligent and intuitive web. Data Visualization plays an essential role in explaining complex concepts in a universal manner through pictorial representation, and the Semantic Web helps in broadening the potential of Data Visualization and thus making it an appropriate combination. The objective of this chapter is to provide fundamental insights concerning the semantic web technologies and in addition to that it also elucidates the issues as well as the solutions regarding the semantic web. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight the semantic web architecture in detail while also comparing it with the traditional search system. It classifies the semantic web architecture into three major pillars i.e. RDF, Ontology, and XML. Moreover, it describes different semantic web tools used in the framework and technology. It attempts to illustrate different approaches of the semantic web search engines. Besides stating numerous challenges faced by the semantic web it also illustrates the solutions.

0.006445987 = product of:
  0.025783949 = sum of:
    0.025783949 = product of:
      0.051567897 = sum of:
        0.051567897 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051567897 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13328442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

0.005837981 = product of:
  0.023351924 = sum of:
    0.023351924 = product of:
      0.04670385 = sum of:
        0.04670385 = weight(_text_:intelligent in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04670385 = score(doc=5903,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21440355 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.2178315 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.633102 = idf(docFreq=429, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

RDF - the Resource Description Framework - is a foundation for processing metadata; it provides interoperability between applications that exchange machine-understandable information on the Web. RDF emphasizes facilities to enable automated processing of Web resources. RDF metadata can be used in a variety of application areas; for example: in resource discovery to provide better search engine capabilities; in cataloging for describing the content and content relationships available at a particular Web site, page, or digital library; by intelligent software agents to facilitate knowledge sharing and exchange; in content rating; in describing collections of pages that represent a single logical "document"; for describing intellectual property rights of Web pages, and in many others. RDF with digital signatures will be key to building the "Web of Trust" for electronic commerce, collaboration, and other applications. Metadata is "data about data" or specifically in the context of RDF "data describing web resources." The distinction between "data" and "metadata" is not an absolute one; it is a distinction created primarily by a particular application. Many times the same resource will be interpreted in both ways simultaneously. RDF encourages this view by using XML as the encoding syntax for the metadata. The resources being described by RDF are, in general, anything that can be named via a URI. The broad goal of RDF is to define a mechanism for describing resources that makes no assumptions about a particular application domain, nor defines the semantics of any application domain. The definition of the mechanism should be domain neutral, yet the mechanism should be suitable for describing information about any domain. This document introduces a model for representing RDF metadata and one syntax for expressing and transporting this metadata in a manner that maximizes the interoperability of independently developed web servers and clients. The syntax described in this document is best considered as a "serialization syntax" for the underlying RDF representation model. The serialization syntax is XML, XML being the W3C's work-in-progress to define a richer Web syntax for a variety of applications. RDF and XML are complementary; there will be alternate ways to represent the same RDF data model, some more suitable for direct human authoring. Future work may lead to including such alternatives in this document.

0.0053588524 = product of:
  0.02143541 = sum of:
    0.02143541 = product of:
      0.06430623 = sum of:
        0.06430623 = weight(_text_:k in 4169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06430623 = score(doc=4169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 4169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4169)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.0053588524 = product of:
  0.02143541 = sum of:
    0.02143541 = product of:
      0.06430623 = sum of:
        0.06430623 = weight(_text_:k in 803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06430623 = score(doc=803,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038061365 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 803, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=803)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)