Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

0.013406853 = product of:
  0.04022056 = sum of:
    0.04022056 = product of:
      0.08044112 = sum of:
        0.08044112 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08044112 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14850806 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 6.2015 16:08:38

0.00812578 = product of:
  0.02437734 = sum of:
    0.02437734 = product of:
      0.04875468 = sum of:
        0.04875468 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04875468 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14850806 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.

0.0023098178 = product of:
  0.006929453 = sum of:
    0.006929453 = product of:
      0.034647264 = sum of:
        0.034647264 = weight(_text_:2 in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034647264 = score(doc=3563,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.33081776 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Wir beschreiben den Digitalen Assistenten DA-2, den wir zur Unterstützung der Sacherschliessung im IBS-Verbund implementiert haben. Diese webbasierte Anwendung ist eine vollständige Neuimplementierung, welche die Erkenntnisse des Vorgängersystems bei der Zentralbibliothek Zürich berücksichtigt. Wir stellen Überlegungen zur Zukunft der Sacherschliessung an und geben eine Übersicht über Projekte mit ähnlichen Zielsetzungen, die Sacherschließung mit Computerunterstützung effizienter und besser zu gestalten.

Object

DA-2

0.0013335737 = product of:
  0.004000721 = sum of:
    0.004000721 = product of:
      0.020003606 = sum of:
        0.020003606 = weight(_text_:2 in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020003606 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 2(2015) Nr.4, S.161-175

0.0011430632 = product of:
  0.0034291893 = sum of:
    0.0034291893 = product of:
      0.017145947 = sum of:
        0.017145947 = weight(_text_:2 in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017145947 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Assistive technology, especially for persons with disabilities, increasingly relies on electronic communication among users, between users and their devices, and among these devices. Making such ICT accessible and inclusive often requires remedial programming, which tends to be costly or even impossible. We, therefore, aim at more interoperable devices, services accessing these devices, and content delivered by these services, at the levels of 1. data and metadata, 2. datamodels and data modelling methods and 3. metamodels as well as a meta ontology language. Even though ontologies are widely being used to enable content interoperability, there is currently no unified framework for ontology interoperability itself. This paper outlines the design considerations underlying OntoIOp (Ontology Integration and Interoperability), a new standardisation activity in ISO/TC 37/SC 3 to become an international standard, which aims at filling this gap.

0.0011430632 = product of:
  0.0034291893 = sum of:
    0.0034291893 = product of:
      0.017145947 = sum of:
        0.017145947 = weight(_text_:2 in 2113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017145947 = score(doc=2113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 2113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2113)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

For some years mapping has been one of the main tasks in the EDUG member countries. While the ISO standard on mapping and interoperability with other vocabularies (ISO 25964-2) gives some advice on creating mappings between a thesaurus and e.g. a classification system, it does not deal with Dewey Decimal Classification specifically. The EDUG members have felt a growing need to discuss and record the knowledge acquired in mapping projects where either the source or the target vocabulary is DDC. The recommendations below are the result of a seminar on mapping in connection with the EDUG annual meeting in April 2015. The recommendations are not exhaustive and will be subject to change as EDUG members gain more experience in this field of work. We still hope that institutions planning to embark on a mapping project to/from DDC, may find the guidelines helpful.

0.0011430632 = product of:
  0.0034291893 = sum of:
    0.0034291893 = product of:
      0.017145947 = sum of:
        0.017145947 = weight(_text_:2 in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017145947 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 4(2017) Nr.2, S.1-13

9.5255265E-4 = product of:
  0.0028576578 = sum of:
    0.0028576578 = product of:
      0.0142882895 = sum of:
        0.0142882895 = weight(_text_:2 in 603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0142882895 = score(doc=603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=603)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Despite the progress made, one of the main barriers towards the use of semantics is the lack of background knowledge. Dealing with this problem has turned out to be a very difficult task because on the one hand the background knowledge should be very large and virtually unbound and, on the other hand, it should be context sensitive and able to capture the diversity of the world, for instance in terms of language and knowledge. Our proposed solution consists in addressing the problem in three steps: (1) create an extensible diversity-aware knowledge base providing a continuously growing quantity of properly organized knowledge; (2) given the problem, build at run-time the proper context within which perform the reasoning; (3) solve the problem. Our work is based on two key ideas. The first is that of using domains, i.e. a general semantic-aware methodology and technique for structuring the background knowledge. The second is that of building the context of reasoning by a suitable combination of domains. Our goal in this paper is to introduce the overall approach, show how it can be applied to an important use case, i.e. the matching of classifications, and describe our first steps towards the construction of a large scale diversity-aware knowledge base.

9.5255265E-4 = product of:
  0.0028576578 = sum of:
    0.0028576578 = product of:
      0.0142882895 = sum of:
        0.0142882895 = weight(_text_:2 in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0142882895 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Object

ISO 25964-2

6.6678686E-4 = product of:
  0.0020003605 = sum of:
    0.0020003605 = product of:
      0.010001803 = sum of:
        0.010001803 = weight(_text_:2 in 4205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010001803 = score(doc=4205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.09549886 = fieldWeight in 4205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4205)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Since the 90s, we have seen an explosion of information and with it there is an increase in the need for data and information aggregation systems that store and manage information. However, most of the information sources apply different Knowledge Organizations Systems (KOS) to describe the content of stored data. This heterogeneous mix of KOS in different systems complicate access and seamless sharing of information and knowledge. Concordances also known as cross-concordances or terminology mappings map different (KOS) to each other for improvement of information retrieval in such heterogeneous mix of systems. (Mayr 2010, Keil 2012). Also for coherent indexing with different terminologies, mappings are considered to be a valuable and essential working tool. However, despite efforts at standardization (e.g. SKOS, ISO 25964-2, Keil 2012, Soergel 2011); there is a significant scarcity of concordances that has led an inability to establish uniform exchange formats as well as methods and tools for maintaining mappings and making them easily accessible. This is particularly true in the field of library classification schemes. In essence, there is a lack of infrastructure for provision/exchange of concordances, their management and quality assessment as well as tools that would enable semi-automatic generation of mappings. The project "coli-conc" therefore aims to address this gap by creating the necessary infrastructure. This includes the specification of a data format for exchange of concordances (JSKOS), specification and implementation of web APIs to query concordance databases (JSKOS-API), and a modular web application to enable uniform access to knowledge organization systems, concordances and concordance assessments (Cocoda).

4.7627633E-4 = product of:
  0.0014288289 = sum of:
    0.0014288289 = product of:
      0.0071441447 = sum of:
        0.0071441447 = weight(_text_:2 in 3370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071441447 = score(doc=3370,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.06821347 = fieldWeight in 3370, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3370)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Precombined subjects, such as those shown above from Dewey, may be expressed in UDC Summary as examples of combination within various records. To express an exact match UDC class 07 has to contain example of combination 07(7) Journals. The Press - North America. In some cases we have, therefore, added examples to UDC Summary that represent exact match to Dewey Summaries. It is unfortunate that DDC has so many classes on the top level that deal with a selection of countries or languages that are given a preferred status in the scheme, and repeating these preferences in examples of combinations of UDC emulates an unwelcome cultural bias which we have to balance out somehow. This brings us to another challenge.. UDC 913(7) Regional Geography - North America [contains 2 concepts each of which has its URI] is an exact match to Dewey 917 [represented as one concept, 1 URI]. It seems that, because they represent an exact match to Dewey numbers, these UDC examples of combinations may also need a separate URIs so that they can be published as SKOS data. Albeit challenging, mapping proves to be a very useful exercise and I am looking forward to future work here especially in relation to our plans to map UDC Summary to Colon Classification. We are discussing this project with colleagues from DRTC in Bangalore (India)."