Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Balakrishnan, U.: DFG-Projekt: Coli-conc : das Mapping Tool "Cocoda" (2016) 0.02 
    0.016684972 = product of:
  0.04588367 = sum of:
    0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 3036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031240587 = score(doc=3036,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3036, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3036)
    0.01478779 = product of:
      0.05915116 = sum of:
        0.05915116 = weight(_text_:o in 3036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05915116 = score(doc=3036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.4434698 = fieldWeight in 3036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3036)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 3036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=3036,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3036, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3036)
    0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 3036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025194194 = score(doc=3036,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 3036, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3036)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 3(2016) Nr.1, S.11-16
    Type
    a
  2. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic-Web-Technologie (2015) 0.01 
    0.0147756655 = product of:
  0.04063308 = sum of:
    0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027335514 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
    0.012939317 = product of:
      0.05175727 = sum of:
        0.05175727 = weight(_text_:o in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05175727 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.38803607 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022529786 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 2(2015) Nr.4, S.161-175
    Type
    a
  3. Suchowolec, K.; Lang, C.; Schneider, R.: Re-designing online terminology resources for German grammar (2016) 0.01 
    0.01470862 = product of:
  0.040448703 = sum of:
    0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0039050733 = score(doc=3108,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
    0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016092705 = score(doc=3108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=3108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
    0.018714907 = weight(_text_:k in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018714907 = score(doc=3108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Abstract
    The compilation of terminological vocabularies plays a central role in the organization and retrieval of scientific texts. Both simple keyword lists as well as sophisticated modellings of relationships between terminological concepts can make a most valuable contribution to the analysis, classification, and finding of appropriate digital documents, either on the Web or within local repositories. This seems especially true for long-established scientific fields with various theoretical and historical branches, such as linguistics, where the use of terminology within documents from different origins is sometimes far from being consistent. In this short paper, we report on the early stages of a project that aims at the re-design of an existing domain-specific KOS for grammatical content grammis. In particular, we deal with the terminological part of grammis and present the state-of-the-art of this online resource as well as the key re-design principles. Further, we propose questions regarding ramifications of the Linked Open Data and Semantic Web approaches for our re-design decisions.
    Pages
    S.59-63
    Type
    a
  4. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.01 
    0.012776819 = product of:
  0.070272505 = sum of:
    0.045059573 = weight(_text_:r in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045059573 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
    0.025212929 = product of:
      0.050425857 = sum of:
        0.050425857 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050425857 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  5. Hinrichs, I.; Milmeister, G.; Schäuble, P.; Steenweg, H.: Computerunterstützte Sacherschließung mit dem Digitalen Assistenten (DA-2) (2016) 0.01 
    0.010839418 = product of:
  0.029808398 = sum of:
    0.006345466 = product of:
      0.012690932 = sum of:
        0.012690932 = weight(_text_:h in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012690932 = score(doc=3563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027335514 = score(doc=3563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
    0.018298957 = product of:
      0.07319583 = sum of:
        0.07319583 = weight(_text_:o in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07319583 = score(doc=3563,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.5487659 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=3563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Content
    https://www.o-bib.de/article/view/2016H4S156-185. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2016H4S144-155 . Vortrag, Leipziger Bibliothekskongresses 2016.
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 3(2016) Nr.4, S.156-185
    Type
    a
  6. Suominen, O.; Hyvönen, N.: From MARC silos to Linked Data silos? (2017) 0.01 
    0.006446229 = product of:
  0.023636172 = sum of:
    0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0023430442 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
    0.019209906 = product of:
      0.076839626 = sum of:
        0.076839626 = weight(_text_:o in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076839626 = score(doc=3732,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.57608426 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020832212 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Content
    https://www.o-bib.de/article/view/2017H2S1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2017H2S1-13.
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 4(2017) Nr.2, S.1-13
    Type
    a
  7. Bastos Vieira, S.; DeBrito, M.; Mustafa El Hadi, W.; Zumer, M.: Developing imaged KOS with the FRSAD Model : a conceptual methodology (2016) 0.01 
    0.0051739053 = product of:
  0.018970985 = sum of:
    0.0041327416 = weight(_text_:a in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0041327416 = score(doc=3109,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.13482209 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
    0.012874164 = weight(_text_:r in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012874164 = score(doc=3109,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
    0.00196408 = weight(_text_:s in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00196408 = score(doc=3109,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    This proposal presents the methodology of indexing with images suggested by De Brito and Caribé (2015). The imagetic model is used as a compatible mechanism with FRSAD for a global information share and use of subject data, both within the library sector and beyond. The conceptual model of imagetic indexing shows how images are related to topics and 'key-images' are interpreted as nomens to implement the FRSAD model. Indexing with images consists of using images instead of key-words or descriptors, to represent and organize information. Implementing the imaged navigation in OPACs denotes multiple advantages derived from this rethinking the OPAC anew, since we are looking forward to sharing concepts within the subject authority data. Images, carrying linguistic objects, permeate inter-social and cultural concepts. In practice it includes translated metadata, symmetrical multilingual thesaurus, or any traditional indexing tools. iOPAC embodies efforts focused on conceptual levels as expected from librarians. Imaged interfaces are more intuitive since users do not need specific training for information retrieval, offering easier comprehension of indexing codes, larger conceptual portability of descriptors (as images), and a better interoperability between discourse codes and indexing competences affecting positively social and cultural interoperability. The imagetic methodology deploys R&D fields for more suitable interfaces taking into consideration users with specific needs such as deafness and illiteracy. This methodology arouse questions about the paradigms of the primacy of orality in information systems and pave the way to a legitimacy of multiple perspectives in document indexing by suggesting a more universal communication system based on images. Interdisciplinarity in neurosciences, linguistics and information sciences would be desirable competencies for further investigations about he nature of cognitive processes in information organization and classification while developing assistive KOS for individuals with communication problems, such autism and deafness.
    Pages
    S.36-47
    Type
    a
  8. Bandholtz, T.; Schulte-Coerne, T.; Glaser, R.; Fock, J.; Keller, T.: iQvoc - open source SKOS(XL) maintenance and publishing tool (2010) 0.00 
    0.00495717 = product of:
  0.027264437 = sum of:
    0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0047346503 = score(doc=604,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
    0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022529786 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    iQvoc is a new open source SKOS-XL vocabulary management tool developed by the Federal Environment Agency, Germany, and innoQ Deutschland GmbH. Its immediate purpose is maintaining and publishing reference vocabularies in the upcoming Linked Data cloud of environmental information, but it may be easily adapted to host any SKOS- XL compliant vocabulary. iQvoc is implemented as a Ruby on Rails application running on top of JRuby - the Java implementation of the Ruby Programming Language. To increase the user experience when editing content, iQvoc uses heavily the JavaScript library jQuery.
    Type
    a
  9. Szostak, R.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Comparative approaches to interdisciplinary KOSs : use cases of converting UDC to BCC (2017) 0.00 
    0.00495717 = product of:
  0.027264437 = sum of:
    0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 3874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0047346503 = score(doc=3874,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 3874, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3874)
    0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 3874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022529786 = score(doc=3874,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 3874, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3874)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    We take a small sample of works and compare how these are classified within both the Universal Decimal Classification and the Basic concepts Classification. We examine notational length, expressivity, network effects, and the number of subject strings. One key finding is that BCC typically synthesizes many more terms than UDC in classifying a particular document - but the length of classificatory notations is roughly equivalent for the two KOSs. BCC captures documents with fewer subject strings (generally one) but these are more complex.
    Type
    a
  10. Kempf, A.O.; Ritze, D.; Eckert, K.; Zapilko, B.: New ways of mapping knowledge organization systems : using a semi­automatic matching­procedure for building up vocabulary crosswalks (2013) 0.00 
    0.0048211203 = product of:
  0.02651616 = sum of:
    0.0040582716 = weight(_text_:a in 989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0040582716 = score(doc=989,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 989, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=989)
    0.022457888 = weight(_text_:k in 989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022457888 = score(doc=989,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 989, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=989)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Crosswalks between different vocabularies are an indispensable prerequisite for integrated and high quality search scenarios in distributed data environments. Offered through the web and linked with each other they act as a central link so that users can move back and forth between different data sources available online. In the past, crosswalks between different thesauri have primarily been developed manually. In the long run the intellectual updating of such crosswalks requires huge personnel expenses. Therefore, an integration of automatic matching procedures, as for example Ontology Matching Tools, seems an obvious need. On the basis of computer generated correspondences between the Thesaurus for Economics (STW) and the Thesaurus for the Social Sciences (TheSoz) our contribution will explore cross-border approaches between IT-assisted tools and procedures on the one hand and external quality measurements via domain experts on the other hand. The techniques that emerge enable semi-automatically performed vocabulary crosswalks.
    Type
    a
  11. Göldner, R.: Datenaustauschformate : Erfahrungen und Schlüsse aus ADeX (2010) 0.00 
    0.004681514 = product of:
  0.051496655 = sum of:
    0.051496655 = weight(_text_:r in 2435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051496655 = score(doc=2435,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 2435, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2435)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
  12. Busch, D.: Organisation eines Thesaurus für die Unterstützung der mehrsprachigen Suche in einer bibliographischen Datenbank im Bereich Planen und Bauen (2016) 0.00 
    0.004570701 = product of:
  0.016759237 = sum of:
    0.0019525366 = weight(_text_:a in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0019525366 = score(doc=3308,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
    0.013070684 = product of:
      0.052282736 = sum of:
        0.052282736 = weight(_text_:o in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052282736 = score(doc=3308,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.39197564 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=3308,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Content
    https://www.o-bib.de/article/view/2016H4S202-216. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2016H4S202-216. Vortrag, Leipziger Bibliothekskongresses 2016.
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 3(2016) Nr.4, S.202-216
    Type
    a
  13. Shaw, R.; Rabinowitz, A.; Golden, P.; Kansa, E.: Report on and demonstration of the PeriodO period gazetteer (2015) 0.00 
    0.0045546377 = product of:
  0.025050508 = sum of:
    0.0057392623 = weight(_text_:a in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0057392623 = score(doc=2249,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
    0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019311246 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    The PeriodO period gazetteer documents definitions of historical period names. Each entry of the gazetteer identifies the definition of a single period. To be included in the gazetteer, a definition must a) give the period a name, b) impose some temporal bounds on the period, c) have some implicit or explicit association with a geographical region, and d) have been formally or informally published in some citable source. Much care has been put into giving period definitions stable identifiers that can be resolved to RDF representations of period definitions. Anyone can propose additions of new definitions to PeriodO, and we have implemented an open source web service and browser-based client for distributed versioning and collaborative maintenance of the gazetteer.
  14. Manguinhas, H.; Charles, V.; Isaac, A.; Miles, T.; Lima, A.; Neroulidis, A.; Ginouves, V.; Atsidis, D.; Hildebrand, M.; Brinkerink, M.; Gordea, S.: Linking subject labels in cultural heritage metadata to MIMO vocabulary using CultuurLink (2016) 0.00 
    0.0038520962 = product of:
  0.0141243525 = sum of:
    0.0054389704 = product of:
      0.010877941 = sum of:
        0.010877941 = weight(_text_:h in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010877941 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0057392623 = weight(_text_:a in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0057392623 = score(doc=3107,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
    0.00294612 = weight(_text_:s in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00294612 = score(doc=3107,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    The Europeana Sounds project aims to increase the amount of cultural audio content in Europeana. It also strongly focuses on enriching the metadata records that are aggregated by Europeana. To provide metadata to Europeana, Data Providers are asked to convert their records from the format and model they use internally to a specific profile of the Europeana Data Model (EDM) for sound resources. These metadata include subjects, which typically use a vocabulary internal to each partner.
    Pages
    S.32-35
    Type
    a
  15. Gulbrandsen, A.D.; Heggø, D.M.O.; Knutsen, U.; Seland, G.: Towards a general Norwegian thesaurus? : Subproject Methodology for mapping Humord to WebDewey (2015) 0.00 
    0.0038022362 = product of:
  0.020912299 = sum of:
    0.0051659266 = weight(_text_:a in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051659266 = score(doc=1827,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
    0.015746372 = weight(_text_:u in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015746372 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    The one-year pilot project Methodology for mapping Humord to WebDewey at the University of Oslo Library (henceforth abbreviated UiO Library) was a sub-project of the larger project Towards a general Norwegian thesaurus? The results of the project were reported to the National Library of Norway in March. The project has received new funding and is prolonged as the two-year project Mapping to Norwegian WebDewey. The present document provides a presentation of the mapping project at the UiO Library, at the point when we closed the pilot and continued our efforts in the prolonged project. The paper is largely a translation of the pilot project report as per March 1st 2015, enriched with some updates and comments. It is indeed an intellectual work in progress, so the discussions, opinions and solutions presented below are under constant debate and review in our project group. This "state of the art" description of our challenges in mapping a thesaurus to WebDewey is intended as a starting point for our joint discussions at the EDUG seminar in Naples.
  16. Haffner, A.: Internationalisierung der GND durch das Semantic Web (2012) 0.00 
    0.0037764222 = product of:
  0.013846881 = sum of:
    0.0013667757 = weight(_text_:a in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0013667757 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.044588212 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
    0.011264893 = weight(_text_:r in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011264893 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.12800737 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
    0.0012152124 = weight(_text_:s in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0012152124 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.04204337 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Pages
    21 S
    Type
    r
  17. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.00 
    0.0033808928 = product of:
  0.01859491 = sum of:
    0.0033135647 = weight(_text_:a in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033135647 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.015281344 = product of:
      0.030562688 = sum of:
        0.030562688 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030562688 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Type
    a
  18. Balakrishnan, U.; Krausz, A,; Voss, J.: Cocoda - ein Konkordanztool für bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme (2015) 0.00 
    0.0032179835 = product of:
  0.017698908 = sum of:
    0.0019525366 = weight(_text_:a in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0019525366 = score(doc=2030,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
    0.015746372 = weight(_text_:u in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015746372 = score(doc=2030,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
  19. Lange, C.; Mossakowski, T.; Galinski, C.; Kutz, O.: Making heterogeneous ontologies interoperable through standardisation : a Meta Ontology Language to be standardised: Ontology Integration and Interoperability (OntoIOp) (2011) 0.00 
    0.0028685331 = product of:
  0.015776932 = sum of:
    0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0046860883 = score(doc=50,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
    0.011090843 = product of:
      0.044363372 = sum of:
        0.044363372 = weight(_text_:o in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044363372 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.33260235 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Assistive technology, especially for persons with disabilities, increasingly relies on electronic communication among users, between users and their devices, and among these devices. Making such ICT accessible and inclusive often requires remedial programming, which tends to be costly or even impossible. We, therefore, aim at more interoperable devices, services accessing these devices, and content delivered by these services, at the levels of 1. data and metadata, 2. datamodels and data modelling methods and 3. metamodels as well as a meta ontology language. Even though ontologies are widely being used to enable content interoperability, there is currently no unified framework for ontology interoperability itself. This paper outlines the design considerations underlying OntoIOp (Ontology Integration and Interoperability), a new standardisation activity in ISO/TC 37/SC 3 to become an international standard, which aims at filling this gap.
    Type
    a
  20. Balakrishnan, U.; Voß, J.: ¬The Cocoda mapping tool (2015) 0.00 
    0.0027495977 = product of:
  0.015122787 = sum of:
    0.0041003274 = weight(_text_:a in 4205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0041003274 = score(doc=4205,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.13376464 = fieldWeight in 4205, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4205)
    0.01102246 = weight(_text_:u in 4205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01102246 = score(doc=4205,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.12662244 = fieldWeight in 4205, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4205)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Since the 90s, we have seen an explosion of information and with it there is an increase in the need for data and information aggregation systems that store and manage information. However, most of the information sources apply different Knowledge Organizations Systems (KOS) to describe the content of stored data. This heterogeneous mix of KOS in different systems complicate access and seamless sharing of information and knowledge. Concordances also known as cross-concordances or terminology mappings map different (KOS) to each other for improvement of information retrieval in such heterogeneous mix of systems. (Mayr 2010, Keil 2012). Also for coherent indexing with different terminologies, mappings are considered to be a valuable and essential working tool. However, despite efforts at standardization (e.g. SKOS, ISO 25964-2, Keil 2012, Soergel 2011); there is a significant scarcity of concordances that has led an inability to establish uniform exchange formats as well as methods and tools for maintaining mappings and making them easily accessible. This is particularly true in the field of library classification schemes. In essence, there is a lack of infrastructure for provision/exchange of concordances, their management and quality assessment as well as tools that would enable semi-automatic generation of mappings. The project "coli-conc" therefore aims to address this gap by creating the necessary infrastructure. This includes the specification of a data format for exchange of concordances (JSKOS), specification and implementation of web APIs to query concordance databases (JSKOS-API), and a modular web application to enable uniform access to knowledge organization systems, concordances and concordance assessments (Cocoda).
    The focus of the project "coli-conc" lies in semi-automatic creation of mappings between different KOS in general and the two important library classification schemes in particular - Dewey classification system (DDC) and Regensburg classification system (RVK). In the year 2000, the national libraries of Germany, Austria and Switzerland adopted DDC in an endeavor to develop a nation-wide classification scheme. But historically, in the German speaking regions, the academic libraries have been using their own home-grown systems, the most prominent and popular being the RVK. However, with the launch of DDC, building concordances between DDC and RVK has become an imperative, although it is still rare. The delay in building comprehensive concordances between these two systems has been because of major challenges posed by the sheer largeness of these two systems (38.000 classes in DDC and ca. 860.000 classes in RVK), the strong disparity in their respective structure, the variation in the perception and representation of the concepts. The challenge is compounded geometrically for any manual attempt in this direction. Although there have been efforts on automatic mappings (OAEI Library Track 2012 -- 2014 and e.g. Pfeffer 2013) in the recent years; such concordances carry the risks of inaccurate mappings, and the approaches are rather more suitable for mapping suggestions than for automatic generation of concordances (Lauser 2008; Reiner 2010). The project "coli-conc" will facilitate the creation, evaluation, and reuse of mappings with a public collection of concordances and a web application of mapping management. The proposed presentation will give an introduction to the tools and standards created and planned in the project "coli-conc". This includes preliminary work on DDC concordances (Balakrishnan 2013), an overview of the software concept, technical architecture (Voß 2015) and a demonstration of the Cocoda web application.

Authors

Languages

  • e 31
  • d 10
  • no 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 20
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes