Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Candela, G.: ¬An automatic data quality approach to assess semantic data from cultural heritage institutions (2023) 0.15
    0.1484918 = product of:
      0.2969836 = sum of:
        0.2376742 = weight(_text_:assess in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2376742 = score(doc=997,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.36863554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.64474034 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
        0.059309397 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059309397 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, cultural heritage institutions have been exploring the benefits of applying Linked Open Data to their catalogs and digital materials. Innovative and creative methods have emerged to publish and reuse digital contents to promote computational access, such as the concepts of Labs and Collections as Data. Data quality has become a requirement for researchers and training methods based on artificial intelligence and machine learning. This article explores how the quality of Linked Open Data made available by cultural heritage institutions can be automatically assessed. The results obtained can be useful for other institutions who wish to publish and assess their collections.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:23:31
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.06
    0.06207739 = product of:
      0.24830955 = sum of:
        0.24830955 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24830955 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5301813 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Marcondes, C.H.: Towards a vocabulary to implement culturally relevant relationships between digital collections in heritage institutions (2020) 0.01
    0.010590964 = product of:
      0.042363856 = sum of:
        0.042363856 = weight(_text_:22 in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042363856 = score(doc=5757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    4. 3.2020 14:22:41

Languages

Types