Search (233 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Zeng, M.L.: Interoperability (2019) 0.13 
    0.1344653 = product of:
  0.17928708 = sum of:
    0.022178162 = weight(_text_:information in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022178162 = score(doc=5232,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
    0.101087205 = weight(_text_:standards in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.101087205 = score(doc=5232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
    0.056021713 = product of:
      0.112043425 = sum of:
        0.112043425 = weight(_text_:organization in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112043425 = score(doc=5232,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.5458315 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    Interoperability refers to the ability of two or more systems or components to exchange information and to use the information that has been exchanged. This article presents the major viewpoints of interoperability, with the focus on semantic interoperability. It discusses the approaches to achieving interoperability as demonstrated in standards and best practices, projects, and products in the broad domain of knowledge organization.
    Series
    Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 46(2019) no.2, S.122-146
  2. Rocha Souza, R.; Lemos, D.: a comparative analysis : Knowledge organization systems for the representation of multimedia resources on the Web (2020) 0.12 
    0.12074791 = product of:
  0.16099721 = sum of:
    0.011761746 = weight(_text_:information in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011761746 = score(doc=5993,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
    0.107219175 = weight(_text_:standards in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.107219175 = score(doc=5993,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.41783947 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
    0.042016286 = product of:
      0.08403257 = sum of:
        0.08403257 = weight(_text_:organization in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08403257 = score(doc=5993,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    The lack of standardization in the production, organization and dissemination of information in documentation centers and institutions alike, as a result from the digitization of collections and their availability on the internet has called for integration efforts. The sheer availability of multimedia content has fostered the development of many distinct and, most of the time, independent metadata standards for its description. This study aims at presenting and comparing the existing standards of metadata, vocabularies and ontologies for multimedia annotation and also tries to offer a synthetic overview of its main strengths and weaknesses, aiding efforts for semantic integration and enhancing the findability of available multimedia resources on the web. We also aim at unveiling the characteristics that could, should and are perhaps not being highlighted in the characterization of multimedia resources.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 47(2020) no.4, S.300-319
  3. Sieglerschmidt, J.: Convergence of internet services in the cultural heritage sector : the long way to common vocabularies, metadata formats, ontologies (2008) 0.10 
    0.102316216 = product of:
  0.13642162 = sum of:
    0.026300065 = weight(_text_:information in 1686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026300065 = score(doc=1686,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1686, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1686)
    0.0758154 = weight(_text_:standards in 1686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0758154 = score(doc=1686,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 1686, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1686)
    0.034306154 = product of:
      0.06861231 = sum of:
        0.06861231 = weight(_text_:organization in 1686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06861231 = score(doc=1686,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 1686, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    Since several years it has been observed that information offered by different knowledge producing institutions on the internet is more and more interlinked. This tendency will increase, because the fragmented information offers on the internet make the retrieval of information difficult as even impossible. At the same time the quantity of information offered on the internet grows exponentially in Europe - and elsewhere - due to many digitization projects. Insofar as funding institutions base the acceptance of projects on the observation of certain documentation standards the knowledge created will be retrievable and will remain so for a longer time. Otherwise the retrieval of information will become a matter of chance due to the limits of fragmented, knowledge producing social groups.
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  4. Stempfhuber, M.; Zapilko, B.: Modelling text-fact-integration in digital libraries (2009) 0.09 
    0.09478018 = product of:
  0.12637357 = sum of:
    0.026300065 = weight(_text_:information in 3393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026300065 = score(doc=3393,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 3393, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3393)
    0.0758154 = weight(_text_:standards in 3393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0758154 = score(doc=3393,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 3393, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3393)
    0.024258113 = product of:
      0.048516225 = sum of:
        0.048516225 = weight(_text_:organization in 3393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048516225 = score(doc=3393,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 3393, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3393)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    Digital Libraries currently face the challenge of integrating many different types of research information (e.g. publications, primary data, expert's profiles, institutional profiles, project information etc.) according to their scientific users' needs. To date no general, integrated model for knowledge organization and retrieval in Digital Libraries exists. This causes the problem of structural and semantic heterogeneity due to the wide range of metadata standards, indexing vocabularies and indexing approaches used for different types of information. The research presented in this paper focuses on areas in which activities are being undertaken in the field of Digital Libraries in order to treat semantic interoperability problems. We present a model for the integrated retrieval of factual and textual data which combines multiple approaches to semantic interoperability und sets them into context. Embedded in the research cycle, traditional content indexing methods for publications meet the newer, but rarely used ontology-based approaches which seem to be better suited for representing complex information like the one contained in survey data. The benefits of our model are (1) easy re-use of available knowledge organisation systems and (2) reduced efforts for domain modelling with ontologies.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  5. Garcia Marco, F.J.: Compatibility & heterogeneity in knowledge organization : some reflections around a case study in the field of consumer information (2008) 0.09 
    0.09191519 = product of:
  0.18383038 = sum of:
    0.016976621 = weight(_text_:information in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016976621 = score(doc=1678,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
    0.16685376 = sum of:
      0.12785149 = weight(_text_:organization in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12785149 = score(doc=1678,freq=20.0), product of:
          0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057573788 = queryNorm
          0.6228422 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
            4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
              20.0 = termFreq=20.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
      0.039002266 = weight(_text_:22 in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039002266 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20161359 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057573788 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    A case study in compatibility and heterogeneity of knowledge organization (KO) systems and processes is presented. It is based in the experience of the author in the field of information for consumer protection, a good example of the emerging transdisciplinary applied social sciences. The activities and knowledge organization problems and solutions of the Aragonian Consumers' Information and Documentation Centre are described and analyzed. Six assertions can be concluded: a) heterogeneity and compatibility are certainly an inherent problem in knowledge organization and also in practical domains; b) knowledge organization is also a social task, not only a lögical one; c) knowledge organization is affected by economical and efficiency considerations; d) knowledge organization is at the heart of Knowledge Management; e) identifying and maintaining the focus in interdisciplinary fields is a must; f the different knowledge organization tools of a institution must be considered as an integrated system, pursuing a unifying model.
    Date
    16. 3.2008 18:22:50
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  6. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Overview of ISO NP 25964 : structured vocabularies for information retrieval (2007) 0.09 
    0.09141248 = product of:
  0.1218833 = sum of:
    0.011761746 = weight(_text_:information in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011761746 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
    0.0758154 = weight(_text_:standards in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0758154 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
    0.034306154 = product of:
      0.06861231 = sum of:
        0.06861231 = weight(_text_:organization in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06861231 = score(doc=535,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    ISO 2788 and ISO 5964, the international standards for monolingual and multilingual thesauri respectively dated 1986 and 1985, are very much in need of revision. A proposal to revise them was recently approved by the relevant subcommittee, ISO TC46/SC9. The work will be based on BS 8723, a five part standard of which Parts 1 and 2 were published in 2005, Parts 3 and 4 are scheduled for publication in 2007, and Part 5 is still in draft. This subsession will address aspects of the whole revision project. It is conceived as a panel session starting with a brief overview from the project leader. Then there are three presentations of 15 minutes, plus 5 minutes each for specific questions. At the end we have 20 minutes for questions to any or all of the panel, and discussion of issues from the workshop participants.
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
  7. Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007) 0.08 
    0.084784515 = product of:
  0.16956903 = sum of:
    0.015682328 = weight(_text_:information in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015682328 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
    0.1538867 = sum of:
      0.09148307 = weight(_text_:organization in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09148307 = score(doc=541,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057573788 = queryNorm
          0.44566956 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
      0.062403627 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.062403627 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20161359 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057573788 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In this presentation, we therefore focus on a solution for providing uniform access to Digital Libraries and other online services. In order to enable uniform query access to heterogeneous sources, we must provide metadata interoperability in a way that a query language - in this case SPARQL - can cope with the incompatibility of the metadata in various sources without changing their already existing information models.
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:46
  8. ISO 25964-2: Der Standard für die Interoperabilität von Thesauri (2013) 0.07 
    0.073209494 = product of:
  0.097612664 = sum of:
    0.006861019 = weight(_text_:information in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006861019 = score(doc=772,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.06788416 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
    0.07660108 = weight(_text_:standards in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07660108 = score(doc=772,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.29851896 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
    0.0141505655 = product of:
      0.028301131 = sum of:
        0.028301131 = weight(_text_:organization in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028301131 = score(doc=772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.13787198 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Content
    Der vollständige Titel von Teil 2 lautet "Information and documentation - Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies - Teil 2: Interoperability with other vocabularies". Wichtige Themen, die der Standard behandelt, sind Strukturmodelle für das Mapping, Richtlinien für Mappingtypen und der Umgang mit Präkombination, die besonders bei Klassifikationen, Taxonomien und Schlagwortsystemen vorkommt. Das primäre Augenmerk von ISO 25964 gilt den Thesauri, und mit Ausnahme von Terminologien existieren keine vergleichbaren Standards für die anderen Vokabulartypen. Statt zu versuchen, diese normativ darzustellen, behandelt Teil 2 ausschließlich die Interoperabilität zwischen ihnen und den Thesauri. Die Kapitel für die einzelnen Vokabulartypen decken jeweils folgende Sachverhalte ab: - Schlüsseleigenschaften des Vokabulars (deskriptiv, nicht normativ) - Semantische Komponenten/Beziehungen (deskriptiv, nicht normativ) Sofern anwendbar, Empfehlungen für das Mapping zwischen Vokabular und Thesaurus (normativ).
    Im Fall von Ontologien, Terminologien und Synonymringen ist das Mapping in oder aus einem Thesaurus nicht immer nützlich. Hier sind andere Formen sich gegenseitig befruchtender Nutzung zu empfehlen. Dies gilt besonders für Ontologien, die im Kontext des Semantischen Web kombiniert mit Thesauri eingesetzt werden können. ISO 25964-2 zeigt die Unterschiede zwischen Thesauri und Ontologien auf und gibt Beispiele für die Möglichkeiten interoperabler Funktionen. Praktische Implementation und weiterführende Arbeiten Und was bedeutet dies für SKOS, dem W3C-Standard für die Veröffentlichung von Simple Knowledge Organization Systems im Web? Die Arbeitsgruppen von SKOS und ISO 25964 haben glücklicherweise eng zusammengearbeitet, was sich in einer guten Kompatibilität der beiden Standards äußert. Gemeinsam haben sie eine Tabelle erarbeitet, die die Übereinstimmungen zwischen den Datenmodellen von ISO 25964 und SKOS/SKOS-XL aufzeigt und nun beim ISO 25964-Sekretariat unter http://www.niso.org/schemas/iso25964/frei zugänglich ist. Die Tabelle ist formal kein Bestandteil der beiden Standards, aber von beiden abhängig. Das macht sie zu einem Beispiel für die Entwicklung praktischer Tools für das sich erweiternde Semantische Web durch die Gemeinschaft seiner Nutzer."
  9. Keil, S.: Terminologie Mapping : Grundlagen und aktuelle Normungsvorhaben (2012) 0.07 
    0.06989704 = product of:
  0.09319606 = sum of:
    0.009801455 = weight(_text_:information in 29) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009801455 = score(doc=29,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 29, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=29)
    0.06317951 = weight(_text_:standards in 29) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06317951 = score(doc=29,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.24621427 = fieldWeight in 29, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=29)
    0.020215092 = product of:
      0.040430184 = sum of:
        0.040430184 = weight(_text_:organization in 29) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040430184 = score(doc=29,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 29, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=29)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    Der Artikel basiert auf einer Bachelorarbeit mit dem Titel "Terminologie Mapping: Grundlagen und aktuelle Standardisierung", die im Sommersemester 2011 an der Hochschule Darmstadt geschrieben wurde. Er befasst sich mit den Grundlagen des Terminologie Mappings, also der Erstellung von Querverbindungen zwischen verschiedenen kontrollierten Vokabularen und der Standardisierung der Mapping-Verfahren. Die Grundlagen sollen anhand der Erkenntnisse aus Doerrs zentraler Publikation aus dem Jahre 2001 (Doerr 2001) dargestellt werden. Darauf folgt ein Blick in den Bereich der Standardisierung, der gerade in den letzten Jahren eine starke Entwicklung durchlaufen hat, was dazu führt, dass immer mehr aktualisierte nationale und internationale Standards herausgegeben werden, die Terminologie Mapping in verschiedener Weise als Mittel zur Erlangung von Interoperabilität empfehlen. Ebenso soll das "Simple Knowledge Organization System" (SKOS), ein Standard des W3Cs zur Repräsentation von kontrollierten Vokabularen, thematisiert werden. Dieser hat das Ziel, kontrollierte Vokabulare im Semantic Web darzustellen. Obwohl sich bei der Modellierung von klassischen kontrollierten Vokabularen (überwiegend Thesauri) in SKOS noch einige Probleme abzeichnen, stellt dieser Standard einen wichtigen Schritt für kontrollierte Vokabulare aus der Fachinformation in das Semantic Web dar. Abschließend soll ein Fazit zur Standardisierung gezogen werden sowie ein Ausblick auf die Möglichkeiten der Einbindung von Terminologie Mapping im Semantic Web via SKOS geben werden.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.1, S.45-55
  10. Ahmed, M.; Mukhopadhyay, M.; Mukhopadhyay, P.: Automated knowledge organization : AI ML based subject indexing system for libraries (2023) 0.07 
    0.06989704 = product of:
  0.09319606 = sum of:
    0.009801455 = weight(_text_:information in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009801455 = score(doc=977,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
    0.06317951 = weight(_text_:standards in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06317951 = score(doc=977,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.24621427 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
    0.020215092 = product of:
      0.040430184 = sum of:
        0.040430184 = weight(_text_:organization in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040430184 = score(doc=977,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    The research study as reported here is an attempt to explore the possibilities of an AI/ML-based semi-automated indexing system in a library setup to handle large volumes of documents. It uses the Python virtual environment to install and configure an open source AI environment (named Annif) to feed the LOD (Linked Open Data) dataset of Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) as a standard KOS (Knowledge Organisation System). The framework deployed the Turtle format of LCSH after cleaning the file with Skosify, applied an array of backend algorithms (namely TF-IDF, Omikuji, and NN-Ensemble) to measure relative performance, and selected Snowball as an analyser. The training of Annif was conducted with a large set of bibliographic records populated with subject descriptors (MARC tag 650$a) and indexed by trained LIS professionals. The training dataset is first treated with MarcEdit to export it in a format suitable for OpenRefine, and then in OpenRefine it undergoes many steps to produce a bibliographic record set suitable to train Annif. The framework, after training, has been tested with a bibliographic dataset to measure indexing efficiencies, and finally, the automated indexing framework is integrated with data wrangling software (OpenRefine) to produce suggested headings on a mass scale. The entire framework is based on open-source software, open datasets, and open standards.
    Source
    DESIDOC journal of library and information technology. 43(2023) no.1, S.45-54
  11. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Thesauri KOS analysis and selected thesaurus mapping methodology on the project case-study (2007) 0.07 
    0.06614451 = product of:
  0.13228902 = sum of:
    0.101087205 = weight(_text_:standards in 2227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.101087205 = score(doc=2227,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 2227, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2227)
    0.031201813 = product of:
      0.062403627 = sum of:
        0.062403627 = weight(_text_:22 in 2227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062403627 = score(doc=2227,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20161359 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2227, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2227)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    - Introduction to the Thesaurus Interoperability problem - Analysis of the thesauri for the project case study - Overview of Schema/Ontology Mapping methodologies - The proposed approach for thesaurus mapping - Standards for implementing the proposed methodology
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
  12. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.07 
    0.06602432 = product of:
  0.13204864 = sum of:
    0.01663362 = weight(_text_:information in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01663362 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
    0.11541502 = sum of:
      0.06861231 = weight(_text_:organization in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06861231 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057573788 = queryNorm
          0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
      0.04680272 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04680272 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20161359 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057573788 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Terminology registries (TRs) are a crucial element of the infrastructure required for resource discovery services, digital libraries, Linked Data, and semantic interoperability generally. They can make the content of knowledge organization systems (KOS) available both for human and machine access. The paper describes the attributes and functionality for a TR, based on a review of published literature, existing TRs, and a survey of experts. A domain model based on user tasks is constructed and a set of core metadata elements for use in TRs is proposed. Ideally, the TR should allow searching as well as browsing for a KOS, matching a user's search while also providing information about existing terminology services, accessible to both humans and machines. The issues surrounding metadata for KOS are also discussed, together with the rationale for different aspects and the importance of a core set of KOS metadata for future machine-based access; a possible core set of metadata elements is proposed. This is dealt with in terms of practical experience and in relation to the Dublin Core Application Profile.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1901-1916
  13. Krause, J.: Semantic heterogeneity : comparing new semantic web approaches with those of digital libraries (2008) 0.06 
    0.06482261 = product of:
  0.12964521 = sum of:
    0.10943013 = weight(_text_:standards in 1908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10943013 = score(doc=1908,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.42645568 = fieldWeight in 1908, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1908)
    0.020215092 = product of:
      0.040430184 = sum of:
        0.040430184 = weight(_text_:organization in 1908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040430184 = score(doc=1908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 1908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1908)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - To demonstrate that newer developments in the semantic web community, particularly those based on ontologies (simple knowledge organization system and others) mitigate common arguments from the digital library (DL) community against participation in the Semantic web. Design/methodology/approach - The approach is a semantic web discussion focusing on the weak structure of the Web and the lack of consideration given to the semantic content during indexing. Findings - The points criticised by the semantic web and ontology approaches are the same as those of the DL "Shell model approach" from the mid-1990s, with emphasis on the centrality of its heterogeneity components (used, for example, in vascoda). The Shell model argument began with the "invisible web", necessitating the restructuring of DL approaches. The conclusion is that both approaches fit well together and that the Shell model, with its semantic heterogeneity components, can be reformulated on the semantic web basis. Practical implications - A reinterpretation of the DL approaches of semantic heterogeneity and adapting to standards and tools supported by the W3C should be the best solution. It is therefore recommended that - although most of the semantic web standards are not technologically refined for commercial applications at present - all individual DL developments should be checked for their adaptability to the W3C standards of the semantic web. Originality/value - A unique conceptual analysis of the parallel developments emanating from the digital library and semantic web communities.
  14. Dunsire, G.; Willer, M.: Initiatives to make standard library metadata models and structures available to the Semantic Web (2010) 0.06 
    0.064350635 = product of:
  0.12870127 = sum of:
    0.015682328 = weight(_text_:information in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015682328 = score(doc=3965,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
    0.11301894 = weight(_text_:standards in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11301894 = score(doc=3965,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.4404415 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This paper describes recent initiatives to make standard library metadata models and structures available to the Semantic Web, including IFLA standards such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD), and International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD) along with the infrastructure that supports them. The FRBR Review Group is currently developing representations of FRAD and the entityrelationship model of FRBR in resource description framework (RDF) applications, using a combination of RDF, RDF Schema (RDFS), Simple Knowledge Organisation System (SKOS) and Web Ontology Language (OWL), cross-relating both models where appropriate. The ISBD/XML Task Group is investigating the representation of ISBD in RDF. The IFLA Namespaces project is developing an administrative and technical infrastructure to support such initiatives and encourage uptake of standards by other agencies. The paper describes similar initiatives with related external standards such as RDA - resource description and access, REICAT (the new Italian cataloguing rules) and CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM). The DCMI RDA Task Group is working with the Joint Steering Committee for RDA to develop Semantic Web representations of RDA structural elements, which are aligned with FRBR and FRAD, and controlled metadata content vocabularies. REICAT is also based on FRBR, and an object-oriented version of FRBR has been integrated with CRM, which itself has an RDF representation. CRM was initially based on the metadata needs of the museum community, and is now seeking extension to the archives community with the eventual aim of developing a model common to the main cultural information domains of archives, libraries and museums. The Vocabulary Mapping Framework (VMF) project has developed a Semantic Web tool to automatically generate mappings between metadata models from the information communities, including publishers. The tool is based on several standards, including CRM, FRAD, FRBR, MARC21 and RDA.
    The paper discusses the importance of these initiatives in releasing as linked data the very large quantities of rich, professionally-generated metadata stored in formats based on these standards, such as UNIMARC and MARC21, addressing such issues as critical mass for semantic and statistical inferencing, integration with user- and machine-generated metadata, and authenticity, veracity and trust. The paper also discusses related initiatives to release controlled vocabularies, including the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), ISBD, Library of Congress Name Authority File (LCNAF), Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), Rameau (French subject headings), Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), and the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) as linked data. Finally, the paper discusses the potential collective impact of these initiatives on metadata workflows and management systems.
    Content
    Vortrag im Rahmen der Session 93. Cataloguing der WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 76TH IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND ASSEMBLY, 10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden - 149. Information Technology, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing with Knowledge Management
  15. Balakrishnan, U.; Voß, J.: ¬The Cocoda mapping tool (2015) 0.06 
    0.06078268 = product of:
  0.08104357 = sum of:
    0.016805995 = weight(_text_:information in 4205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016805995 = score(doc=4205,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.16628155 = fieldWeight in 4205, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4205)
    0.04422565 = weight(_text_:standards in 4205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04422565 = score(doc=4205,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.17234999 = fieldWeight in 4205, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4205)
    0.020011922 = product of:
      0.040023845 = sum of:
        0.040023845 = weight(_text_:organization in 4205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040023845 = score(doc=4205,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.19498043 = fieldWeight in 4205, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4205)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    Since the 90s, we have seen an explosion of information and with it there is an increase in the need for data and information aggregation systems that store and manage information. However, most of the information sources apply different Knowledge Organizations Systems (KOS) to describe the content of stored data. This heterogeneous mix of KOS in different systems complicate access and seamless sharing of information and knowledge. Concordances also known as cross-concordances or terminology mappings map different (KOS) to each other for improvement of information retrieval in such heterogeneous mix of systems. (Mayr 2010, Keil 2012). Also for coherent indexing with different terminologies, mappings are considered to be a valuable and essential working tool. However, despite efforts at standardization (e.g. SKOS, ISO 25964-2, Keil 2012, Soergel 2011); there is a significant scarcity of concordances that has led an inability to establish uniform exchange formats as well as methods and tools for maintaining mappings and making them easily accessible. This is particularly true in the field of library classification schemes. In essence, there is a lack of infrastructure for provision/exchange of concordances, their management and quality assessment as well as tools that would enable semi-automatic generation of mappings. The project "coli-conc" therefore aims to address this gap by creating the necessary infrastructure. This includes the specification of a data format for exchange of concordances (JSKOS), specification and implementation of web APIs to query concordance databases (JSKOS-API), and a modular web application to enable uniform access to knowledge organization systems, concordances and concordance assessments (Cocoda).
    The focus of the project "coli-conc" lies in semi-automatic creation of mappings between different KOS in general and the two important library classification schemes in particular - Dewey classification system (DDC) and Regensburg classification system (RVK). In the year 2000, the national libraries of Germany, Austria and Switzerland adopted DDC in an endeavor to develop a nation-wide classification scheme. But historically, in the German speaking regions, the academic libraries have been using their own home-grown systems, the most prominent and popular being the RVK. However, with the launch of DDC, building concordances between DDC and RVK has become an imperative, although it is still rare. The delay in building comprehensive concordances between these two systems has been because of major challenges posed by the sheer largeness of these two systems (38.000 classes in DDC and ca. 860.000 classes in RVK), the strong disparity in their respective structure, the variation in the perception and representation of the concepts. The challenge is compounded geometrically for any manual attempt in this direction. Although there have been efforts on automatic mappings (OAEI Library Track 2012 -- 2014 and e.g. Pfeffer 2013) in the recent years; such concordances carry the risks of inaccurate mappings, and the approaches are rather more suitable for mapping suggestions than for automatic generation of concordances (Lauser 2008; Reiner 2010). The project "coli-conc" will facilitate the creation, evaluation, and reuse of mappings with a public collection of concordances and a web application of mapping management. The proposed presentation will give an introduction to the tools and standards created and planned in the project "coli-conc". This includes preliminary work on DDC concordances (Balakrishnan 2013), an overview of the software concept, technical architecture (Voß 2015) and a demonstration of the Cocoda web application.
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich: 14th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, TPDL 2015 Conference in Poznan, Poland, Friday 18th September 2015. Vgl. auch: http://eprints.rclis.org/28007/. Vgl. auch: http://coli-conc.gbv.de/.
  16. Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Towards a comprehensive international Knowledge Organization System (2008) 0.06 
    0.05770751 = product of:
  0.23083004 = sum of:
    0.23083004 = sum of:
      0.13722461 = weight(_text_:organization in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13722461 = score(doc=4786,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057573788 = queryNorm
          0.66850436 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
      0.09360544 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09360544 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20161359 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057573788 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Präsentation anlässlich: NKOS 2008 - Networked Knowledge Organization Systems, September 19th 2008 ECDL-Conference, Arhus.
    Date
    22. 9.2008 19:30:41
  17. Golub, K.: Subject access in Swedish discovery services (2018) 0.05 
    0.054782204 = product of:
  0.10956441 = sum of:
    0.089349315 = weight(_text_:standards in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.089349315 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.34819958 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
    0.020215092 = product of:
      0.040430184 = sum of:
        0.040430184 = weight(_text_:organization in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040430184 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20527108 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    While support for subject searching has been traditionally advocated for in library catalogs, often in the form of a catalog objective to find everything that a library has on a certain topic, research has shown that subject access has not been satisfactory. Many existing online catalogs and discovery services do not seem to make good use of the intellectual effort invested into assigning controlled subject index terms and classes. For example, few support hierarchical browsing of classification schemes and other controlled vocabularies with hierarchical structures, few provide end-user-friendly options to choose a more specific concept to increase precision, a broader concept or related concepts to increase recall, to disambiguate homonyms, or to find which term is best used to name a concept. Optimum subject access in library catalogs and discovery services is analyzed from the perspective of earlier research as well as contemporary conceptual models and cataloguing codes. Eighteen proposed features of what this should entail in practice are drawn. In an exploratory qualitative study, the three most common discovery services used in Swedish academic libraries are analyzed against these features. In line with previous research, subject access in contemporary interfaces is demonstrated to less than optimal. This is in spite of the fact that individual collections have been indexed with controlled vocabularies and a significant number of controlled vocabularies have been mapped to each other and are available in interoperable standards. Strategic action is proposed to build research-informed (inter)national standards and guidelines.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.4, S.297-309
  18. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.05 
    0.05445496 = product of:
  0.10890992 = sum of:
    0.0758154 = weight(_text_:standards in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0758154 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
    0.03309452 = product of:
      0.06618904 = sum of:
        0.06618904 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06618904 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20161359 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  19. Binz, V.; Rühle, S.: KIM - Das Kompetenzzentrum Interoperable Metadaten (2009) 0.05 
    0.05108667 = product of:
  0.10217334 = sum of:
    0.013722038 = weight(_text_:information in 4559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013722038 = score(doc=4559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4559)
    0.0884513 = weight(_text_:standards in 4559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0884513 = score(doc=4559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 4559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4559)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die Interoperabilität von Metadaten ist eine wichtige Voraussetzung für das Generieren von Information und Wissen in einer vernetzten Welt. Aus diesem Grund entstehen seit Mitte der Neunziger Jahre verschiedene Standards mit dem Ziel, die Interoperabilität von Metadaten zu erhöhen. Genannt seien hier vor allem DCMES und DCAM, RDF und SKOS. Aufgabe von KIM ist es, diese Entwicklungen zu begleiten und in die deutschsprachige Community zu tragen. Dabei bietet KIM neben reinen Informationsangeboten (z. B. in Form von Übersetzungen, Vorträgen und Handreichungen) auch konkrete Unterstützung in Form von Schulungen und Beratungen an.
  20. Kutz, O.; Mossakowski, T.; Galinski, C.; Lange, C.: Towards a standard for heterogeneous ontology integration and interoperability (2011) 0.05 
    0.05108667 = product of:
  0.10217334 = sum of:
    0.013722038 = weight(_text_:information in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013722038 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
    0.0884513 = weight(_text_:standards in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0884513 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Even though ontologies are widely being used to enable interoperability in information-rich endeavours, there is currently no united framework for ontology interoperability itself. Surprisingly little of the state of the art in modularity and structuring, e.g. in software engineering, has been applied to ontology engineering so far. However, application areas like Ambient Assisted Living (AAL), which require synchronization and orchestration of interoperable services, are in dire need of safe and secure ontology interoperability. OntoIOp (Ontology Integration and Interoperability), a new international standard proposed in ISO/TC 37/SC 3, aims at filling this gap.
    Imprint
    Seoul : Korean Agency for Technology and Standards

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 187
  • d 42
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 163
  • el 64
  • m 14
  • x 8
  • s 7
  • r 4
  • n 2
  • p 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications