Search (76 results, page 1 of 4)

0.08284423 = product of:
  0.20711057 = sum of:
    0.16626124 = weight(_text_:objects in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16626124 = score(doc=553,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.4595864 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
    0.04084933 = weight(_text_:7 in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04084933 = score(doc=553,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.18116702 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Currently, a number of efforts are being carried out to integrate collections from different institutions and containing heterogeneous material. Examples of such projects are The European Library [1] and the Memory of the Netherlands [2]. A crucial point for the success of these is the availability to provide a unified access on top of the different collections, e.g. using one single vocabulary for querying or browsing the objects they contain. This is made difficult by the fact that the objects from different collections are often described using different vocabularies - thesauri, classification schemes - and are therefore not interoperable at the semantic level. To solve this problem, one can turn to semantic links - mappings - between the elements of the different vocabularies. If one knows that a concept C from a vocabulary V is semantically equivalent to a concept to a concept D from vocabulary W, then an appropriate search engine can return all the objects that were indexed against D for a query for objects described using C. We thus have an access to other collections, using a single one vocabulary. This is however an ideal situation, and hard alignment work is required to reach it. Several projects in the past have tried to implement such a solution, like MACS [3] and Renardus [4]. They have demonstrated very interesting results, but also highlighted the difficulty of aligning manually all the different vocabularies involved in practical cases, which sometimes contain hundreds of thousands of concepts. To alleviate this problem, a number of tools have been proposed in order to provide with candidate mappings between two input vocabularies, making alignment a (semi-) automatic task. Recently, the Semantic Web community has produced a lot of these alignment tools'. Several techniques are found, depending on the material they exploit: labels of concepts, structure of vocabularies, collection objects and external knowledge sources. Throughout our presentation, we will present a concrete heterogeneity case where alignment techniques have been applied to build a (pilot) browser, developed in the context of the STITCH project [5]. This browser enables a unified access to two collections of illuminated manuscripts, using the description vocabulary used in the first collection, Mandragore [6], or the one used by the second, Iconclass [7]. In our talk, we will also make the point for using unified representations the vocabulary semantic and lexical information. Additionally to ease the use of the alignment tools that have these vocabularies as input, turning to a standard representation format helps designing applications that are more generic, like the browser we demonstrate. We give pointers to SKOS [8], an open and web-enabled format currently developed by the Semantic Web community.
References [1] http:// www.theeuropeanlibrary.org [2] http://www.geheugenvannederland.nl [3] http://macs.cenl.org [4] Day, M., Koch, T., Neuroth, H.: Searching and browsing multiple subject gateways in the Renardus service. In Proceedings of the RC33 Sixth International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Amsterdam , 2005. [5] http://stitch.cs.vu.nl [6] http://mandragore.bnf.fr [7] http://www.iconclass.nl [8] www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/ 1 The Semantic Web vision supposes sharing data using different conceptualizations (ontologies), and therefore implies to tackle the semantic interoperability problem

0.078530684 = product of:
  0.1963267 = sum of:
    0.15021834 = weight(_text_:objects in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15021834 = score(doc=5757,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
    0.046108373 = weight(_text_:22 in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046108373 = score(doc=5757,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Cultural heritage institutions are publishing their digital collections over the web as LOD. This is is a new step in the patrimonialization and curatorial processes developed by such institutions. Many of these collections are thematically superimposed and complementary. Frequently, objects in these collections present culturally relevant relationships, such as a book about a painting, or a draft or sketch of a famous painting, etc. LOD technology enables such heritage records to be interlinked, achieving interoperability and adding value to digital collections, thus empowering heritage institutions. An aim of this research is characterizing such culturally relevant relationships and organizing them in a vocabulary. Use cases or examples of relationships between objects suggested by curators or mentioned in literature and in the conceptual models as FRBR/LRM, CIDOC CRM and RiC-CM, were collected and used as examples or inspiration of cultural relevant relationships. Relationships identified are collated and compared for identifying those with the same or similar meaning, synthesized and normalized. A set of thirty-three culturally relevant relationships are identified and formalized as a LOD property vocabulary to be used by digital curators to interlink digital collections. The results presented are provisional and a starting point to be discussed, tested, and enhanced.

Date

4. 3.2020 14:22:41

0.0756721 = product of:
  0.37836048 = sum of:
    0.37836048 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37836048 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5770437 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.

0.0540515 = product of:
  0.2702575 = sum of:
    0.2702575 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2702575 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5770437 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.

0.04892856 = product of:
  0.1223214 = sum of:
    0.057769675 = weight(_text_:7 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057769675 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
    0.06455172 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06455172 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Date

22. 6.2023 18:23:31

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.866-878

0.044154998 = product of:
  0.22077498 = sum of:
    0.22077498 = weight(_text_:objects in 2965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22077498 = score(doc=2965,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 2965, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2965)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Repositories are web portals that provide access to learning objects. Resources can be easily located through the use of metadata, an important factor to increase the ease of searching for digital resources in repositories. However, there are as yet no similarly effective methods in order to increase access to learning objects. The main goal of this paper is to offer an alternative search system to improve access to academic learning objects and publications for several repositories through the use of information visualisation and Simple Knowledge Organization Schemes (SKOS). To this end, we have developed a visual framework and have used the Organic.Edunet and AGRIS as case studies in order to access academic and scientific publication resources respectively. In this paper, we present the results of our work through a test aimed at evaluating the whole visual framework, and offer recommendations on how to integrate this type of visual search into academic repositories based on SKOS.

0.025820687 = product of:
  0.12910344 = sum of:
    0.12910344 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12910344 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 6.2015 16:08:38

0.025492895 = product of:
  0.12746447 = sum of:
    0.12746447 = weight(_text_:objects in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12746447 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Topic Maps are a standardized modelling approach for the semantic annotation and description of WWW resources. They enable an improved search and navigational access on information objects stored in semi-structured information spaces like the WWW. However, the according standards ISO 13250 and XTM (XML Topic Maps) lack formal semantics, several questions concerning e.g. subclassing, inheritance or merging of topics are left open. The proposed TMUML meta model, directly derived from the well known UML meta model, is a meta model for Topic Maps which enables semantic constraints to be formulated in OCL (object constraint language) in order to answer such open questions and overcome possible inconsistencies in Topic Map repositories. We will examine the XTM merging conditions and show, in several examples, how the TMUML meta model enables semantic constraints for Topic Map merging to be formulated in OCL. Finally, we will show how the TM validation process, i.e., checking if a Topic Map is well formed, includes our merging conditions.

0.025492895 = product of:
  0.12746447 = sum of:
    0.12746447 = weight(_text_:objects in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12746447 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The treatment of subjects by Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) has attracted less attention than some of its other aspects, but there seems to be a general consensus that it needs work. While some have proposed elaborating its subject categories-concepts, objects, events, and places-to increase their semantic complexity, a working group of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) has recently made a promising proposal that essentially bypasses those categories in favor of one entity, thema. This article gives an overview of the proposal and discusses its relevance to another difficult problem, ambiguities in the establishment of headings for buildings.Use of dynamic links from subject-based finding aids to records for electronic resources in the OPAC is suggested as one method for by-passing the OPAC search interface, thus making the library's electronic resources more accessible. This method simplifies maintenance of links to electronic resources and aids instruction by providing a single, consistent access point to them. Results of a usage study from before and after this project was completed show a consistent, often dramatic increase in use of the library's electronic resources.

0.025492895 = product of:
  0.12746447 = sum of:
    0.12746447 = weight(_text_:objects in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12746447 = score(doc=1802,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The German subject headings authority file - SWD - provides a terminologically controlled vocabulary, covering all fields of knowledge. The subject headings are determined by the German Rules for the Subject Catalogue. The authority file is produced and updated daily by participating libraries from around Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Over the last twenty years, it grew to an online-accessible database with about 550.000 headings. They are linked to other thesauri, also to French and English equivalents and with notations of the Dewey Decimal Classification. Thus, it allows multilingual access and searching in dispersed, heterogeneously indexed catalogues. The vocabulary is not only used for cataloguing library materials, but also web-resources and objects in archives and museums.

0.025492895 = product of:
  0.12746447 = sum of:
    0.12746447 = weight(_text_:objects in 2373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12746447 = score(doc=2373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2373)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine how complexities of pre-coordinated classes can influence mapping quality. Though various kinds of mappings among vocabularies have been achieved and applied, there is little research directly pointing out the problems that hinder the mapping quality. This paper focuses on the relationship between the grammatical forms of pre-coordinated classes and semantic mapping quality, in order to provide useful assistance to the setting and mapping of complex concepts in knowledge organization systems. A review of the literature on vocabulary interoperability and an empirical study of pre-coordinated classes in Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and Chinese Library Classification (CLC) are presented. As research objects, the authors have selected two main classes, mathematics and astronomy, in both DDC and CLC. Distributions in the selected classes are described based on the definition and division of pre-coordinated classes. We conclude that the high proportion of pre-coordinated classes in both DDC and CLC greatly increase the difficulty of achieving mapping quality.

0.02310787 = product of:
  0.11553935 = sum of:
    0.11553935 = weight(_text_:7 in 4138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11553935 = score(doc=4138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.5124177 = fieldWeight in 4138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4138)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

New review of information networking. 7(2001) no.xx, S.147-157

0.022132019 = product of:
  0.11066009 = sum of:
    0.11066009 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11066009 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".

0.022132019 = product of:
  0.11066009 = sum of:
    0.11066009 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11066009 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 9.2008 19:30:41

0.02124408 = product of:
  0.1062204 = sum of:
    0.1062204 = weight(_text_:objects in 5902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1062204 = score(doc=5902,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 5902, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5902)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

With networked information access to heterogeneous data sources, the problem of terminology provision and interoperability of controlled vocabulary schemes such as thesauri becomes increasingly urgent. Solutions are needed to improve the performance of full-text retrieval systems and to guide the design of controlled terminology schemes for use in structured data, including metadata. Thesauri are created in different languages, with different scope and points of view and at different levels of abstraction and detail, to accomodate access to a specific group of collections. In any wider search accessing distributed collections, the user would like to start with familiar terminology and let the system find out the correspondences to other terminologies in order to retrieve equivalent results from all addressed collections. This paper investigates possible semantic differences that may hinder the unambiguous mapping and transition from one thesaurus to another. It focusses on the differences of meaning of terms and their relations as intended by their creators for indexing and querying a specific collection, in contrast to methods investigating the statistical relevance of terms for objects in a collection. It develops a notion of optimal mapping, paying particular attention to the intellectual quality of mappings between terms from different vocabularies and to problems of polysemy. Proposals are made to limit the vagueness introduced by the transition from one vocabulary to another. The paper shows ways in which thesaurus creators can improve their methodology to meet the challenges of networked access of distributed collections created under varying conditions. For system implementers, the discussion will lead to a better understanding of the complexity of the problem

0.01844335 = product of:
  0.092216745 = sum of:
    0.092216745 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.092216745 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".

0.01844335 = product of:
  0.092216745 = sum of:
    0.092216745 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.092216745 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

0.016995264 = product of:
  0.084976315 = sum of:
    0.084976315 = weight(_text_:objects in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084976315 = score(doc=3109,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

This proposal presents the methodology of indexing with images suggested by De Brito and Caribé (2015). The imagetic model is used as a compatible mechanism with FRSAD for a global information share and use of subject data, both within the library sector and beyond. The conceptual model of imagetic indexing shows how images are related to topics and 'key-images' are interpreted as nomens to implement the FRSAD model. Indexing with images consists of using images instead of key-words or descriptors, to represent and organize information. Implementing the imaged navigation in OPACs denotes multiple advantages derived from this rethinking the OPAC anew, since we are looking forward to sharing concepts within the subject authority data. Images, carrying linguistic objects, permeate inter-social and cultural concepts. In practice it includes translated metadata, symmetrical multilingual thesaurus, or any traditional indexing tools. iOPAC embodies efforts focused on conceptual levels as expected from librarians. Imaged interfaces are more intuitive since users do not need specific training for information retrieval, offering easier comprehension of indexing codes, larger conceptual portability of descriptors (as images), and a better interoperability between discourse codes and indexing competences affecting positively social and cultural interoperability. The imagetic methodology deploys R&D fields for more suitable interfaces taking into consideration users with specific needs such as deafness and illiteracy. This methodology arouse questions about the paradigms of the primacy of orality in information systems and pave the way to a legitimacy of multiple perspectives in document indexing by suggesting a more universal communication system based on images. Interdisciplinarity in neurosciences, linguistics and information sciences would be desirable competencies for further investigations about he nature of cognitive processes in information organization and classification while developing assistive KOS for individuals with communication problems, such autism and deafness.

0.016505621 = product of:
  0.08252811 = sum of:
    0.08252811 = weight(_text_:7 in 1243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08252811 = score(doc=1243,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.36601263 = fieldWeight in 1243, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1243)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

7. 1.1997 17:39:26

0.016339732 = product of:
  0.08169866 = sum of:
    0.08169866 = weight(_text_:7 in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08169866 = score(doc=1960,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.36233404 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Classification

025.4/7

DDC

025.4/7