Search (102 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  1. Wongthontham, P.; Abu-Salih, B.: Ontology-based approach for semantic data extraction from social big data : state-of-the-art and research directions (2018) 0.04
    0.04020585 = product of:
      0.0804117 = sum of:
        0.067829 = weight(_text_:media in 4097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067829 = score(doc=4097,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 4097, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4097)
        0.012582705 = product of:
          0.02516541 = sum of:
            0.02516541 = weight(_text_:research in 4097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02516541 = score(doc=4097,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 4097, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4097)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A challenge of managing and extracting useful knowledge from social media data sources has attracted much attention from academic and industry. To address this challenge, semantic analysis of textual data is focused in this paper. We propose an ontology-based approach to extract semantics of textual data and define the domain of data. In other words, we semantically analyse the social data at two levels i.e. the entity level and the domain level. We have chosen Twitter as a social channel challenge for a purpose of concept proof. Domain knowledge is captured in ontologies which are then used to enrich the semantics of tweets provided with specific semantic conceptual representation of entities that appear in the tweets. Case studies are used to demonstrate this approach. We experiment and evaluate our proposed approach with a public dataset collected from Twitter and from the politics domain. The ontology-based approach leverages entity extraction and concept mappings in terms of quantity and accuracy of concept identification.
  2. Marx, E. et al.: Exploring term networks for semantic search over RDF knowledge graphs (2016) 0.03
    0.02628294 = product of:
      0.10513176 = sum of:
        0.10513176 = sum of:
          0.041942354 = weight(_text_:research in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041942354 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.31521314 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
          0.0631894 = weight(_text_:22 in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0631894 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  3. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.03
    0.02628294 = product of:
      0.10513176 = sum of:
        0.10513176 = sum of:
          0.041942354 = weight(_text_:research in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041942354 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.31521314 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.0631894 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0631894 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  4. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.02
    0.023771245 = product of:
      0.09508498 = sum of:
        0.09508498 = sum of:
          0.0508524 = weight(_text_:research in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0508524 = score(doc=6958,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.38217562 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
          0.04423258 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04423258 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the design of a GUI for the Okapi 'best match' retrieval system developed at the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, UK, for online library catalogues. The X-Windows interface includes an interactive query expansion (IQE) facilty which involves the user in the selection of query terms to reformulate a search. Presents the design rationale, based on a game board metaphor, and describes the features of each of the stages of the search interaction. Reports on the early operational field trial and discusses relevant evaluation issues and objectives
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  5. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.02
    0.022978492 = product of:
      0.09191397 = sum of:
        0.09191397 = sum of:
          0.029359644 = weight(_text_:research in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029359644 = score(doc=5295,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.06255432 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06255432 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
  6. Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003) 0.02
    0.018398056 = product of:
      0.07359222 = sum of:
        0.07359222 = sum of:
          0.029359644 = weight(_text_:research in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029359644 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
          0.04423258 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04423258 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  7. Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014) 0.02
    0.018375725 = product of:
      0.0735029 = sum of:
        0.0735029 = sum of:
          0.035589263 = weight(_text_:research in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035589263 = score(doc=1464,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.2674672 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
          0.03791364 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03791364 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper attempts to explore an approach of using an automatic semantic analysis tool to enhance the "subject" access to materials that are not included in the usual library subject cataloging process. Using two research samples the authors analyzed the access points supplied by OpenCalais, a semantic analysis tool. As an aid in understanding how computerized subject analysis might be approached, this paper suggests using the three-layer framework that has been accepted and applied in image analysis, developed by Erwin Panofsky.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  8. Drexel, G.: Knowledge engineering for intelligent information retrieval (2001) 0.02
    0.01695725 = product of:
      0.067829 = sum of:
        0.067829 = weight(_text_:media in 4043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067829 = score(doc=4043,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 4043, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4043)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a clustered approach to designing an overall ontological model together with a general rule-based component that serves as a mapping device. By observational criteria, a multi-lingual team of experts excerpts concepts from general communication in the media. The team, then, finds equivalent expressions in English, German, French, and Spanish. On the basis of a set of ontological and lexical relations, a conceptual network is built up. Concepts are thought to be universal. Objects unique in time and space are identified by names and will be explained by the universals as their instances. Our approach relies on multi-relational descriptions of concepts. It provides a powerful tool for documentation and conceptual language learning. First and foremost, our multi-lingual, polyhierarchical ontology fills the gap of semantically-based information retrieval by generating enhanced and improved queries for internet search
  9. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.02
    0.015769763 = product of:
      0.06307905 = sum of:
        0.06307905 = sum of:
          0.02516541 = weight(_text_:research in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02516541 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
          0.03791364 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03791364 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 8th European conference, ECDL 2004, Bath, UK, September 12-17, 2004 : proceedings. Eds.: Heery, R. u. E. Lyon
  10. Järvelin, K.; Kristensen, J.; Niemi, T.; Sormunen, E.; Keskustalo, H.: ¬A deductive data model for query expansion (1996) 0.02
    0.015769763 = product of:
      0.06307905 = sum of:
        0.06307905 = sum of:
          0.02516541 = weight(_text_:research in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02516541 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
          0.03791364 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03791364 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046639 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al
  11. Gnoli, C.; Santis, R. de; Pusterla, L.: Commerce, see also Rhetoric : cross-discipline relationships as authority data for enhanced retrieval (2015) 0.01
    0.014131041 = product of:
      0.056524165 = sum of:
        0.056524165 = weight(_text_:media in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056524165 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Präsentation unter: http://www.udcds.com/seminar/2015/media/slides/Gnoli_InternationalUDCSeminar2015.pdf.
  12. Horch, A.; Kett, H.; Weisbecker, A.: Semantische Suchsysteme für das Internet : Architekturen und Komponenten semantischer Suchmaschinen (2013) 0.01
    0.014131041 = product of:
      0.056524165 = sum of:
        0.056524165 = weight(_text_:media in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056524165 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In der heutigen Zeit nimmt die Flut an Informationen exponentiell zu. In dieser »Informationsexplosion« entsteht täglich eine unüberschaubare Menge an neuen Informationen im Web: Beispielsweise 430 deutschsprachige Artikel bei Wikipedia, 2,4 Mio. Tweets bei Twitter und 12,2 Mio. Kommentare bei Facebook. Während in Deutschland vor einigen Jahren noch Google als nahezu einzige Suchmaschine beim Zugriff auf Informationen im Web genutzt wurde, nehmen heute die u.a. in Social Media veröffentlichten Meinungen und damit die Vorauswahl sowie Bewertung von Informationen einzelner Experten und Meinungsführer an Bedeutung zu. Aber wie können themenspezifische Informationen nun effizient für konkrete Fragestellungen identifiziert und bedarfsgerecht aufbereitet und visualisiert werden? Diese Studie gibt einen Überblick über semantische Standards und Formate, die Prozesse der semantischen Suche, Methoden und Techniken semantischer Suchsysteme, Komponenten zur Entwicklung semantischer Suchmaschinen sowie den Aufbau bestehender Anwendungen. Die Studie erläutert den prinzipiellen Aufbau semantischer Suchsysteme und stellt Methoden der semantischen Suche vor. Zudem werden Softwarewerkzeuge vorgestellt, mithilfe derer einzelne Funktionalitäten von semantischen Suchmaschinen realisiert werden können. Abschließend erfolgt die Betrachtung bestehender semantischer Suchmaschinen zur Veranschaulichung der Unterschiede der Systeme im Aufbau sowie in der Funktionalität.
  13. Hu, K.; Luo, Q.; Qi, K.; Yang, S.; Mao, J.; Fu, X.; Zheng, J.; Wu, H.; Guo, Y.; Zhu, Q.: Understanding the topic evolution of scientific literatures like an evolving city : using Google Word2Vec model and spatial autocorrelation analysis (2019) 0.01
    0.011304833 = product of:
      0.045219332 = sum of:
        0.045219332 = weight(_text_:media in 5102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045219332 = score(doc=5102,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.20699982 = fieldWeight in 5102, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5102)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Topic evolution has been described by many approaches from a macro level to a detail level, by extracting topic dynamics from text in literature and other media types. However, why the evolution happens is less studied. In this paper, we focus on whether and how the keyword semantics can invoke or affect the topic evolution. We assume that the semantic relatedness among the keywords can affect topic popularity during literature surveying and citing process, thus invoking evolution. However, the assumption is needed to be confirmed in an approach that fully considers the semantic interactions among topics. Traditional topic evolution analyses in scientometric domains cannot provide such support because of using limited semantic meanings. To address this problem, we apply the Google Word2Vec, a deep learning language model, to enhance the keywords with more complete semantic information. We further develop the semantic space as an urban geographic space. We analyze the topic evolution geographically using the measures of spatial autocorrelation, as if keywords are the changing lands in an evolving city. The keyword citations (keyword citation counts one when the paper containing this keyword obtains a citation) are used as an indicator of keyword popularity. Using the bibliographical datasets of the geographical natural hazard field, experimental results demonstrate that in some local areas, the popularity of keywords is affecting that of the surrounding keywords. However, there are no significant impacts on the evolution of all keywords. The spatial autocorrelation analysis identifies the interaction patterns (including High-High leading, High-Low suppressing) among the keywords in local areas. This approach can be regarded as an analyzing framework borrowed from geospatial modeling. Moreover, the prediction results in local areas are demonstrated to be more accurate if considering the spatial autocorrelations.
  14. Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002) 0.01
    0.011170413 = product of:
      0.044681653 = sum of:
        0.044681653 = product of:
          0.08936331 = sum of:
            0.08936331 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08936331 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:17:40
  15. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.01
    0.011058145 = product of:
      0.04423258 = sum of:
        0.04423258 = product of:
          0.08846516 = sum of:
            0.08846516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08846516 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  16. Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016) 0.01
    0.007898675 = product of:
      0.0315947 = sum of:
        0.0315947 = product of:
          0.0631894 = sum of:
            0.0631894 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0631894 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  17. Kozikowski, P. et al.: Support of part-whole relations in query answering (2016) 0.01
    0.007898675 = product of:
      0.0315947 = sum of:
        0.0315947 = product of:
          0.0631894 = sum of:
            0.0631894 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0631894 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  18. Hoang, H.H.; Tjoa, A.M: ¬The state of the art of ontology-based query systems : a comparison of existing approaches (2006) 0.01
    0.0072646285 = product of:
      0.029058514 = sum of:
        0.029058514 = product of:
          0.05811703 = sum of:
            0.05811703 = weight(_text_:research in 792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05811703 = score(doc=792,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.43677214 = fieldWeight in 792, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Based on an in-depth analysis of existing approaches in building ontology-based query systems we discuss and compare the methods, approaches to be used in current query systems using Ontology or the Semantic Web techniques. This paper identifies various relevant research directions in ontology-based querying research. Based on the results of our investigation we summarise the state of the art ontology-based query/search and name areas of further research activities.
  19. Sebastian, Y.: Literature-based discovery by learning heterogeneous bibliographic information networks (2017) 0.01
    0.0069553517 = product of:
      0.027821407 = sum of:
        0.027821407 = product of:
          0.055642813 = sum of:
            0.055642813 = weight(_text_:research in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055642813 = score(doc=535,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.41817746 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Literature-based discovery (LBD) research aims at finding effective computational methods for predicting previously unknown connections between clusters of research papers from disparate research areas. Existing methods encompass two general approaches. The first approach searches for these unknown connections by examining the textual contents of research papers. In addition to the existing textual features, the second approach incorporates structural features of scientific literatures, such as citation structures. These approaches, however, have not considered research papers' latent bibliographic metadata structures as important features that can be used for predicting previously unknown relationships between them. This thesis investigates a new graph-based LBD method that exploits the latent bibliographic metadata connections between pairs of research papers. The heterogeneous bibliographic information network is proposed as an efficient graph-based data structure for modeling the complex relationships between these metadata. In contrast to previous approaches, this method seamlessly combines textual and citation information in the form of pathbased metadata features for predicting future co-citation links between research papers from disparate research fields. The results reported in this thesis provide evidence that the method is effective for reconstructing the historical literature-based discovery hypotheses. This thesis also investigates the effects of semantic modeling and topic modeling on the performance of the proposed method. For semantic modeling, a general-purpose word sense disambiguation technique is proposed to reduce the lexical ambiguity in the title and abstract of research papers. The experimental results suggest that the reduced lexical ambiguity did not necessarily lead to a better performance of the method. This thesis discusses some of the possible contributing factors to these results. Finally, topic modeling is used for learning the latent topical relations between research papers. The learned topic model is incorporated into the heterogeneous bibliographic information network graph and allows new predictive features to be learned. The results in this thesis suggest that topic modeling improves the performance of the proposed method by increasing the overall accuracy for predicting the future co-citation links between disparate research papers.
  20. Looking for information : a survey on research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2016) 0.01
    0.0064210845 = product of:
      0.025684338 = sum of:
        0.025684338 = product of:
          0.051368676 = sum of:
            0.051368676 = weight(_text_:research in 3803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051368676 = score(doc=3803,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.38605565 = fieldWeight in 3803, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3803)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The 4th edition of this popular and well-cited text is now co-authored, and includes significant changes from earlier texts. Presenting a comprehensive review of over a century of research on information behavior (IB), this book is intended for students in information studies and disciplines interested in research on information activities. The initial two chapters introduce IB as a multi-disciplinary topic, the 3rd provides a brief history of research on information seeking. Chapter four discusses what is meant by the terms "information" and "knowledge. "Chapter five discusses "information needs," and how they are addressed. The 6th chapter identifies many related concepts. Twelve models of information behavior (expanded from earlier editions) are illustrated in chapter seven. Chapter eight reviews various paradigms and theories informing IB research. Chapter nine examines research methods invoked in IB studies and a discussion of qualitative and mixed approaches. The 10th chapter gives examples of IB studies by context. The final chapter looks at strengths and weaknesses, recent trends, and future development.

Years

Languages

  • e 94
  • d 7
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 84
  • el 13
  • m 7
  • r 6
  • x 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…