Search (273 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  1. Imhof, A.: RSWK/SWD und Faceted Browsing : neue Möglichkeiten einer inhaltlich-intuitiven Navigation (2006) 0.01 
    0.011939461 = product of:
  0.071636766 = sum of:
    0.014304725 = product of:
      0.02860945 = sum of:
        0.02860945 = weight(_text_:dienstleistungen in 5946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02860945 = score(doc=5946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10771505 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.009912 = idf(docFreq=294, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.2656031 = fieldWeight in 5946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.009912 = idf(docFreq=294, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5946)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.013148096 = weight(_text_:neue in 5946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013148096 = score(doc=5946,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.18005691 = fieldWeight in 5946, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5946)
    0.035194755 = sum of:
      0.0072956234 = weight(_text_:online in 5946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0072956234 = score(doc=5946,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.017922899 = queryNorm
          0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 5946, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5946)
      0.027899133 = weight(_text_:dienste in 5946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027899133 = score(doc=5946,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.106369466 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.017922899 = queryNorm
          0.26228517 = fieldWeight in 5946, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5946)
    0.008492753 = weight(_text_:u in 5946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008492753 = score(doc=5946,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 5946, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5946)
    4.9643347E-4 = product of:
      0.0014893003 = sum of:
        0.0014893003 = weight(_text_:a in 5946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0014893003 = score(doc=5946,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.072065435 = fieldWeight in 5946, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5946)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    Content
    "Die kontinuierliche Optimierung der Informationsversorgung ist ein von allen Seiten unterstütztes Ziel in Forschung und Lehre. Neben der Verfügbarkeit an Literatur ist das Organisieren derselben, aber auch das Suchen, Finden und Erhalten von Informationen angesprochen. Die Anstrengungen der vergangenen Jahre für eine verbesserte Literaturrecherche haben in der Bibliothekswelt bereits zu einigen Erfolgen geführt. Inzwischen ist es selbstverständlich geworden, über das Internet in deutschen und internationalen Online-Katalogen nach relevanter Literatur zu suchen. Weiterführende Dienste wie Dokumentenlieferung oder direkte Verlinkung zu elektronischen Volltexten sind dabei nahtlos eingebunden. Die Weiterentwicklung bibliothekarischer Dienstleistungen werden ohne Unterbrechung vorangetrieben, zumal freie Suchmaschinen wie Google im "Information Retrieval", insbesondere durch Google-Scholar und Google-Buchsuche, einen beträchtlichen Konkurrenzdruck auf die Bibliotheken ausüben. Dabei drängt sich insgesamt der Eindruck auf, dass die Bibliotheken gegenüber den freien Suchmaschinen deren Entwicklungen hinterherlaufen. Ohne es als solches wahrzunehmen, verfügen die Bibliotheken im deutschsprachigen Raum jedoch über ein Instrument, mit dem sie im Wettbewerb mit Google um die Nutzerinnen wieder ihre Vorzüge herausstellen können. Es existiert längst ein Konzept, mit dessen Hilfe die Literaturrecherche inhaltlich-intuitiv gestaltet und damit ein Vorteil der Bibliotheksrecherche gegenüber kommerziellen Suchmaschinen herausgearbeitet werden kann. Das Konzept heißt "Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog" (RSWK)' und bietet im Zusammenhang mit dem mittlerweile nicht mehr ganz so neuen Navigationskonzept "Faceted Browsing" ungeahnte Möglichkeiten eines intuitiven Recherschewerkzeuges, das Literatur gezielt inhaltlich entdecken lässt.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  2. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002) 0.01 
    0.009711035 = product of:
  0.072832756 = sum of:
    0.014702087 = product of:
      0.029404175 = sum of:
        0.029404175 = weight(_text_:29 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029404175 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.010943435 = product of:
      0.02188687 = sum of:
        0.02188687 = weight(_text_:online in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02188687 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.025478259 = weight(_text_:u in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025478259 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
    0.021708973 = product of:
      0.03256346 = sum of:
        0.003159283 = weight(_text_:a in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003159283 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
        0.029404175 = weight(_text_:29 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029404175 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Date
    18. 5.2002 17:29:00
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  3. Johnson, J.D.: On contexts of information seeking (2003) 0.01 
    0.009589763 = product of:
  0.09589763 = sum of:
    0.08176539 = weight(_text_:760 in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08176539 = score(doc=1082,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1486828 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.5499317 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
    0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012739129 = score(doc=1082,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
    0.0013931128 = product of:
      0.0041793385 = sum of:
        0.0041793385 = weight(_text_:a in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041793385 = score(doc=1082,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Abstract
    While surprisingly little has been written about context at a meaningful level, context is central to most theoretical approaches to information seeking. In this essay I explore in more detail three senses of context. First, I look at context as equivalent to the situation in which a process is immersed. Second, I discuss contingency approaches that detail active ingredients of the situation that have specific, predictable effects. Third, I examine major frameworks for meaning systems. Then, I discuss how a deeper appreciation of context can enhance our understanding of the process of information seeking by examining two vastly different contexts in which it occurs: organizational and cancer-related, an exemplar of everyday life information seeking. This essay concludes with a discussion of the value that can be added to information seeking research and theory as a result of a deeper appreciation of context, particularly in terms of our current multi-contextual environment and individuals taking an active role in contextualizing.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 39(2003) no.5, S.735-760
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  4. Hauer, M.: Neue OPACs braucht das Land ... dandelon.com (2006) 0.01 
    0.007907701 = product of:
  0.059307754 = sum of:
    0.019722143 = weight(_text_:neue in 6047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019722143 = score(doc=6047,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.27008536 = fieldWeight in 6047, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6047)
    0.026319932 = weight(_text_:medien in 6047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026319932 = score(doc=6047,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 6047, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6047)
    0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 6047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012739129 = score(doc=6047,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 6047, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6047)
    5.265472E-4 = product of:
      0.0015796415 = sum of:
        0.0015796415 = weight(_text_:a in 6047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0015796415 = score(doc=6047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 6047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6047)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Abstract
    In dandelon.com werden im Gegensatz zu den bisherigen Federated Search-Portal-Ansätzen die Titel von Medien neu mittels intelligentCAPTURE dezentral und kollaborativ erschlossen und inhaltlich stark erweitert. intelligentCAPTURE erschließt maschinell bisher Buchinhaltsverzeichnisse, Bücher, Klappentexte, Aufsätze und Websites, übernimmt bibliografische Daten aus Bibliotheken (XML, Z.39.50), von Verlagen (ONIX + Cover Pages), Zeitschriftenagenturen (Swets) und Buchhandel (SOAP) und exportierte maschinelle Indexate und aufbereitete Dokumente an die Bibliothekskataloge (MAB, MARC, XML) oder Dokumentationssysteme, an dandelon.com und teils auch an Fachportale. Die Daten werden durch Scanning und OCR, durch Import von Dateien und Lookup auf Server und durch Web-Spidering/-Crawling gewonnen. Die Qualität der Suche in dandelon.com ist deutlich besser als in bisherigen Bibliothekssystemen. Die semantische, multilinguale Suche mit derzeit 1,2 Millionen Fachbegriffen trägt zu den guten Suchergebnissen stark bei.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  5. BOND: Assoziativ-OPAC SpiderSearch (2003) 0.01 
    0.007801092 = product of:
  0.058508188 = sum of:
    0.01643512 = weight(_text_:neue in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01643512 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.22507115 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
    0.031018337 = weight(_text_:medien in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031018337 = score(doc=1795,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.36770552 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
    0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010615941 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
    4.3878925E-4 = product of:
      0.0013163678 = sum of:
        0.0013163678 = weight(_text_:a in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0013163678 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Abstract
    Der Hersteller von Bibliothekssoftware BOND erweitert sein Produktangebot um eine innovative Neuheit, den Assoziativ-OPAC SpiderSearch. Dieser graphische Web-OPAC sucht zu einem Stichwort Assoziative, d.h. sinn- oder sprachwissenschaftlich verwandte Begriffe. Diese baut er spinnennetzartig um den zentralen Suchbegriff herum auf. Anhand der ihm angebotenen Assoziative kann sich der Leser sehr einfach und anschaulich durch den Medienbestand der Bibliothek klicken. So findet er schnell und komfortabel relevante Medien, die mit herkömmlichen Suchverfahren nur schwer recherchierbar wären. Mühsame Überlegungen über verwandte Suchbegriffe und angrenzende Themengebiete bleiben dem Benutzer erspart. Dies übernimmt SpiderSearch und navigiert den Benutzer ähnlich wie beim Surfen durch Webseiten durch sämtliche Themen, die mit dem Suchbegriff in Zusammenhang stehen. Auch aufwändiges Durchblättern einer riesigen Suchergebnisliste ist nicht nötig. Durch die im semantischen Netz vorgeschlagenen Begriffe, kann der Benutzer sein Thema genau eingrenzen und erhält in seiner Trefferliste nur passende Medien. Diese ordnet SpiderSearch nach ihrer Relevanz, so dass der Leser die benötigte Literatur einfach und komfortabel findet. Wie auch im normalen Web-OPAC enthält die Trefferliste Angaben zu Titel, Standort und Verfügbarkeit des Mediums. Zur einfachen Zuordnung der Medienart ist jedem Medium ein entsprechendes Symbol zugewiesen. Per Mausklick erhält der Benutzer Detailangaben zum Medium und optional eine Ansicht des Buchcovers. SpiderSearch ist ein Zusatzmodul zur Software BIBLIOTHECA2000 von BOND und setzt auf den Web-OPAL auf. Vor allem bei Öffentlichen Bibliotheken stößt SpiderSearch auf großes Interesse. Erste Anwender bieten Ihren Lesern bereits dieses neue Sucherlebnis.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  6. Kelly, D.: Measuring online information seeking context : Part 2: Findings and discussion (2006) 0.01 
    0.007358985 = product of:
  0.055192385 = sum of:
    0.033399336 = weight(_text_:post in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033399336 = score(doc=215,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
    0.010195945 = product of:
      0.02039189 = sum of:
        0.02039189 = weight(_text_:online in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02039189 = score(doc=215,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.37489069 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010615941 = score(doc=215,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
    9.811628E-4 = product of:
      0.002943488 = sum of:
        0.002943488 = weight(_text_:a in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002943488 = score(doc=215,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Abstract
    Context is one of the most important concepts in information seeking and retrieval research. However, the challenges of studying context are great; thus, it is more common for researchers to use context as a post hoc explanatory factor, rather than as a concept that drives inquiry. The purpose of this study was to develop a method for collecting data about information seeking context in natural online environments, and identify which aspects of context should be considered when studying online information seeking. The study is reported in two parts. In this, the second part, results and implications of this research are presented. Part 1 (Kelly, 2006) discussed previous literature on information seeking context and behavior, situated the current study within this literature, and described the naturalistic, longitudinal research design that was used to examine and measure the online information seeking context of seven users during a 14-week period. Results provide support for the value of the method in studying online information seeking context, the relative importance of various measures of context, how these measures change over time, and, finally, the relationship between these measures. In particular, results demonstrate significant differences in distributions of usefulness ratings according to task and topic.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  7. Kelly, D.: Measuring online information seeking context : Part 1: background and method (2006) 0.01 
    0.007250119 = product of:
  0.05437589 = sum of:
    0.033399336 = weight(_text_:post in 206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033399336 = score(doc=206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=206)
    0.009119529 = product of:
      0.018239059 = sum of:
        0.018239059 = weight(_text_:online in 206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018239059 = score(doc=206,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 206, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=206)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010615941 = score(doc=206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=206)
    0.0012410836 = product of:
      0.0037232507 = sum of:
        0.0037232507 = weight(_text_:a in 206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0037232507 = score(doc=206,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 206, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=206)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Abstract
    Context is one of the most important concepts in information seeking and retrieval research. However, the challenges of studying context are great; thus, it is more common for researchers to use context as a post hoc explanatory factor, rather than as a concept that drives inquiry. The purposes of this study were to develop a method for collecting data about information seeking context in natural online environments, and identify which aspects of context should be considered when studying online information seeking. The study is reported in two parts. In this, the first part, the background and method are presented. Results and implications of this research are presented in Part 2 (Kelly, in press). Part 1 discusses previous literature on information seeking context and behavior and situates the current work within this literature. This part further describes the naturalistic, longitudinal research design that was used to examine and measure the online information seeking contexts of users during a 14-week period. In this design, information seeking context was characterized by a user's self-identified tasks and topics, and several attributes of these, such as the length of time the user expected to work on a task and the user's familiarity with a topic. At weekly intervals, users evaluated the usefulness of the documents that they viewed, and classified these documents according to their tasks and topics. At the end of the study, users provided feedback about the study method.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  8. Hauer, M: Silicon Valley Vorarlberg : Maschinelle Indexierung und semantisches Retrieval verbessert den Katalog der Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek (2004) 0.01 
    0.0066139842 = product of:
  0.049604878 = sum of:
    0.01643512 = weight(_text_:neue in 2489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01643512 = score(doc=2489,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.22507115 = fieldWeight in 2489, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2489)
    0.021933276 = weight(_text_:medien in 2489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021933276 = score(doc=2489,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.26000705 = fieldWeight in 2489, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2489)
    0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 2489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010615941 = score(doc=2489,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2489, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2489)
    6.205418E-4 = product of:
      0.0018616254 = sum of:
        0.0018616254 = weight(_text_:a in 2489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0018616254 = score(doc=2489,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 2489, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2489)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Abstract
    10 Jahre Internet haben die WeIt um die Bibliotheken herum stark geändert. Der Web-OPAC war eine Antwort der Bibliotheken. Doch reicht ein Web-OPAC im Zeitalter des Internets noch aus? Außer Web ist es doch der alte Katalog. Ca. 90% aller Bibliotheksrecherchen durch Benutzer sind Themenrecherchen. Ein Anteil dieser Recherchen bringt kein Ergebnis. Es kann leicht gemessen werden, dass null Medien gefunden wurden. Die Gründe hierfür wurden auch immer wieder untersucht: Plural- anstelle Singularformen, zu spezifische Suchbegriffe, Schreib- oder Bedienungsfehler. Zu wenig untersucht sind aber die Recherchen, die nicht mit einer Ausleihe enden, denn auch dann kann man in vielen Fällen von einem Retrieval-Mangel ausgehen. Schließlich: Von den ausgeliehenen Büchern werden nach Einschätzung vieler Bibliothekare 80% nicht weiter als bis zum Inhaltsverzeichnis gelesen (außer in Präsenzbibliotheken) - und erst nach Wochen zurückgegeben. Ein Politiker würde dies neudeutsch als "ein Vermittlungsproblem" bezeichnen. Ein Controller als nicht hinreichende Kapitalnutzung. Einfacher machen es sich immer mehr Studenten und Wissenschaftler, ihr Wissensaustausch vollzieht sich zunehmend an anderen Orten. Bibliotheken (als Funktion) sind unverzichtbar für die wissenschaftliche Kommunikation. Deshalb geht es darum, Wege zu finden und auch zu beschreiten, welche die Schätze von Bibliotheken (als Institution) effizienter an die Zielgruppe bringen. Der Einsatz von Information Retrieval-Technologie, neue Erschließungsmethoden und neuer Content sind Ansätze dazu. Doch die bisherigen Verbundstrukturen und Abhängigkeit haben das hier vorgestellte innovative Projekt keineswegs gefördert. Innovation entsteht wie die Innvoationsforschung zeigt eigentlich immer an der Peripherie: in Bregenz fing es an.
    Location
    A
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  9. Ross, J.: ¬A new way of information retrieval : 3-D indexing and concept mapping (2000) 0.01 
    0.006276173 = product of:
  0.06276173 = sum of:
    0.014702087 = product of:
      0.029404175 = sum of:
        0.029404175 = weight(_text_:29 in 6171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029404175 = score(doc=6171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.025478259 = weight(_text_:u in 6171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025478259 = score(doc=6171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 6171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6171)
    0.022581384 = product of:
      0.033872075 = sum of:
        0.0044679004 = weight(_text_:a in 6171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044679004 = score(doc=6171,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 6171, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6171)
        0.029404175 = weight(_text_:29 in 6171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029404175 = score(doc=6171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6171)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Date
    25. 2.1997 10:29:16
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  10. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: ¬The effects of topic complexity and familiarity on cognitive and physical moves in a thesaurus-enhanced search environment (2003) 0.01 
    0.006276173 = product of:
  0.06276173 = sum of:
    0.014702087 = product of:
      0.029404175 = sum of:
        0.029404175 = weight(_text_:29 in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029404175 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.025478259 = weight(_text_:u in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025478259 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
    0.022581384 = product of:
      0.033872075 = sum of:
        0.0044679004 = weight(_text_:a in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044679004 = score(doc=4695,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
        0.029404175 = weight(_text_:29 in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029404175 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.6, S.517-
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  11. Kasprzik, A.; Kett, J.: Vorschläge für eine Weiterentwicklung der Sacherschließung und Schritte zur fortgesetzten strukturellen Aufwertung der GND (2018) 0.01 
    0.005715303 = product of:
  0.04286477 = sum of:
    0.00612587 = product of:
      0.01225174 = sum of:
        0.01225174 = weight(_text_:29 in 4599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01225174 = score(doc=4599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01643512 = weight(_text_:neue in 4599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01643512 = score(doc=4599,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.22507115 = fieldWeight in 4599, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4599)
    0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 4599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010615941 = score(doc=4599,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4599, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4599)
    0.009687838 = product of:
      0.014531757 = sum of:
        0.0022800162 = weight(_text_:a in 4599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0022800162 = score(doc=4599,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 4599, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4599)
        0.01225174 = weight(_text_:29 in 4599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01225174 = score(doc=4599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4599)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Abstract
    Aufgrund der fortgesetzten Publikationsflut stellt sich immer dringender die Frage, wie die Schwellen für die Titel- und Normdatenpflege gesenkt werden können - sowohl für die intellektuelle als auch die automatisierte Sacherschließung. Zu einer Verbesserung der Daten- und Arbeitsqualität in der Sacherschließung kann beigetragen werden a) durch eine flexible Visualisierung der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) und anderer Wissensorganisationssysteme, so dass deren Graphstruktur intuitiv erfassbar wird, und b) durch eine investigative Analyse ihrer aktuellen Struktur und die Entwicklung angepasster automatisierter Methoden zur Ermittlung und Korrektur fehlerhafter Muster. Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) prüft im Rahmen des GND-Entwicklungsprogramms 2017-2021, welche Bedingungen für eine fruchtbare community-getriebene Open-Source-Entwicklung entsprechender Werkzeuge gegeben sein müssen. Weiteres Potential steckt in einem langfristigen Übergang zu einer Darstellung von Titel- und Normdaten in Beschreibungssprachen im Sinne des Semantic Web (RDF; OWL, SKOS). So profitiert die GND von der Interoperabilität mit anderen kontrollierten Vokabularen und von einer erleichterten Interaktion mit anderen Fach-Communities und kann umgekehrt auch außerhalb des Bibliothekswesens zu einem noch attraktiveren Wissensorganisationssystem werden. Darüber hinaus bieten die Ansätze aus dem Semantic Web die Möglichkeit, stärker formalisierte, strukturierende Satellitenvokabulare rund um die GND zu entwickeln. Daraus ergeben sich nicht zuletzt auch neue Perspektiven für die automatisierte Sacherschließung. Es wäre lohnend, näher auszuloten, wie und inwieweit semantisch-logische Verfahren den bestehenden Methodenmix bereichern können.
    Date
    13.12.2018 13:29:07
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  12. Weiermann, S.L.: Semantische Netze und Begriffsdeskription in der Wissensrepräsentation (2000) 0.01 
    0.005518109 = product of:
  0.08277163 = sum of:
    0.067909315 = weight(_text_:einzelne in 3001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067909315 = score(doc=3001,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10548963 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.64375347 = fieldWeight in 3001, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3001)
    0.014862318 = weight(_text_:u in 3001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014862318 = score(doc=3001,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 3001, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3001)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    BK
    18.00 Einzelne Sprachen und Literaturen allgemein
    Classification
    18.00 Einzelne Sprachen und Literaturen allgemein
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  13. Deuschel, T.; Heuss, T.; Humm, B.: ¬Die Medienplattform : ein System für gerichtete und ungerichtete semantische Suchen (2015) 0.01 
    0.0052780816 = product of:
  0.052780814 = sum of:
    0.035093244 = weight(_text_:medien in 2233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035093244 = score(doc=2233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.4160113 = fieldWeight in 2233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2233)
    0.016985506 = weight(_text_:u in 2233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016985506 = score(doc=2233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2233)
    7.0206285E-4 = product of:
      0.0021061886 = sum of:
        0.0021061886 = weight(_text_:a in 2233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0021061886 = score(doc=2233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2233)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Abstract
    Die Medienplattform bietet neuartige Möglichkeiten, um Medienbestände zu entdecken. In zwei verschiedenen Anwendungsszenarien unterstützt sie unterschiedliche Suchparadigmen: Für browsingbasierte Anwendungen wird das Digitale Schlendern vorgestellt, eine Methode in der semantische Zusammenhänge von Medien als Explorationsanreiz genutzt werden. Für Anwendungen bei denen der Nutzer weiß, was er sucht, aber nicht wie das gesuchte Medium heißt, wird eine suchkontextsensitive semantische Facettierung vorgestellt.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  14. Stojanovic, N.: On the query refinement in the ontology-based searching for information (2005) 0.01 
    0.0051574437 = product of:
  0.051574435 = sum of:
    0.01225174 = product of:
      0.02450348 = sum of:
        0.02450348 = weight(_text_:29 in 2907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02450348 = score(doc=2907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2907)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.021231882 = weight(_text_:u in 2907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021231882 = score(doc=2907,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 2907, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2907)
    0.01809081 = product of:
      0.027136216 = sum of:
        0.0026327355 = weight(_text_:a in 2907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0026327355 = score(doc=2907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2907)
        0.02450348 = weight(_text_:29 in 2907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02450348 = score(doc=2907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2907)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Date
    5. 4.1996 15:29:15
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  15. Rädler, K.: In Bibliothekskatalogen "googlen" : Integration von Inhaltsverzeichnissen, Volltexten und WEB-Ressourcen in Bibliothekskataloge (2004) 0.00 
    0.0045535862 = product of:
  0.045535862 = sum of:
    0.03429938 = weight(_text_:einzelne in 2432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03429938 = score(doc=2432,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10548963 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.3251446 = fieldWeight in 2432, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2432)
    0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 2432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010615941 = score(doc=2432,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2432, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2432)
    6.205418E-4 = product of:
      0.0018616254 = sum of:
        0.0018616254 = weight(_text_:a in 2432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0018616254 = score(doc=2432,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 2432, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2432)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Abstract
    Ausgangslage Die Katalog-Recherchen über Internet, also von außerhalb der Bibliothek, nehmen erwartungsgemäß stark zu bzw. sind mittlerweile die Regel. Damit ist natürlich das Bedürfnis und die Notwendigkeit gewachsen, über den Titel hinaus zusätzliche inhaltliche Informationen zu erhalten, die es erlauben, die Zweckmäßigkeit wesentlich besser abschätzen zu können, eine Bestellung vorzunehmen oder vielleicht auch 50 km in die Bibliothek zu fahren, um ein Buch zu entleihen. Dieses Informationsdefizit wird zunehmend als gravierender Mangel erfahren. Inhaltsverzeichnisse referieren den Inhalt kurz und prägnant. Sie sind die erste Stelle, welche zur Relevanz-Beurteilung herangezogen wird. Fast alle relevanten Terme einer Fachbuchpublikation finden sich bereits dort. Andererseits wird immer deutlicher, dass die dem bibliothekarischen Paradigma entsprechende intellektuelle Indexierung der einzelnen dokumentarischen Einheiten mit den engsten umfassenden dokumentationssprachlichen Termen (Schlagwörter, Klassen) zwar eine notwendige, aber keinesfalls hinreichende Methode darstellt, das teuer erworbene Bibliotheksgut Information für den Benutzer in seiner spezifischen Problemstellung zu aktivieren und als Informationsdienstleistung anbieten zu können. Informationen zu sehr speziellen Fragestellungen, die oft nur in kürzeren Abschnitten (Kapitel) erörtert werden, sind derzeit nur indirekt, mit großem Zeitaufwand und oft überhaupt nicht auffindbar. Sie liegen sozusagen brach. Die Tiefe der intellektuellen Indexierung bis in einzelne inhaltliche Details zu erweitern, ist aus personellen und damit auch finanziellen Gesichtspunkten nicht vertretbar. Bibliotheken fallen deshalb in der Wahrnehmung von Informationssuchenden immer mehr zurück. Die enorme Informationsvielfalt liegt hinter dem Informations- bzw. Recherchehorizont der bibliographischen Aufnahmen im Katalog.
    Location
    A
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  16. Horch, A.; Kett, H.; Weisbecker, A.: Semantische Suchsysteme für das Internet : Architekturen und Komponenten semantischer Suchmaschinen (2013) 0.00 
    0.0045535862 = product of:
  0.045535862 = sum of:
    0.03429938 = weight(_text_:einzelne in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03429938 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10548963 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.3251446 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
    0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010615941 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
    6.205418E-4 = product of:
      0.0018616254 = sum of:
        0.0018616254 = weight(_text_:a in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0018616254 = score(doc=4063,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Abstract
    In der heutigen Zeit nimmt die Flut an Informationen exponentiell zu. In dieser »Informationsexplosion« entsteht täglich eine unüberschaubare Menge an neuen Informationen im Web: Beispielsweise 430 deutschsprachige Artikel bei Wikipedia, 2,4 Mio. Tweets bei Twitter und 12,2 Mio. Kommentare bei Facebook. Während in Deutschland vor einigen Jahren noch Google als nahezu einzige Suchmaschine beim Zugriff auf Informationen im Web genutzt wurde, nehmen heute die u.a. in Social Media veröffentlichten Meinungen und damit die Vorauswahl sowie Bewertung von Informationen einzelner Experten und Meinungsführer an Bedeutung zu. Aber wie können themenspezifische Informationen nun effizient für konkrete Fragestellungen identifiziert und bedarfsgerecht aufbereitet und visualisiert werden? Diese Studie gibt einen Überblick über semantische Standards und Formate, die Prozesse der semantischen Suche, Methoden und Techniken semantischer Suchsysteme, Komponenten zur Entwicklung semantischer Suchmaschinen sowie den Aufbau bestehender Anwendungen. Die Studie erläutert den prinzipiellen Aufbau semantischer Suchsysteme und stellt Methoden der semantischen Suche vor. Zudem werden Softwarewerkzeuge vorgestellt, mithilfe derer einzelne Funktionalitäten von semantischen Suchmaschinen realisiert werden können. Abschließend erfolgt die Betrachtung bestehender semantischer Suchmaschinen zur Veranschaulichung der Unterschiede der Systeme im Aufbau sowie in der Funktionalität.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  17. Sihvonen, A.; Vakkari, P.: Subject knowledge improves interactive query expansion assisted by a thesaurus (2004) 0.00 
    0.0045176204 = product of:
  0.045176204 = sum of:
    0.033399336 = weight(_text_:post in 4417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033399336 = score(doc=4417,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 4417, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4417)
    0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 4417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010615941 = score(doc=4417,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4417, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4417)
    0.0011609273 = product of:
      0.003482782 = sum of:
        0.003482782 = weight(_text_:a in 4417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003482782 = score(doc=4417,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 4417, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4417)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Abstract
    This study explores how experts and novices in pedagogics expanded queries supported by the ERIC thesaurus, and how this was connected to the search effectiveness in an easy and a difficult search task. The expert group consisted of 15 undergraduates in pedagogy and the novice group of 15 students with no previous studies in this field. Their search logs were recorded and a pre- and post-search interview was conducted. The results show that the number and type of terms selected from the thesaurus for expansion by experts improved search effectiveness, whereas there were no connections between the use of thesaurus and improvement of effectiveness among novices. The effectiveness of expansions varied between the facets of the queries. Thus, a vital condition for benefiting from a thesaurus in query expansion to improve search results is sufficient familiarity with the search topic. The results suggest also that it is not in the first place the number of terms used in expansion, but their type and quality that are crucial for search success.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  18. Baofu, P.: ¬The future of information architecture : conceiving a better way to understand taxonomy, network, and intelligence (2008) 0.00 
    0.0044775284 = product of:
  0.04477528 = sum of:
    0.033399336 = weight(_text_:post in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033399336 = score(doc=2257,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
    0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010615941 = score(doc=2257,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
    7.6000544E-4 = product of:
      0.0022800162 = sum of:
        0.0022800162 = weight(_text_:a in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0022800162 = score(doc=2257,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Abstract
    The Future of Information Architecture examines issues surrounding why information is processed, stored and applied in the way that it has, since time immemorial. Contrary to the conventional wisdom held by many scholars in human history, the recurrent debate on the explanation of the most basic categories of information (eg space, time causation, quality, quantity) has been misconstrued, to the effect that there exists some deeper categories and principles behind these categories of information - with enormous implications for our understanding of reality in general. To understand this, the book is organised in to four main parts: Part I begins with the vital question concerning the role of information within the context of the larger theoretical debate in the literature. Part II provides a critical examination of the nature of data taxonomy from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part III constructively invesitgates the world of information network from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part IV proposes six main theses in the authors synthetic theory of information architecture, namely, (a) the first thesis on the simpleness-complicatedness principle, (b) the second thesis on the exactness-vagueness principle (c) the third thesis on the slowness-quickness principle (d) the fourth thesis on the order-chaos principle, (e) the fifth thesis on the symmetry-asymmetry principle, and (f) the sixth thesis on the post-human stage.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  19. Jarvelin, K.: ¬A deductive data model for thesaurus navigation and query expansion (1996) 0.00 
    0.004228744 = product of:
  0.04228744 = sum of:
    0.0098013915 = product of:
      0.019602783 = sum of:
        0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019602783 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.016985506 = weight(_text_:u in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016985506 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
    0.01550054 = product of:
      0.023250809 = sum of:
        0.0036480257 = weight(_text_:a in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0036480257 = score(doc=5625,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
        0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019602783 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Abstract
    Describes a deductive data model based on 3 abstraction levels for representing vocabularies for information retrieval: conceptual level; expression level; and occurrence level. The proposed data model can be used for the representation and navigation of indexing and retrieval thesauri and as a vocabulary source for concept based query expansion in heterogeneous retrieval environments
    Date
    2. 3.1997 17:29:07
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  20. AssoziativOPAC : SpiderSearch von BOND (2003) 0.00 
    0.004207307 = product of:
  0.042073067 = sum of:
    0.031018337 = weight(_text_:medien in 2029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031018337 = score(doc=2029,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.36770552 = fieldWeight in 2029, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2029)
    0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 2029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010615941 = score(doc=2029,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.017922899 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2029, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2029)
    4.3878925E-4 = product of:
      0.0013163678 = sum of:
        0.0013163678 = weight(_text_:a in 2029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0013163678 = score(doc=2029,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 2029, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2029)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Content
    "Der Hersteller von Bibliothekssoftware BOND erweitert sein Produktangebot um den Assoziativ-OPAC SpiderSearch. Dieser graphische Web-OPAC sucht zu einem Stichwort Assoziative, d.h. sinnoder sprachwissenschaftlich verwandte Begriffe. Diese baut er spinnennetzartig um den zentralen Suchbegriff herum auf. Anhand der ihm angebotenen Assoziative kann sich der Leser sehr einfach und anschaulich durch den Medienbestand der Bibliothek klicken. So findet er schnell und komfortabel relevante Medien, die mit herkömmlichen Suchverfahren nur schwer recherchierbar wären. Überlegungen über verwandte Suchbegriffe und angrenzende Themengebiete bleiben dem Benutzer erspart: SpiderSearch navigiert den Benutzer ähnlich wie beim Surfen durch Webseiten durch sämtliche Themen, die mit dem Suchbegriff in Zusammenhang stehen. Auch aufwändiges Durchblättern einer riesigen Suchergebnisliste ist nicht nötig. Durch die im semantischen Netz vorgeschlagenen Begriffe kann der Benutzer sein Thema genau eingrenzen und erhält in seiner Trefferliste nur passende Medien. Diese ordnet SpiderSearch nach ihrer Relevanz, so dass der Leser die benötigte Literatur einfach und komfortabel findet. Wie auch im normalen Web-OPAC enthält die Trefferliste Angaben zu Titel, Standort und Verfügbarkeit des Mediums. Zur einfachen Zuordnung der Medienart ist jedem Medium ein entsprechendes Symbol zugewiesen. Per Mausklick erhält der Benutzer Detailangaben zum Medium und optional eine Ansicht des Buchcovers. SpiderSearch ist ein Zusatzmodul zur Software BIBLIOTHECA2000 von BOND und setzt auf den Web-OPAC auf."
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 228
  • d 40
  • f 2
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 235
  • el 28
  • m 19
  • r 8
  • x 4
  • p 2
  • s 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications