-
Rorissa, A.: ¬A comparative study of Flickr tags and index terms in a general image collection (2010)
0.00
0.002667959 = product of:
0.013339795 = sum of:
0.013339795 = product of:
0.02667959 = sum of:
0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 4100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02667959 = score(doc=4100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Web 2.0 and social/collaborative tagging have altered the traditional roles of indexer and user. Traditional indexing tools and systems assume the top-down approach to indexing in which a trained professional is responsible for assigning index terms to information sources with a potential user in mind. However, in today's Web, end users create, organize, index, and search for images and other information sources through social tagging and other collaborative activities. One of the impediments to user-centered indexing had been the cost of soliciting user-generated index terms or tags. Social tagging of images such as those on Flickr, an online photo management and sharing application, presents an opportunity that can be seized by designers of indexing tools and systems to bridge the semantic gap between indexer terms and user vocabularies. Empirical research on the differences and similarities between user-generated tags and index terms based on controlled vocabularies has the potential to inform future design of image indexing tools and systems. Toward this end, a random sample of Flickr images and the tags assigned to them were content analyzed and compared with another sample of index terms from a general image collection using established frameworks for image attributes and contents. The results show that there is a fundamental difference between the types of tags and types of index terms used. In light of this, implications for research into and design of user-centered image indexing tools and systems are discussed.
-
Tsui, E.; Wang, W.M.; Cheung, C.F.; Lau, A.S.M.: ¬A concept-relationship acquisition and inference approach for hierarchical taxonomy construction from tags (2010)
0.00
0.002667959 = product of:
0.013339795 = sum of:
0.013339795 = product of:
0.02667959 = sum of:
0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 4220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02667959 = score(doc=4220,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4220, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4220)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.44-57
-
Hsu, M.-H.; Chen, H.-H.: Efficient and effective prediction of social tags to enhance Web search (2011)
0.00
0.002667959 = product of:
0.013339795 = sum of:
0.013339795 = product of:
0.02667959 = sum of:
0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 4625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02667959 = score(doc=4625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4625)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- As the web has grown into an integral part of daily life, social annotation has become a popular manner for web users to manage resources. This method of management has many potential applications, but it is limited in applicability by the cold-start problem, especially for new resources on the web. In this article, we study automatic tag prediction for web pages comprehensively and utilize the predicted tags to improve search performance. First, we explore the stabilizing phenomenon of tag usage in a social bookmarking system. Then, we propose a two-stage tag prediction approach, which is efficient and is effective in making use of early annotations from users. In the first stage, content-based ranking, candidate tags are selected and ranked to generate an initial tag list. In the second stage, random-walk re-ranking, we adopt a random-walk model that utilizes tag co-occurrence information to re-rank the initial list. The experimental results show that our algorithm effectively proposes appropriate tags for target web pages. In addition, we present a framework to incorporate tag prediction in a general web search. The experimental results of the web search validate the hypothesis that the proposed framework significantly enhances the typical retrieval model.
-
Bentley, C.M.; Labelle, P.R.: ¬A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation (2008)
0.00
0.002303783 = product of:
0.011518915 = sum of:
0.011518915 = product of:
0.02303783 = sum of:
0.02303783 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02303783 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008)
0.00
0.002303783 = product of:
0.011518915 = sum of:
0.011518915 = product of:
0.02303783 = sum of:
0.02303783 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02303783 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Vander Wal, T.: Welcome to the Matrix! (2008)
0.00
0.002303783 = product of:
0.011518915 = sum of:
0.011518915 = product of:
0.02303783 = sum of:
0.02303783 = weight(_text_:22 in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02303783 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 6.2009 9:15:45
-
Yoon, J.W.: Towards a user-oriented thesaurus for non-domain-specific image collections (2009)
0.00
0.0021343674 = product of:
0.010671836 = sum of:
0.010671836 = product of:
0.021343673 = sum of:
0.021343673 = weight(_text_:management in 4221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021343673 = score(doc=4221,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 4221, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4221)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 45(2009) no.4, S.452-468
-
Wei, W.; Ram, S.: Utilizing sozial bookmarking tag space for Web content discovery : a social network analysis approach (2010)
0.00
0.0021343674 = product of:
0.010671836 = sum of:
0.010671836 = product of:
0.021343673 = sum of:
0.021343673 = weight(_text_:management in 1) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021343673 = score(doc=1,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 1, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WITH A MAJOR IN MANAGEMENT In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA. Vgl.: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/195123. Vgl. auch: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Utilizing-social-bookmarking-tag-space-for-web-a-Ram-Wei/da9e7e5ee771008b741af7176d3f0d67128d1dca.
-
Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Scott, J.: Social bookmarking tools (I) : a general review (2005)
0.00
0.0018675713 = product of:
0.009337856 = sum of:
0.009337856 = product of:
0.018675713 = sum of:
0.018675713 = weight(_text_:management in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018675713 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.13034125 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Because, to paraphrase a pop music lyric from a certain rock and roll band of yesterday, "the Web is old, the Web is new, the Web is all, the Web is you", it seems like we might have to face up to some of these stark realities. With the introduction of new social software applications such as blogs, wikis, newsfeeds, social networks, and bookmarking tools (the subject of this paper), the claim that Shelley Powers makes in a Burningbird blog entry seems apposite: "This is the user's web now, which means it's my web and I can make the rules." Reinvention is revolution - it brings us always back to beginnings. We are here going to remind you of hyperlinks in all their glory, sell you on the idea of bookmarking hyperlinks, point you at other folks who are doing the same, and tell you why this is a good thing. Just as long as those hyperlinks (or let's call them plain old links) are managed, tagged, commented upon, and published onto the Web, they represent a user's own personal library placed on public record, which - when aggregated with other personal libraries - allows for rich, social networking opportunities. Why spill any ink (digital or not) in rewriting what someone else has already written about instead of just pointing at the original story and adding the merest of titles, descriptions and tags for future reference? More importantly, why not make these personal 'link playlists' available to oneself and to others from whatever browser or computer one happens to be using at the time? This paper reviews some current initiatives, as of early 2005, in providing public link management applications on the Web - utilities that are often referred to under the general moniker of 'social bookmarking tools'. There are a couple of things going on here: 1) server-side software aimed specifically at managing links with, crucially, a strong, social networking flavour, and 2) an unabashedly open and unstructured approach to tagging, or user classification, of those links.
